Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Expiratory valves used for home devices: experimental and clinical comparison

F Lofaso, P Aslanian, JC Richard, D Isabey, T Hang, E Corriger, A Harf, L Brochard
European Respiratory Journal 1998 11: 1382-1388; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.11061382
F Lofaso
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Aslanian
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JC Richard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D Isabey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T Hang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E Corriger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Harf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Brochard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A bench study followed by a clinical trial were performed to evaluate the mechanical characteristics of five (commercially available) expiratory valves used for home ventilators, as well as the potential clinical impact of differences between these valves. In the in vitro study, expiratory valve resistance was evaluated under unvarying conditions, whereas dynamic behaviour was evaluated by calculating the imposed expiratory work of breathing during a simulated breath generated by a lung model. Differences in resistance and imposed expiratory work of up to twofold and 150%, respectively, were found across valves. We then conducted a randomized crossover clinical study to compare the effects of the least resistive (Bennett) and most resistive expiratory valves (Peters) in 10 intubated patients receiving pressure support ventilation. There were no significant differences regarding blood gases or respiratory parameters except for the oesophageal pressure-time product (PTPoes), which was significantly increased by the Peters valve (236+/-113 cmH2O x s x min(-1) versus 194+/-90 cmH2O x s x min(-1)). An analysis of individual responses found that the Peters valve induced substantial increases in intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), PTPoes, and expiratory activity in those patients with the greatest ventilatory demand. In conclusion, differences between home expiratory valve resistances may have a clinically relevant impact on the respiratory effort of patients with a high ventilatory demand.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 11 Issue 6 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expiratory valves used for home devices: experimental and clinical comparison
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Expiratory valves used for home devices: experimental and clinical comparison
F Lofaso, P Aslanian, JC Richard, D Isabey, T Hang, E Corriger, A Harf, L Brochard
European Respiratory Journal Jun 1998, 11 (6) 1382-1388; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.11061382

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Expiratory valves used for home devices: experimental and clinical comparison
F Lofaso, P Aslanian, JC Richard, D Isabey, T Hang, E Corriger, A Harf, L Brochard
European Respiratory Journal Jun 1998, 11 (6) 1382-1388; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.11061382
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Lung volume reduction surgery versus conservative treatment in severe emphysema
  • Inhaled isotonic alkaline versus saline solution and radioaerosol clearance in chronic cough
  • Effect of moderate alcohol upon obstructive sleep apnoea
Show more Clinical Trial

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society