Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (transfer factor/alveolar volume) in females versus males

J.M.B. Hughes, N.B. Pride
European Respiratory Journal 2003 22: 186-187; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00024903
J.M.B. Hughes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N.B. Pride
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • "Carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (transfer factor/alveolar volume) in females versus males". J.M.B. Hughes, N.B. Pride. Eur Respir J 2003; 22: 186–189. - September 01, 2003

To the Editors:

The single breath transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide (TL,CO) is derived from the multiple of the carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO) and the alveolar volume (VA) during breath holding 1; consequently, the TL,CO is highly dependent on lung size (∼VA), and thus is smaller in females for a given height and age. Essentially, the KCO is the rate constant for alveolar carbon monoxide uptake (its units are per second or per minute) and may be expected to be the same in males as in females, as it was in the original description of the technique 2. The published guidelines 3, 4 are not definitive on this point, so we reviewed all studies of reference values for TL,CO and KCO, which have presented data for both males and females.

The European reference values for KCO 3 are derived from the ratio TL,CO predicted/total lung capacity (TLC) predicted. This unusual recommendation arose from correspondence in the ERJ 5, which pointed out that the reference equations previously published in 1983 6 produced values for KCO that were incompatible with those for TL,CO. These European Respiratory Society reference values have been quoted in 118 articles published since 1993 (23 in the ERJ) and have been adopted elsewhere 7. The TL,CO values for females were based on a summary equation 6 derived from only five small studies, the most recent being published in 1979. Fortunately, the available database for TL,CO and KCO has now expanded considerably; seven studies that examined both males and females in their chosen populations have been published between 1980 and 1992 (table 1⇓).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Published population studies of the carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO)

In addition, we believe the use of the TL,CO pred/TLC pred ratio is, itself, unjustified. First, because in general it is undesirable to ratio two reference values obtained from different populations; this is compounded in the present instance, when KCO is inevitably measured in every individual in the actual manoeuvre used to obtain TL,CO. Secondly, although the original recommendation 18 was that the lung volume during breath-holding (∼VA) should be measured from the inspired volume preceding the breath hold plus the residual volume (from closed circuit helium dilution), virtually all subsequent population studies (and all those in table 1⇑) have substituted the VA derived from the dilution of the inhaled marker gas. This single breath VA, both in the derivation of TL,CO and in the subsequent calculation of TL/VA, is always less than TLC, because the anatomic dead space is subtracted from the VA but not from the TLC, and because gas mixing is often less efficient with a single breath measurement. Hence, using TLC when a single breath VA has been used to calculate TL,CO will lead to a systematic underestimate of predicted KCO.

Table 1⇑ shows predicted values for KCO at a standard age and height for males and females from 10 studies. Following American Thoracic Society Guidelines 19, we have compared males of 1.75 m stature with females of 1.65 m. When these studies are averaged (without weighting for the different numbers in each study) there is no sex difference for KCO at age 45 yrs, although there is a small (nonsignificant) difference between males and females at 65 yrs. In contrast, from the TL,CO pred/TLC pred ratio 3, the predicted KCO in females at a given age is 5–10% higher than for males, irrespective of whether they are at identical TLC (approximate height for males 1.6 m versus 1.8 m for females) or at identical height (approximate TLC for males 6.1 L versus 5.1 L for females). Table 1⇑ also shows considerable between-study differences both in mean values and in the age and height coefficients, as is found for most other predicted values for tests of lung function 6. From first principles, a dependence on height would not be expected, but it has been suggested 16 that in taller people the apices of the lungs may be more poorly perfused relative to the mid and lower zones for gravitational reasons; the resulting inhomogeneity in blood flow and blood volume would reduce the measured KCO. All published data on changes with age are derived from cross-sectional studies. The only cohort study of >8 yrs of TL,CO and KCO is that of Watson et al. 20 who followed up, among others, 29 male never-smokers (mean age 37 yrs at start) over a 22-yr period. They found no change in the KCO.

We understand that a joint working party of the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society is currently reviewing reference values for spirometry, lung volumes and the transfer factor. We hope the carbon monoxide transfer coefficient will not be neglected, since the current recommendations are unsatisfactory. Ideally, values for total lung capacity should be obtained from the same individuals used to obtain reference values for the single breath transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide and the carbon monoxide transfer coefficient, so that the effects of poor inflation and/or true differences in total lung capacity at a given height and age can be allowed for 17.

    • © ERS Journals Ltd

    References

    1. ↵
      Hughes JMB, Pride NB. In defence of the carbon monoxide transfer coefficient KCO (TL/VA). Eur Respir J 2001;17:168–174.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      Krogh M. The diffusion of gases through the lungs of man. J Physiol 1915;49:271–296.
    3. ↵
      Cotes JE, Chinn DJ, Quanjer PH, Roca J, Yernault J‐C. Standardization of the measurement of transfer factor (diffusing capacity). Eur Respir J 1993;6:Suppl. 16, 41–52.
    4. ↵
      American Thoracic Society. Single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (transfer factor), recommendation for a standard technique - 1995 update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:2185–2198.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      Love RG, Seaton A, Quanjer PH. About the ECCS summary equations (letters). Eur Respir J 1990;9:489–490.
      OpenUrl
    6. ↵
      Quanjer PH. Standardised lung function testing. Report of a Working Party of the European Community for Coal and Steel. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1983;19:Suppl. 5, 45–51.
      OpenUrl
    7. ↵
      British Thoracic Society and Association of Respiratory Technicians and Physiologists. Guidelines for the measurement of respiratory function. Respir Med 1994;88:165–194.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      van Ganse WF, Ferris BG, Cotes JE. Cigarette smoking and pulmonary diffusing capacity (transfer factor). Am Rev Respir Dis 1972;105:30–40.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      Salorinne Y. Single breath pulmonary diffusing capacity: reference values and application in connective tissue diseases and in various lung diseases. Scand J Respir Dis Suppl 1976;96:1–86.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    10. ↵
      Crapo RO, Gardner RM. Single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (transfer factor), recommendations for a standard technique. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:299–1307.
      OpenUrl
    11. ↵
      Miller A, Thornton JC, Warshaw R, Anderson A, Teirstein AS, Selikoff IJ. Single breath diffusing capacity in a representative sample of the population of Michigan, a large industrial state. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;127:270–277.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      Paoletti P, Viegi G, Pistelli G, et al. Reference equations for the single-breath diffusing capacity: A cross-sectional analysis and effect of body size and age. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;132:806–813.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      Knudson RJ, Kaltenborn WT, Knudson DE, Burrows B. The single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity: Reference equations derived from a healthy non-smoking population and effects of hematocrit. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;135:805–811.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      Roca J, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Cobo E, Burgos F, Perez J, Clausen JL. Single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity prediction equations from a Mediterranean population. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:1026–1032.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      Roberts CM, MacRae KD, Winning AJ, Adams L, Seed WA. Reference values and prediction equations for normal lung function in a non-smoking white urban population. Thorax 1991;46:643–650.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      Gulsvik A, Bakke P, Humerfelt S, et al. Single breath transfer factor for carbon monoxide in an asymptomatic population of never smokers. Thorax 1992;47:167–173.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      Chinn DY, Cotes JE, Flowers R, Marks A‐M, Read JW. Transfer factor (diffusing capacity) standardized for alveolar volume: validation, reference values and application of a new linear model to replace KCO (TL/ VA). Eur Respir J 1996;9:1269–1277.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    18. ↵
      Ogilvie CM, Forster RE, Blakemore WS, Morton JW. A standardized breath holding technique for the clinical measurement of the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. J Clin Invest 1957;36:1–17.
    19. ↵
      American Thoracic Society. Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:1202–1218.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      Watson A, Joyce H, Pride NB. Changes in carbon monoxide transfer over 22 years in middle-aged men. Respir Med 2000;94:1103–1108.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    View this article with LENS
    Vol 22 Issue 1 Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (transfer factor/alveolar volume) in females versus males
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Print
    Citation Tools
    Carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (transfer factor/alveolar volume) in females versus males
    J.M.B. Hughes, N.B. Pride
    European Respiratory Journal Jul 2003, 22 (1) 186-187; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00024903

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero

    Share
    Carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (transfer factor/alveolar volume) in females versus males
    J.M.B. Hughes, N.B. Pride
    European Respiratory Journal Jul 2003, 22 (1) 186-187; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00024903
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Full Text (PDF)

    Jump To

    • Article
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    More in this TOC Section

    • Clinical outcomes of bronchiectasis in India
    • Reply: Clinical outcomes of bronchiectasis in India
    • Risk factors for disease progression in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis
    Show more Correspondence

    Related Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current issue
    • Archive

    About the ERJ

    • Journal information
    • Editorial board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Permissions and reprints
    • Advertising

    The European Respiratory Society

    • Society home
    • myERS
    • Privacy policy
    • Accessibility

    ERS publications

    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS books online
    • ERS Bookshop

    Help

    • Feedback

    For authors

    • Instructions for authors
    • Publication ethics and malpractice
    • Submit a manuscript

    For readers

    • Alerts
    • Subjects
    • Podcasts
    • RSS

    Subscriptions

    • Accessing the ERS publications

    Contact us

    European Respiratory Society
    442 Glossop Road
    Sheffield S10 2PX
    United Kingdom
    Tel: +44 114 2672860
    Email: journals@ersnet.org

    ISSN

    Print ISSN:  0903-1936
    Online ISSN: 1399-3003

    Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society