Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Comparison of induced sputum with bronchial wash, bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial biopsies in COPD

SR Rutgers, W Timens, HF Kaufmann, TW van der Mark, GH Koeter, DS Postma
European Respiratory Journal 2000 15: 109-115; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00.15110900
SR Rutgers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W Timens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HF Kaufmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TW van der Mark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GH Koeter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DS Postma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

It is unclear how cellular and soluble inflammatory markers in induced sputum relate to markers in lavage fluid and biopsies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This was investigated and also the possible differences between subjects with COPD and healthy controls assessed. Eighteen nonatopic subjects with COPD and 11 healthy controls were studied. Sputum was induced by inhalation of hypertonic saline. The airways were lavaged, using the first 50 mL for bronchial wash (BW) and the subsequent 150 mL for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and biopsies were taken from subsegmental carinae. Neutrophils were the predominant cell type in sputum in COPD (median 77.3%) but not in BW (5.5%) and BAL fluid (1.7%). Differential cell counts in sputum did not correlate with the counts in BW or BAL fluid or biopsies, whereas sputum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels correlated with BW fluid ECP levels (p=0.66, p=0.007) and sputum interleukin-8 (IL-8) concentration with BAL fluid IL-8 concentration (p= 0.52, p=0.026). Subjects with COPD had a higher percentage of sputum neutrophils and eosinophils and higher concentrations of ECP and IL-8 than healthy controls. The higher percentages of eosinophils and concentrations of ECP were also seen in BW and BAL fluid. Finally, higher numbers of macrophages and eosinophils were found in biopsies. In conclusion, induced sputum is derived from a different compartment from BW and BAL fluid and biopsies. Induced sputum may be useful for studying the contribution of luminal neutrophils and eosinophils in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 15 Issue 1 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of induced sputum with bronchial wash, bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial biopsies in COPD
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of induced sputum with bronchial wash, bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial biopsies in COPD
SR Rutgers, W Timens, HF Kaufmann, TW van der Mark, GH Koeter, DS Postma
European Respiratory Journal Jan 2000, 15 (1) 109-115; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00.15110900

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparison of induced sputum with bronchial wash, bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial biopsies in COPD
SR Rutgers, W Timens, HF Kaufmann, TW van der Mark, GH Koeter, DS Postma
European Respiratory Journal Jan 2000, 15 (1) 109-115; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00.15110900
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Ambulatory management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax
  • Systematic assessment of respiratory health in illness susceptible athletes
  • Identifying early PAH biomarkers in systemic sclerosis
Show more Original Articles

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society