Chest
Volume 143, Issue 2, February 2013, Pages 315-323
Journal home page for Chest

Original Research
Pulmonary Vascular Disease
Baseline and Follow-up 6-Min Walk Distance and Brain Natriuretic Peptide Predict 2-Year Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-0270Get rights and content

Background

Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels at baseline and after initiation of treatment have been associated with survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Our objective was to determine the individual and additive ability of pretreatment and posttreatment 6MWD and BNP to discriminate 2-year survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Methods

We included patients enrolled in two randomized clinical trials of ambrisentan who had 2-year follow-up (N = 370). 6MWD and BNP were assessed before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to identify optimal cutoffs that defined subgroups with a high 2-year mortality. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to determine the incremental prognostic value of combined assessments.

Results

6MWD at baseline and after 12 weeks of therapy were similarly discriminatory of 2-year survival (c-statistics = 0.77 [95% CI 0.70-0.84] and 0.82 [95% CI 0.75-0.88], respectively), whereas change in 6MWD from baseline to week 12 was not discriminating. The same observation was true of BNP at baseline and after 12 weeks of therapy (c-statistics = 0.68 [95% CI 0.60-0.76] and 0.74 [95% CI 0.66-0.82], respectively). After consideration of baseline 6MWD, there was no prognostic information added by the week 12 6MWD or BNP at either time point.

Conclusions

6MWD and BNP values at baseline or week 12 identified a population with an elevated risk of death at 2 years. A repeat assessment of 6MWD or BNP after 12 weeks of ambrisentan therapy did not provide additional prognostic information beyond that obtained from baseline values.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania (approval No. 814307). Additional details of the methods and statistical analysis are provided in e-Appendix 1.

ARIES (Ambrisentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Efficacy Study)-1 and ARIES-2 were concurrent, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs of ambrisentan for the treatment of PAH.8 Patients were randomized to placebo or

Results

There were 383 subjects in the study cohort (Fig 1). We excluded 13 who did not have 2-year survival status data from the primary analyses, leaving 370 subjects in the study sample for the 6MWD analysis. Thirty-seven additional subjects were excluded from the BNP analyses due to missing baseline BNP values, leaving 333 in the study sample. Baseline demographics of the study samples and those excluded are presented in Table 1, Table 2, for descriptive purposes only. Most patients had idiopathic

Discussion

In this study, we assessed the ability of baseline and 12-week 6MWD and BNP levels to discriminate PAH patients with a high vs low risk of death at 2 years after treatment with ambrisentan. Both 6MWD at baseline and at 12 weeks after treatment displayed moderately strong predictive ability for discriminating patients at high and low risks of death at 2 years. Similar findings were observed for baseline and 12-week BNP levels, although these were somewhat weaker predictors. A baseline 6MWD < 250

Acknowledgments

Author contributions: Drs Fritz and Kawut guarantee the integrity of the study.

Dr Fritz: contributed to study conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, as well as article drafting and revision, and gave final approval.

Ms Blair: contributed to data analysis and interpretation as well as article revision and gave final approval.

Dr Oudiz: contributed to data analysis and interpretation as well as article revision and gave final approval.

Dr Dufton: contributed to data analysis and

References (22)

Cited by (91)

  • Risk stratification strategy and assessment of disease progression in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: Updated Recommendations from the Cologne Consensus Conference 2018

    2018, International Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    There is still no specific marker for PAH or pulmonary vascular remodelling, although a wide variety of biomarkers have been explored in the field. These can be grouped into markers of vascular dysfunction [asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), endothelin-1, angiopoeitins, von Willebrand factor] [39–44], markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, chemokines) [45–48], markers of myocardial stress (atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)/NT-proBNP, troponins) [4,30,49–52], markers of low CO and/or tissue hypoxia [pCO2, uric acid, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), osteopontin] [53–56] and markers of secondary organ damage (creatinine, bilirubin) [4,52]. This list is constantly growing, but so far BNP and NT-proBNP remain the only biomarkers that are widely used in the routine practice of PH centres as well as in clinical trials.

View all citing articles on Scopus

For editorial comment see page 285

Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians. See online for more details.

Funding/Support: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [K24 HL103844 to S. M. K.].

View full text