Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Evidence of biological efficacy for prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in patients with unresolving ARDS

G.U. Meduri, P. Carratu, A.X. Freire
European Respiratory Journal 2003 22: 57s-64s; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00420903
G.U. Meduri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Carratu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.X. Freire
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a disease of multifactorial etiology characterised by rapid development of severe diffuse and nonhomogenous inflammation of the pulmonary lobules causing life-threatening hypoxaemic respiratory failure. The current authors tested a therapeutic intervention on a previously defined pathophysiological model of ARDS. The model was defined by investigating, during the natural history of ARDS, the relationship among the three fundamental elements of a disease process pathogenesis, structural alterations, and functional consequences. In these studies, the present authors provided biological and morphological evidence indicating that ARDS patients failing to improve after 1 week of mechanical ventilation (unresolving ARDS) have intense and protracted (dysregulated) pulmonary and systemic inflammatory and neo-fibrogenetic activity.

Nuclear factor-κB and the glucocorticoid receptor have diametrically opposed functions in regulating inflammation. This chapter will review recent data indicating that poor outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome might be related in part to failure of the activated glucocorticoid receptors to downregulate the transcription of inflammatory cytokines despite elevated levels of circulating cortisol. In a small randomised study of patients with unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome, the current authors have shown that prolonged glucocorticoid supplementation improved all aspects of glucocorticoid receptors function and enhanced glucocorticoid-mediated anti-inflammatory action by interfering with nuclear factor-κB activation.

  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • biology
  • glucocorticoid
  • glucocorticoid receptor
  • nuclear factor-κB
  • outcome

This work was supported by the Baptist Memorial Health Care Foundation and the Assisi Foundation of Memphis.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a term applied to a clinical condition of multifactorial etiology associated with a relatively specific morphological lesion termed “diffuse alveolar damage” 1. This chapter will review studies that have tested a therapeutic intervention (glucocorticoid (GC) treatment) on a previously defined pathophysiological model of ARDS 2. The model was developed by investigating during the longitudinal course of ARDS, the relationship between the three fundamental elements of a disease process pathogenesis, structural alterations, and functional consequences 3.

At presentation, (early) ARDS manifests with severe, diffuse, and nonhomogenous acute host inflammatory response (HIR) of the pulmonary lobules leading to a breakdown in the barrier and gas exchange function of the lung. Injury to the alveolo-capillary membrane (ACM) causes flooding of the airspaces with protein-rich neutrophilic oedema fluid, resulting in severe gas exchange and lung compliance abnormalities 4. While a regulated inflammatory response is critical to survival 5, a major predictor of poor outcome in ARDS patients is persistence of pulmonary and systemic inflammation after 1 week of lung injury 6, 7. Failure to downregulate the production of inflammatory mediators (dysregulated HIR) is associated with maladaptive lung repair and inability to improve ACM permeability, gas exchange, and lung mechanics over time.

The lung injury score (LIS) quantifies the physiological respiratory impairment in ARDS through the use of a four-point score based on the levels of positive end-expiratory pressure, arterial oxygen tension: inspiratory oxygen fraction, the static lung compliance, and the degree of infiltration present on chest radiograph 8. Patients failing to improve the LIS or its components by day 7 of ARDS (nonimprovers) have a poor outcome 9–11. The present authors have previously reported that patients meeting predefined criteria for unresolving ARDS (LIS on day 7 of ARDS ≥2.5 and <1‐point reduction from day 1 of ARDS) have a mortality rate in excess of 80% (table 1⇓) 12.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Definitions of resolving and unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

Model of translational research

Because there is no animal model to study the progression of ARDS, translational clinical research has an important role to play for advancing understanding in this field. At the University of Tennessee the current authors have followed a “holistic” level of inquiry in constructing a pathophysiological model of ARDS attempting to fit pathogenesis (biology) with morphological (pathology) and clinical (physiology) findings observed during the longitudinal course of the disease (fig. 1⇓) 3. Most importantly, the current authors have attempted to define the differences over time between patients with an adaptive (resolving ARDS) versus maladaptive (unresolving ARDS) reparative response, and the time span of disease reversibility (prior to reaching end-stage disease) that is potentially amenable to anti-inflammatory treatment. Patients failing to improve after 1 week of ARDS onset (unresolving ARDS) were also studied to investigate the effect of prolonged anti-inflammatory (GC) treatment. In relation to the treatment investigation, it was assumed that the closer the treatment intervention was to the core pathogenetic mechanisms of the diseases, the more likely treatment would affect all “layers” of the disease process (fig. 1⇓). In this context, a positive or negative biological and physiological response to treatment was used to test the pathogenetic relevance (central versus peripheral) of the factor or pathway affected by treatment.

Fig. 1.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.—

Disease elements.

Over the last decade scientific understanding of the intermediary events that occur between the reception of a biological signal at the cell membrane, and the eventual conversion of that signal to a change in gene expression at the nuclear level (i.e. signal transduction) has grown immensely 13. It is now recognised that two cellular signalling pathways are central to the regulation of inflammation, the stimulatory nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and the inhibitory glucocorticoid receptor (GR)‐α‐mediated signal transduction cascades. In unstimulated cells, both NF-κB and GR are predominantly sequestered in the cytoplasm.

Nuclear factor-κB

NF-κB is recognised as the central transcription factor that drives the inflammatory response to insults. NF-κB activation is an essential step in the experimental development of neutrophilic lung inflammation 14–16. NF-κB is found in essentially all cell types and is involved in activation of an exceptionally large number of target genes (over 100) 17. NF-κB is a heterogenous collection of dimers, composed of various combinations of the NF-κB/Rel family. The p65:p50 heterodimer was the first form of NF-κB to be identified and is the most abundant in most cell types 17. NF-κB is maintained in an inactive form by sequestration in the cytoplasm through interaction with inhibitory proteins (IκBs; most important being IκBα) (fig. 2⇓) 18. Activation of NF-κB is a rapid, immediate early event that occurs within minutes after exposure to a relevant inducer, including innate immunity stimulating molecules (e.g. lipopolysaccharide), double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), physical and chemical stresses, and inflammatory cytokines (e.g. tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α and interleukin (IL) ‐1β). In response to these various stimuli, the latent NF-κB/IκB complex is activated by phosphorylation and proteolytic degradation of IκB, with exposure of the NF-κB nuclear localisation sequence 17. Proteolytic degradation of IκB is an irreversible step in the signalling pathway that constitutes a commitment to transcriptional activation 17.

Fig. 2.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.—

Interaction between nuclear factor (NF)-κB and the activated glucocorticoid receptor (GR). When cells are stimulated by inflammatory signals, specific kinases phosphorylate the inhibitory protein IκB and cause its rapid degradation. The activated form of NF-κB then moves to the nucleus initiating the transcription of the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, cell adhesion molecules (e.g. intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)), and inflammation-associated enzymes (cyclooxygenase (COX), phospholipase A2 (PLA2), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)). Cortisol or exogenous glucocorticoids (GCs) freely cross into the cytoplasm and bind to their specific GC receptors (GRα) to form the activated receptor (GC-GRα). GC-GRα complexes may influence NF-κB activity in 5 major ways: 1) physically interacting with the p65 subunit with formation of an inactive (GC-GRα/NF-κB) complex; 2) inducing the synthesis of the inhibitory protein IκBα via interaction with glucocorticoid-responsive element deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in the promoter of the IκB gene; 3) blocking degradation of IκBα via enhanced synthesis of interleukin (IL)-10; 4) impairing tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α‐induced degradation of IκBα; and 5) competing for limited amounts of GR co-activators such as CREB-binding protein and steroid receptor coactivator‐1. GC-GRα may also decrease the stability of mRNA of several pro-inflammatory cytokines and other molecules. Products of the genes that are stimulated by NF-κB activate this transcription factor. Thus, TNF‐α and IL‐1β both activate and are activated by NF-κB, by forming a positive regulatory loop that amplifies and perpetuates inflammation.

The liberated NF-κB then translocates into the nucleus and binds to promoter regions of target genes to initiate the transcription of multiple cytokines including TNF‐α, and the interleukins IL‐1β, IL‐2, IL‐6, chemokines such as IL‐8, cell adhesion molecules (e.g. intercellular adhesion molecule‐1, E‐selectin), interferon, receptors involved in immune recognition such as members of the major histocompatibility complex, proteins involved in antigen presentation, receptors required for neutrophil adhesion and migration, and inflammation-associated enzymes (cyclooxygenase, phospholipase A2 (PLA2), inducible nitric oxide synthase) 18, 19. Products of the genes that are stimulated by NF-κB activate this transcription factor. Thus, TNF‐α and IL‐1β both activate and are activated by NF-κB, by forming a positive regulatory loop that amplifies and perpetuates inflammation 20. NF-κB also operates in conjunction with other transcription factors, including activator protein‐1 (AP‐1) 21.

Glucocorticoid receptor

Peripherally generated TNF‐α, IL‐1β, and IL‐6 activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis independently at some or all of its levels 22, 23. The HPA axis responds in a graded manner to greater intensities of stress with increased production of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and GCs. Due to their hormonal and lipophilic nature, GCs pass freely through the cell membrane. GCs exert most of their effects by activating ubiquitously distributed (2,000 to 30,000 per cell) cytoplasmic heat shock protein-complexed GR with formation of GC-GR complexes 24. It is now appreciated that the GC-GR complexes modulate transcription in a hormone-dependent manner by binding as a dimer to glucocorticoid-responsive elements (GREs) located in the promoter regions of GC responsive genes and by interfering with the activity of other transcription factors such as NF-κB on genes regulated by these factors 25. As a dimer and/or a monomer, GR-mediated transcriptional interference is achieved by five important mechanisms (fig. 2⇑): 1) physically interacting with the p65 subunit and formation of an inactive (GR-NF-κB) complex 24; 2) by inducing the transcription of the inhibitory protein IκBα gene 24, 26, 27; 3) by blocking degradation of IκBα via enhanced synthesis of IL-10 28–30; 4) by impairing TNF‐α‐induced degradation of IκBα 31, 32 and 5) by competing for limited amounts of GR co-activators such as CREB-binding protein and steroid receptor coactivator‐1 33. In addition to the transcriptional modulation described above, GCs also influence the processing of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and translation of proteins probably through transactivation or transrepression of genes that regulate mRNA stability and translation 34.

Inflammation-associated glucocorticoid inadequacy/resistance

GCs as end-effectors of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis are the most important natural inhibitors of inflammation 35. However, endogenous GCs are not always effective in suppressing life-threatening systemic inflammation, even though the degree of cortisolemia frequently correlates with severity of illness and mortality rate 36–39. Unquestionably, the elevation of GC secretion in nonsurvivors is inadequate to meet the needs of the concurrent inflammatory response and its adverse systemic effects. Failure to suppress inflammation could be due to tissue resistance to GCs, inadequacy of the level and duration of endogenous GC elevation to suppress an HIR gone awry, or both 40.

The concept of acquired GC resistance was first introduced by Kass and Finland 41 in 1957. These investigators suggested that increased blood cortisol levels in patients with sepsis may reflect a block to steroidal activity or transport, as a consequence of the infection. In this situation, a small increase in blood levels with a low (equal or less than physiological) dose of exogenous GCs was believed to be sufficient for facilitating the passage of steroids into host cells 41. GR-mediated resistance was originally described as a primary inherited familial syndrome 42, 43 and was recently recognised as an “acquired” condition. Among others, acquired immune tissue-specific GR resistance has been described in patients with asthma 44–47, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) 48 and severe sepsis 49.

Recent in vitro studies have shown that cytokines may induce resistance to GCs by reducing GR binding affinity to cortisol and/or GREs 50–52. Such abnormalities of GR function were demonstrated in T‐cells incubated with a combination of IL‐2 and IL‐4 51. IL‐1, IL‐6, and interferon (IFN)‐γ 50 or IL-13 52. GC resistance was induced in a cytokine concentration-dependent fashion and was reversed by the removal of cytokines 51. GR-mediated resistance in the presence of systemic inflammation was also studied in experimental models of sepsis and sepsis-induced ARDS 49, 53, 54. In a sheep model of sepsis-induced ARDS, maximal binding capacity of GR decreased continuously after endotoxin infusion, while there was a marked elevation of cortisol levels 53. The reduced GR binding correlated negatively (r=−0.87, p<0.01) with PLA2 activity, a gene that is stimulated by NF-κB. In a rat model of septic shock, GR blockade by mifepristone (RU 486) exacerbated the physiological and pathological changes induced by endotoxemia 54. PLA2 activity in rats with 80% GR blockade was more marked than in those with 50% GR blockade 54. Monocytes of patients with sepsis developed near total GC resistance in vitro, when cytokines, especially IL‐2, were added 49.

Several inflammatory cytokines, including TNF‐α, IL‐1β, and IL‐6 activate NF-κB 55. It has been proposed that when cytokine-activated NF-κB forms protein-protein complexes with activated GR, the availability and activity of effective GR molecules are reduced 24, 47. This functional reduction in GR availability is associated with decreased GR-GRE DNA binding and GC-mediated anti-inflammatory activity 24, 47.

Longitudinal studies of biomarkers of host inflammatory response in acute respiratory distress syndrome

The current authors previously reported data to support a single “hit” model for ARDS progression, where degree and duration of the HIR determined the adaptive versus maladaptive evolution of the reparative process and final outcome. In a series of studies 56–59 the current authors have shown that patients with ARDS failing to improve in the first week of mechanical ventilation (unresolving ARDS) had biological and morphological evidence of intense and protracted pulmonary and systemic inflammatory and neo-fibrogenetic activity. Over time, patients with unresolving ARDS had persistent and exaggerated elevation in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) levels of TNF‐α, IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, 56–59 soluble intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 (sICAM‐1) 58 and procollagen aminoterminal propeptide type I (PINP) and type III (PIIINP) 60. During the first week of ARDS, pro-inflammatory cytokine levels declined in all survivors, while levels remained persistently elevated in all nonsurvivors. Recent data from the present authors' group indicate that cytokine levels reflected true biological activity 61. Furthermore, histological findings of open lung biopsies obtained in patients with unresolving ARDS (day 15±7 of mechanical ventilation) provided morphological evidence of persistent activation of the HIR. Histological findings in previously spared pulmonary lobules included new injury to the endothelial and epithelial surfaces with associated intravascular coagulation and extravascular fibrin deposition 6, 7. Histological findings in previously involved pulmonary lobules included progressive fibroproliferative obliteration with transformation of the initially fibrinous exudate into myxoid connective tissue matrix and eventually into dense acellular fibrous tissue 6, 7. Histological differences between survivors and nonsurvivors placed advanced pulmonary fibrosis with acellular fibrosis and loss of alveolar architecture at the upper boundary of disease reversibility 6.

Glucocorticoid treatment of unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome

Large randomised studies have previously shown that a short course (≤24 h) of high-dose methylprednisolone (MP) in early ARDS is ineffective 10, 62–64. Table 2⇓ shows the differences between the older trials in early ARDS and the newer one in unresolving ARDS. The reference of Meduri 65 provides an historical review of GC treatment in sepsis and ARDS in relation to the evolving pathophysiological understanding of systemic inflammation. Because the half-life of MP is ∼180 min, a sustained pharmacological effect in life threatening protracted lung inflammation (i.e. status asthmaticus, Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, etc.) can be achieved only with prolonged administration aimed at disease resolution. In a rat model of butylated hydroxytoluene-induced acute lung injury, GC administration was shown to be effective in decreasing lung collagen and oedema formation as long as treatment was prolonged; while withdrawal rapidly negated the positive effects of therapy 66–68. Two clinical studies demonstrated that premature discontinuation of prolonged GC administration in unresolving ARDS was associated with physiological deterioration that resolved with re-institution of treatment 69, 70. Moreover, studies suggest that premature discontinuation of GC therapy may not only lead to loss of the early treatment benefits, but may in fact be harmful. Indeed, in another study the cytokine response to lipopolysaccharide challenge in humans was significantly enhanced by a prior (12–144 h) short course of GCs 71. This observation may explain the differences in infection-related mortality between studies utilising a short course (24 h) 63 versus a prolonged course of methylprednisolone treatment 12, 72.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Comparison of old and new trials investigating methylprednisolone use in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

Similar to the original reports from Ashbaugh and Maier 69 and Hooper and Kearl 70 the current authors investigated the use of prolonged MP administration in patients with unresolving ARDS. The current authors and others have reported significant improvement in lung function during prolonged MP administration in medical 6, 70, 73, 74 and surgical 69, 75 patients with unresolving ARDS and have found that survival correlated with improvement in lung function. The current authors' studies 6, 73 defined improvement in lung function as a reduction in LIS 8 of at least one point after 10 to 14 days of MP treatment. In phase II trials involving 34 patients, mortalities of 17% were reported in 29 patients who improved lung function (responders) and 100% in 5 nonresponders 6, 73. Additional findings of phase II trials are shown in ⇓tables 3 and 4⇓.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Phase II studies evaluating methylprednisolone in unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Findings at initiation of methylprednisolone treatment

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Phase II studies evaluating methylprednisolone in unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Findings during methylprednisolone treatment

Most recently the present authors completed a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of prolonged MP treatment (MPT) in patients with unresolving ARDS 72. Methylprednisolone or placebo was given daily as intravenous push every 6 h (one-fourth of the daily dose) and changed to a single per os dose when oral intake was restored. The MP dosage regimen is shown in table 5⇓. If the patient was extubated prior to day 14, treatment was advanced to day 15 of drug therapy and tapered according to schedule 72. The protocol contained: 1) a provision for blindly crossing over patients who did not improve LIS by at least 1 point after 10 days of treatment or earlier crossover in patients with life-threatening deterioration in gas exchange and; 2) procedures for infection surveillance, including weekly bronchoscopy with bilateral BAL 72. Because MP blunts the febrile response to an infection, this latter intervention was essential for minimising the random variation generated by the potential morbidity and mortality of untreated nosocomial infections. The study was designed as a sequential phase III clinical trial and projected to recruit 100 patients. The decision to end the trial was made when the test statistic exceeded the upper boundary of the triangular test of Whitehead, and the null hypothesis was rejected at a significance <0.05 and a power >0.95.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5

Methylprednisolone treatment in unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome

The two groups were similar at study entry. After ten days, all patients in the MPT group improved (≥1 point reduction in LIS) versus 2 of 8 (25%) in the placebo group. Intensive care unit and hospital-associated mortality were significantly reduced: 0% versus 62% (p=0.002) and 12% versus 62% (p=0.03), respectively. The small number of patients may have biased the estimate of the treatment effect. The rate of complications between the two groups was similar. During MP treatment, pneumonia frequently developed in patients without fever (44%). Therefore, infection surveillance, including weekly bilateral bronchoscopic BAL, was useful for early detection of pneumonia and other serious infections. None of the recognised and appropriately treated infections developing during MP therapy affected resolution of ARDS or clinical outcome. Since the study was completed, the present authors routinely use prolonged MPT in patients with unresolving ARDS with a physiological improvement observed in 60–80% of patients.

The therapeutic anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic efficacy of prolonged MPT was assessed with serial measurements of HIR biomarkers. MPT was associated with a rapid and sustained reduction in mean plasma and BAL TNF‐α, IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, sICAM‐1, IL‐1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), soluble TNF receptor 1 and 2 (sTNFR1 and sTNFR2), PINP and PIIINP, and with increases in IL-10 and in anti-inflammatory-to-pro-inflammatory cytokine ratios (IL-1ra/IL‐1β, IL-10/TNF‐α, IL-10/IL‐1β) 59, 60, 78. Placebo administration was not associated with reductions in HIR biomarkers. The current authors believe that failure of older trials investigating massive doses of MP in early ARDS (table 2⇑) was attributable to the short duration of administration and not to timing of administration.

Evidence of inflammation-associated glucocorticoid inadequacy/resistance in unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome

Using an ex vivo model of systemic inflammation in ARDS the current authors investigated intracellular upstream and downstream events associated with DNA-binding of NF‐κB and GRα in the peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) (naive cells) obtained from a healthy volunteer (laboratory work conducted by F. Stentz, Dept of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) 79. PBLs were incubated for 3 h with 98 plasma samples obtained longitudinally from 17 patients with ARDS before and after randomisation to either placebo (n=6) or MP (n=11). The cells were processed for fractionation into cytosolic and nuclear components, ribonucleic acid (RNA) extraction, and intracellular labelling. The primary objectives of these studies were to quantify the relationships among circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines TNF‐α and IL‐1β and HPA-axis hormones (ACTH and cortisol), and intracellular activities mediated by NF-κB (NF‐κB κb‐binding and transcription of TNF‐α and IL‐1β) and GRα (GRα binding to NF‐κB, GRα binding to GRE DNA, stimulation of inhibitory protein IκBα, and stimulation of IL-10 transcription).

In the observation period prior to randomisation, the biological and physiological characteristics of the MP and placebo groups were similar. Patients had persistent elevations in plasma levels of inflammatory (TNF‐α, IL‐1β, and IL‐6) cytokines and HPA-axis (ACTH and cortisol) hormones and similar severity of organ dysfunction scores. In PBLs exposed to patients' plasma GRα-mediated activities were essentially unchanged over time, while NF-κB κb-binding and transcription of TNF‐α and IL‐1β increased over time. The current authors' hypothesised that inadequate secretion of cortisol and/or immune tissue resistance to endogenous GCs might explain the observed failure of activated GR to suppress inflammation (progressive increase in NF‐κB‐mediated activities) in the presence of persistently elevated ACTH and cortisol levels.

Patients treated with MP had rapid, progressive and sustained reductions in plasma TNF‐α, IL‐1β, IL‐6, ACTH and cortisol levels over time. These were associated with parallel improvements in pulmonary and extrapulmonary organ dysfunction scores (previously reported in reference 72). Normal PBL exposed to plasma samples collected during MP versus placebo treatment also exhibited rapid, progressive significant increases in GRα-mediated activities (GRα binding to NF-κB, GRα binding to GRE DNA, stimulation of inhibitory protein IκBα, and stimulation of IL-10 transcription), and significant reductions in NF-κB κb-binding and transcription of TNF‐α and IL‐1β. With MPT, the intracellular relations between the NF‐κB and GRα signalling pathways changed from an initial NF-κB-driven and GR-resistant state to a GR-driven and GR-sensitive one.

The current authors interpret the responses observed during methylprednisolone treatment to support the concept of inflammation-dependent acquired glucocorticoid resistance in patients with unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome. The findings also underscore the central role played by activated glucocorticoid receptor‐α in regulating inflammation and provide strong mechanistic evidence for the efficacy of prolonged methylprednisolone treatment in unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome. A controlled trial is in progress to evaluate the effect of prolonged methylprednisolone treatment initiated within 72 h of acute respiratory distress syndrome development.

    • acute respiratory distress syndrome
    • biology
    • glucocorticoid
    • glucocorticoid receptor
    • nuclear factor-κB
    • outcome
    • © ERS Journals Ltd

    References

    1. ↵
      Katzenstein AL, Bloor CM, Leibow AA. Diffuse alveolar damage - the role of oxygen, shock, and related factors. A review. Am J Pathol 1976;85:209–228.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    2. ↵
      Meduri GU. The role of the host defence response in the progression and outcome of ARDS: pathophysiological correlations and response to glucocorticoid treatment. Eur Respir J 1996;9:2650–2670.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    3. ↵
      Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL.. Cellular injury and cellular deathIn: Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL, editors. Pathologic basis of disease. 5th EdnPhiladelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1994; pp. 1–34.
    4. ↵
      Steinberg KP, Hudson LD. Acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The clinical syndrome. Clin Chest Med 2000;21:401–417.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      McKay LI, Cidlowski JA. Molecular control of immune/inflammatory responses: interactions between nuclear factor-kappa B and steroid receptor-signaling pathways. Endocr Rev 1999;20:435–459.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. ↵
      Meduri GU, Chinn AJ, Leeper KV, et al. Corticosteroid rescue treatment of progressive fibroproliferation in late ARDS. Patterns of response and predictors of outcome. Chest 1994;105:1516–1527.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      Meduri GU, Eltorky M, Winer-Muram HT. The fibroproliferative phase of late adult respiratory distress syndrome. Semin Respir Infect 1995;10:154–175.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    8. ↵
      Murray JF, Matthay MA, Luce JM, Flick MR. An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;138:720–723.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      Bone RC, Maunder R, Slotman G, et al. An early test of survival in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. The PaO2/FIO2 ratio and its differential response to conventional therapy. Prostaglandin E1 Study Group. Chest 1989;96:849–851.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      Bernard GR, Luce JM, Sprung CL, et al. High-dose corticosteroids in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1565–1570.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      Meduri GU. Host defense response and outcome in ARDS. Chest 1997;112:1154–1158.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      Headley AS, Tolley E, Meduri GU. Infections and the inflammatory response in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 1997;111:1306–1321.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      Shanley TP, Wong HR.. Signal transduction pathways in acute lung injury: NF-κB and AP‐1In: Wong HR, Shanley TP, editors. Molecular Biology of Acute Lung Injury, Molecular and Cellular Biology of Critical Care MedicineBoston, Kluwer, 2001; pp. 1–16.
    14. ↵
      Ross SD, Kron IL, Gangemi JJ, et al. Attenuation of lung reperfusion injury after transplantation using an inhibitor of nuclear factor-kappaB. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000;279:L528–536.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. Lentsch AB, Czermak BJ, Bless NM, Van Rooijen N, Ward PA. Essential role of alveolar macrophages in intrapulmonary activation of NF-kappaB. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1999;20:692–698.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      Christman JW, Sadikot RT, Blackwell TS. The role of nuclear factor-kappa B in pulmonary diseases. Chest 2000;117:1482–1487.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      Karin M, Ben-Neriah Y. Phosphorylation meets ubiquitination: the control of NF-[kappa]B activity. Annu Rev Immunol 2000;18:621–663.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      Baeuerle PA, Baltimore D. NF-kappa B: ten years after. Cell 1996;87:13–20.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      Yamamoto Y, Gaynor RB. Therapeutic potential of inhibition of the NF-kappaB pathway in the treatment of inflammation and cancer. J Clin Invest 2001;107:135–142.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      Barnes PJ, Karin M. Nuclear factor-kappa B: a pivotal transcription factor in chronic inflammatory diseases. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1066–1071.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    21. ↵
      Stein B, Baldwin AS Jr, Ballard DW, Greene WC, Angel P, Herrlich P. Cross-coupling of the NF-kappa B p65 and Fos/Jun transcription factors produces potentiated biological function. EMBO J 1993;12:3879–3891.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      Perlstein RS, Whitnall MH, Abrams JS, Mougey EH, Neta R. Synergistic roles of interleukin‐6, interleukin‐1, and tumor necrosis factor in the adrenocorticotropin response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide in vivo. Endocrinology 1993;132:946–952.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    23. ↵
      Hermus AR, Sweep CG. Cytokines and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1990;37:867–871.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      Bamberger CM, Schulte HM, Chrousos GP. Molecular determinants of glucocorticoid receptor function and tissue sensitivity to glucocorticoids. Endocr Rev 1996;17:245–261.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      Didonato JA, Saatcioglu F, Karin M. Molecular mechanisms of immunosuppression and anti-inflammatory activities by glucocorticoids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:S11–15.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    26. ↵
      Scheinman RI, Cogswell PC, Lofquist AK, Baldwin AS Jr. Role of transcriptional activation of I kappa B alpha in mediation of immunosuppression by glucocorticoids. Science 1995;270:283–286.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      Wissink S, van Heerde EC, vand der Burg B, van der Saag PT. A dual mechanism mediates repression of NF-kappa B activity by glucocorticoids. Mol Endocrinol 1998;12:355–363.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      Wang P, Wu P, Siegel MI, Egan RW, Billah MM. Interleukin (IL)-10 inhibits nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa B) activation in human monocytes. IL-10 and IL‐4 suppress cytokine synthesis by different mechanisms. J Biol Chem 1995;270:9558–9563.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    29. Lentsch AB, Shanley TP, Sarma V, Ward PA. In vivo suppression of NF-kappa B and preservation of I kappa B alpha by interleukin-10 and interleukin-13. J Clin Invest 1997;100:2443–2448.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    30. ↵
      Shames BD, Selzman CH, Meldrum DR, et al. Interleukin-10 stabilizes inhibitory kappaB-alpha in human monocytes. Shock 1998;10:389–394.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    31. ↵
      Hoffman SL, Punjabi NH, Kumala S, et al. Reduction of mortality in chloramphenicol-treated severe typhoid fever by high-dose dexamethasone. N Engl J Med 1984;310:82–88.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      Poppers DM, Schwenger P, Vilcek J. Persistent tumor necrosis factor signaling in normal human fibroblasts prevents the complete resynthesis of I kappa B‐alpha. J Biol Chem 2000;275:29587–29593.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    33. ↵
      Sheppard KA, Phelps KM, Williams AJ, et al. Nuclear integration of glucocorticoid receptor and nuclear factor-kappaB signaling by CRE-binding protein and steroid receptor coactivator‐1. J Biol Chem 1998;273:29291–29294.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    34. ↵
      Bamberger CM, Bamberger AM, de Castro M, Chrousos GP. Glucocorticoid receptor beta, a potential endogenous inhibitor of glucocorticoid action in humans. J Clin Invest 1995;95:2435–2441.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    35. ↵
      Chrousos GP. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune-mediated inflammation. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1351–1362.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    36. ↵
      Melby JC, Spink WW. Comparative studies on adrenalcortical function and cortisol metabolism in healthy adults and in patients with shock due to infection. Journal of Clinical Investigation 1958;37:1791–1798.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    37. Reincke M, Allolio B, Wurth G, Winkelmann W. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in critical illness: response to dexamethasone and corticotropin-releasing hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;77:151–156.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    38. Briegel J, Forst H, Hellinger H, Haller M. Contribution of cortisol deficiency to septic shock. Lancet 1991;338:507–508.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    39. ↵
      Annane D, Sebille V, Troche G, Raphael JC, Gajdos P, Bellissant E. A 3‐level prognostic classification in septic shock based on cortisol levels and cortisol response to corticotropin. JAMA 2000;283:1038–1045.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    40. ↵
      Meduri GU, Chrousos GP. Duration of glucocorticoid treatment and outcome in sepsis: is the right drug used the wrong way?. Chest 1998;114:355–360.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    41. ↵
      Kass EH, Finland M. Adrenocortical hormones and the management of infection. Ann Rev Med 1957;8:1–18.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    42. ↵
      Chrousos GP, Detera-Wadleigh SD, Karl M. Syndromes of glucocorticoid resistance. Annals of Internal Medicine 1993;119:1113–1124.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    43. ↵
      Lamberts SW, Koper JW, Biemond P, den Holder FH, de Jong FH. Cortisol receptor resistance: the variability of its clinical presentation and response to treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992;74:313–321.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    44. ↵
      Lane SJ, Lee TH. Glucocorticoid receptor characteristics in monocytes of patients with corticosteroid-resistant bronchial asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;143:1020–1024.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    45. Sher ER, Leung DY, Surs W, et al. Steroid-resistant asthma. Cellular mechanisms contributing to inadequate response to glucocorticoid therapy. J Clin Invest 1994;93:33–39.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    46. Adcock IM, Lane SJ, Brown CR, Peters MJ, Lee TH, Barnes PJ. Differences in binding of glucocorticoid receptor to DNA in steroid-resistant asthma. J Immunol 1995;154:3500–3505.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    47. ↵
      Barnes PJ, Greening AP, Crompton GK. Glucocorticoid resistance in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:S125–140.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    48. ↵
      Norbiato G, Bevilacqua M, Vago T, et al. Cortisol resistance in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992;74:608–613.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    49. ↵
      Molijn GJ, Spek JJ, van Uffelen JC, et al. Differential adaptation of glucocorticoid sensitivity of peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes in patients with sepsis or septic shock. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:1799–1803.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    50. ↵
      Almawi WY, Lipman ML, Stevens AC, Zanker B, Hadro ET, Strom TB. Abrogation of glucocorticoid-mediated inhibition of T cell proliferation by the synergistic action of IL‐1, IL‐6, and IFN-gamma. J Immunol 1991;146:3523–3527.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    51. ↵
      Kam JC, Szefler SJ, Surs W, Sher ER, Leung DY. Combination IL‐2 and IL‐4 reduces glucocorticoid receptor-binding affinity and T cell response to glucocorticoids. J Immunol 1993;151:3460–3466.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    52. ↵
      Spahn JD, Szefler SJ, Surs W, Doherty DE, Nimmagadda SR, Leung DY. A novel action of IL-13: induction of diminished monocyte glucocorticoid receptor-binding affinity. J Immunol 1996;157:2654–2659.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    53. ↵
      Liu LY, Sun B, Tian Y, Lu BZ, Wang J. Changes of pulmonary glucocorticoid receptor and phospholipase A2 in sheep with acute lung injury after high dose endotoxin infusion. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148:878–881.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    54. ↵
      Fan J, Gong XQ, Wu J, Zhang YF, Xu RB. Effect of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) blockade on endotoxemia in rats. Circ Shock 1994;42:76–82.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    55. ↵
      Baeuerle PA, Baichwal VR. NF-kappa B as a frequent target for immunosuppressive and anti- inflammatory molecules. Adv Immunol 1997;65:111–137.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    56. ↵
      Meduri GU, Headley S, Kohler G, et al. Persistent elevation of inflammatory cytokines predicts a poor outcome in ARDS. Plasma IL‐1 beta and IL‐6 levels are consistent and efficient predictors of outcome over time. Chest 1995;107:1062–1073.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    57. Meduri GU, Kohler G, Headley S, Tolley E, Stentz F, Postlethwaite A. Inflammatory cytokines in the BAL of patients with ARDS. Persistent elevation over time predicts poor outcome. Chest 1995;108:1303–1314.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    58. ↵
      Golden E, John B, Stentz F, Tolley EA, Meduri GU. Interleukin‐8 and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 during acute respiratory distress syndrome and in response to prolonged methylprednisolone treatment. Shock 2000;13:42S.
      OpenUrl
    59. ↵
      Headley AS, Meduri GU, Tolley E, Stentz F. Infections, SIRS, and CARS during ARDS and in response to prolonged glucocorticoid treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:A378.
      OpenUrl
    60. ↵
      Meduri GU, Tolley EA, Chinn A, Stentz F, Postlethwaite A. Procollagen types I and III aminoterminal propeptide levels during acute respiratory distress syndrome and in response to methylprednisolone treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1432–1441.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    61. ↵
      Carratu P, Quasney MW, Stentz FB, et al. TNF‐a and LT‐a gene polymorphism in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:A474.
      OpenUrl
    62. ↵
      Weigelt JA, Norcross JF, Borman KR, Snyder WHD. Early steroid therapy for respiratory failure. Arch Surg 1985;120:536–540.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    63. ↵
      Bone RC, Fisher CJ Jr, Clemmer TP, Slotman GJ, Metz CA. Early methylprednisolone treatment for septic syndrome and the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 1987;92:1032–1036.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    64. ↵
      Luce JM, Montgomery AB, Marks JD, Turner J, Metz CA, Murray JF. Ineffectiveness of high-dose methylprednisolone in preventing parenchymal lung injury and improving mortality in patients with septic shock. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;138:62–68.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    65. ↵
      Meduri GU. An historical review of glucocorticoid treatment in Sepsis. Disease pathophysiology and the design of treatment investigation. Sepsis 1999;3:21–38.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    66. ↵
      Hesterberg TW, Last JA. Ozone-induced acute pulmonary fibrosis in rats. Prevention of increased rates of collagen synthesis by methylprednisolone. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981;123:47–52.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    67. Hakkinen PJ, Schmoyer RL, Witschi HP. Potentiation of butylated-hydroxytoluene-induced acute lung damage by oxygen. Effects of prednisolone and indomethacin. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;128:648–651.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    68. ↵
      Kehrer JP, Klein-Szanto AJ, Sorensen EM, Pearlman R, Rosner MH. Enhanced acute lung damage following corticosteroid treatment. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;130:256–261.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    69. ↵
      Ashbaugh DG, Maier RV. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment. Arch Surg 1985;120:530–535.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    70. ↵
      Hooper RG, Kearl RA. Established ARDS treated with a sustained course of adrenocortical steroids. Chest 1990;97:138–143.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    71. ↵
      Barber AE, Coyle SM, Marano MA, et al. Glucocorticoid therapy alters hormonal and cytokine responses to endotoxin in man. J Immunol 1993;150:1999–2006.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    72. ↵
      Meduri GU, Headley S, Carson S, Umberger R, Kelso T, Tolley E. Prolonged methylprednisolone treatment improves lung function and outcome of unresolving ARDS. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. JAMA 1998;280:159–165.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    73. ↵
      Meduri GU, Headley S, Tolley E, Shelby M, Stentz F, Postlethwaite A. Plasma and BAL cytokine response to corticosteroid rescue treatment in late ARDS. Chest 1995;108:1315–1325.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    74. ↵
      Hooper RG, Kearl RA. Established adult respiratory distress syndrome successfully treated with corticosteroids. South Med J 1996;89:359–364.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    75. ↵
      Biffl WL, Moore FA, Moore EE, Haenel JB, McIntyre RC Jr, Burch JM. Are corticosteroids salvage therapy for refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome?. Am J Surg 1995;170:591–595.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    76. ↵
      Meduri GU, Belenchia JM, Estes RJ, Wunderink RG, el Torky M, Leeper KV, Jr. Fibroproliferative phase of ARDS. Clinical findings and effects of corticosteroids. Chest 1991;100:943–952.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    77. ↵
      Meduri GU, Belenchia JM, Massie JD, Eltorky M, Tolley EA. The role of gallium-67 scintigraphy in diagnosing sources of fever in ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:395–403.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    78. ↵
      Meduri GU, Tolley EA, Chrousos GP, Stentz F. Prolonged methylprednisolone treatment suppresses systemic inflammation in patients with unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome. Evidence for inadequate endogenous glucocorticoid secretion and inflammation-induced immune cell resistance to glucocorticoids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:983–991.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    79. ↵
      Stentz F, Tolley EA, Headley AS, Chrousos GP, Meduri GU. Mechanisms of NF-κB and glucocorticoid receptor (GRα) in activation and regulation of systemic inflammation (SI) in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:A450.
      OpenUrl
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 22 Issue 42 suppl Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Evidence of biological efficacy for prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in patients with unresolving ARDS
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    Evidence of biological efficacy for prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in patients with unresolving ARDS
    G.U. Meduri, P. Carratu, A.X. Freire
    European Respiratory Journal Aug 2003, 22 (42 suppl) 57s-64s; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00420903

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    Evidence of biological efficacy for prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in patients with unresolving ARDS
    G.U. Meduri, P. Carratu, A.X. Freire
    European Respiratory Journal Aug 2003, 22 (42 suppl) 57s-64s; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00420903
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Model of translational research
      • Nuclear factor-κB
      • Glucocorticoid receptor
      • Inflammation-associated glucocorticoid inadequacy/resistance
      • Longitudinal studies of biomarkers of host inflammatory response in acute respiratory distress syndrome
      • Glucocorticoid treatment of unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome
      • Evidence of inflammation-associated glucocorticoid inadequacy/resistance in unresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • EmPHasis-10 as a measure of quality of life in PAH
    • EmPHasis-10 health-related quality of life score predicts outcomes in PAH
    • Periostin and airway epithelial function in asthma
    Show more Original Articles

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Reviewers
    • CME
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • ERS author centre

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society