Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • For authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Author FAQs
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
  • Alerts
  • Podcasts
  • Subscriptions

Meta-analysis of diagnostic procedures for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-1-infected patients

M. Cruciani, P. Marcati, M. Malena, O. Bosco, G. Serpelloni, C. Mengoli
European Respiratory Journal 2002 20: 982-989; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.02.01372002
M. Cruciani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Marcati
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Malena
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O. Bosco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Serpelloni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Mengoli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Sputum induction is a simple and noninvasive procedure for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) diagnosis in human immunodeficiency virus-1-positive patients, although less sensitive than bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). In order to obtain an overview of the diagnostic accuracy of sputum induction, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the comparative sensitivity and specificity of BAL (the “gold standard”) and sputum induction was performed.

The odds ratio and related 95% confidence interval were calculated using summary receiving operating characteristic curves as well as fixed-effect and random-effect models. Based on pooled data, the negative and positive predictive values were calculated for a range of PCP prevalence using a Bayesian approach.

Seven prospective studies assessed the comparative accuracy of BAL and sputum induction. On the whole, sputum induction demonstrated 55.5% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity. The sensitivity of sputum induction was significantly higher with immunofluorescence than with cytochemical staining (67.1 versus 43.1%). In settings of 25–60% prevalence of PCP, the positive and negative predictive values ranged 86–96.7 and 66.2–89.8, respectively, with immunofluorescence, and 79–94.4 and 53–83.5% with cytochemical staining.

In conclusion, in a setting of low prevalence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, sputum induction, particularly with immunostaining, appears to be adequate for clinical decision-making.

  • bronchoalveolar lavage
  • diagnosis
  • meta-analysis
  • Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia
  • sputum induction

The use of effective prophylaxis for opportunistic infections and, more recently, the availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) have considerably altered the natural history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection 1–4. The new effective antiretroviral treatment provides substantial protection against all major opportunistic infections. For instance, HAART has not only changed the morbidity and mortality of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) but also clinicians' attitudes towards prophylaxis directed against this opportunistic infection 1, 4–10. Despite these advances, PCP has not lost its clinical relevance, particularly in persons who are not aware of their HIV-1 infection status or in those who fail to respond to antiretroviral treatment.

In this dynamic context, reappraisal of strategies for the management of infectious complications of HIV is the subject of intense investigation [1–l0]. Rapid and specific diagnosis of PCP is still needed in HIV-infected patients.

Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of PCP usually rely on microscopic demonstration of P. carinii by means of conventional cytochemical procedures or immunocytochemical staining 11–14. Polymerase chain reaction assays have been used to diagnose PCP, but this technique is not yet suitable for implementation in routine diagnostic laboratories 11. Immunostaining seems to increase sensitivity and specificity, but the quality of the clinical material from the respiratory tract is of crucial importance for diagnostic accuracy 11–16. Indeed, fibreoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), with a sensitivity of >90%, is recognised as the procedure of choice for the diagnosis of PCP 11, 12.

The sputum induction technique for PCP diagnosis was originally described by Bigby et al. 16. Since then, this technique has emerged as a simple and noninvasive procedure, although rather wide variation in diagnostic accuracy (25–90%) has been reported 11–17. The wide range of accuracy reported may be related to factors in the population studied or features related to study design, execution of the test and staining techniques 18. For instance, data from early reports suggest that the sensitivity of sputum induction techniques can be increased by use of monoclonal antibodies 15. Moreover, although sensitivity and specificity remain constant when the technique is applied to populations with different prevalences of disease, the related predictive values are subject to wide variation 19.

Data from a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the sputum induction procedure in comparison with fibreoptic bronchoscopy with BAL for the diagnosis of PCP in HIV-1-infected patients are presented. The aim of the study was to provide an overview of the diagnostic accuracy of the sputum induction procedure and evaluate the predictive values of the test according to different prevalences of PCP.

Material and methods

Literature search

The English literature produced during January 1982–April 2001 was searched for using Medline. For the search, the terms “Pneumonia, Pneumocystis carinii” and either “Diagnosis” or “Sputum” had to be present in the title or abstract. The search for pertinent studies was completed by consulting bibliographies from original articles and reviews retrieved via Medline.

Protocol of the analysis

All papers considered possibly eligible were reviewed independently by the present authors, who assessed whether the paper was concerned with the comparison of the sputum induction procedure with the reference standard for the diagnosis of PCP in a relevant clinical population. A relevant clinical population was defined as a group of HIV-positive individuals requiring fibreoptic bronchoscopic investigation for suspected PCP or other pulmonary diseases. This choice was made in an attempt to cover the spectrum of diseases that is likely to be encountered in the current or future use of this diagnostic test.

Studies were included for analysis if: they compared the sputum induction procedure to BAL with fibreoptic bronchoscopy (the “gold standard”); they reported data on false-positive, true-positive, false-negative, and true-negative results of the diagnostic test; and the comparison between tests was performed prospectively in a consecutive series of patients.

Sensitivity was defined as the percentage of patients with a diagnosis of PCP by BAL who were correctly found to be positive using the sputum induction procedure. Specificity was the percentage of patients with negative BAL results correctly identified by a negative result from the sputum induction procedure.

Articles were examined in detail by two of the authors. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus with a third party.

As seen in the study of Lijmer et al. 20, studies were scored based on the sampling method as consecutive, nonconsecutive and case-control. When the comparison between tests was performed prospectively, in a blinded or nonblinded fashion, in a consecutive series of patients, the study was scored as consecutive. When not all of the patients presenting with the relevant conditions were included in order of entry or in a random design, the study was referred to as nonconsecutive. When the study evaluated a group of patients already known to have the disease and a separate group of subjects not considered a relevant clinical population, it was scored as a case-control study. Moreover, the methods of data collection and reporting were also considered. Data collection was categorised as prospective, retrospective or, when the description of the procedure was insufficient, unknown. The description of the characteristics of the study population and criteria for performing the test were also analysed.

Statistical analysis

In order to remove the influence of threshold variation from the accuracy of sputum induction procedures, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with sensitivity plotted on the y-axis and 1-specificity on the x-axis were used 21–24. False-positive and true-positive rates were transformed to their logits, U and V, respectively, after increasing each observed frequency by 0.5 25–27.

Since there is a constant odds ratio irrespective of the threshold, other meta-analytical methods were used for calculating a common weighted odds ratio. For this purpose, the fixed effect method of Mantel-Haenszel 28, 29 and random effect model of Der Simonian and Laird 30 were used. The diagnostic odds ratio describes the odds of positive test results in individuals with the disease compared with the odds of positive test results in those without disease, and corresponds to particular pairings of sensitivity and specificity 18. Heterogeneity was assessed by means of the Cochran Q method 31. Since microscopic examination of induced sputum was performed using two methods, immunofluorescence or conventional staining, two separate analyses were performed in subgroups of specimens identified on the basis of the method used.

The sensitivity and specificity of the two staining techniques were evaluated by comparison of m proportions from several independent samples 32.

Finally, the post-test probability was calculated for a range of PCP prevalences using a Bayesian approach 33. The overall values were based on pooled data corrected by taking the common odds ratio of Mantel-Haenszel into account.

All calculations were carried out by implementation of the appropriate algorithms on Excel worksheets. EasyMA (available from 34) 35, meta.exe, version 4.38 (obtainable upon request from authors of 36), Stata release 7.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) and Minitab programs (available from 37) were also utilised.

Results

The computer search yielded 1,191 possible articles. Of these, 1,155 were eliminated by review of titles and/or abstracts. The remaining 36 articles were reviewed in detail, and 29 of these were excluded (see Appendix). Overall, data retrieved from seven publications were included in the meta-analysis 38–44. Table 1⇓ summarises the characteristics of the seven studies included in the meta-analysis. Altogether, 322 individuals (160 patients with PCP and 162 with other lung infections) were studied using the sputum induction procedure in comparison to BAL. Sputum and BAL specimens from all of these patients were processed using conventional staining methodologies, which included P. carinii cytochemical stains for cyst wall and/or intracystic bodies and trophozoites. In three of these studies, which included a total of 156 patients, the sputum specimens were also processed by immunofluorescence staining with monoclonal antibodies 41, 42, 44.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1—

Characteristics of studies included in analysis

Study quality

The method of patient enrolment was consecutive in all of the included studies. Four studies provided an adequate description of the independence of interpretation of test results 39, 42–44. Details of staining techniques and specimen collection procedures were sufficiently described in all but one 38 of the seven publications. Information on the study population was provided in all of the studies.

Results of the meta-analysis

Odds ratios and related 95% confidence intervals for each study are shown in figure 1⇓. The summary ROC curves showing true-positive versus false-positive rates from individual studies are shown in figure 2⇓. The common diagnostic odds ratios and the corresponding sensitivities and specificities are shown in table 2⇓. The fixed effect model was used for analysis of immunofluorescence data, as the homogeneity hypothesis was tenable (p=0.5).

Fig. 1.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.—

Forest plots showing odds ratios (▪) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal bars) for studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of sputum induction with a) cytochemical and b) immunofluorescence staining (═: overall odds ratio). The scale on the x-axis is logarithmic.

Fig. 2.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.—

Summary receiver operating characteristic curves for two methods of staining induced sputum specimens (–––––: immunofluorescence; - - - - : cytochemical).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2—

Cumulative meta-analysis data

The random-effect model was more appropriate for data from cytochemical staining of sputum, as the homogeneity hypothesis was rejected (p=0.001).

The summary ROC curves did not provide significant parameters for the regression line. Moreover, the regression coefficient β assumed a negative value, thus supporting the hypothesis that the odds ratio for an association between cytochemical or immunofluorescent staining of induced sputum specimens and the standard reference is not dependent on the threshold used.

Cytochemical versus immunofluorescent staining of induced sputum specimens

The diagnostic odds ratio was considerably higher when specimens were examined by means of immunofluorescence compared to cytochemical staining. This was also confirmed by comparison of sensitivity and specificity. The overall sensitivity was significantly greater with immunofluorescent staining than with cytochemical staining (67.1 versus 43.1%, p=0.001), whereas the specificity was comparable.

The a posteriori positive and negative predictive values are shown in table 3⇓. The relationship between prevalence of PCP and positive and negative predictive values is shown in figure 3⇓. These overall values were calculated according to different prevalences of PCP, and were based on pooled sensitivity and specificity data (67.1 and 96.5% for immunofluorescence and 43.1 and 96.2% for cytochemical staining, respectively).

Fig. 3.—
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.—

Relationship between prevalence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) and a) positive predictive value (PPV) and b) negative predictive value (NPV) of sputum induction followed by immunofluorescent (–––) or cytochemical staining (- - - - -). A Bayesian approach was followed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3—

Estimated positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of sputum induction according to prevalence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP)

Discussion

Owing to its high sensitivity and specificity, bronchoscopy with BAL is regarded as the gold standard for PCP diagnosis in HIV-1-infected patients 11–13. However, although safer than and at least as sensitive as fibreoptic bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsy, BAL with fibreoptic bronchoscopy is still considered an invasive diagnostic method 12, 13, 45. As a consequence, the increased prevalence of PCP observed concomitant with the explosion of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic has brought about an increased need for less invasive diagnostic methods 12, 46.

Sputum induction has emerged as a sensitive and cost-effective diagnostic strategy for PCP in HIV-1-infected patients 11, 12, 16, 46. This technique has gained popularity because it is less expensive, saves time and is less invasive than bronchoscopy with BAL. In patients without HIV-1 infection, however, this procedure has not been studied extensively. Moreover, the reduced organism burdens observed in PCP associated with conditions other than AIDS seems to be a limiting factor for the widespread use of sputum induction in patients without HIV-1 infection 47.

The reported sensitivities of the induced sputum technique often differ greatly from one report to another 12, 13, 38–44. In this context, a meta-analysis can provide an overall summary of diagnostic accuracy, as well as estimates of accuracy according to the characteristics of the study design, population examined and test used 21–24. Moreover, the decreased prevalence of PCP related to the widespread use of prophylaxis, and more recently, to the availability of HAART, provides further grounds for a re-evaluation of P. carinii diagnosis.

Seven studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of sputum induction in comparison with fibreoptic bronchoscopy with BAL were included in the present meta-analysis. In an observational evaluation of the methodological features of studies evaluating diagnostic tests, selection of nonrepresentative patients or use of different reference standards were found to cause significant overestimation of the accuracy of a diagnostic test 20. Based on these observations, several studies with methodological shortcomings that may have affected the estimation of diagnostic accuracy of sputum induction were excluded.

Quality assessment of the studies included in the analysis detected methodological flaws in three reports, in which interpretation of test results was not blinded. All of the included studies were consecutive, representative of a relevant clinical population of HIV-infected patients and applied the same reference standard.

Conversely, the experimental design of the studies included in the present analysis may have introduced some limits to the general applicability of the summary estimates in routine clinical practice. For instance, the use of adequate techniques for induction, collection and processing of induced sputum specimens is of crucial importance to the diagnostic yield of the procedure. Although these techniques do not require specialised skills or equipment, the availability of dedicated experienced personnel certainly increases the quality of induced specimens 40. Moreover, interpretation of stained specimens for P. carinii can be more problematic for induced sputum than BAL specimens. The use of monoclonal antibodies, however, seems to overcome this problem even in laboratories with little previous experience of identifying the microorganism 15, 48.

Using meta-analysis, the present report provides an overall summary of diagnostic accuracy. Across the whole population examined, sputum induction demonstrated 55.5% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity. A significantly higher sensitivity from immunofluorescence staining compared to cytochemical staining of sputum specimens (67.1 versus 43.1%) was clearly identifiable. Conversely, the specificity of the two staining techniques was comparable.

The overall measurement of diagnostic accuracy applied was the summary odds ratio computed using the fixed-effect and/or random-effect model. Random-effect summaries yield higher estimated variances and, consequently, broader confidence intervals than fixed-effect summaries when there is evidence of substantial heterogeneity among individual studies. If heterogeneity is found, the fixed-effect model yields an artificially narrow confidence interval. In this case, the random-effect model, which incorporates a moment estimator of the between-trial components of variance, is more appropriate 49. Since with cytochemical staining of sputum the homogeneity hypothesis was rejected, the odds ratio was calculated using the random-effect model.

The estimate of the summary odds ratio for cytochemical staining of sputum induction was 19.1, corresponding to 43.1% sensitivity and 96.2% specificity. With the fixed-effect model, the summary diagnostic odds ratio for immunofluorescence was 56.9, corresponding to 67.1% sensitivity and 96.5% specificity, and was reasonably consistent across the studies (test for heterogeneity, p=0.5).

With the summary ROC curve, the regression coefficient did not differ significantly from zero, thus supporting the assumption that the odds ratio does not depend on threshold.

Whether sputum induction is appropriate for a particular task depends ultimately on the predictive values in the intended setting, which, in turn, critically depend on the prevalence of the condition to be detected. Based on the sensitivity and specificity obtained from meta-analysis, the interpretations of the sputum induction results for the different pretest probabilities were examined using Bayes' theorem to generate post-test probabilities. For instance, in a setting of 25% prevalence of PCP, a negative result excludes infection in 89.8% of sputum specimens processed with immunological staining, and in 83.5% of specimens processed with cytochemical staining. By contrast, in a setting of higher prevalence, a negative result gives an excessive chance of P. carinii being present (table 3⇑ and fig. 3⇑). A high prevalence of PCP is still found in patients who failed to respond to HAART, are noncompliant with antiretroviral and/or prophylactic regimens, or are unaware of their HIV status, or in countries with a large burden of HIV-1 infection and no access to effective antiretroviral treatment 6, 50. In these circumstances, as in the pre-HAART era, fibreoptic bronchoscopy with BAL should be performed in patients with negative induced sputum results 51.

Conversely, a positive result in a setting of 25% PCP prevalence gave a 13 and 21% possibility of a false-positive result with sputum specimens stained with monoclonal antibodies and conventional staining techniques, respectively. With a higher prevalence of PCP, a positive result was almost invariably associated with the disease, independent of the staining technique.

Another potential problem is that the induced technique sputum may be less effective than bronchoscopy with BAL in the diagnosis of other lung diseases in HIV-1-infected patients. In two studies, bronchoscopy with BAL performed concomitantly with or after the induced sputum technique provided additional diagnoses of lung disease other than that caused by P. carinii 40, 52. In two other comparative studies, however, sputum induction was also found to be reliable for the diagnosis of other infectious causes of pneumonitis, including tuberculosis 38, 53.

The present meta-analysis supports the argument that the sputum induction technique is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Since the specificity of induced sputum specimen results is high, a positive result retains a high predictive value even in a context of low Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prevalence. The interpretation of a negative result may be more problematic, especially if obtained with cytochemical staining. Owing to its greater sensitivity, the immunofluorescent staining of a sputum induction specimen is preferable to cytochemical staining. This test could be of particular value in settings in which the prevalence of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia is low. In agreement with the data of Chouaid et al. 46, in such a situation, immunofluorescence staining of induced sputum may be the most cost-effective diagnostic strategy. Furthermore, a marked reduction in the need for bronchoscopy after the widespread use of protease inhibitors has already been reported 54. In conclusion, the present data provide compelling evidence of the value of the sputum induction procedure in the diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and underscore the importance of a reappraisal of strategies for the diagnosis of infectious complications in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Appendix

The following studies comparing induced sputum procedures and bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of PCP in HIV-1-infected patients were not included in the analysis because they failed to meet the predefined inclusion criteria. Eleven studies were excluded because bronchoscopy with BAL was performed only in subsets of patients (usually in patients with negative induced sputum results) 6, 16, 46, 51, 55–61. Fifteen studies (seven case-control 48, 62–67 and eight retrospective and/or nonconsecutive 51, 68–74) were excluded on the basis of design and/or because they did not permit direct comparison of accuracy for every individual in the sample. Three studies used a different diagnostic standard reference 52, 75, 76.

  • Received February 18, 2002.
  • Accepted May 2, 2002.
  • © ERS Journals Ltd

References

  1. ↵
    Palella FJ Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1998;338:796–800.
    OpenUrl
  2. Jacobson MA, French M. Altered natural history of AIDS-related opportunistic infections in the era of potent combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 1998;12:Suppl. A, S157–S163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. Gebo KA, Diener-West M, Moore RD. Hospitalization rates in an urban cohort after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2001;27:143–152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Segal R, Poznasky MC, Connors L, Sands K, Barlam T. Changing patterns of presentation of patients with HIV-related disease at a tertiary referral center and its implications for physician training. Int J STD AIDS 2001;12:453–459.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. Detels R, Tarwater P, Phair JP, Margolick J, Riddler SA, Munoz A. Effectiveness of potent antiretroviral therapies on the incidence of opportunistic infections before and after AIDS diagnosis. AIDS 2001;15:347–355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Benito N, Rano A, Moreno A, et al. Pulmonary infiltrates in HIV-infected patients in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era in Spain. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2001;27:35–43.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  7. Dworkin MS, Hanson DL, Navin TR. Survival of patients with AIDS, after the diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, in the United States. J Infect Dis 2001;183:1409–1412.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. Arozullah AM, Yarnold PR, Weinstein RA, et al. A new preadmission staging system for predicting inpatient mortality from HIV-associated Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in the early highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:1081–1086.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. Powderly WG. Prophylaxis for opportunistic infections in an era of effective antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:597–601.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Ledergerber B, Mocroft A, Reiss P, et al. Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with HIV infection who have a response to antiretroviral therapy. Eight European Study Groups. N Engl J Med 2001;344:168–174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Kroe DM, Kirsch CM, Jensen WA. Diagnostic strategies for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Semin Respir Infect 1997;12:70–78.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    Walzer PD. Pneumocystis cariniiIn: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th EdnChurchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, PA, 2000; pp. 2781–2795.
  13. ↵
    Broaddus C, Dake MD, Stulbarg MS, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsy for the diagnosis of pulmonary infections in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1985;102:747–752.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    Linder J, Radio SJ. Immunohistochemistry of Pneumocystis carinii. Semin Diagn Pathol 1989;6:238–244.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Kovacs JA, Ng VL, Masur H, et al. Diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: improved detection in sputum with use of monoclonal antibody. N Engl J Med 1988;318:589–593.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Bigby TD, Margolskee D, Curtis JL, et al. The usefulness of induced sputum in the diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;133:515–518.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Bedrossian CWM, Mason MR, Gupta PK. Rapid cytologic diagnosis of Pneumocystis: a comparison of effective techniques. Semin Diagn Pathol 1989;6:245–261.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 2001;323:157–162.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Loy CT, Irwig LM, Katelaris PH, Talley NJ. Do commercial serological kits for Helicobacter pylori infection differ in accuracy? A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1138–1144.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061–1066.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Irwig L, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis C, Lau J, Chalmers TC, Mosteller F. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:667–676.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziore P, Fahey M. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:119–130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. Littenberg B, Moses LE. Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method. Med Decis Making 1993;13:313–321.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Vamvakas EC. Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests. A review of the concept and methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:675–686.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med 1993;12:1293–1316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. Gart JJ. Point and interval estimation of the common odds ratio in the combination of 2×2 tables with fixed marginals. Biometrika 1970;57:471–475.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Gart JJ. The comparison of proportions: a review of significance tests, confidence intervals and adjustments for stratification. Rev Int Stat Inst 1971;39:16–37.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719–748.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Mantel N. Chi square tests with one degree of freedom: extension of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. J Am Stat Assoc 1963;58:690–700.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Cochran WG. The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika 1950;37:256–266.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Fleiss JL. Statistical Method for Rates and Proportion. 2nd EdnNew York, NY, John Wiley & Sons, 1981; pp. 138–143.
  33. ↵
    Motulsky H. Intuitive BiostatisticsOxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.
  34. ↵
    www.weasyma.com/biblio.html.
  35. ↵
    Cucherat M, Boissel JP, Leizorovicz A, Haugh MC. EasyMA: a program for the meta-analysis of clinical trials. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1997;53:187–190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Cruciani M, Rampazzo R, Malena M, Lazzarini L, Todeschini G, Messori A. Prophylaxis with fluoroquinolones for bacterial infections in neutropenic patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:795–805.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    www.minitab.com.
  38. ↵
    Rolston KVI, Rodriguez S, McRory L, Botero GU, Morice R, Mansell PWA. Diagnostic value of induced sputum in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Med 1988;85:269.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    Zaman MK, Wootens OJ, Suprahmanya B, Ankobiah W, Finch PJP, Kamholz SL. Rapid noninvasive diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii from induced liquefied sputum. Ann Intern Med 1988;109:7–10.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    Miller RF, Kocjan G, Buckland J, Holton J, Malin A, Semple SJG. Sputum induction for the diagnosis of pulmonary disease in HIV positive patients. J Infect 1991;23:5–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    Fortun J, Navas E, Marti-Belda P, et al. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-infected patients: diagnostic yield of induced sputum and immunofluorescent stain with monoclonal antibodies. Eur Respir J 1992;5:665–669.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Chouaid C, Housset B, Poirot JL, Roux P, Lebeau B. Cost effectiveness of the induced sputum technique for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in HIV-infected patients. Eur Respir J 1993;6:248–252.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Skøt J, Lerche AG, Kolmos HJ, Nielsen JO, Reinhardt Mathiensen L, Lundgren JD. Pneumocystis carinii in bronchoalveolar lavage and induced sputum: detection with a nested polymerase chain reaction. Scand J Infect Dis 1995;27:363–367.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    Rocha P, Awe R, Guy ES, et al. A rapid inexpensive method for processing induced sputum for the detection of Pneumocystis carinii. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;105:52–57.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    Bigby TD. Diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. How invasive. Chest 1994;105:650–652.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    Chouaid C, Housset B, Lebeau B. Cost-analysis of four diagnostic strategies for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-infected subjects. Eur Respir J 1995;8:1554–1558.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  47. ↵
    Limper AH, Offord KP, Smith TF, Martin WJ II. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: differences in lung parasite number and inflammation in patients with and without AIDS. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;140:1204–1209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    Elvin KM, Bjorkman A, Linder E, Heurlin N, Hjerpe A. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: detection of parasites in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by monoclonal antibodies. BMJ 1988;297:381–384.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Hardy RJ, Thompson SG. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects. Stat Med 1996;15:619–629.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    Ruffini D, Madhi SA. The high burden of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in African HIV-1-infected children hospitalized for severe pneumonia. AIDS 2002;16:105–112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    Huang L, Hecht FM, Stansell D, Montanti R, Hadley WK, Hopewell C. Suspected Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia with a negative induced sputum examination. Is early bronchoscopy useful?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151:1866–1871.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    Pitchenik AE, Ganjei P, Torres A, Evans DA, Rubin E, Baier H. Sputum examination for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;133:226–229.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    Conde MB, Soares SLM, Mello FCQ, et al. Comparison of sputum induction with fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:2238–2240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    Murri R, Cingolani A, Limongelli P, Visconti E, Maiuro G. Reduction of bronchoscopy performances should be included in the advantages of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2000;25:286–287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    Ognibene FP, Gill VJ, Pizzo PA, et al. Induced sputum to diagnose Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in immunosuppressed pediatric patients. J Pediatr 1989;115:430–433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. Leigh TR, Parson P, Hume C, Husain OAN, Gazzard B, Collins JV. Sputum induction for diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Lancet 1989;ii:205–206.
    OpenUrl
  57. Ng VL, Gartner I, Weymouth LA, Goodman CD, Hopewell PC, Hadley WK. The use of mucolysed induced sputum for the identification of pulmonary pathogens associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989;113:488–493.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  58. Midgley J, Parson PA, Shanson DC, Husain OA, Francis N. Monoclonal immunofluorescence compared with silver stain for investigating Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. J Clin Pathol 1991;44:75–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. Kirsch CM, Azzi R, Yenokida GG, Jensen WA. Analysis of induced sputum in the diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Am J Med Sci 1990;299:386–391.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  60. Kirsch CM, Jensen WA, Kagawa FT, Azzi RL. Analysis of induced sputum for the diagnosis of recurrent Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Chest 1992;102:1152–1154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    Chouaid C, Roux P, Lavard I, Poirot JL, Housset B. Use of the polymerase chain reaction technique on induced sputum samples for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-infected patients. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;104:72–75.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    Lipschik GY, Gill VJ, Lundgren JD, et al. Improved diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii infection by polymerase chain reaction on induced sputum and blood. Lancet 1992;340:203–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. Willocks L, Burns S, Cossar R, Brettle R. Diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in a population of HIV-positive drug users, with particular reference to sputum induction and fluorescent antibody techniques. J Infect 1993;26:257–264.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. Wazir JF, Macrorie SG, Coleman DV. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of monoclonal antibody 3F6 for the detection of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens and induced sputum. Cytophatology 1994;5:82–89.
    OpenUrl
  65. Evans R, Joss AWL, Pennington TH, Ho-Yen DO. The use of a nested polymerase chain reaction for detecting Pneumocystis carinii from lung and blood in rat and human infection. J Med Microbiol 1995;42:209–213.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. Ortona E, Margutti P, Tamburrini E, et al. Detection of Pneumocystis carinii in respiratory specimens by PCR-solution hybridization enzyme-linked immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:1589–1591.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    Khan MA, Farrag N, Butcher P. Diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: immunofluorescence staining, simple PCR or nPCR. J Infect 1999;39:77–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    Blumenfeld W, Kovacs JA. Use of monoclonal antibody to detect Pneumocystis carinii in induced sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by immunoperoxidase staining. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1988;112:1233–1236.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  69. Wolfson JS, Waldron MA, Sierra LS. Blinded comparison of a direct immunofluorescence monoclonal antibody staining method and Giemsa staining method for identification of Pneumocystis carinii in induced sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2136–2138.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. Cregan P, Yamamoto A, Lum A, VanderHeide T, MacDonald M, Pulliam L. Comparison of four methods for rapid detection of Pneumocystis carinii in respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2432–2436.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. Stratton N, Hryniewicki J, Aarnaes SL, Tan G, de la Maza LM, Peterson EM. Comparison of monoclonal antibody and calcofluor white stains for the detection of Pneumocystis carinii from respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:645–647.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. Ng VL, Geaghan SM, Leoung G, et al. Lack of effect of prophylactic aerosolized pentamidine on the detection of Pneumocystis carinii in induced sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1993;117:493–496.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  73. Leibovitz E, Pollack H, Moore T, et al. Comparison of PCR and standard cytological staining for detection of Pneumocystis carinii from respiratory specimens from patients with or at high risk for infection by human immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:3004–3007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    Rafanan AL, Klevjer-Anderson P, Metersky ML. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia diagnosed by non induced sputum stained with a direct fluorescent antibody. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1998;28:99–103.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  75. ↵
    Bustamante EA, Levy H. Sputum induction compared with bronchoalveolar lavage by Ballard catheter to diagnose Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Chest 1994;105:816–822.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  76. ↵
    Roux P, Lavard I, Poirot JL, et al. Usefulness of PCR for detection of Pneumocystis carinii DNA. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:2324–2326.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
Vol 20 Issue 4 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Meta-analysis of diagnostic procedures for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-1-infected patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Meta-analysis of diagnostic procedures for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-1-infected patients
M. Cruciani, P. Marcati, M. Malena, O. Bosco, G. Serpelloni, C. Mengoli
European Respiratory Journal Oct 2002, 20 (4) 982-989; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.02.01372002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Meta-analysis of diagnostic procedures for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-1-infected patients
M. Cruciani, P. Marcati, M. Malena, O. Bosco, G. Serpelloni, C. Mengoli
European Respiratory Journal Oct 2002, 20 (4) 982-989; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.02.01372002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Material and methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Determinants of community-acquired pneumonia in children and young adults in primary care
  • Oral versus i.v. antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in children: a cost-minimisation analysis
  • Incidence, characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe community acquired-MRSA pneumonia
Show more Original Articles: Respiratory infections

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Reviewers
  • CME
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • ERS author centre

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2021 by the European Respiratory Society