Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Immunokinetics in severe pneumonia due to influenza virus and bacteria coinfection in mice

M. Seki, K. Yanagihara, Y. Higashiyama, Y. Fukuda, Y. Kaneko, H. Ohno, Y. Miyazaki, Y. Hirakata, K. Tomono, J. Kadota, T. Tashiro, S. Kohno
European Respiratory Journal 2004 24: 143-149; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00126103
M. Seki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Yanagihara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Higashiyama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Fukuda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Kaneko
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Ohno
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Miyazaki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Hirakata
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Tomono
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Kadota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Tashiro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Kohno
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Coinfections of bacteria and influenza are a major cause of excessive mortality during influenza epidemics. However, the mechanism of the synergy between influenza virus and bacteria are poorly understood.

In this study, mice were inoculated with influenza virus, followed 2 days later by inoculation with Streptococcus pneumoniae. The kinetics of viral titres, bacterial numbers and the immune response (cytokine and chemokine production) were also analysed.

Short-term survival correlated with pathological changes in the lungs of infected mice. Influenza virus or S. pneumoniae infection alone induced moderate pneumonia; however, severe bronchopneumonia with massive haemorrhage in coinfected mice, which caused death of these mice ∼2 days after inoculation with S. pneumoniae, was noted. Intrapulmonary levels of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, type‐1 T‐helper cell cytokines and Toll-like receptors, and the related mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling molecules (phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase ‐1 and ‐2, p38 and c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase), were increased in coinfected mice.

These results suggest that immune mediators, including cytokines and chemokines, through Toll-like receptors/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, play important roles in the pathology of coinfection caused by influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

  • Cyclooxygenase‐2
  • cytokine
  • influenza virus
  • mitogen-activated protein kinase
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae
  • Toll-like receptors

Influenza virus infection is one of the most pandemic infectious diseases in the world 1. In the USA, >20,000 influenza-associated deaths were reported in each of the nine epidemics between 1972 and 1992, and four of these epidemics each resulted in >40,000 influenza-associated deaths. In general, influenza virus infection can induce bronchitis and pneumonia, but severe lethal pneumonia is usually seen when complications involve bacterial infections. Hence, coinfections of bacteria and influenza are considered one of the major factors of morbidity and mortality during influenza virus epidemics 2–4.

The great “Spanish flu” influenza pandemic of 1918/1919 killed ≥20 million people, making it the worst infectious pandemic in history. Recent studies regarding this pandemic have revealed that most deaths occurred among young adults, a group in which the influenza-related mortality rate is usually very low, and pathology sections from these cases often exhibited massive alveolar haemorrhage and pulmonary oedema 5–7. In these cases, the majority of sections showed acute lobular pneumonia with massive neutrophil infiltration, suggesting death by acute bacterial pneumonia, one of the most common sequelae of the pandemic. These findings suggest that the combination of influenza virus infection and bacterial infection may play a critical role in inducing severe lung damage and pneumonia in pandemic influenza virus infection.

LeVine et al. 8 recently investigated the mechanisms of defective pulmonary clearance of Streptococcus pneumoniae using influenza virus-infected mice. They infected mice with S. pneumoniae 7 days after influenza virus inoculation, and demonstrated that prior exposure to influenza virus altered neutrophil function and the lung inflammatory environment, leading to defective S. pneumoniae clearance. In an in vitro study, Engelich et al. 9 showed that combined infection caused a marked reduction in the survival of neutrophils, which was due to increases in annexin V binding and caspase‐3 activation, and also showed that combination infection with influenza virus and S. pneumoniae caused significantly more hydrogen peroxide production than either infection alone. Moreover, a detailed study in a viral/bacterial synergistic mouse model was reported, which implicated a receptor-mediated pathway and other mechanisms in the lethal synergism between influenza virus and bacteria 10.

In the present study, mice were inoculated with influenza virus, followed 2 days later, the day of peak viral titre 11, by inoculation with S. pneumoniae, and short-term survival and fulminant pathological changes in the lungs observed. The kinetics of viral titres, bacterial numbers and immune responses, such as cytokines and chemokines, in the lungs of these mice were analysed. Some critical immune mediators, including Toll-like receptor (TLR)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling, cyclooxygenase (COX) expression and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production were then focused on and analysed.

Materials and methods

Viral preparation

A mouse-adapted A‐strain influenza virus (strain A/PR8/34; haemagglutinin type 1, neuraminidase type 1 (H1N1)) was used in the present experiments. Madin-Darby canine kidney cells were used for maintenance of influenza virus and plaque formation assays to analyse viral titres. Influenza virus were cultured in these cells for a few days and the supernatants collected and stored at −80°C as viral stocks until used in experiments.

Bacteria preparation

Penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae‐187 serotype 19 (isolated at Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan) was used. Bacteria were incubated in brain/heart infusion broth overnight at 37°C, and harvested by centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000×g. The harvested bacteria were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2–7.4) at a concentration of 1×108 colony-forming units (cfu)·mL−1, as determined by colony-forming assay on blood agar plates.

Inoculation of mice and sampling

Male 6‐week-old CBA/J specific pathogen-free mice, weighing 30–35 g, were purchased from Japan Charles River, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). For survival study, 40 animals were divided into four treatment groups: influenza virus- and S. pneumoniae-infected mice, influenza virus-infected mice, S. pneumoniae-infected mice, and controls. Each group comprised 10 mice. Mice in the influenza virus-infected group were anaesthetised with 50 µg·kg body weight−1 pentobarbital and then inoculated intranasally with 50 µL 1×104 plaque-forming units·mL−1 influenza virus. In the influenza virus- and S. pneumoniae-infected group of mice, 50 µL 1×108 cfu·mL−1 S. pneumoniae were also inoculated intranasally 2 days afterinoculation of influenza virus. The inoculum size of S. pneumonia was based on that used in a previous study 12. Singly infected mice and controls consisted of mice inoculated singly with a dose of either organism and an equal volume of diluent (Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium), respectively. The mice were observed for 2 weeks for survival studies. The lungs and heart blood were collected as biological samples at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after S. pneumoniae infection (n=4 in each group). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and staining of cells inBAL fluid (BALF) were performed as described previously 13. Paraffin embedding and tissue staining with haematoxylin and eosin were performed using standard methodologies.

Analysis of Toll-like receptor and cyclooxygenase‐2 expression

Total ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from lung homogenates or cells using ISOGEN (Nippongene, Tokyo, Japan). In order to prepare lung homogenates, lungs were homogenised in 1 mL PBS using a glass tissue homogeniser (Takashima, Tokyo, Japan) for 60 s in an ice-cold water bath.Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using the First Strand & Detection kit (Life Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Mice TLR and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) complementary deoxyribonucleic acids were amplified using the specific primers listed in table 1⇓. The specific primers used for amplifications of Cox‐1 and ‐2 were as previously reported by Graf et al. 14. Expression levels of mouse HPRT wereused as an internal control. PCR was performed for 38cycles for TLR2 and TLR4, 35 cycles for TLR5 and TLR9, 30 cycles for TLR3, and 25 cycles for HPRT. One PCR cycle consisted of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C and 1 min at 72°C. The signal intensity of each band on Western blotting was analysed by AlphaImager (Alpha-Innotech Co., San Leandro, CA, USA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1—

Primers used for amplification of mouse Toll-like receptor (TLR) and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) complementary deoxyribonucleic acids

Western blot analysis

The proteins in the lung homogenates were separated by sodium dodecylsulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred on to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk in tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris)-buffered saline (pH 7.2–7.4) containing 0.05% Tween‐20 (TBS‐T) and incubated with rabbit antibodies directed against either intact extracellular signal-regulated kinase‐1 and ‐2 (ERK‐1/‐2), p38 or c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK) or the phosphorylated (activated) forms of these kinases (Cell Signalling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA; each diluted 1:1,000) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were then washed with TBS‐T and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antirabbit immunoglobulin G (Santa Cruz Technology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; diluted 1:5,000) for 1 h at room temperature. After two additional washes, the signals were developed with ECL‐plus (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, USA).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Concentrations of tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α), interleukin (IL)-4, -5, -6 and -12, interferon gamma (IFN‐γ), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP) 2, regulated on activation, normal T‐cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), and PGE2 in aqueous lung extracts were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using mouse Quantikine Kits (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). In order to prepare aqueous lung extracts, the homogenates were centrifuged for 60 min at 2,000×g at 4°C 15. Supernatants were collected and used in the assay.

Image and statistical analyses

The signal intensity of each band on Western blot analysis was determined using an AlphaImager. Data are presented as mean±sem. Differences between groups were examined for significance using an unpaired t‐test. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for analysis of survival rates. Differences in bacterial numbers and viral titres were tested by geometric analysis. A p‐value of <0.05 denoted a significant difference.

Results

Short-term survival rates

In order to assess the infection outcome, short-term survival was analysed in mice that were coinfected with influenza virus and S. pneumoniae (fig. 1⇓). In the controls (mock-infected mice), no deaths were observed during the 14‐day observation period. In contrast, 30% of mice infected with both influenza virus and S. pneumoniae died on the first day and 60% were dead by day 2. All coinfected mice died within 3 days of S. pneumoniae inoculation. Survival of coinfected mice was significantly shorter than that of mock- or singly infected mice (p<0.01).

Fig. 1.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.—

Survival rates of mice infected with influenza virus and/or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mice were infected with influenza virus 2 days before S. pneumoniae instillation, which occurred on day 0. Each group comprised 10 mice (•: doubly infected mice; ○: influenza virus-infected mice; □: S. pneumoniae-infected mice; ▪: mock-infected mice). The survival rate was significantly lower in mice infected with both influenza virus and S. pneumoniae than in singly or mock-infected mice (p<0.01).

Severe pneumonia in coinfected mice

Pathological examination of the lungs of coinfected mice showed severe bronchopneumonia with massive haemorrhage (fig. 2d⇓), whereas the lungs of mice infected with a single type of pathogen exhibited only moderate pneumonia (fig. 2b and c⇓) on day 2. The total number of cells in BALF was also significantly higher in coinfected mice compared to singly infected mice (table 2⇓). Coinfected lungs were filled with inflammatory cells and blood, and almost the entire airspace was obliterated (fig. 2h, l and p⇓). The BALF data suggested neutrophil accumulation and showed the highest gain among inflammatory cells in the lungs of coinfected mice (table 2⇓). In contrast, pulmonary invasion of inflammatory cells was mild in singly infected mice (influenza: fig. 2f, j and n⇓; S. pneumoniae: fig. 2g, k and o⇓). The lungs of mock-infected mice showed no inflammation (fig. 2a, e, i and m⇓).

Fig. 2.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.—

Pathological analysis of the lungs of mice infected with influenza virus and/or Streptococcus pneumoniae. Lungs were collected 2 days after S. pneumoniae inoculation. a–d) photographs of whole lungs; and haematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections at magnifications of e–h) ×40, i–l) ×400 and m–p) ×1,000. a, e, i, m) Mock-infected (control) mice, b, f, j, n) influenza virus-infected mice, c, g, k, o) S. pneumoniae-infected mice and d, h, l, p) doubly infected mice.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2—

Inflammatory cells in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of mice infected with influenza virus and/or Streptococcus pneumoniae on day 2

The number of S. pneumoniae in the lungs showed a 10–100‐fold increase in coinfected mice at 12 (p<0.05), 24 and 48 (p<0.01) h, compared with singly infected mice. However, viral titres in coinfected lungs were almost identical to those of mice infected with influenza virus alone (data not shown).

Effect of infection type on inflammatory cytokines in the lungs

The concentrations of these inflammatory cytokines were compared between coinfected mice and singly or mock-infected mice on day 2 (table 3⇓). The concentrations of all inflammatory cytokines/chemokines, including TNF‐α, IL‐6, MIP‐2 and RANTES, were significantly higher in the lungs of coinfected mice than in the lungs of either singly or mock-infected mice (table 3⇓).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3—

Inflammatory cytokine and chemokine concentrations in the lungs of mice infected with influenza virus and/or Streptococcus pneumoniae

Type‐1/type‐2 T‐helper cell balance in coinfected lungs

In the present coinfected mice, levels of IFN‐γ, type‐1 T‐helper cell (Th1) cytokines and IL‐12, which directs the induction of Th1, were significantly higher than in singly and mock-infected mice (table 3⇑). In contrast, type‐2 T‐helper cell (Th2) cytokines, such as IL‐4 and ‐5, were not induced or suppressed, respectively, in the lungs of coinfected mice, compared to singly and mock-infected mice (table 3⇑).

Expression of Toll-like receptor messenger ribonucleic acids in coinfected lungs

The expression levels of TLR messenger RNA (mRNA) (TLR2, -3, -4, -5 and -9) in the lungs of coinfected mice were examined on day 2 (fig. 3⇓; table 4⇓). Both influenza and S. pneumoniae infections induced upregulation of TLR2 and -4 mRNA. Greater induction of TLR2 and -4 mRNA were also observed in the lungs of coinfected mice, compared to either influenza- or S. pneumoniae-infected mice. Upregulation of TLR5 and -9 mRNA in the lungs of coinfected mice was weak, and almost identical in influenza- and S. pneumoniae-infected mice. The expression level of TLR3 mRNA did not change with either coinfection or single infection.

Fig. 3.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.—

Toll-like receptor (TLR) messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the lungs of mice infected with influenza virus and/or Streptococcus pneumoniae on day 2, analysed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction with hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) as internal control: a) TLR2, b) TLR3, c) TLR4, d) TLR5, e) TLR9 and f) HPRT (lane 1: mock-infected; lane 2: influenza virus-infected; lane 3: S. pneumoniae-infected; lane 4: doubly infected; relative densities are shown in table 4⇓). The experiment was repeated three times; representative results are shown.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4—

Expression# of Toll-like receptor (TLR) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and -2 messenger ribonucleic acid in the lungs of mice infected with influenza virus and/or Streptococcus pneumoniae

Mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling in coinfected lungs

Activation of ERK‐1/‐2 and p38, and to a lesser extent of JNK, was observed in the lungs of S. pneumoniae- and influenza virus-infected mice, compared to mock-infected mice. Very strong activation of these MAPK molecules was noted in coinfected lungs (fig. 4⇓; table 5⇓).

Fig. 4.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.—

Activation of a, b) extracellular signal-regulated kinase‐1 and ‐2 (ERK‐1/‐2), c, d) p38 and e, f) c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK), signalling factors in the Toll-like receptor-mediated cytokine production pathway, in the lungs of mice infected with influenza virus and/or Streptococcus pneumoniae on day 2. Levels of activation were analysed by Western blotting, using antibodies directed against each: a, c, e) phosphorylated (activated) form and b, d, f) intact form (lane 1: mock-infected; lane 2: influenza virus-infected; lane 3: S. pneumoniae-infected; lane 4: doubly infected; the ratios of phosphorylated to nonphosphorylated protein are shown in table 5⇓). The experiment was repeated three times; representative results are shown.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5—

Activation# of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 and -2 (ERK‐1/‐2), p38 and c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK) in the lungs of mice infected with influenza virus and/or Streptococcus pneumoniae

Cyclooxygenase‐2 production in the lungs and its effects on coinfected mice

COX‐2 mRNA was upregulated in the lungs of both influenza virus- and S. pneumoniae-infected mice, compared to mock-infected mice (fig. 5a⇓; table 4⇑). Significant expression of COX‐2 mRNA was observed in the lungs of coinfected mice, compared to those of singly and mock-infected mice. In contrast to COX‐2 mRNA, COX‐1 mRNA levels did not change and there was constitutive expression in all samples (fig. 5a⇓; table 4⇑). The effect of COX‐2 on PGE2 production was also examined. There was a significant increase in PGE2 production in the lungs of coinfected mice compared to singly and mock-infected mice (fig. 5b⇓).

Fig. 5.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.—

Expression of a) cyclooxygenase (COX)‐1, b) COX‐2 and c) hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), analysed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction with HPRT as internal control (relative densities are shown in table 4⇑), and d) prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in the lungs of mice infected with influenza virus and/or Streptococcus pneumoniae on day 2 (1: mock-infected; 2: influenza virus-infected; 3: S. pneumoniae-infected; 4: doubly infected). The mRNA expression experiment was repeated three times; representative results are shown. PGE2 data are presented as mean±sem. **: p<0.01 versus all other groups.

Discussion

In the present study, a mouse model of coinfection with influenza virus and S. pneumoniae was used, and significant short-term survival of coinfected mice found, due to severe bronchopneumonia and massive lung haemorrhage. These lethal pathological changes progressed rapidly ∼48 h after S. pneumoniae inoculation. On microbiological analysis, counts of S. pneumoniae in the lungs of mice with a preceding influenza virus infection were 10–100‐fold higher than in the lungs of mice infected with S. pneumoniae alone. However, the titres of influenza virus were similar in coinfected mice and in mice infected with influenza virus alone. These data suggest that the pathogenesis of severe lung damage is probably not dependent on simple synergy between the agents. The host immune response is one of the most important factors in determining lung pathology in coinfected mice, and infection by influenza virus may favour the growth of bacteria, resulting in a secondary bacterial infection and subsequent severe lung damage. Recent in vitro studies have demonstrated that influenza A virus-infected HEp‐2 cells exhibit significantly greater binding to S. pneumoniae strains than uninfected cells 16. It has been proposed that influenza virus infection may activate the epithelium and upregulate cytokine production and receptors for platelet activating factor. These influenza virus-induced mechanisms may underlie the enhanced bacterial adherence and increased tissue damage in the lungs. Therefore, the present study focused on host immune responses and analysis of inflammatory molecules in the mice used.

The present results revealed significant increases in intrapulmonary pro-inflammatory and inflammatory cytokine/chemokine concentrations. Among these cytokines and chemokines, the concentrations of TNF‐α, IL‐6, MIP‐2 (functionally similar to IL‐8 in human) and RANTES increased significantly in the lungs of coinfected mice, compared to either mock- or singly infected mice. These results suggest that TNF‐α, IL‐6, MIP‐2 and RANTES play important roles in the pathological changes in the lungs of mice with severe pneumonia.

Moreover, the present results revealed increases in Th1 cytokine levels, but no significant changes in Th2 cytokine levels, in the lungs of coinfected mice. In general, Th1 cytokines are known to exert protective and antiviral effects. However, Th2 cytokines exhibit inhibitory effects on viral clearance. The balance between Th1 and Th2 cytokines seems to be involved in the pathogenesis of severe lung damage observed in the present study.

In order to evaluate the relationships between cytokines and the pathological changes, the related molecules TLR and MAPK were investigated in terms of mRNA expression and activation, respectively, in coinfected lungs. The production of cytokines and chemokines in response to components of microbiological agents is stimulated by TLRs and mediated by MAPK signalling 17, 18. Of TLR2, -3, -4, -5 and -9, TLR2 mRNA showed the most specific induction in coinfected lungs. TLR2 is known as the recognition receptor for peptidoglycans of Gram-positive bacteria, including S. pneumoniae 19. Furthermore, strong activation of MAPK‐related molecules, such as ERK‐1/‐2, p38 and JNK, was observed. These data suggest that TLR, especially TLR2 stimulation, and MAPK signalling cytokine secretion pathways may be involved in the severe lung damage noted in coinfected mice.

The potential role of other inflammatory mediators, COXs, which convert arachidonic acid to prostaglandins, was also analysed 20. Of the two known COX isoforms, COX‐1 is constitutively expressed in most cells and is thought to be important for normal physiological functions. Conversely, COX‐2 is usually expressed at low basal levels and is rapidly induced by inflammatory stimulation. It was reported that COX‐2 expression is dependent on MAPK signalling and IL‐1β secretion 21, 22. In the present study, COX‐2 mRNA expression was significantly increased in coinfected lungs, consistent with the pathological changes. COX‐2 expression has been detected in fatal pneumococcal pneumonia and allergic inflammation in guinea-pig lungs. In the present study, significant upregulation of COX‐2 mRNA was found in samples from coinfected mice, compared to those from singly or mock-infected mice. Significantly high concentrations of PGE2 were also noted in coinfected lungs, compared to either mock- and/or singly infected lungs, suggesting that COX‐2 and COX‐2‐stimulated PGE2 production might be important mediators of the severe pneumonia in coinfected mice.

In conclusion, intranasal inoculation of influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae in mice resulted in severe lethal pneumonia with lung haemorrhage. These pathological changes were initiated by the infectious agents and regulated by host immune responses, including the Toll-like receptor-mediated signalling pathway. Administration of cyclooxygenase‐2 inhibitors may protect against severe inflammation. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of fulminant lung damage in influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae coinfection.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to M. Harada for excellent technical support, and to F.G. Issa (Word-Medex Pty Ltd, Sydney, Australia) for careful reading and editing of the manuscript.

  • Received November 11, 2003.
  • Accepted February 17, 2004.
  • © ERS Journals Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;63:1730–1754.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Glezen WP. Serious morbidity and mortality associated with influenza virus epidemics. Epidemiol Rev 1982;4:25–44.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. Schwarzmann SW, Adler JL, Sullivan RL, Marine WM. Bacterial pneumonia during the Hong Kong influenza epidemic of 1968–1969. Arch Intern Med 1971;127:1037–1041.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Seemungal TR, Harper-Owen R, Bhowmik A, et al. Respiratory viruses, symptoms, and inflammatory markers in acute exacerbations and stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1618–1623.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Reid AH, Fanning TG, Hultin JV, Taubenberger JK. Origin and evolution of the 1918 “Spanish” influenza virus hemagglutinin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:1651–1656.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. Taubenberger JK. Influenza virus hemagglutinin cleavage into HA1, HA2: no laughing matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:9713–9715.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Taubenberger JK, Reid AH, Krafft AE, Bijwaard KE, Fanning TG. Initial genetic characterization of the 1918 “Spanish” influenza virus. Science 1997;275:1793–1796.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    LeVine AM, Koeningsknecht V, Stark JM. Decreased pulmonary clearance of S. pneumoniae following influenza A infection in mice. J Virol Methods 2001;94:173–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Engelich G, White M, Hartshorn KL. Neutrophil survival is markedly reduced by incubation with influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae: role of respiratory burst. J Leukoc Biol 2001;69:50–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    McCullers JA, Rehg JE. Lethal synergism between influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae: characterization of a mouse model and role of platelet-activating factor receptor. J Inf Dis 2002;186:341–350.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Hayden FG, Fritz RS, Lobo MC, Alvord WG, Strober W, Straus SE. Local and systemic cytokine responses during experimental human influenza S virus infection. Relation to symptom formation and host defense. J Clin Invest 1998;101:643–649.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Otsu Y, Yanagihara K, Fukuda Y, et al. In vivo efficacy of a new quinolone, DQ‐113, against Streptococcus pneumoniae in a mouse model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:3699–3703.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Yanagihara K, Seki M, Cheng P-W. Lipopolysaccharide induces mucus cell metaplasia in mouse lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2001;24:66–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Graf BA, Nazarenko DA, Borrello MA, et al. Biphenotypic B/macrophage cells express COX‐1 and up-regulate COX‐2 expression and prostaglandin E2 production in response to pro-inflammatory signals. Eur J Immunol 1999;29:3793–3803.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Yanagihara K, Tomono K, Kuroki M, et al. Intrapulmonary concentrations of inflammatory cytokines in a mouse model of chronic respiratory infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Exp Immunol 2000;122:67–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    El Ahmer OR, Raza MW, Ogilvie MM, Weir DM, Blackwell CC. Binding of bacteria to HEp‐2 cells infected with influenza A virus. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1999;23:331–341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T. Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nature Immunol 2001;2:675–680.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Pleschka S, Wolff T, Ehrhardt C, et al. Influenza virus propagation is impaired by inhibition of the Raf/MEK/ERK signalling cascade. Nature Cell Biol 2001;3:301–305.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Yoshimura A, Lien E, Ingalls RR, Tuomanen E, Dziarski R, Golenbock D. Cutting edge: recognition of Gram-positive bacterial cell wall components by the innate immune system occurs via Toll-like receptor 2. J Immunol 1999;163:1–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Smith WL, Garavito RM, DeWitt DL. Prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthases (cyclooxygenases)-1 and -2. J Biol Chem 1996;271:33157–33160.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Bonazzi A, Bolla M, Buccellati C, et al. Effect of endogenous and exogenous prostaglandin E2 on interleukin‐1β‐induced cyclooxygenase‐2 expression in human airway smooth-muscle cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:2272–2277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Oguma T, Asano K, Shiomi T, et al. Cyclooxygenase‐2 expression during allergic inflammation in guinea-pig lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:382–386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 24 Issue 1 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immunokinetics in severe pneumonia due to influenza virus and bacteria coinfection in mice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Immunokinetics in severe pneumonia due to influenza virus and bacteria coinfection in mice
M. Seki, K. Yanagihara, Y. Higashiyama, Y. Fukuda, Y. Kaneko, H. Ohno, Y. Miyazaki, Y. Hirakata, K. Tomono, J. Kadota, T. Tashiro, S. Kohno
European Respiratory Journal Jul 2004, 24 (1) 143-149; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00126103

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Immunokinetics in severe pneumonia due to influenza virus and bacteria coinfection in mice
M. Seki, K. Yanagihara, Y. Higashiyama, Y. Fukuda, Y. Kaneko, H. Ohno, Y. Miyazaki, Y. Hirakata, K. Tomono, J. Kadota, T. Tashiro, S. Kohno
European Respiratory Journal Jul 2004, 24 (1) 143-149; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00126103
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Determinants of community-acquired pneumonia in children and young adults in primary care
  • Oral versus i.v. antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in children: a cost-minimisation analysis
  • Incidence, characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe community acquired-MRSA pneumonia
Show more Original Articles: Respiratory Infections

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society