Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Population impact of different definitions of airway obstruction

B.R. Celli, R.J. Halbert, S. Isonaka, B. Schau
European Respiratory Journal 2003 22: 268-273; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00075102
B.R. Celli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.J. Halbert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Isonaka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Schau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.—
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.—

    Prevalence of airway obstruction, by diagnostic definition and age group. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. ♦: fixed ratio; ▪: % predicted; ▴: lower limit of normal; ○: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage IIA; ▿: self-report.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Definitions of airway obstruction

    DefinitionReference
    Self-reported diagnosis of chronic bronchitis or emphysema “self report”See text for description of variables used
    FEV1/FVC <0.70 and FEV1 <80% pred#GOLD Stage IIA 12
    FEV1/FVC < lower limit of normal¶See text for comparability to ATS guidelines 13
    FEV1/FVC <88% pred in males and <89% pred in females “per cent predicted”See text for comparability to ERS guidelines 14
    FEV1/FVC <0.70 “fixed ratio” #“Clinical” definition 6, equivalent to GOLD Stage I 12
    • FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second

    • FVC: forced vital capacity

    • % pred: % predicted

    • GOLD: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

    • ATS; American Thoracic Society

    • ERS: European Respiratory Society

    • #: GOLD specifies that all FEV1 values should refer topostbronchodilator FEV1. The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) did not include reversibility testing 12

    • ¶: the ATS specifies that spirometry should be performed pre- and postbronchodilator. NHANES III did not include reversibility testing 13

  • Table 2

    Population characteristics

    CrudeWeighted#FEV1 mLFEV1% predFVC mLFVC% predFEV1/FVC%FEV1/FVC% pred
    Total study population98381094834372900±86695.7±16.73762±103899.6±15.177.0±9.096.6±10.2
    Age yrs
     30–341542189788063484±777100.0±12.64254±979102.8±12.382.3±6.298.2±7.2
     35–391400174199363307±75598.7±12.74083±970101.2±12.981.4±6.098.3±7.0
     40–441320167973293228±73498.1±13.24069±951101.2±13.179.7±6.497.6±7.7
     45–49871120416773056±74496.1±15.13933±96399.5±13.778.0±7.497.0±9.1
     50–5477793547982856±76593.0±16.63767±100597.0±14.676.2±8.096.0±9.9
     55–5973488115692676±72491.9±16.93600±96596.6±15.174.7±8.395.4±10.4
     60–6494079133472525±71692.0±19.13452±93497.4±16.773.4±9.395.1±11.9
     65–6982776812112407±70492.6±20.13331±93798.0±18.172.6±9.395.4±12.0
     70–7480561233412248±66292.8±20.73186±90198.1±17.771.2±10.595.0±13.8
     75–8062243614242013±64194.0±22.82899±88199.3±19.670.1±11.595.1±15.4
    Sex
     Male4705532646613367±84795.0±16.94439±91798.6±14.275.5±9.596.1±11.0
     Female5133562187762472±63096.3±16.63141±699100.6±15.978.4±8.397.1±9.4
    Race/ethnicity
     Mexican-American257548683143028±82098.0±14.63823±977103.7±14.679.2±7.698.2±8.3
     Non-Hispanic Black2735112348762745±79797.1±17.23498±940100.2±15.778.5±8.896.4±9.9
     Non-Hispanic White4528933802482921±91693.5±17.33887±109897.0±14.574.9±9.595.9±11.2
    Smoking status
     Never4313454905082850±83999.0±15.23592±1016101.3±15.079.4±7.499.0±8.5
     Former2846336729182941±88094.8±17.23907±103499.1±14.975.0±9.595.8±10.9
     Current2679303200122938±88991.3±17.53882±103797.5±15.275.4±10.093.6±11.0
    • Data are presented as n or mean±sd

    • FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second

    • FVC: forced vital capacity

    • % pred: % predicted

    • #: results are weighted to the general USA population

  • Table 3

    Airway obstruction by diagnostic definition

    Self-reportGOLD stage IIALower limit of normal% predFixed ratio
    Prevalent cases8.58.615.617.518.4
    Rate per 1000 population
     Overall77.378.7142.1160.0167.8
     Age yrs
      30–3449.317.383.790.444.7
      35–3939.518.292.5100.154.6
      40–4465.635.7115.8127.194.8
      45–4977.150.2138.8152.5133.5
      50–5486.8102.5156.1178.8181.9
      55–5992.3137.6191.8212.1255.6
      60–64109.4152.4197.7234.4311.5
      65–69124.0179.3212.5256.1345.4
      70–74137.0189.0228.6258.3406.2
      75–80121.9194.8227.2261.8416.9
    Sex
     Male58.284.8150.0160.9199.0
     Female95.572.9134.5159.2138.3
    Race/Ethnicity
     Mexican-American35.727.291.587.073.2
     Non-Hispanic Black58.058.5119.6144.8116.8
     Non-Hispanic White81.883.8147.4165.6178.9
    Smoking Status
     Never45.936.072.486.890.5
     Former86.489.0156.6178.9213.9
     Current114.4131.2230.4248.8232.6
    • Prevalent cases are presented as n (millions). Results are weighted to the general USA population

    • GOLD: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

    • % pred: % predicted

PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 22 Issue 2 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Population impact of different definitions of airway obstruction
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Citation Tools
Population impact of different definitions of airway obstruction
B.R. Celli, R.J. Halbert, S. Isonaka, B. Schau
European Respiratory Journal Aug 2003, 22 (2) 268-273; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00075102

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Population impact of different definitions of airway obstruction
B.R. Celli, R.J. Halbert, S. Isonaka, B. Schau
European Respiratory Journal Aug 2003, 22 (2) 268-273; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00075102
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Novel strategy to identify genetic risk factors for COPD severity: a genetic isolate
  • Calculating gambling odds and lung ages for smokers
  • Is treatment with ICS and LABA cost-effective for COPD? Multinational economic analysis of the TORCH study
Show more Original Articles: COPD

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2022 by the European Respiratory Society