Chest
Volume 112, Issue 1, July 1997, Pages 113-116
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations: Pulmonary Function Tests: Articles
Maximal Expiratory Pressures in Spinal Cord Injury Using Two Mouthpieces

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.112.1.113Get rights and content

Study objective

A technique for assessing expiratory muscle strength is the measurement of maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax). Previous studies have shown that a tube-style mouthpiece yields greater PEmax values than a flange-style mouthpiece because the latter technique is limited by the strength of the buccal muscles. In individuals with weak muscles of exhalation, this limitation may not apply because the strength of their buccal muscles may exceed that of the respiratory muscles.

Design

A tube-style mouthpiece and flange-style mouthpiece were used to measure PEmax. The order of the mouthpiece used in testing was alternated between subjects and the greatest values obtained after three efforts were compared.

Setting

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Participants

Fifty subjects with chronic spinal cord injury without acute medical illnesses recruited from veterans and the community.

Results

The mean difference between PEmaxtube and PEmaxflange was 20.7 ±26.4 cm H2O (p=0.0001). Differences were negligible in those with the weakest muscles of exhalation but were substantial even in some quadriplegic subjects.

Conclusion

Even in individuals with neuromuscular disorders, errors in assessment of expiratory strength occur when a flange-style mouthpiece is used, and we recommend that this technique be abandoned in the measurement of PEmax.

Section snippets

Level of Injury

The level and degree of completeness of SCI was determined for each subject by a Rehabilitation Medicine Service physician (C.G.T.). Injury level was determined as follows: (1) incomplete level—the highest level on each side of the body at which there was any loss of motor function; and (2) complete level—the lowest level on each side of the body at which the motor function was graded 3 of 5 or more with a subsequent caudal loss of all motor function. Sensory function was used in the place of

Results

There were 29 individuals with complete SCI and 21 with incomplete SCI. Among those individuals with complete SCI, 8 had cervical, 11 had high thoracic, and 10 had lower injuries. Among those with incomplete SCI, 13 had cervical, 2 had high thoracic, and 6 had lower injuries.

For each level of injury, the difference in PEmax between mouthpieces was greater than zero (Table 1). The mean difference for the entire group was 20.7±26.4 cm H2O, range was —24 to 110 cm H2O (p=0.0001). The lower the

Discussion

Owing to the clinical utility of using PEmax to quantify the loss of expiratory muscle strength, it is important to determine correctly the PEmax that a given individual is capable of producing. This study of SCI subjects confirmed prior results found in normal subjects whereby a tube-style mouthpiece yielded higher expiratory pressures than a flange-style mouthpiece.

The best method must accommodate several concerns. In previous studies, patients with generalized neuromuscular disease were

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge gratefully the advice of David Leith, MD, the advice of Robert Harrington, and the assistance of the Brockton/West Roxbury VAMC Spinal Cord Injury Service in conducting this study.

References (5)

  • N. Koulouris et al.

    Comparison of two different mouthpieces for the measurement of Pimax and Pemax in normal and weak subjects

    Eur Respir J

    (1988)
  • C.D. Cook et al.

    Static volume-pressure characteristics of the respiratory system during maximal efforts

    J Appl Physiol

    (1964)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (24)

  • Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Pulmonary Physiologic Principles and Management

    2018, Clinics in Chest Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    For measurement of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP, respectively), a flange-style mouthpiece is generally used. However, in a study of 50 subjects with tetraplegia, MEP values obtained using a tube-style mouthpiece were significantly greater than those obtained by use of an intraoral flange-style mouthpiece due to perioral air leaks around the latter device.51 Neuromuscular weakness in persons with chronic tetraplegia and high paraplegia is classically associated with spirometric and lung volume measurements demonstrating restrictive ventilatory defects highlighted by reduction in VC, peak expiratory flow, TLC, expiratory reserve volume (ERV) and IC, as well as an increase in residual volume (RV) and little change in FRC.40,52–61

  • Respiratory muscle training for respiratory deficits in neurodegenerative disorders: A systematic review

    2013, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    Depending its style, people are encouraged to maintain a tight seal around the mouthpiece using the buccal muscles.47 Given this, MEP can show improvements after training due to enhancement in buccal muscle performance.47 Although all the studies included in this review described the proper and standardized measurement of MIP/MEP as described by Black and Hyatt48 and the American Thoracic Society guidelines,42 seven7,9,13,27–30 detailed the technical characteristics of the equipment and the procedures used to prevent unnecessary contraction of the buccal muscles and uncontrolled air leaking.

  • Pulmonary function and spinal cord injury

    2009, Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
  • Determinants of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV<inf>1</inf>), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), and FEV<inf>1</inf>/FVC in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

    2006, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    In our study, we used the highest values of FEV1 and FVC from the expiratory efforts. MIP and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) were reported as the maximum of 3 values, but MEP was not assessed in our analysis because it was measured in fewer participants (n=230).20 Lung volumes were measured by helium dilution.

  • Dyspnea during daily activities in chronic spinal cord injury

    2005, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Maximum inspiratory pressures (MIP) and expiratory pressures (MEP) were measured 3 times with either a Validyneb pressure transducer connected to a Hewlett Packard strip chart recorder,c or a Dataq computerized data acquisition systemd with a microchip pressure transducer. Maximal values were reported.7 We used t tests to compare means, and we compared ratios using chi-square tests, using the Fisher exact test when appropriate.

  • A longitudinal evaluation of sleep and breathing in the first year after cervical spinal cord injury

    2005, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    A pneumatic pressure gaugee and a hard, oval mouthpiece were used to determine maximal static respiratory pressures. Tubular mouthpieces have been shown to give significantly higher measures of MIP and MEP in both able-bodied23 and spinal injury populations.24 At each testing session, neck circumference was measured at the level of the hyoid bone, and abdomen girth was measured at the level of the umbilicus.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Merit Review Grant.

View full text