Chest
Volume 103, Issue 5, May 1993, Pages 1385-1389
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
Changing Patterns of Aerosol Deposition During Methacholine Bronchoprovocation

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.103.5.1385Get rights and content

During bronchoprovocation testing with methacholine, induced changes in airway geometry are known to affect sites of drug deposition. However, it is not known if changes in these sites determine measured responsiveness. We assessed the importance of sites of deposition as determinants of reactivity by comparing particle behavior in two subject groups with and without hyperresponsiveness. By administering radiolabeled aerosols of similar aerodynamic characteristics to methacholine aerosol, we measured the deposition pattern in terms of the specific central to peripheral ratio (sC/P) before and after methacholine inhalation (sC/P1 and sC/P*2, respectively) and thereby quantified the changes in deposition sites that occur during the course of a typical bronchoprovocation test. Subjects whose FEV1 decreased by 20 percent or greater were classified as methacholine responsive (MR; nine subjects), and the remainder were classified as nonmethacholine responsive (NMR; seven subjects). The two groups had similar baseline FEV1 percent predicted (FEV1 percent) and initial deposition patterns (sC/P1) with particles depositing primarily in peripheral airways (mean ± SE; sC/P, 1.43 ± 0.070 and 1.39 ± 0.065, MR and NMR, respectively, p = NS). Following methacholine inhalation, the deposition pattern changes markedly for all subjects with particles depositing primarily in central airways (sC/P2 2.58 ± 0.24, p = 0.001, and 2.15 ± 0.22, p = 0.001 from baseline, p = NS between groups) By definition, the MR subjects had a significantly greater change in FEV1 than the NMR subjects. Preferential deposition in central airways occurs in all subjects during bronchoprovocation testing and does not significantly determine methacholine responsiveness.

Section snippets

Subjects

Sixteen subjects were recruited by advertisement. Nine had a history of being treated for asthma, and seven had no history of asthma. All subjects had been free of symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection for at least four weeks. All subjects abstained from taking bronchodilators for 12 h prior to the study, and none had taken corticosteroids or cromolyn sodium for at least 8 weeks. The study was confined to subjects with a baseline FEV1 percent predicted of greater than 75 percent. The

RESULTS

Clinical and spirometric details and the responsiveness expressed as PC20 are shown in Table 1. Of the nine subjects who gave a history of asthma, two did not have a significant response to methacholine. By contrast, two of the seven without a history of asthma were hyperresponsive. The subjects are grouped into methacholine responsive (MR) and nonmethacholine responsive (NMR). The age distribution of the two groups is similar. The baseline FEV1 percent predicted (FEV1 percent) for both groups

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that the pattern of aerosol deposition changes significantly during typical methacholine bronchoprovocation in subjects with and without hyperresponsiveness. The finding that changes occur in the MR subjects is consistent with the work of Pavia et al14 in stable subjects with airways obstruction, with a study by Clague et al8 in subjects who were hyperresponsive to histamine, and with a study by Richards et al9 who induced a 20 percent decrease in FEV1 in normal subjects

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Mr. Robert Perry for technical assistance in performing the deposition studies and Roger Grimson, Ph.D., Department of Community Medicine, SUNY at Stony Brook, for statistical advice.

REFERENCES (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Supported by grant AI 16337 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Manuscript received May 14; revision accepted August 7.

View full text