Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Subjective scoring of cough in children: parent-completed vs child-completed diary cards vs an objective method

AB Chang, RG Newman, JB Carlin, PD Phelan, CF Robertson
European Respiratory Journal 1998 11: 462-466; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.11020462
AB Chang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RG Newman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JB Carlin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PD Phelan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CF Robertson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cough is often used as an outcome measure, although the reporting of cough is unreliable. Using a 24 h ambulatory cough meter to measure cough frequency, the aim of this study was to compare: 1) the correlation of child-completed diary cards to the objective measurement, with that of parent-completed diary cards; and 2) the visual analogue scale (VAS) to the verbal category descriptive (VCD) score. The cough meter consisted of a previously validated Holter monitor and a cough processor. Eighty four children (39 with recurrent cough and 45 controls, aged 6-17 yrs) used a cough meter at least once. Thirty three subjects used the cough meter twice. Parents and children completed separate diary cards using the VAS and VCD scores. The strength of the relationship between the subjective scores and the objective recordings was analysed by spearman's rank correlation coefficient. For daytime cough, child-completed diary cards and the VCD correlated better to the objective measurement than parent-completed diary cards and the VAS, respectively. In subjects that used the cough meter twice, the difference between the cough frequency correlated to the difference in the subjective scores. The confidence intervals for the correlation coefficients were wide. The agreement between the objective and subjective presence of daytime cough was good but that for night-time cough was poor. We conclude that the severity of cough defined on diary cards may not represent cough frequency. Objective readings are first choice but currently not yet practical. The verbal category descriptive diary card completed by children and assisted by parents has the highest correlation to cough frequency measured objectively.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 11 Issue 2 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Subjective scoring of cough in children: parent-completed vs child-completed diary cards vs an objective method
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Subjective scoring of cough in children: parent-completed vs child-completed diary cards vs an objective method
AB Chang, RG Newman, JB Carlin, PD Phelan, CF Robertson
European Respiratory Journal Feb 1998, 11 (2) 462-466; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.11020462

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Subjective scoring of cough in children: parent-completed vs child-completed diary cards vs an objective method
AB Chang, RG Newman, JB Carlin, PD Phelan, CF Robertson
European Respiratory Journal Feb 1998, 11 (2) 462-466; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.11020462
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Ambulatory management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax
  • Systematic assessment of respiratory health in illness susceptible athletes
  • Identifying early PAH biomarkers in systemic sclerosis
Show more Original Articles

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society