Translating research into practice: how are guidelines implemented?

Abstract

Numerous guidelines have now been produced both nationally and internationally for the management of respiratory and nonrespiratory disease. They should be regarded as useful tools designed to aid the busy clinician, but their method of production, their value and especially their applicability to primary care and to low income countries need to be assessed critically.

The production of guidelines needs to be carefully incorporated into a planned dissemination and implementation programme. This is likely to be most successful when use is made of interactive educational methods associated with intraconsultation prompting and use of reminders. Updating and life-long learning is necessary and guideline revisions need to be closely incorporated into continuing medical education programmes. National campaigns, the use of media and the “training” of patients to make them more effective partners in healthcare can all enhance a beneficial change in health professional behaviour.

Recent research has enhanced the knowledge of a wide range of respiratory conditions and very effective therapies now exist for many conditions. However, too little attention is often given to the ways in which care is organised and to the important aspects of management that are nonpharmacological. When dealing with long-term conditions, long-term supervision and the teaching of self-management skills are as important as the prescription.

In many parts of the world the ideals, as laid out in guidelines, remain dreams and will continue to be dreams until there is some global redistribution of wealth. Only then will research be translated into practice everywhere.