Abstract
Cough is often used as an outcome measure, although the reporting of cough is unreliable. Using a 24 h ambulatory cough meter to measure cough frequency, the aim of this study was to compare: 1) the correlation of child-completed diary cards to the objective measurement, with that of parent-completed diary cards; and 2) the visual analogue scale (VAS) to the verbal category descriptive (VCD) score. The cough meter consisted of a previously validated Holter monitor and a cough processor. Eighty four children (39 with recurrent cough and 45 controls, aged 6-17 yrs) used a cough meter at least once. Thirty three subjects used the cough meter twice. Parents and children completed separate diary cards using the VAS and VCD scores. The strength of the relationship between the subjective scores and the objective recordings was analysed by spearman's rank correlation coefficient. For daytime cough, child-completed diary cards and the VCD correlated better to the objective measurement than parent-completed diary cards and the VAS, respectively. In subjects that used the cough meter twice, the difference between the cough frequency correlated to the difference in the subjective scores. The confidence intervals for the correlation coefficients were wide. The agreement between the objective and subjective presence of daytime cough was good but that for night-time cough was poor. We conclude that the severity of cough defined on diary cards may not represent cough frequency. Objective readings are first choice but currently not yet practical. The verbal category descriptive diary card completed by children and assisted by parents has the highest correlation to cough frequency measured objectively.
