Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Should we use spirometry in the early detection of COPD?

P. White
European Respiratory Journal 2005 26: 558-559; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00061705
P. White
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editors:

Enrigh tet al. 1 in the European Respiratory Monograph, promote office spirometry as the way forward in the routine assessment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and in the early detection of COPD. They define office spirometry as ‘spirometry performed in the primary care setting’. There is an unwelcome ambiguity in their paper when it comes to both of these subjects, and the evidence they use to support their arguments is far from decisive. In the case of the early detection of COPD, the evidence seems to oppose their position.

My first concern is about their use of the term office spirometry, which seems to imply spirometry carried out by the consulting clinician. They say that spirometry with electronic spirometers is now faster than it was with traditional bellows spirometers. This latter suggestion is untrue, even using the 6 s manoeuvre, since the spirometry manoeuvre is independent of the type of spirometer used, the learning curve for the patient is the same and the instruction given by the operator is also identical. They believe that the main problem with office spirometry is in the quality of the instruction and supervision of the test by the clinician. I agree and think that this must be one of the main objections to spirometry being conducted by clinicians during routine consultations. They quote a primary care Dutch study in which the quality of the spirometry was unacceptably variable 2. Furthermore, they recommend certification for nurses and technologists carrying out spirometry in primary care. This hardly encourages the routine office use of spirometry by clinicians in their consultations.

The main argument put forward by Enright et al. 1 is for the use of spirometry in the early detection of COPD. They say that spirometry fulfils all the standard criteria for application of a medical test for screening. A fundamental criterion for any screening programme is the availability of a useful intervention for the patient who screens positive 3. The main reason to detect COPD in its early stages is to intervene with smoking cessation. Enright et al. 1 quote three papers in support of the role of early diagnosis of COPD in smoking cessation. None of these actually support their assertion.

The first by Risser et al. 4 is a trial of a complex intervention comparing education and a motivational intervention with education alone, in which spirometry was a just component of the motivational intervention. In the second paper Segnan et al. 5 actually conclude, “In no treatment group was the outcome significantly different from that for one-time counselling at the (p<0.05) level.” In the third paper, Gorecka et al. 6 demonstrated that the diagnosis of airflow limitation had no effect in improving smoking cessation overall, and only in a subanalysis could they show that it leads to an improvement in smoking cessation in those who have moderate or severe airflow limitation. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines acknowledge the uncertainty surrounding the benefits of community screening of COPD 7. While there is no argument that smokers should be sought and helped to quit smoking, there is no evidence that early diagnosis of COPD improves smoking cessation.

The promotion of early diagnosis of COPD has been gathering momentum despite the lack of evidence to justify it. Many papers are appearing which report the efforts of clinicians to diagnose COPD early. In the Differential Diagnosis between Asthma and COPD study, Buffels et al. 8 report that spirometry-based screening for COPD in primary care doubles the rate of diagnosis of COPD.

The impact on patients and services of a policy to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease early, which doubles the number of cases in the system, is likely to be expensive and will dilute the resources available for the management of symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It should not even be considered until there is at least some evidence to support it.

    • © ERS Journals Ltd

    References

    1. ↵
      Enright PL, Studnicka M, Zielinski J. Spirometry to detect and manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma in the primary care setting. In: Wouters EF, Gosselink R, Stam H, eds. Lung Function Testing. Eur Respir Mon2005;31:1–14
    2. ↵
      Schermer TR, Jacobs JE, Chavannes NH, et al. Validity of spirometric testing in a general practice population of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thorax 2003;58:861–866.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      Wilson JM. Principles of screening for disease. Proc R Soc Med 1971;64:1255–1256.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. ↵
      Risser NL, Belcher DW. Adding spirometry, carbon monoxide, and pulmonary symptom results to smoking cessation counseling: a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med 1990;5:16–22.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      Segnan N, Ponti A, Battista RN, et al. A randomized trial of smoking cessation interventions in general practice in Italy. Cancer Causes Control 1991;2:239–246.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. ↵
      Gorecka D, Bednarek M, Nowinski A, Puscinska E, Goljan-Geremek A, Zielinski J. Diagnosis of airflow limitation combined with smoking cessation advice increases stop-smoking rate. Chest 2003;123:1916–1923.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Ma P, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and World Health Organization Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD): executive summary. Respir Care2001;46:79882 (2004 update at www.goldcopd.com)
      OpenUrlPubMed
    8. ↵
      Buffels J, Degryse J, Heyrman J, Decramer M. Office spirometry significantly improves early detection of COPD in general practice: the DIDASCO Study. Chest 2004;125:1394–1399.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 26 Issue 3 Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Should we use spirometry in the early detection of COPD?
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Should we use spirometry in the early detection of COPD?
    P. White
    European Respiratory Journal Sep 2005, 26 (3) 558-559; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00061705

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    Should we use spirometry in the early detection of COPD?
    P. White
    European Respiratory Journal Sep 2005, 26 (3) 558-559; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00061705
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Fixed breathing protocols in multiple-breath washout testing in children
    • Fixed breathing protocols in multiple-breath washout testing in children
    • Connexins and the pulmonary vascular response to hypoxia
    Show more Correspondence

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Reviewers
    • CME
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • ERS author centre

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society