Chest
Volume 95, Issue 2, February 1989, Pages 344-347
Journal home page for Chest

The Quality of Well-being in Cystic Fibrosis

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.95.2.344Get rights and content

Traditional outcome measures in CF include PFTs, exercise tests, and several scoring systems that depend on pulmonary status and are largely subjective. The Quality of Well-being scale (QWB) is a widely used tool for measuring quality of life by three subscales: mobility, physical activity, and social activity, with points assigned within each subscale. The QWB has been shown to be valid in patients with COPD. We administered the QWB scale to 44 patients with CF, aged 7 to 36 years, and examined the relationship between QWB and PFTs, and in 15 patients the QWB vs exercise performance (peak VO2) on a progressive cycle ergometer test. QWB was significantly correlated with each variable examined: QWB vs FEV1, r=0.5518 (p<.0001); QWB vs FEF25-75%, r = 0.4793 (p<.001); QWB vs PEFR, r=0.4018 (p<.01); QWB vs peak Vo2, r=0.5778 (p<.01). The QWB scale is an objective measure that is significantly correlated with measures of performance and pulmonary function in CF. The relationship is not one of identity; further, the QWB is broad based and takes into account general well-being, not just pulmonary health, adding an important dimension to the care of patients with CF.

(Chest 1989; 95:344-47)

QWB = quality of well-being; SEP = Sickness Impact Profile

Section snippets

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The subjects were 25 male and 19 female patients with CF under care in the Pittsburgh Cystic Fibrosis Center. Their ages ranged from 7 to 36 years (mean = 16.5; SD = 6.9 years). Cystic fibrosis was diagnosed by elevated sweat chloride concentration (>60 mEq/L) and typical pulmonary or digestive symptoms or family history of CF.

Pulmonary function was measured using standard spirometry, adhering to the Snowbird Conference guidelines.13 We focused on readily obtainable measures that are

RESULTS

Resting pulmonary (unction test results and peak oxygen consumption during exercise are shown in Table 2. There was a significant correlation between QWB and each of the expiratory flow rates (Table 3; Fig 1). The correlation between QWB and FEV1 (r = 0.5518) was stronger than the correlation between QWB and FEF25-75% (r = 0.4793) and the correlation between QWB and PEFR (r = 0.4018). There was also a significant correlation between QWB and peak oxygen consumption (r = 0.5778), as seen in Table

DISCUSSION

This study provides evidence for the validity of the QWB scale as an outcome measure of patients with CF. The QWB is significantly related to more traditional outcome measures, namely, pulmonary function and exercise tolerance, yet the correlation is not perfect (r = 1.0). Although PFTs and exercise testing provide objective physiologic measures of disease severity and progression, neither is sensitive to other problems associated with the disease or its treatment. For instance, a hypothetical

REFERENCES (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Supported in part by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and NIH grants S07 RR0550724 and MOI RR00084

Manuscript received February 11; revision accepted June 21.

View full text