Chest
Volume 128, Issue 4, October 2005, Pages 2778-2787
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations in Critical Care
Impact of Clinical Guidelines in the Management of Severe Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.4.2778Get rights and content

Study objectives

To asses the impact of locally developed antimicrobial treatment guidelines in the initial empiric treatment of ICU patients with severe hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP).

Design

Observational cohort study with preguideline and postguideline data collection.

Patients

A total of 48 preguideline patients with 56 episodes of severe HAP defined by the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) compared with 58 guideline-treated (GUIDE) patients with 61 episodes of severe HAP.

Results

The two groups were similar in terms of mean (± SD) age (NNIS group, 67.7 ± 9.6 years; GUIDE group, 68.0 ± 11.5 years) and simplified acute physiology score (NNIS group, 12.9 ± 3.9; GUIDE group, 12.6 ± 3.1) at the HAP diagnosis, and the proportion of the most frequent isolates (ie, Pseudomonas and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). There was wide variation in initial antibiotic use in NNIS-treated patients, with cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and piperacillin being the most common agents compared with all of the GUIDE patients who received an imipenem-cilastin-based regimen. Vancomycin use was similar in both groups. The GUIDE patients had a higher percentage of adequately treated patients (81% vs 46%, respectively; p < 0.01) with a lower mortality rate at 14 days (8% vs 23%, respectively; p = 0.03). A lower mortality rate was also noted at the end of 30 days and the end of hospitalization but was not statistically significant. Appropriate imipenem use (as defined by the guidelines) occurred in 74% of the cases, and there was no increase in the number of imipenem-resistant organisms isolated during the course of the study.

Conclusions

These guidelines represent a successful implementation of a “deescalation” approach, because the recommended empiric therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics was switched to therapy with narrower spectrum agents after 3 days. Based on our experience, this approach improves the adequacy of antibiotic treatment, with improvement in short-term survival and without increasing the emergence of resistant organisms.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

The West Los Angeles Healthcare Center is a tertiary care facility with > 200 medical-surgical beds, of which 25 are ICU beds. No specific local guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia were in place prior to 1999. The management of patients with pneumonia (community-acquired pneumonia or HAP) was at the discretion of the physician staff. Perhaps reflecting the fact that national guidelines or consensus statements for the management of pneumonia provide only general recommendations regarding

Results

There were 48 patients in the NNIS database with 56 episodes of HAP, and they were designated as the NNIS group. All of the patients had been treated prior to guideline implementation. Fifty-eight patients with 61 episodes of HAP were treated according to the guidelines and comprised the GUIDE group. Basic demographics are summarized in Table 1. In those patients with more than one episode of HAP in the NNIS group, the episodes of HAP occurred a least 1 month apart during the same

Discussion

Of the many factors that influence the outcome of patients with VAP, the timely administration of effective antimicrobial therapy, well before culture results are known, forms the cornerstone for successful therapy.2627 The choice of appropriate therapy has a dramatic effect, with the mortality rate reduced by as much as one half to two thirds of that seen with inadequate antibiotic coverage.

Guidelines can help to facilitate appropriate management, and there has been an explosion in the number

References (40)

  • HacknerD et al.

    Guidelines in pulmonary medicine: a 25-year profile

    Chest

    (1999)
  • RelloJ et al.

    Why do physicians not follow evidence-based guidelines for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia? A survey based on the opinions of an international panel of intensivists

    Chest

    (2002)
  • VincentJL et al.

    The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe: results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study; EPIC International Advisory Committee

    JAMA

    (1995)
  • American Thoracic Society. Hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults: diagnosis, assessment of severity, initial antimicrobial therapy and preventive strategies

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (1995)
  • LeuHS et al.

    Hospital-acquired pneumonia: attributable mortality and morbidity

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1989)
  • ChastreJ et al.

    Ventilator-associated pneumonia

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2002)
  • WarrenDK et al.

    Outcome and attributable cost of ventilator-associated pneumonia among intensive care unit patients in a suburban medical center

    Crit Care Med

    (2003)
  • Winer-MuramHT et al.

    Pneumonia and ARDS in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography

    Radiology

    (1993)
  • SalataRA et al.

    Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in intubated, intensive care unit patients

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1987)
  • TorresA et al.

    Validation of different techniques for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: comparison with immediate postmortem pulmonary biopsy

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (1994)
  • Cited by (130)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal.org/misc/reprints.shtml).

    This study was supported in part by a grant from Merck & Co, Inc.

    View full text