Chest
Volume 109, Issue 2, February 1996, Pages 480-485
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations in Critical Care
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Prevents the Loss of Respiratory Compliance During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation in Acute Lung Injury Patients

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.109.2.480Get rights and content

Study objective

To study the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the decay of respiratory system compliance (Cpl, rs) due to low tidal volume (VT) ventilation in acute lung injury (ALI) patients.

Setting

General ICU in a university hospital.

Participants

Eight ALI patients with a lung injury score greater than 2.5.

Interventions

Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), with an average VT of 8.5 ± 0.4 mL/kg, were applied at three levels of PEEP (5, 10, and 15 cm H2O). Before each PCV and VCV period, lung volume history was standardized by manual hyperinflation maneuvers.

Measurements

We measured Cpl, rs at time 0 (start), 10, 20, and 30 (end) min from the beginning of each PCV and VCV period. Gas exchange and hemodynamic data were collected at end.

Results

At PEEP 5 and 10 cm H2O, we observed a progressive Cpl, rs decay with both PCV and VCV modes. At PEEP 5 cm H2O, we detected a higher Cpl, rs decrease during PCV, due to a higher Cpl, rs at start, compared with VCV. At PEEP 15 cm H2O, Cpl, rs did not decrease significantly. Cpl, rs values measured at end as well as oxygenation and hemodynamic data did not differ between PCV and VCV. At PEEP 15 cm H2O, PCV provided lower PaCO2 than VCV.

Conclusions

A PEEP of at least 15 cm H2O was needed to prevent Cpl, rs decay. The progressive Cpl, rs loss we observed at lower PEEP probably reflects alveolar instability.

Section snippets

Patient Population

Eight patients with ALI were enrolled in this study according to the following criteria: (1) lung injury score of 2.5 or more;15 (2) no history of chronic obstructive lung disease; (3) no active air leak; (4) pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) less than 18 mm Hg; and (5) stable hemodynamics during the previous 6 h. All patients were in supine position and undergoing VCV by a ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens Elema; Solna, Sweden). All patients were under IV sedation by continuous

RESULTS

Cpl, rs decreased from start to end with both ventilatory modes (Tables 2 and 3) at PEEP 5 and 10 cm H2O, but not at PEEP 15 cm H2O. Figure 1 shows the average time course of Cpl, rs at the three PEEP levels during PCV and VCV periods. The Cpl, rs decay, when observed, was progressive in time, but an apparent steady state was reached by the 30th minute.

At PEEP 5 cm H2O, the decrease of Cpl, rs was significantly higher during PCV than during VCV, even if end Cpl, rs values were comparable

DISCUSSION

The main results of this study are as follows: at PEEP 5 and 10 cm H2O, Cpl, rs decayed from start to end during both VCV and PCV modes and PEEP 15 cm H2O prevented this decay in Cpl, rs.

An interesting collateral finding was that, at PEEP 15 cm H2O, PaCO2 was lower in PCV than in VCV. The observed decay of Cpl, rs confirms the classic studies reporting a progressive Cpl, rs decrease during anesthesia.9 Low VT ventilation fosters Cpl, rs decay while hyperinflation maneuvers may restore Cpl, rs.10

CONCLUSIONS

In ALI patients ventilated with relatively low VT, we observed a Cpl, rs decay in time that was prevented by a 15 cm H2O PEEP level. Progressive compliance loss during mechanical ventilation is the result of ventilatory strategies that allow the development of atelectasis.14 Experimental evidence suggests, however, that alveolar instability worsens lung injury.29 Therefore, ventilatory patterns focused on lung volume recruitment are recommended as a safer choice.30 In our patients, a relatively

REFERENCES (30)

  • HernandezLA et al.

    Chest wall restriction limits high airway pressure-induced lung injury in young rabbits

    J Appl Physiol

    (1989)
  • PontoppidanH et al.

    Acute respiratory failure in the adult (third of three parts)

    N Engl J Med

    (1972)
  • MeadJ et al.

    Relation of volume history of lungs to respiratory mechanics in anesthetized dogs

    J Appl Physiol

    (1959)
  • BendixenHH et al.

    Impaired oxygenation in surgical patients during general anesthesia with controlled ventilation

    N Engl J Med

    (1963)
  • EgbertLD et al.

    Intermittent deep breaths and compliance during anesthesia in man

    Anesthesiology

    (1963)
  • Cited by (64)

    • The Patient with a Full Stomach

      2013, Benumof and Hagberg's Airway Management
    • Ventilation strategies in obese patients undergoing surgery: A quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis

      2012, British Journal of Anaesthesia
      Citation Excerpt :

      This result was not unexpected as previous studies in ALI and ARDS patients,42 43 or in non-obese patients undergoing thoracic surgery44 failed to show a significant difference between these two ventilation modes. As suggested by Cereda and colleagues,45 a theoretical risk of PCV in surgical patients is that the progressive decrease in compliance during anaesthesia and surgery may lead to a reduction in ventilation. These trials did not allow confirmation of this hypothesis.

    • The Patient with a Full Stomach

      2012, Benumof and Hagberg's Airway Management: Third Edition
    • Blast injuries

      2009, The Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      When positive-pressure ventilation is needed, lung-protective techniques should be used. These strategies include maintaining acceptably low oxygen saturations (90%) and low tidal volumes (5–7 mL/kg), pressure-controlled ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP), and permissive hypercapnia.2,36,62,79–83 By contrast, strategies to minimise the sequelae from arterial air emboli include maximising spontaneous ventilation, low PEEP, and using 100% FiO2 to encourage quick absorption of emboli.73,84

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    revision accepted September 15.

    View full text