Abstract
New reference value studies for spirometry are commonly compared to existing reference value studies using average data derived from existing reference equations. Such comparisons are inherently flawed because they do not account for differences in distributions of the independent and dependent variables and they do not have identical methodologies. This study was undertaken 1) to derive reference equations for forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) for natives of Mongolia and 2) to compare the Mongolian data with data from a 1981 reference study of Caucasians in Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Spirometry was performed on 344 (176 male, 168 female) healthy, nonsmoking urban natives of Mongolia to generate reference equations for FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC. These data were compared with data from a 1981 reference study of Caucasians in Salt Lake City, using both an analysis of covariance of the raw data and parametric and nonparametric comparisons of a matched pair subset. Average measured forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second in native Mongolians were within 1-2% of the Caucasian predicted values. These small differences are not statistically significant in any of the multiple methods of comparisons. Power analysis suggests that, if real differences exist, the differences in forced vital capacity are <155 mL for males, <105 mL for females, and the differences in forced expiratory volume in one second are <107 mL for males and <76 mL for females.
