Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
    • WoS Reviewer Recognition Service
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
    • WoS Reviewer Recognition Service
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Antioxidant properties of N‐acetylcysteine: their relevance in relation to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

P.N.R. Dekhuijzen
European Respiratory Journal 2004 23: 629-636; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00016804
P.N.R. Dekhuijzen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Both reactive oxidant species from inhaled cigarette smoke and those endogenously formed by inflammatory cells constitute an increased intrapulmonary oxidant burden. Structural changes to essential components of the lung are caused by oxidative stress, contributing to irreversible damage of both parenchyma and airway walls. In addition, oxidative stress results in alterations in the local immune response, increasing the risk of infections and exacerbations, which, in turn, may accelerate lung function decline.

The antioxidant N‐acetylcysteine, a glutathione precursor, has been applied in these patients in order to reduce symptoms, exacerbations and the accelerated lung function decline. This article reviews the presently available experimental and clinical data on the antioxidative effects of N‐acetylcysteine in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

  • N‐Acetylcysteine
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • inflammation
  • oxidative stress
  • pathogenesis

Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 1–5. Both reactive oxidant species (ROS) from inhaled cigarette smoke and those endogenously formed by inflammatory cells constitute an increased intrapulmonary oxidant burden. Data from in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo studies indicate two sorts of effect of oxidative stress relevant to COPD. Structural changes to essential components of the lung are caused by oxidative stress, contributing to irreversible damage of both parenchyma and airway walls 6, 7. In addition, oxidative stress may result in alterations in the local immune response 7. Theoretically, this might increase the risk of infections and exacerbations, which, in turn, may accelerate lung function decline 8, although there are no data to support this contention.

Oxidative stress is closely linked to inflammation. The inflammatory process in patients with stable COPD is dominated by macrophages, CD8+ T‐lymphocytes and neutrophils, and to a lesser extent mast cells, in the bronchial submucosa and alveoli 5. Increased production of mediators, such as interleukin (IL)‐8, tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) and leukotriene B4, which both attract inflammatory cells and increase oxidant production by these cells, has been found.

Attenuation of oxidative stress would be expected to result in reduced pulmonary damage and a decrease in local infections, contributing to attenuation of the progression of COPD. At present the only antioxidant widely available for the treatment of patients with COPD is N‐acetylcysteine (NAC). The present article reviews the available experimental and clinical data on the antioxidative effects of NAC in relation to COPD.

Oxidants and antioxidants in the lungs of patients with COPD

Several reviews have summarised the available data on the presence (table 1⇓) and consequences (table 2⇓) of oxidative stress in the lungs of “healthy” smokers and smokers with COPD 1–5, 9. Cigarette smoke is a major source of oxidants, e.g. free radicals, including semiquinone and hydroxyl radicals, nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide, in the lungs 3. Furthermore, cigarette smoke promotes the influx and activation of neutrophils and macrophages. Leukocytes from smokers release more oxidants, such as the superoxide anion and H2O2, than leukocytes from nonsmokers 10. The alveolar macrophages of smokers contain increased amounts of iron and release more free iron than those of nonsmokers 11. The presence of free iron facilitates the generation of very reactive hydroxyl radicals.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1—

Indices (biochemical markers) of increased oxidative stress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2—

Alterations in components of the lung caused by oxidative stress

An important part of the pulmonary antioxidant defence is located in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF). Vitamin C and E levels in ELF are depleted in smokers, but glutathione (GSH) levels are increased 6, 10, 12. These effects are dependent on the time course of exposure to tobacco smoke. Acute exposure causes marked depletion of antioxidants in plasma 13, 14, intracellular GSH in erythrocytes 15 and GSH in ELF 10, 12.

Alterations in the lung caused by oxidative stress

Both in vitro and in vivo experiments have demonstrated that oxidative stress may cause alterations in essential components of the lung, contributing to pathological abnormalities and functional changes (table 2⇑) 6, 7.

Increased amounts of ROS have been shown to reduce the synthesis of elastin and collagen 16, 17. Fragmentation of these major constituents of the lung skeleton may also occur. In addition, ROS may affect the structure of components of the extracellular matrix, such as hyaluronate 7. Depolymerisation of the proteoglycans in the lung reduces the viscosity of the extracellular matrix.

Oxidative stress may also initiate or amplify alterations in the airway wall. Lipid peroxidation may initiate the release of arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids, leading to release of prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Increased levels of ROS may also increase IL‐1 and ‐8 production in several cell systems 18, 19.

Other changes include changes in protein structure, leading to altered antigenicity and thus immune responses, contraction of smooth muscle, impairment of β‐adrenoceptor function, stimulation of airway secretion, pulmonary vascular smooth muscle relaxation or contraction, and activation of mast cells 7. Antiproteases such as α1‐proteinase inhibitor (α1‐PI) and secretory leukoprotease inhibitor may be inactivated by ROS 20. In particular, oxidation of the active site of α1‐PI, the so-called methionine residue, reduces the ability of α1‐PI to inactivate neutrophil elastase 21.

Changes in the alveolar epithelial cell layer occur both as a direct result of inhaled ROS and through the above-mentioned alterations 22. The permeability of this part of the lung is increased by detachment of the cellular layer, reduced adherence of cells and increased cell lysis 7.

Sequestration of neutrophils, initiated by inhaled tobacco smoke, may occur in the lung microcirculation 23. Both a reduction in the deformability of neutrophils and an increase in neutrophil adhesion to the vascular endothelium, due to increased levels of adhesion molecules, are involved in this pulmonary sequestration. The increased numbers and prolonged presence of these inflammatory cells contributes to the cycle of locally increased ROS production, attraction of new inflammatory cells, etc.

Finally, oxidative stress activates the transcription factor nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB), which switches on the genes for TNF‐α, IL‐8 and other inflammatory proteins 5, 24, enhancing inflammation.

Taken together, these data strongly suggest that oxidative stress is an important pathogenetic factor in the alterations in the lungs of patients with COPD.

Pharmacotherapy of COPD

Pharmacotherapy in patients with COPD is primarily focused on maximal bronchodilatation by inhaled anticholinergics and β2‐agonists 25. The role of anti-inflammatory treatment is the subject of many mechanistic and clinical long-term interventional trials. Neither inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) nor high dosages of oral corticosteroids affect the number of inflammatory cells or concentrations of cytokines and proteases in induced sputum from COPD patients 26, 27. Dexamethasone does not inhibit basal or stimulated release of IL‐8 by alveolar macrophages in COPD patients compared to healthy smokers 28. Corticosteroids inhibit apoptosis and thus stimulate survival of neutrophils 29. ICS do not affect activation markers of neutrophils, such as myeloperoxidase and human neutrophil lipocalin 27. They do, however, reduce serum IL‐8 levels, which may result in a reduction in the influx of neutrophils 30. This effect may possibly be mediated by the effects of ICS on airway epithelial cells 31. Biopsy studies showed a reduction in the number of mast cells by ICS 32. Treatment with ICS reduces the concentration of exhaled NO 33 and H2O2 34 in exhaled air. Recent placebo-controlled trials show no effect of prolonged treatment on the course of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in mild COPD 35–38. A reduction in the number and severity of exacerbations was observed in the Inhaled Steroids in Obstructive Lung Disease study in patients with an FEV1 of ∼50% of the predicted value 37. In severe COPD patients, recent studies using a combination of ICS and long-acting β2‐agonists showed an additive effect on the number of exacerbations compared to ICS or long-acting β2‐agonists alone 39–42. It is difficult, however, to attribute these effects specifically to an antioxidative effect, given the strong anti-inflammatory potency of ICS. The potential role and positioning of antioxidant therapy with NAC is discussed below.

Pharmacology of N‐acetylcysteine

Antioxidant properties

NAC exhibits direct and indirect antioxidant properties. Its free thiol group is capable of interacting with the electrophilic groups of ROS 43, 44. This interaction with ROS leads to intermediate formation of NAC thiol, with NAC disulphide as a major end product 45. In addition, NAC exerts an indirect antioxidant effect related to its role as a GSH precursor. GSH is a tripeptide made up of glutamic acid, cysteine and glycine. It serves as a central factor in protecting against internal toxic agents (such as cellular aerobic respiration and metabolism of phagocytes) and external agents (such as NO, sulphur oxide and other components of cigarette smoke, and pollution). The sulphydryl group of cysteine neutralises these agents. Maintaining adequate intracellular levels of GSH is essential to overcoming the harmful effects of toxic agents. GSH synthesis takes place mainly in the liver (which acts as a reservoir) and the lungs. Synthesis takes place in the cellular cytoplasm in two separate enzymatic stages. In the first, the amino acids glutamic acid and cysteine are combined by γ‐glutamylcysteine synthetase, and, in the second, GSH synthetase adds glycine to the dipeptide γ‐glutamylcysteine to form GSH. In vitro, NAC acts as a precursor of GSH as it can penetrate cells easily and is subsequently deacylated to form cysteine 43.

The availability of amino acids for GSH synthesis is a fundamental factor in its regulation. Cellular levels of glutamic acid and glycine, but not cysteine, are plentiful. Consequently, GSH synthesis depends on the availability of cysteine. In the case of (relative) depletion of GSH levels or increased demand, GSH levels may be increased by delivering additional cysteine via NAC. However, it is impossible to administer the active form of cysteine, l‐cysteine, because of low intestinal absorption, poor water solubility and rapid hepatic metabolism. NAC, with the acetyl radical linked to amine function, eliminates these disadvantages. The required quantity of cysteine may thus be administrated to maintain adequate levels of GSH in the lungs. Other cysteine derivatives, in which the sulphydryl group is blocked (carboxymethylcysteine), do not have this precursor action.

Clinical pharmacology

NAC is rapidly absorbed after oral administration in both animals and humans 46–48. The maximum plasma concentration is reached 2–3 h after administration 30 and the plasma half-life is 6.3 h. NAC undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism, resulting in a low bioavailability of ∼10% for the unchanged molecule.

As expected, NAC cannot be detected in plasma or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) following oral administration for 5–14 days 49, 50. In contrast, cysteine and GSH levels were increased transiently in plasma 49, 50 and lung 50 after oral administration of NAC 600 mg once daily. In patients with COPD, however, plasma concentrations of GSH were unchanged after this dose of NAC, whereas 600 mg three times daily increased plasma GSH levels 51. With this higher dose, administered for 5 days to patients who underwent lung resection surgery (n=11), cysteine and GSH levels were increased by ∼50% compared to untreated patients (n=11). This difference was, however, not significant, which was probably due to the high variation in concentrations of cysteine and GSH. Nevertheless, these data suggest that there is a transient dose-dependent effect of NAC on lung cysteine and GSH levels.

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects

The efficacy of NAC as a precursor in GSH synthesis has been studied in isolated mouse lungs 43. Cigarette smoke administered directly to the lung through the trachea caused a dose-dependent reduction in total pulmonary GSH. Administering NAC together with cigarette smoke prevented the loss of pulmonary GSH and abolished the effects of cigarette smoke. NAC reduced H2O2‐induced damage to epithelial cells in vitro 22 and NF‐κB activation in some cells 52. In addition, NAC treatment reduced cigarette smoke-induced abnormalities in polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) 53, alveolar macrophages, fibroblasts and epithelial cells in vitro 54–57. Treatment with NAC also attenuated rat secretory cell hyperplasia induced by tobacco smoke 58 and prevented hypochlorous acid-mediated inactivation of α1‐PI in vitro 59. In a rat model of cigarette smoke-induced alterations in small airways, NAC prevented thickening of the airway wall and improved distribution of ventilation 60.

In addition to its effects on PMNs, NAC also influences the morphology and markers of oxidative stress in red blood cells (RBCs). An increased percentage of RBCs in COPD patients is morphologically damaged, with high concentrations of H2O2 and lowered levels of thiols 61. Such alterations are correlated with reduced oxygen exchange 62. Treatment of COPD patients with 1.2 or 1.8 mg·day−1 NAC for 2 months improved RBC shape, reduced H2O2 concentrations by 38–54% and increased thiol levels by 50–68% 63.

Treatment with NAC may alter lung oxidant/antioxidant imbalance. NAC (600 mg·day−1) given orally increased lung lavage GSH levels 50, reduced O2·− production by alveolar macrophages 55 and decreased BALF PMN chemiluminescence in vitro 64. In addition, 600 mg·day−1 NAC in COPD patients reduced sputum eosinophil cationic protein concentrations and the adhesion of PMNs 65. In vitro, NAC reduced adhesion of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae to oropharyngeal epithelial cells 66.

Effects on cigarette smoke-induced changes

Three studies have investigated the effects of 600 mg·day−1 NAC given orally on parameters of inflammation in the BALF of “healthy” smokers 55, 67, 68. NAC resulted in a tendency towards normalisation of the cell composition, with an increase in lymphocyte concentration (p<0.05) 55. In addition, improvements were observed in the phagocytic activity of alveolar macrophages 55, and an increase in secretion of leukotriene B4 (p<0.05), which shows a chemotactic activity that represents an important defence mechanism against aggressive agents 55. In addition, NAC reduced the stimulated production of O2·− (from p<0.01 to p<0.05, depending on the type of stimulus) 67. Finally, a reduction in the levels of various markers of inflammatory activity, such as eosinophil cationic protein, lactoferrin and antichymotrypsin (p<0.05), was found after administration of NAC 68.

Effects on elastase activity

Treatment with NAC resulted in a considerable reduction in elastase activity, in both the bronchoalveolar cavity and plasma, related to its property of scavenging HOCl 44.

Modulatory effect on genes

Redox signalling forms part of the fundamental mechanisms of inflammation, such as cytokine induction, proliferation, apoptosis and gene regulation for cell protection. Oxidants act as mediators of signal transduction, e.g. activation of NF‐κB and activation protein 1. NAC has been shown to inhibit activation of NF‐κB, which controls the cellular genes for intracellular adhesion molecules in intact cells 52. In addition, NAC has been shown to inhibit the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 in human endothelial cells 69.

Effects on oxidative stress induced by viruses

Oxidant production in respiratory cells rises when they become infected with pathogenic viruses, and the oxidative stress is accompanied by increased production of a variety of inflammatory mediators. NAC has been shown to play a protective role in increasing the resistance of mice to influenza virus 70. Influenza virus increased the production of ROS in epithelial cells and activated NF‐κB transcription factor 71. Pretreatment with NAC attenuated virus-induced NF‐κB and IL‐8 release. Mice infected intranasally with influenza virus APR/8 showed high BALF levels of xanthine oxidase, TNF‐α and IL‐6 as early as 3 days after infection 72. Xanthine oxidase levels were also elevated in serum and lung tissue. Administration orally of 1 g·kg body weight−1·day−1 NAC significantly reduced the mortality rate of the infected mice (p<0.005). Rhinoviruses also stimulated increased production of H2O2 and oxidative stress of human respiratory epithelial cells 73. Oxidative stress, in turn, caused activation of NF‐κB and release of IL‐8, and this effect was blocked by NAC in a dose-dependent manner.

Effect on exhaled biomarkers of oxidative stress

Increased levels of H2O2 in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) have been shown in stable COPD patients, with a further increase during exacerbations 74. Treatment with NAC 600 mg once daily for 12 months reduced the concentration of H2O2 in EBC compared to placebo in stable COPD patients (FEV1 ∼60–70% pred) 75. This effect was observed in the second 6 months of the treatment period. A higher dose of NAC (1.2 g once daily) reduced the concentration of H2O2 in EBC within a period of 30 days, suggesting that there is a dose-dependent effect on this marker of oxidative stress 76.

Mucolytic effects

In addition to these antioxidant actions, NAC exhibits mucolytic properties by destroying the disulphide bridges of mucoprotein macromolecules after inhalation. This pharmacological action is due to the presence of a free sulphydryl group in the NAC molecule 77, 78. Mucus viscosity is reduced in vitro in human tracheobronchial secretions 79. NAC also decreased the viscosity of canine tracheal mucus, leading to improved mucociliary transport 80. In an animal model of chronic bronchitis, oral NAC inhibited smoke-induced goblet cell hyperplasia 81 and associated mucus hypersecretion 82. In addition, NAC reduced the time to recovery of goblet cell numbers after smoking cessation 83.

Clinical efficacy of N‐acetylcysteine in COPD

The clinical efficacy of NAC has been investigated in a number of both open and double-blind studies of patients with chronic bronchitis, with and without COPD. The effects on symptoms, viral and bacterial infections, number and severity of exacerbations, and lung function decline are discussed separately.

Clinical symptoms

An open clinical trial including 1,392 patients demonstrated the efficacy of NAC at a dose of 600 mg·day−1 in reducing the viscosity of expectorations, promoting expectoration and reducing the severity of cough 84. After 2 months of treatment with NAC, the viscosity of expectorations improved in 80% of cases, the nature of the expectorations improved in 59%, difficulty in expectorating improved in 74% and the severity of cough improved in 71%.

Improvement in clinical symptoms as a result of treatment with NAC has been shown in a long-term double-blind trial with parallel groups conducted in several centres to which 744 patients with chronic bronchitis were recruited 85. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, one treated with NAC and the other with placebo. The results confirmed the efficacy of NAC regarding the parameters related to bronchial hypersecretion.

Bronchial bacterial colonisation

In an open cross-sectional study performed in 22 smokers with no chronic bronchitis, 19 smokers with chronic bronchitis, with or without airway obstruction, and 14 healthy nonsmokers, the bacterial flora and effect of NAC on bacterial numbers were investigated 86. The number of bacterial colonies was highest in smokers with chronic bronchitis. In addition, the number of intrabronchial bacteria was significantly lower in patients treated with NAC compared to other patients. This effect was more obvious in patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis.

N‐acetylcysteine and viruses

The effects of NAC on influenza and influenza-like episodes have been studied in 262 patients suffering from nonrespiratory chronic degenerative diseases 87. Compared to placebo, NAC, 600 mg twice daily for 6 months, resulted in a significant decrease in both the frequency and severity of influenza-like episodes. Local and systemic symptoms were also significantly reduced in the group receiving NAC. Although seroconversion towards influenza virus was similar in the two groups, only 25% of virus-infected subjects treated with NAC developed the symptomatic form of the condition compared with 79% of the placebo group.

Lung function decline

In an open observational survey in Sweden, the decline in FEV1 in COPD patients who took NAC for 2 yrs was less than that in a reference group receiving usual care 88. This favourable effect was particularly apparent in COPD patients aged >50 yrs (annual decline in FEV1 of 30 mL) compared to the reference group (annual decline in FEV1 of 54 mL). After 5 yrs, the reduction in FEV1 in the NAC group was less than that in the reference group (B. Lundbäck, Unit for Lung and Allergy Research, National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, personal communication). Clearly, it should be noted that the nature of the study design precludes firm conclusions regarding the effect of NAC on lung function decline in COPD.

Exacerbations

In a recent systematic review by Stey et al. 89, data on prevention of exacerbation, improvement of symptoms and adverse effects were extracted from original reports (fig. 1⇓). The relative benefit and number needed to treat were calculated for both individual trials and the combined data. Of the 39 trials retrieved, 11 (2,011 patients analysed), published 1976–1994, were regarded as relevant and valid according to preset criteria 85, 90–99. Except for one study 97, these were placebo-controlled randomised trials. In nine of the studies, 351 of 723 (48.5%) patients receiving NAC showed no exacerbation compared with 229 of 733 (31.2%) patients receiving placebo (relative benefit 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37–1.77), number needed to treat 5.8 (95% CI 4.5–8.1)). There was no evidence of any effect of study period (12–24 weeks) or cumulative dose of NAC on efficacy. In five of the trials, 286 of 466 (61.4%) patients receiving NAC reported improvement of their symptoms compared with 160 of 462 (34.6%) patients receiving placebo (relative benefit 1.78 (95% CI 1.54–2.05), number needed to treat 3.7 (95% CI 3.0–4.9)). These findings are in line with the outcomes of two previous meta-analyses using less-precise selection of these studies 100, 101, and confirm that NAC has a clinically significant effect on the number and impact of exacerbations. Again, it should be stressed that the patients included in these studies were not characterised in as detailed a fashion as would currently be demanded according to, for example, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines 25.

Fig. 1.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.—

Correlation of absence of exacerbation with oral N‐acetylcysteine (NAC) and placebo in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or chronic bronchitis. ○: trial (symbol size proportional to trial size); -----: line of equality. Arrows represent weighted means. Reproduced with permission from 89.

With NAC, 68 of 666 (10.2%) patients reported gastrointestinal adverse effects compared to 73 of 671 (10.9%) taking placebo. With NAC, 79 of 1,207 (6.5%) patients withdrew from the study due to adverse effects, compared to 87 of 1,234 (7.1%) receiving placebo.

Conclusions

Oxidative stress is considered to be an important part of the inflammatory response to both environmental and internal signals. Transcription factors such as NF‐κB and activation protein 1 are activated by oxidative stress, and, in turn, amplify the inflammatory response to noxious stimuli. In this way, both oxidative stress and inflammation are involved in the complex pathophysiology of COPD, in terms of both pathogenesis and the progression of the disease. The benefits of ICS in severe COPD are limited, and no effects have been found in mild and moderate COPD.

In vitro and in vivo data show that N‐acetylcysteine protects the lungs against toxic agents by increasing pulmonary defence mechanisms through its direct antioxidant properties and indirect role as a precursor in glutathioine synthesis. In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, treatment with N‐acetylcysteine at a dose of 600 mg once daily reduces the risk of exacerbations and improves symptoms compared to placebo. Whether this benefit is sufficient to justify the routine and long-term use of N‐acetylcysteine in all patients with chronic bronchitis has been addressed recently in the Bronchitis Randomized On NAC Cost-Utility Study 102. This phase III randomised double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group multicentric study was designed to assess the effectiveness of N‐acetylcysteine 600 mg daily for 3 yrs in altering the decline in forced expiratory volume in one second, exacerbation rate and quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In addition, the cost/utility of the treatment was estimated. This study has recently been completed and will provide further data for establishing the application of N‐acetylcysteine as an antioxidant in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

  • Received October 29, 2003.
  • Accepted November 11, 2003.
  • © ERS Journals Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    Repine JE, Lankhorst ILM, Debacker WA, et al. Oxidative stress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:341–357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Rahman I, MacNee W. Lung glutathione and oxidative stress: implications in cigarette smoke-induced airway disease. Am J Physiol 1999;277:L1067–L1088.
  3. ↵
    MacNee W, Rahman I. Oxidants and antioxidants as therapeutic targets in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:S58–S65.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. MacNee W. Oxidants/antioxidants and COPD. Chest 2000;117: 5 Suppl. 1, 303S–317S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Barnes PJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2000;343:269–280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Rahman I, MacNee W. Role of oxidants/antioxidants in smoking-induced lung diseases. Free Radic Biol Med 1996;21:669–681.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Warren JS, Johnson KJ, Ward PA. Consequences of oxidant injury. In: Crystal RG, West JB, Weibel ER, Barnes PJ, editors. The Lung: Scientific FoundationsNew York, NY, Raven Press Ltd, 1997; pp. 2279–2288.
  8. ↵
    Wilkinson TM, Patel IS, Wilks M, Donaldson GC, Wedzicha JA. Airway bacterial load and FEV1 decline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:1090–1095.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. MacNee W. Oxidative stress and lung inflammation in airways disease. Eur J Pharmacol 2001;429:195–207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Morrison D, Rahman I, Lannan S, MacNee W. Epithelial permeability, inflammation, and oxidant stress in the air spaces of smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:473–479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Mateos F, Brock JH, Perez-Arellano JL. Iron metabolism in the lower respiratory tract. Thorax 1998;53:594–600.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Cantin AM, North SL, Hubbard R, Crystal RG. Normal alveolar epithelial lining fluid contains high levels of glutathione. J Appl Physiol 1987;63:152–157.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Rahman I, Morrison D, Donaldson K, MacNee W. Systemic oxidative stress in asthma, COPD, and smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:1055–1060.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Rahman I, Skwarska E, MacNee W. Attenuation of oxidant/antioxidant imbalance during treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1997;52:565–568.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Maranzana A, Mehlhorn RJ. Loss of glutathione, ascorbate recycling, and free radical scavenging in human erythrocytes exposed to filtered cigarette smoke. Arch Biochem Biophys 1998;350:169–182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Laurent P, Janoff A, Kagan HM. Cigarette smoke blocks cross-linking of elastin in vitro. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;127:189–192.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Cantin A, Crystal RG. Oxidants, antioxidants and the pathogenesis of emphysema. Eur J Respir Dis 1985;66: Suppl. 139, 7–17.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    Ghezzi P, Dinarello CA, Bianchi M, Rosandich ME, Repine JE, White CW. Hypoxia increases production of interleukin‐1 and tumor necrosis factor by human mononuclear cells. Cytokine 1991;3:189–194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Metinko AP, Kunkel SL, Standiford TJ, Strieter RM. Anoxia-hyperoxia induces monocyte-derived interleukin-8. J Clin Invest 1992;90:791–798.
  20. ↵
    Abboud RT, Fera T, Richter A, Tabona MZ, Johal S. Acute effect of smoking on the functional activity of α1‐protease inhibitor in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;131:79–85.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Maier KL, Leuschel L, Costabel U. Increased oxidized methionine residues in BAL fluid proteins in acute or chronic bronchitis. Eur Respir J 1992;5:651–658.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Cotgreave IA, Moldeus P. Lung protection by thiol-containing antioxidants. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1987;23:275–277.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    MacNee W, Wiggs B, Belzberg AS, Hogg JC. The effect of cigarette smoking on neutrophil kinetics in human lungs. N Engl J Med 1989;321:924–928.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Rahman I, MacNee W. Oxidative stress and regulation of glutathione in lung inflammation. Eur Respir J 2000;16:534–554.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PMA, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS, on behalf of the GOLD Scientific Committee. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1256–1276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Culpitt SV, Maziak W, Loukidis S, Nightingale JA, Matthews JL, Barnes PJ. Effect of high dose inhaled steroid on cells, cytokines, and proteases in induced sputum in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1635–1639.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Keatings VM, Jatakanon A, Worsdell YM, Barnes PJ. Effects of inhaled and oral glucocorticoids on inflammatory indices in asthma and COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:542–548.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Culpitt SV, Rogers DF, Shah P, et al. Impaired inhibition by dexamethasone of cytokine release by alveolar macrophages from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:24–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Meagher LC, Cousin JM, Seckl JR, Haslett C. Opposing effects of glucocorticoids on the rate of apoptosis in neutrophilic and eosinophilic granulocytes. J Immunol 1996;156:4422–4428.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Confalonieri M, Mainardi E, Della PR, et al. Inhaled corticosteroids reduce neutrophilic bronchial inflammation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1998;53:583–585.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Thompson AB, Mueller MB, Heires AJ, et al. Aerosolized beclomethasone in chronic bronchitis. Improved pulmonary function and diminished airway inflammation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;146:389–395.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    Hattotuwa KL, Gizycki MJ, Ansari TW, Jeffery PK, Barnes NC. The effects of inhaled fluticasone on airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled biopsy study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1592–1596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Ferreira IM, Hazari MS, Gutierrez C, Zamel N, Chapman KR. Exhaled nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: effects of inhaled beclomethasone. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1012–1015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    van Beurden WJC, Harff GA, Dekhuijzen PNR, van der Poel-Smet SM, Smeenk FWJM. Effects of inhaled corticosteroids with different lung deposition on exhaled hydrogen peroxide in stable COPD patients. Respiration 2003;70:242–248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Pauwels RA, Lofdahl CG, Laitinen LA, et al. Long-term treatment with inhaled budesonide in persons with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who continue smoking. European Respiratory Society Study on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1948–1953.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. Vestbo J, Sorensen T, Lange P, Brix A, Torre P, Viskum K. Long-term effect of inhaled budesonide in mild and moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353:1819–1823.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    Burge PS, Calverley PM, Jones PW, Spencer S, Anderson JA, Maslen TK. Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the ISOLDE trial. BMJ 2000;320:1297–1303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Lung Health Study Group. Effect of inhaled triamcinolone on the decline in pulmonary function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1902–1909.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Mahler DA, Wire P, Horstman D, et al. Effectiveness of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol combination delivered via the Diskus device in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1084–1091.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. Szafranski W, Cukier A, Ramirez A, et al. Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 2003;21:74–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. Calverley PM, Boonsawat W, Cseke Z, Zhong N, Peterson S, Olsson H. Maintenance therapy with budesonide and formoterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 2003;22:912–919.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Calverley P, Pauwels R, Vestbo J, et al. , and the trial of inhaled steroids and long-acting β2 agonists study group. Combined salmeterol and fluticasone in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:449–456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    Moldeus P, Cotgreave IA, Berggren M. Lung protection by a thiol-containing antioxidant: N‐acetylcysteine. Respiration 1986;50:31–42.
  44. ↵
    Aruoma OI, Halliwell B, Hoey BM, Butler J. The antioxidant action of N‐acetylcysteine: its reaction with hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, superoxide, and hypochlorous acid. Free Radic Biol Med 1989;6:593–597.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    Cotgreave IA. N‐acetylcysteine: pharmacological considerations and experimental and clinical applications. Adv Pharmacol 1997;38:205–227.
  46. ↵
    Sheffner AL, Medler EM, Bailey KR, Gallo DG, Mueller AJ, Sarett HP. Metabolic studies with acetylcysteine. Biochem Pharmacol 1966;15:1523–1535.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. Rodenstein D, DeCoster A, Gazzaniga A. Pharmacokinetics of oral acetylcysteine: absorption, binding and metabolism in patients with respiratory disorders. Clin Pharmacokinet 1978;3:247–254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    Borgstrom L, Kagedal B, Paulsen O. Pharmacokinetics of N‐acetylcysteine in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1986;31:217–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    Cotgreave IA, Eklund A, Larsson K, Moldeus P. No penetration of orally administered N‐acetylcysteine into bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Eur J Respir Dis 1987;70:73–77.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    Bridgeman MM, Marsden M, MacNee W, Flenley DC, Ryle AP. Cysteine and glutathione concentrations in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after treatment with N‐acetylcysteine. Thorax 1991;46:39–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    Bridgeman MM, Marsden M, Selby C, Morrison D, MacNee W. Effect of N‐acetyl cysteine on the concentrations of thiols in plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and lung tissue. Thorax 1994;49:670–675.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Schreck R, Albermann K, Baeuerle PA. Nuclear factor κB: an oxidative stress-responsive transcription factor of eukaryotic cells (a review). Free Radic Res Commun 1992;17:221–237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    Bridges RB. Protective action of thiols on neutrophil function. Eur J Respir Dis 1985;66: Suppl. 139, 40–48.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. ↵
    Voisin C, Aerts C, Wallaert B. Prevention of in vitro oxidant-mediated alveolar macrophage injury by cellular glutathione and precursors. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1987;23:309–313.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    Linden M, Wieslander E, Eklund A, Larsson K, Brattsand R. Effects of oral N‐acetylcysteine on cell content and macrophage function in bronchoalveolar lavage from healthy smokers. Eur Respir J 1988;1:645–650.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. Moldeus P, Berggren M, Graffström R. N‐Acetylcysteine protection against the toxicity of cigarette smoke and cigarette smoke condensates in various tissues and cells in vitro. Eur J Respir Dis 1985;66: Suppl. 139, 123–129.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    Drost E, Lannan S, Bridgeman MME, et al. Lack of effect of N‐acetylcysteine on the release of oxygen radicals from neutrophils and alveolar macrophages. Eur Respir J 1991;4:723–729.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    Jeffery PK, Rogers DF, Ayers MM. Effect of oral acetylcysteine on tobacco smoke-induced secretory cell hyperplasia. Eur J Respir Dis 1985;66: Suppl. 139, 117–122.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    Borregaard N, Jensen HS, Bjerrum OW. Prevention of tissue damage: inhibition of myeloperoxidase mediated inactivation of α1‐proteinase inhibitor by N‐acetyl cysteine, glutathione, and methionine. Agents Actions 1987;22:255–260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    Rubio ML, Sanchez-Cifuentes MV, Ortega M, et al. N‐acetylcysteine prevents cigarette smoke induced small airways alterations in rats. Eur Respir J 2000;15:505–511.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  61. ↵
    Santini MT, Straface E, Cipri A, Peverini M, Santulli M, Malorni W. Structural alterations in erythrocytes from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Haemostasis 1997;27:201–210.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  62. ↵
    Cuzzocrea S, Mazzon E, Dugo L, et al. Protective effects of N‐acetylcysteine on lung injury and red blood cell modification induced by carrageenan in the rat. FASEB J 2001;15:1187–1200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Schmid G, Li Bianchi E, Straface E, et al. N‐acetylcysteine (NAC) counteracts erythrocyte damage and is useful in the management of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:A227.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    Jankowska R, Passowicz-Muszynska E, Medrala W, Banas T, Marcinkowska A. The influence of N‐acetylcysteine on chemiluminescence of granulocytes in peripheral blood of patients with chronic bronchitis. Pneumonol Alergol Pol 1993;61:586–591.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. ↵
    De Backer W, van Overveld F, Vandekerckhove K. Sputum ECP levels in COPD patients decrease after treatment with N‐acetylcysteine (NAC). Eur Respir J 1997;12:225s.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    Riise GC, Qvarfordt I, Larsson S, Eliasson V, Andersson BA. Inhibitory effect of N‐acetylcysteine on adherence of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae to human oropharyngeal epithelial cells in vitro. Respiration 2000;67:552–558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    Bergstrand H, Björnson A, Eklund A, et al. Stimuli-induced superoxide radical generation in vitro by human alveolar macrophages from smokers: modulation by N‐acetylcysteine treatment in vivo. J Free Radic Biol Med 1986;2:119–127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Eklund A, Eriksson O, Hakansson L, et al. Oral N‐acetylcysteine reduces selected humoral markers of inflammatory cell activity in BAL fluid from healthy smokers: correlation to effects on cellular variables. Eur Respir J 1988;1:832–838.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    Marui N, Offermann MK, Swerlick R, et al. Vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 (VCAM‐1) gene transcription and expression are regulated through an antioxidant-sensitive mechanism in human vascular endothelial cells. J Clin Invest 1993;92:1866–1874.
  70. ↵
    Streightoff F, Redman CE, DeLong DC. In vivo antiviral chemotherapy. II. Anti-influenza action of compounds affecting mucous secretions. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 1966;6:503–508.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. ↵
    Knobil K, Choi AM, Weigand GW, Jacoby DB. Role of oxidants in influenza virus-induced gene expression. Am J Physiol 1998;274:L134–L142.
  72. ↵
    Akaike T, Ando M, Oda T, et al. Dependence on O2·− generation by xanthine oxidase of pathogenesis of influenza virus infection in mice. J Clin Invest 1990;85:739–745.
  73. ↵
    Biagioli MC, Kaul P, Singh I, Turner RB. The role of oxidative stress in rhinovirus induced elaboration of IL‐8 by respiratory epithelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med 1999;26:454–462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    Dekhuijzen PNR, Aben KKH, Dekker I, et al. Increased exhalation of hydrogen peroxide in patients with stable and unstable COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:813–816.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. ↵
    Kasielski M, Nowak D. Long-term administration of N‐acetylcysteine decreases hydrogen peroxide exhalation in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2001;95:448–456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  76. ↵
    De Benedetto F, Aceto A, Formisano S, et al. Long-term treatment with N‐acetylcysteine (NAC) decreases hydrogen peroxide level in exhaled air of patients with moderate COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:A725.
    OpenUrl
  77. ↵
    Braga PC, Allegra L. Drugs in Bronchial MucologyNew York, NY, Raven Press, 1989; pp. 77–102.
  78. ↵
    Nightingale JA, Rogers DF. Should drugs affecting mucus properties be used in COPD?. Clinical evidenceIn: Similowski T, Whitelaw WA, Derenne JP, editors. Clinical Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseNew York, NY, Basle, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2002; pp. 405–425.
  79. ↵
    Sheffner AL, Medler EM, Jacobs LW, Sarett HP. The in vitro reduction in viscosity of human tracheobronchial secretions by acetylcysteine. Am Rev Respir Dis 1964;90:721–729.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    Martin R, Litt M, Marriott C. The effect of mucolytic agents on the rheologic and transport properties of canine tracheal mucus. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980;121:495–500.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  81. ↵
    Rogers DF, Jeffery PK. Inhibition by oral N‐acetylcysteine of cigarette smoke-induced “bronchitis” in the rat. Exp Lung Res 1986;10:267–283.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  82. ↵
    Rogers DF, Turner NC, Marriott C, Jeffery PK. Oral N‐acetylcysteine or S‐carboxymethylcysteine inhibit cigarette smoke-induced hypersecretion of mucus in rat larynx and trachea in situ. Eur Respir J 1989;2:955–960.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    Rogers DF, Godfrey RW, Majumdar S, Jeffery PK. Oral N‐acetylcysteine speeds reversal of cigarette smoke-induced mucous cell hyperplasia in the rat. Exp Lung Res 1988;14:19–35.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  84. ↵
    Tattersall AB, Bridgman KM, Huitson A. Acetylcysteine (Fabrol) in chronic bronchitis – a study in general practice. J Int Med Res 1983;11:279–284.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. ↵
    Multicenter Study Group. Long-term oral acetylcysteine in chronic bronchitis. A double-blind controlled study. Eur J Respir Dis 1980;61: Suppl. 111, 93–108.
    OpenUrl
  86. ↵
    Riise GC, Larsson S, Larsson P, Jeansson S, Andersson BA. The intrabronchial microbial flora in chronic bronchitis patients: a target for N‐acetylcysteine therapy?. Eur Respir J 1994;7:94–101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. ↵
    De Flora S, Grassi C, Carati L. Attenuation of influenza symptomatology and improvement of immunological parameters due to long-term treatment with N‐acetylcysteine. Eur Respir J 1997;10:1535–1541.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  88. ↵
    Lundbäck B, Lindström M, Andersson S, Nyström L, Rosenhall L, Stjernberg N. Possible effect of acetylcysteine on lung function. Eur Respir J 1992;5: Suppl. 15, 289s.
    OpenUrl
  89. ↵
    Stey C, Steurer J, Bachmann S, Medici TC, Tramer MR. The effect of oral N‐acetylcysteine in chronic bronchitis: a quantitative systematic review. Eur Respir J 2000;16:253–262.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    Grassi C, Morandini GC. A controlled trial of intermittent oral acetylcysteine in the long-term treatment of chronic bronchitis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1976;9:393–396.
    OpenUrl
  91. Aylward M, Maddock J, Dewland P. Clinical evaluation of acetylcysteine in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis: a balanced double-blind trial with placebo control. Eur J Respir Dis 1980;61: Suppl. 111, 81–89.
    OpenUrl
  92. Boman G, Backer U, Larsson S, Melander B, Wahlander L. Oral acetylcysteine reduces exacerbation rate in chronic bronchitis: report of a trial organized by the Swedish Society for Pulmonary Diseases. Eur J Respir Dis 1983;64:405–415.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  93. Borgia M, Sepe N, Ori-Belometti M, Borgia M. Confronto tra acetilcisteina e placebo nel trattamento a lungo termine della bronchite cronica. Gaz Med It 1981;140:467–472.
    OpenUrl
  94. British Thoracic Society Research Committee. Oral N‐acetylcysteine and exacerbation rates in patients with chronic bronchitis and severe airways obstruction. Thorax 1985;40:832–835.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. Meister R. Langzeittherapie mit Acetylcystein Retard-Tabletten bei Patienten mit chronischer Bronchitis. Eine doppelblinde-placebokontrollierte Studie. Forum Prakt Allg Artz 1986;25:18–22.
    OpenUrl
  96. Parr GD, Huitson A. Oral Fabrol (oral N‐acetyl-cysteine) in chronic bronchitis. Br J Dis Chest 1987;81:341–348.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    Rasmussen JB, Glennon C. Reduction in days of illness after long-term treatment with N‐acetylcysteine controlled-release tablets in patients with chronic bronchitis. Eur Respir J 1988;1:351–355.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  98. Hansen NCG, Skriver A, Brorsen-Riis L, et al. Orally administered N‐acetylcysteine may improve general well-being in patients with mild chronic bronchitis. Respir Med 1994;88:531–535.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  99. ↵
    Jackson IM, Barnes J, Cooksey P. Efficacy and tolerability of oral acetylcysteine (Fabrol) in chronic bronchitis: a double-blind placebo controlled study. J Int Med Res 1984;12:198–206.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  100. ↵
    Grandjean EM, Berthet P, Ruffmann R, Leuenberger P. Efficacy of oral long-term N‐acetylcysteine in chronic bronchopulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of published double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Clin Ther 2000;22:209–221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  101. ↵
    Poole PJ, Black PN. Oral mucolytic drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review. BMJ 2001;322:1271–1274.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  102. ↵
    Decramer M, Dekhuijzen PNR, Troosters T, et al. The Bronchitis Randomized On NAC Cost-Utility Study (BRONCUS): hypothesis and design. BRONCUS‐trial Committee. Eur Respir J 2001;17:329–336.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 23 Issue 4 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antioxidant properties of N‐acetylcysteine: their relevance in relation to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Antioxidant properties of N‐acetylcysteine: their relevance in relation to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
P.N.R. Dekhuijzen
European Respiratory Journal Apr 2004, 23 (4) 629-636; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00016804

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Antioxidant properties of N‐acetylcysteine: their relevance in relation to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
P.N.R. Dekhuijzen
European Respiratory Journal Apr 2004, 23 (4) 629-636; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.04.00016804
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Oxidants and antioxidants in the lungs of patients with COPD
    • Alterations in the lung caused by oxidative stress
    • Pharmacotherapy of COPD
    • Pharmacology of N‐acetylcysteine
    • Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects
    • Clinical efficacy of N‐acetylcysteine in COPD
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying outcome measures for severe asthma
  • Core Outcome Measures sets for paediatric and adult Severe Asthma
  • Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in COPD
Show more Reviews

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society