Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Proteolysis in the lung

S.D. Shapiro
European Respiratory Journal 2003 22: 30s-32s; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00000903a
S.D. Shapiro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Pulmonary emphysema is a major component of the morbidity and mortality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a condition that has become the fourth leading cause of death in the USA, and is becoming epidemic worldwide. Emphysema is defined as enlargement of peripheral airspaces of the lung including respiratory bronchioles, alveolar ducts and alveoli, accompanied by destruction of the walls of these structures. The pathogenesis of emphysema can be dissected into three interrelated events: 1) chronic exposure to cigarette smoke may lead to inflammatory cell recruitment within the terminal airspaces of the lung; 2) these inflammatory cells release elastolytic proteinases that damage the extracellular matrix of the lung; and 3) ineffective repair of elastin and perhaps other extracellular matrix components result in pulmonary emphysema.

Proteases in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Inherited deficiency of α1‐antitrypsin (α1‐AT), the primary inhibitor of neutrophil elastase (NE), predisposes individuals to early onset emphysema, and intrapulmonary instillation of elastolytic enzymes in experimental animals causes emphysema. Together, these findings led to the elastase/antielastase hypothesis for the pathogenesis of emphysema, which was proposed ∼40 yrs ago and remains the prevailing concept today. While the capacity of NE to initiate emphysema in patients deficient in α1‐AT is clear, the proteinases involved in the pathogenesis of the common form of emphysema associated with cigarette smoking is more complicated. In addition to NE, neutrophil primary granules contain other elastolytic serine proteinases including, cathepsin G and proteinase 3, and secondary granules possess matrix metalloproteinases; MMP‐8, a collagenase and MMP‐9, a 92 kDa gelatinase. While, macrophages are prominent inflammatory cells in smokers' lungs, the capacity of macrophages to degrade elastin was controversial until cysteine proteinases including cathepsins S and L were identified (K the most potent elastase has not been identified in lung macrophages). The author's group identified several MMPs produced by alveolar and interstitial macrophages, including elastolytic MMP‐9 and MMP‐12.

Expression of most of these proteinases has been associated with human COPD. To determine directly the contribution of MMP‐12 to pulmonary emphysema, a murine model of cigarette smoke­induced emphysema was developed, and MMP‐12­/­ mice and wildtype (MMP‐12+/+) littermates were subjected to chronic cigarette smoke exposure. Application of wildtype (MMP‐12+/+) mice to long­term cigarette smoke exposure led to inflammatory cell recruitment followed by alveolar space enlargement similar to the pathological defect in humans. However, mice deficient in macrophage elastase (MMP‐12­/­) were protected from development of emphysema despite long­term smoke exposure. MMP‐12­/­ mice also failed to recruit monocytes into their lungs in response to cigarette smoke 1. Since MMP‐12 and most other MMPs are only expressed upon differentiation of monocytes to macrophages, it appeared unlikely that monocytes require MMP‐12 for transvascular migration. The working hypothesis is that MMP‐12‐deficient macrophages have impaired chemotaxis. This could be in part secondary to MMP‐12‐mediated chemokine activation or generation of elastin fragments, known for many years to be chemotactic for monocytes, and appears to play a role in this condition.

Recently, several other genetically engineered mice have confirmed the capacity of MMPs/MMP‐12 to cause airspace enlargement. Inducible, lung­specific transgenic mice expressing either the T‐helper cell (Th) type‐2 cytokine interleukin‐13 2, 3, or the Th1 cytokine interferon (IFN)‐γ 4, induce expression of MMP‐12, MMP‐9, and cysteine proteinases with subsequent airspace enlargement. IFN‐γ‐mediated MMP induction is likely indirect given the finding that IFN‐γ inhibits macrophage MMP production. Wert et al. 5 found that surfactant protein‐D­/­ mice demonstrate macrophage activation MMP production and consequent emphysema. Finally, αvβ6‐/­ mice develop macrophage accumulation in the lung, MMP‐12 activation and airspace enlargement with age. Emphysema is abrogated upon crossing αvβ6‐/­ with MMP‐12‐/­ mice. This study suggests that transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β serves to inhibit MMP‐12 production under normal circumstances and in the absence of integrin, there is diminished TGF‐β and enhanced MMP‐12 leading to emphysema 6. Serine proteinases, particularly NE, are also involved. NE­/­ mice developed only 40% as much airspace enlargement as wildtype mice (unpublished data). Several interactions were also found between NE and MMPs. MMPs degrade α1‐AT and NE degrades tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases, potentiating the proteinase activity of each other. NE mediates monocyte migration, and MMP‐12 may influence acute neutrophil accumulation via tumour necrosis factor‐α shedding 7.

Clearly, there are several MMPs expressed in association with emphysema. The major lesson to be gained from the murine model of cigarette smoke­induced emphysema is not that MMP‐12 is the sole proteinase responsible for human disease, but that macrophages have the capacity to cause emphysema upon recruitment and activation by cigarette smoke. In mice, the predominant macrophage proteinase is MMP‐12; human macrophages probably have a broader spectrum of MMPs (including MMP‐12). Moreover, serine proteinases and MMPs interact to augment each others destructive activity. Also, human COPD may be exacerbated by recurrent airway infections. These infections are associated with neutrophil recruitment, whose proteinases may also contribute to destructive changes.

Proteinases in cell movement

A basic function of MMPs has been thought to be to impart the ability of cells to move and to traverse tissue barriers. Tumour cells in particular use these enzymes to clear paths, promoting local tissue invasion and distant metastasis. Extrapolating from these observations of tumour cells, it was speculated that inflammatory cells use their cadre of MMPs to move through tissue barriers in a similar fashion. Indeed, this has been seen to occur.

Yet there has been some confusion, because it was obvious that these enzymes do more than simply clear road­blocks from the path of migrating neutrophils. Moreover, cells have other ways to move. For example, fibroblasts normally take straight paths, degrading the extracellular matrix as they go. However, in the presence of MMP inhibitors, such cells change both their pattern of movement and their shape as they pick their way through microscopic gaps in the matrix. Neutrophils, meanwhile, are known to be the most “flexible” inflammatory cells, able to weave through tissue barriers in the absence of protein­digesting enzymes. Recently, Li et al. 8 have shown that MMP‐7 promotes neutrophil migration into the lung following bleomycin “shedding” syndecan‐1‐KC complexes to form a chemical gradient 8.

To complicate the picture still further, MMPs may also limit inflammation. McQuibban et al. 9 showed that some of these enzymes process and inactivate the chemokines to which other inflammatory cells (monocytes) respond, thereby restricting monocyte migration into sites of injury. Altogether, this suggests a feedback mechanism whereby MMPs initially promote cell influx to damaged areas, subsequently the excessive quantities of these enzymes turn off the proinflammatory chemokine signals.

Proteinases as antimicrobial agents

Proteinases have not traditionally been thought to play a significant role in host defence although some attention has gone to neutrophil serine proteinases. The recent finding by Wilson et al. 10 that gut epithelial cell MMP‐7 induces activation of defensins was the first evidence that MMPs may be indirectly involved in antimicrobial activity. The role and abundance of epithelial cell­derived defensins in the lung has been questioned. The author's group propose that macrophages and their product MMP‐12 play a significant role as the initial line of host defence when bacteria escape upper airway defenses and arrive in the alveolar space.

Neutrophil serine proteinases

When neutrophils encounter bacteria they internalise them within phagosomes that fuse to lysosomes exposing them to oxidative and nonoxidative mechanisms of killing. Proteinases and antimicrobial peptides termed defensins represent the major nonoxidative pathway. Serine proteinases, particularly NE, are becoming increasingly recognised for their importance in eliminating bacteria. The role of NE was first suspected three decades ago when Janoff and Blondin 11 showed that NE extracts can lyse cell walls of heat­killed bacteria. Yet, the role of NE in bacterial killing was largely ignored until recently. Ganz and co­workers 12, 13 found that porcine polymorphonuclear leukocytes generate extracellular microbicidal activity by elastase­mediated activation of secreted proprotegrins. Mice deficient in NE were generated and it was demonstrated that NE is required for maximal killing of Gram­negative but not Gram­positive bacteria 14, 15. NE kills Gram­negative bacteria via catalysis of specific outer membrane proteins in the outer membrane forming “holes” in the bacterial wall and allowing NE access to other intracellular bacterial target proteins 16. NE also degrades bacterial toxins, protecting the neutrophil from their adverse effects 17.

Matrix metalloproteinases as antimicrobial agents

As mentioned above, there is limited data regarding the role of MMPs in antimicrobial killing. As a negative control for NE‐mediated killing, MMP‐9 was exposed to bacteria without effect on the growth of Gram­negative or Gram­positive bacteria. As shown in preliminary data, the author's group has been unable to detect a direct ability of any major MMP to limit bacterial growth with the exception of MMP‐12. MMP‐7, while not directly antimicrobial, is able to activate defensins in the gut. As opposed to wildtype mice, extracts from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of MMP‐7­/­ mice did not possess activated defensins. Moreover, MMP‐7­/­ mice had altered flora and poorer clearance of bacteria instilled in the GI tract.

Conclusion

Preliminary data shows that MMP‐12 represents the first MMP with direct antimicrobial activity. In the absence of MMP‐12, septic mice have markedly increased bacterial loads in the lung. MMP‐12­/­ mice have a poorer survival in response to models of Gram­positive pneumonia. It has also been demonstrated that macrophages require MMP‐12 for maximal intracellular bacterial killing.

This study represents the first intracellular function identified for a matrix metalloproteinase. Finally, these studies also strongly support the importance of the lung macrophage in the initial host defence against bacteria.

    • © ERS Journals Ltd

    References

    1. ↵
      Hautamaki RD, Kobayashi DK, Senior RM, Shapiro SD. Requirement for macrophage elastase for cigarette smoke­induced emphysema in mice. Science 1997;277:2002–2005.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      Zheng T, Zhu Z, Wang Z, et al. Inducible targeting of IL‐13 to the adult lung causes matrix metalloproteinase­ and cathepsin­dependent emphysema. J Clin Invest 2000;106:1081–1093.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      Wang Z, Zheng T, Zhu Z, et al. Interferon γ induction of pulmonary emphysema in the adult murine lung. J Exp Med 2000;192:1587–1599.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      Lanone S, Zheng T, Zhu Z, et al. Overlapping and enzyme­specific contributions of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‐9 and MMP‐12 to the pathogenesis of IL‐13‐induced inflammation and alveolar remodeling in the lung. J Clin Invest 2002;110:463–474.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      Wert S, Yoshida M, LeVine A, et al. Increased metalloproteinase activity, oxidant production, and emphysema in surfactant protein D gene­inactivated mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:5972–5977.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      Morris DG, Huang X, Kaminski N, et al. Loss of integrin­mediated TGF‐beta activation causes MMP‐12 dependent pulmonary emphysema. Nature 2003;422:169–173.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      Churg A, Wang RD, Tai H, et al. Macrophage metalloelastase mediates acute cigarette smoke­induced inflammation via tumour necrosis factor‐α release. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:1083–1089.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      Li Q, Park PW, Wilson CL, Parks WC. Matrilysin shedding of syndecan‐1 regulates chemokine mobilization and transepithelial efflux of neutrophils in acute lung injury. Cell 2002;111:635–646.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      McQuibban GA, Gong JH, Tam EM, McCulloch CA, Clark­Lewis I, Overall CM. Inflammation dampened by gelatinase A cleavage of monocyte chemoattractant protein‐3. Science 2000;289:1202–1206.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      Wilson C, Ouellette A, Satchell D, et al. Regulation of intestinal α‐defensin activation by the metalloproteinase matrilysin in innate host defense. Science 1999;286:113–117.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      Janoff A, Blondin J. The effect of human granulocyte elastase on bacterial suspensions. Lab Invest 1973;29:454–457.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      Panyutich A, Shi J, Boutz PL, Zhao C, Ganz T. Porcine polymorphonuclear leukocytes generate extracellular microbicidal activity by elastase­mediated activation of secreted proprotegrins. Infect Immun 1997;65:978–985.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      Shi J, Ganz T. The role of protegrins and other elastase­activated polypeptides in the bactericidal properties of porcine inflammatory fluids. Infect Immun 1998;66:3611–3617.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      Belaaouaj A, McCarthy R, Baumann M, et al. Mice lacking neutrophil elastase reveal impaired host defense against gram negative pathogens. Nature Med 1998;4:615–619.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      Tkalcevic J, Novelli M, Phylactides M, Iredale JP, Segal AW, Roes J. Impaired immunity and enhanced resistance to endotoxin in the absence of neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G. Immunity 2000;12:201–210.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      Belaaouaj A, Kim KS, Shapiro SD. Degradation of outer membrane protein A in Escherichia coli killing by neutrophil elastase. Science 2000;289:1185–1187.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      Weinrauch Y, Drujan D, Shapiro SD, Weiss J, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil elastase targets virulence factors of enterobaceria. Nature 2002;417:91–94.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 22 Issue 44 suppl Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Proteolysis in the lung
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    Proteolysis in the lung
    S.D. Shapiro
    European Respiratory Journal Sep 2003, 22 (44 suppl) 30s-32s; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00000903a

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    Proteolysis in the lung
    S.D. Shapiro
    European Respiratory Journal Sep 2003, 22 (44 suppl) 30s-32s; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00000903a
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • Proteases in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
      • Proteinases in cell movement
      • Proteinases as antimicrobial agents
      • Neutrophil serine proteinases
      • Matrix metalloproteinases as antimicrobial agents
      • Conclusion
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Systematic assessment of respiratory health in illness susceptible athletes
    • Identifying early PAH biomarkers in systemic sclerosis
    • Viable virus aerosol propagation by PAP circuit leak
    Show more Original Articles

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society