“How diseases of the liver affect lung function?” is one of those puzzling questions that can turn obsessive for those who want to understand how two seemingly distinctive organs can interact and eventually lead to severe disorders 1, 2. The most common respiratory consequence of liver disease is hypoxaemia, which is often mild to moderate 3. Seldom severe hypoxaemia occurs when the arterial pressure of oxygen (Pa,O2) falls below 8 kPa (60 mmHg), heralding the occurrence of a condition known as the “hepatopulmonary syndrome” (HPS). HPS is characterised by a triad of conditions, namely: 1) advanced liver disease (with or without liver cirrhosis); 2) widespread intrapulmonary vasodilatation; and 3) alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (PA‐a,O2) >2.6 kPa (20 mmHg) whilst breathing room air 2, 3. Clinical symptoms typically include shortness of breath, which may either worsen on standing (platypnoea) and/or be accompanied by a 10% fall in Pa,O2 (orthodeoxia). As with other lung disorders, hypoxaemia results from impaired gas exchange, which, in HPS, is particularly perturbed by excessive and widespread dilatation of intrapulmonary vessels. After decades of careful investigations, the underlying mechanisms linking altered gas exchange and pulmonary vasodilatation are now well delineated 2–4. Reduced tone causing vascular relaxation occurs at both ends of the capillary bed, i.e. affecting pre-capillary and post-capillary vessels. This allows mixed venous blood to speed through, or even bypass, gas exchange units. It is believed that hypoxaemia occurs as a result of one (or the combination of several) of these following mechanisms: 1) ventilation-perfusion mismatching (reflecting excess perfusion for a given ventilation); 2) true intrapulmonary anatomical shunts; and 3) diffusion-perfusion impairment (due to increased oxygen diffusion distance from alveoli to haemoglobin across the dilated vessels) 5–9. Vascular dilatation can be observed using contrast-enhanced echocardiography or fractional brain uptake after lung perfusion of technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin lung scanning 10.
As pulmonary vasodilatation is the main culprit, hunting endogenous vasodilators that reduce pulmonary vascular tone logically became a sound strategy for those whose quest was to unravel the missing “molecular” link between the diseased liver and the affected lung. Nitric oxide (NO), one of the most potent and prominent endogenous pulmonary vasodilators 11, soon appeared as a very likely candidate, not only for the hyperdynamic circulatory syndrome in cirrhosis 12, but also for HPS 13. This hypothesis has been further consolidated in the light of clinical and experimental results from several recent studies 2. First, pulmonary endogenous production of NO, which can be assessed by measuring exhaled NO 14, is increased in patients with HPS 15–18 and returns to normal values 3–12 months after orthotopic liver transplantation 17, 18. Interestingly, normalisation of exhaled NO concentrations was observed either whilst the patient achieved normoxaemia again 17 or correlated with reduced PA‐a,O2 18 after liver transplantation. This is consistent with the hypothesis of a major contributory role of endogenous NO in causing inadequate pulmonary vasodilatation, hence ventilation-perfusion mismatching and hypoxaemia, in HPS. The second question that naturally arises from these observations is “what is (are) the origin(s) of the increased NO production in HPS?”. Early studies from our group have provided evidence of vascular hyporeactivity, which resulted from increased NO production in both systemic and pulmonary vascular beds of animals with experimental cirrhosis 19, 20. Applying the technique of multiple flow analysis, which allows to differentiate alveolar from bronchial origins of exhaled NO, Delclaux et al. 21 have elegantly zoomed in on the alveoli as the major source of increased NO production in cirrhotic patients. “What are the cellular types, and the NO synthases (NOS) subtypes, which are involved in this overproduction of NO?” came naturally as the question to ask at this stage. In experimental cirrhosis, overexpression of both inducible (NOS‐2) and constitutive (NOS‐3) isoforms are seen in alveolar macrophages and pulmonary endothelial cells, respectively 22, 23. Although the same pattern of lung NOS overexpression has not yet been documented in patients with HPS, this probably occurs in most cases, at least in patients who have been successfully treated with synthesis inhibitors of either NO or its target, namely the second messenger cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Two reports recently described successful use of this therapeutic strategy in HPS patients, who were improved by either nebulisation of the NOS inhibitor, NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester 24, or intravenous administration of methylene blue, an inhibitor of the main molecular target of NO, the cGMP-synthesising enzyme soluble guanylyl cyclase 25 (fig. 1⇓).
In the current issue of the European Respiratory Journal, Sztrymf et al. 26 have taken us a step further down the path exploring intracellular signalisation of NO with their study on the effect of pentoxifylline, a nonspecific inhibitor of synthesis of the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α 26. It is known that synthesis of NO by the inducible enzyme NOS‐2 is regulated at a transcriptional level, mainly through activation of transcription factors, e.g. nuclear factor‐κB or activator protein‐1, both of which are stimulated by TNF‐α 27 (fig. 1⇑). Thus, targeting TNF‐α would be a logical approach, especially after the recent finding of increased production of this cytokine in experimental HPS 28. The paper by Sztrymf et al. 26, demonstrating that pretreatment with pentoxyfilline prevented HPS and the hyperdynamic circulatory syndrome, presumably through inhibition of TNF‐α synthesis and NOS‐2 induction, elegantly adds a new piece of information to our knowledge on the pathophysiology of HPS. This further supports the central role of excess NO synthesis as a major molecular mechanism. The recent suggestion of a possible implication of endothelin (ET)‐1 in HPS may further complicate an already complex scheme 28. However, as overexpression of pulmonary ET‐B receptors, which provides another mechanism for the stimulation of NO release (fig. 1⇑), is seen in experimental HPS 29, 30, NO is likely to keep on focussing our interest for a while yet.
Therefore, the spotlight is pinpointing down on nitric oxide. But we all know the interest and pitfall of this approach. Too much focus certainly allows greater scrutiny for a given factor, but also favours the risk of overlooking the others. Let's keep both nitric oxide in mind and our mind open for other forthcoming players in hepatopulmonary syndrome pathogenesis.
- © ERS Journals Ltd