Abstract
To identify the most efficient device for the delivery of bronchodilator aerosol to nonventilated preterm infants with chronic lung disease, we compared the metered dose inhaler (MDI) used in conjunction with a non-valved spacer, an ultrasonic nebulizer with a small medication cup, and two jet nebulizers. The subjects were enrolled in two double-blind randomized crossover studies. In study A (n=10), each infant was given a nominal dose of 200 microg of salbutamol by a MDI (Ventolin) at 4 h intervals, and in random sequence via an Aerochamber (Neonatal Aerochamber) with its one-way valve removed, an ultrasonic nebulizer with a small cone-shaped medication cup (Siemens Electronics), and a jet nebulizer (Side-stream). Their functional residual capacity (FRC) and static respiratory system mechanics were measured before, and at 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after aerosol delivery. Study B (n=10) was carried out in an identical manner, but with a different jet nebulizer (Hudson). In both studies, administration of salbutamol aerosol via the MDI Aerochamber or ultrasonic nebulizer resulted in a significantly greater reduction in respiratory system resistance than via jet nebulizers. Furthermore, the use of MDI Aerochamber or ultrasonic nebulizer was associated with a greater degree of post-treatment tachycardia and improvement in FRC. The bronchodilating effect of salbutamol delivered via the ultrasonic nebulizer appeared to be slightly greater than that via the MDI-Aerochamber, receiving significance only in Study B. We conclude that both the metered-dose inhaler used with a nonvalved Aerochamber and the ultrasonic nebulizer with a small medication cup are both more efficient than the jet nebulizers in preterm infants.
