Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

User menu

  • Log in
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
  • ERS Publications
    • European Respiratory Journal
    • ERJ Open Research
    • European Respiratory Review
    • Breathe
    • ERS Books
    • ERS publications home

Login

European Respiratory Society

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • ERJ Early View
  • Past issues
  • ERS Guidelines
  • Authors/reviewers
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
    • COVID-19 submission information
    • Peer reviewer login
  • Alerts
  • Subscriptions

Differences in bronchodilating potency of salbutamol in Turbuhaler as compared with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler formulation in patients with reversible airway obstruction

CG Lofdahl, L Andersson, E Bondesson, LG Carlsson, K Friberg, J Hedner, Y Hornblad, P Jemsby, A Kallen, A Ullman, S Werner, N Svedmyr
European Respiratory Journal 1997 10: 2474-2478; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10112474
CG Lofdahl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Andersson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E Bondesson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LG Carlsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K Friberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J Hedner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y Hornblad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Jemsby
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Kallen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Ullman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Werner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N Svedmyr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Two studies are presented, with the aim of establishing the dose potency ratio for salbutamol given via Turbuhaler and via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Both studies were of a double-blind, randomized design. Outpatients with mild-to-moderate chronic reversible airway obstruction were given single doses of salbutamol administered via Turbuhaler and via pMDI. Efficacy and safety variables were measured before and during 6 h after each dose. The first study was a four-way crossover study including 12 patients. The salbutamol doses given were: 50, 100 and 2x100 microg via Turbuhaler and 2x100 microg via pMDI (Ventolin). The study showed that 2x100 microg of salbutamol inhaled via Turbuhaler is more potent than 2x100 microg salbutamol inhaled via a pMDI, and that 100 microg salbutamol via Turbuhaler is at least as potent as 2x100 microg salbutamol inhaled via a pMDI. The second study including 50 patients was a placebo-controlled five-way crossover, study. Two doses of salbutamol via Turbuhaler, 50 and 2x100 microg, and via pMDI, 100 and 2x200 microg, were given. There was a dose-dependent response in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) for both inhalers. Adjusted for differences in baseline FEV1 values, the estimated relative dose potency for Turbuhaler versus pMDI was 1.98:1 (95% confidence interval 12-3.2). These studies showed that the same bronchodilating effect can be achieved when half the dose of salbutamol given via a conventional pressurized metered-dose inhaler is given via Turbuhaler.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Vol 10 Issue 11 Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on European Respiratory Society .

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differences in bronchodilating potency of salbutamol in Turbuhaler as compared with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler formulation in patients with reversible airway obstruction
(Your Name) has sent you a message from European Respiratory Society
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the European Respiratory Society web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Differences in bronchodilating potency of salbutamol in Turbuhaler as compared with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler formulation in patients with reversible airway obstruction
CG Lofdahl, L Andersson, E Bondesson, LG Carlsson, K Friberg, J Hedner, Y Hornblad, P Jemsby, A Kallen, A Ullman, S Werner, N Svedmyr
European Respiratory Journal Nov 1997, 10 (11) 2474-2478; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10112474

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Differences in bronchodilating potency of salbutamol in Turbuhaler as compared with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler formulation in patients with reversible airway obstruction
CG Lofdahl, L Andersson, E Bondesson, LG Carlsson, K Friberg, J Hedner, Y Hornblad, P Jemsby, A Kallen, A Ullman, S Werner, N Svedmyr
European Respiratory Journal Nov 1997, 10 (11) 2474-2478; DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10112474
Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Full Text (PDF)

Jump To

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

More in this TOC Section

  • Lung volume reduction surgery versus conservative treatment in severe emphysema
  • Inhaled isotonic alkaline versus saline solution and radioaerosol clearance in chronic cough
  • An auto-continuous positive airway pressure device controlled exclusively by the forced oscillation technique
Show more Clinical Trial

Related Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current issue
  • Archive

About the ERJ

  • Journal information
  • Editorial board
  • Press
  • Permissions and reprints
  • Advertising

The European Respiratory Society

  • Society home
  • myERS
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility

ERS publications

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • ERJ Open Research
  • European Respiratory Review
  • Breathe
  • ERS books online
  • ERS Bookshop

Help

  • Feedback

For authors

  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication ethics and malpractice
  • Submit a manuscript

For readers

  • Alerts
  • Subjects
  • Podcasts
  • RSS

Subscriptions

  • Accessing the ERS publications

Contact us

European Respiratory Society
442 Glossop Road
Sheffield S10 2PX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 114 2672860
Email: journals@ersnet.org

ISSN

Print ISSN:  0903-1936
Online ISSN: 1399-3003

Copyright © 2023 by the European Respiratory Society