Abbreviations and acronyms

     
  • ACS

    acute coronary syndrome

  •  
  • AMPLIFY

    Apixaban for the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis as First-line Therapy

  •  
  • aPTT

    activated partial thromboplastin time

  •  
  • b.i.d.

    bis in diem (twice daily)

  •  
  • b.p.m.

    beats per minute

  •  
  • BNP

    brain natriuretic peptide

  •  
  • BP

    blood pressure

  •  
  • CI

    confidence interval

  •  
  • CO

    cardiac output

  •  
  • COPD

    chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

  •  
  • CPG

    Committee for Practice Guidelines

  •  
  • CRNM

    clinically relevant non-major

  •  
  • CT

    computed tomographic/tomogram

  •  
  • CTEPH

    chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

  •  
  • CUS

    compression venous ultrasonography

  •  
  • DSA

    digital subtraction angiography

  •  
  • DVT

    deep vein thrombosis

  •  
  • ELISA

    enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

  •  
  • ESC

    European Society of Cardiology

  •  
  • H-FABP

    heart-type fatty acid-binding protein

  •  
  • HIT

    heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

  •  
  • HR

    hazard ratio

  •  
  • ICOPER

    International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry

  •  
  • ICRP

    International Commission on Radiological Protection

  •  
  • INR

    international normalized ratio

  •  
  • iPAH

    idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

  •  
  • IVC

    inferior vena cava

  •  
  • LMWH

    low molecular weight heparin

  •  
  • LV

    left ventricle/left ventricular

  •  
  • MDCT

    multi-detector computed tomographic (angiography)

  •  
  • MRA

    magnetic resonance angiography

  •  
  • NGAL

    neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin

  •  
  • NOAC(s)

    Non-vitamin K-dependent new oral anticoagulant(s)

  •  
  • NT-proBNP

    N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide

  •  
  • o.d.

    omni die (every day)

  •  
  • OR

    odds ratio

  •  
  • PAH

    pulmonary arterial hypertension

  •  
  • PE

    pulmonary embolism

  •  
  • PEA

    pulmonary endarterectomy

  •  
  • PEITHO

    Pulmonary EmbolIsm THrOmbolysis trial

  •  
  • PESI

    pulmonary embolism severity index

  •  
  • PH

    pulmonary hypertension

  •  
  • PIOPED

    Prospective Investigation On Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis

  •  
  • PVR

    pulmonary vascular resistance

  •  
  • RIETE

    Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad Thromboembolica venosa

  •  
  • RR

    relative risk

  •  
  • rtPA

    recombinant tissue plasminogen activator

  •  
  • RV

    right ventricle/ventricular

  •  
  • SPECT

    single photon emission computed tomography

  •  
  • sPESI

    simplified pulmonary embolism severity index

  •  
  • TAPSE

    tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion

  •  
  • Tc

    technetium

  •  
  • TOE

    transoesophageal echocardiography

  •  
  • TTR

    time in therapeutic range

  •  
  • TV

    tricuspid valve

  •  
  • UFH

    unfractionated heparin

  •  
  • V/Q scan

    ventilation–perfusion scintigraphy

  •  
  • VKA

    vitamin K antagonist(s)

  •  
  • VTE

    venous thromboembolism

1. Preamble

Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient, with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk-benefit-ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines and recommendations should help the health professionals to make decisions in their daily practice. However, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible health professional(s) in consultation with the patient and caregiver as appropriate.

A great number of Guidelines have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as well as by other societies and organisations. Because of the impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for the development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines can be found on the ESC Web Site (http://www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/esc-guidelines/about/Pages/rules-writing.aspx). ESC Guidelines represent the official position of the ESC on a given topic and are regularly updated.

Members of this Task Force were selected by the ESC to represent professionals involved with the medical care of patients with this pathology. Selected experts in the field undertook a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management (including diagnosis, treatment, prevention and rehabilitation) of a given condition according to ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) policy. A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures was performed including assessment of the risk-benefit-ratio. Estimates of expected health outcomes for larger populations were included, where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular management options were weighed and graded according to predefined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1

Classes of recommendations

graphic
graphic
Table 1

Classes of recommendations

graphic
graphic
Table 2

Levels of evidence

graphic
graphic
Table 2

Levels of evidence

graphic
graphic

The experts of the writing and reviewing panels filled in declarations of interest forms which might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These forms were compiled into one file and can be found on the ESC Web Site (http://www.escardio.org/guidelines). Any changes in declarations of interest that arise during the writing period must be notified to the ESC and updated. The Task Force received its entire financial support from the ESC without any involvement from healthcare industry.

The ESC CPG supervises and coordinates the preparation of new Guidelines produced by Task Forces, expert groups or consensus panels. The Committee is also responsible for the endorsement process of these Guidelines. The ESC Guidelines undergo extensive review by the CPG and external experts. After appropriate revisions it is approved by all the experts involved in the Task Force. The finalized document is approved by the CPG for publication in the European Heart Journal. It was developed after careful consideration of the scientific and medical knowledge and the evidence available at the time of their dating.

The task of developing ESC Guidelines covers not only the integration of the most recent research, but also the creation of educational tools and implementation programmes for the recommendations. To implement the guidelines, condensed pocket guidelines versions, summary slides, booklets with essential messages, summary cards for non-specialists, electronic version for digital applications (smartphones etc) are produced. These versions are abridged and, thus, if needed, one should always refer to the full text version which is freely available on the ESC Website. The National Societies of the ESC are encouraged to endorse, translate and implement the ESC Guidelines. Implementation programmes are needed because it has been shown that the outcome of disease may be favourably influenced by the thorough application of clinical recommendations.

Surveys and registries are needed to verify that real-life daily practice is in keeping with what is recommended in the guidelines, thus completing the loop between clinical research, writing of guidelines, disseminating them and implementing them into clinical practice.

Health professionals are encouraged to take the ESC Guidelines fully into account when exercising their clinical judgment as well as in the determination and the implementation of preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic medical strategies. However, the ESC Guidelines do not override in any way whatsoever the individual responsibility of health professionals to make appropriate and accurate decisions in consideration of each patient's health condition and in consultation with that patient and the patient's caregiver where appropriate and/or necessary. It is also the health professional's responsibility to verify the rules and regulations applicable to drugs and devices at the time of prescription.

2. Introduction

This document follows the two previous ESC Guidelines focussing on clinical management of pulmonary embolism, published in 2000 and 2008. Many recommendations have retained or reinforced their validity; however, new data has extended or modified our knowledge in respect of optimal diagnosis, assessment and treatment of patients with PE. The most clinically relevant new aspects of this 2014 version as compared with its previous version published in 2008 relate to: These new aspects have been integrated into previous knowledge to suggest optimal and—whenever possible—objectively validated management strategies for patients with suspected or confirmed pulmonary embolism.

  1. Recently identified predisposing factors for venous thromboembolism

  2. Simplification of clinical prediction rules

  3. Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs

  4. Sub-segmental pulmonary embolism

  5. Incidental, clinically unsuspected pulmonary embolism

  6. Advanced risk stratification of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism

  7. Initiation of treatment with vitamin K antagonists

  8. Treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with the new direct oral anticoagulants

  9. Efficacy and safety of reperfusion treatment for patients at intermediate risk

  10. Early discharge and home (outpatient) treatment of pulmonary embolism

  11. Current diagnosis and treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

  12. Formal recommendations for the management of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy and of pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer.

In order to limit the length of the printed text, additional information, tables, figures and references are available as web addenda at the ESC website (www.escardio.org).

2.1 Epidemiology

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) encompasses deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). It is the third most frequent cardiovascular disease with an overall annual incidence of 100–200 per 100 000 inhabitants.1,2 VTE may be lethal in the acute phase or lead to chronic disease and disability,3–6 but it is also often preventable.

Acute PE is the most serious clinical presentation of VTE. Since PE is, in most cases, the consequence of DVT, most of the existing data on its epidemiology, risk factors, and natural history are derived from studies that have examined VTE as a whole.

The epidemiology of PE is difficult to determine because it may remain asymptomatic, or its diagnosis may be an incidental finding;2 in some cases, the first presentation of PE may be sudden death.7,8 Overall, PE is a major cause of mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization in Europe. As estimated on the basis of an epidemiological model, over 317 000 deaths were related to VTE in six countries of the European Union (with a total population of 454.4 million) in 2004.2 Of these cases, 34% presented with sudden fatal PE and 59% were deaths resulting from PE that remained undiagnosed during life; only 7% of the patients who died early were correctly diagnosed with PE before death. Since patients older than 40 years are at increased risk compared with younger patients and the risk approximately doubles with each subsequent decade, an ever-larger number of patients are expected to be diagnosed with (and perhaps die of) PE in the future.9

In children, studies reported an annual incidence of VTE between 53 and 57 per 100 000 among hospitalized patients,10,11 and between 1.4 and 4.9 per 100 000 in the community at large.12,13

2.2 Predisposing factors

A list of predisposing (risk) factors for VTE is shown in Web Addenda Table I. There is an extensive collection of predisposing environmental and genetic factors. VTE is considered to be a consequence of the interaction between patient-related—usually permanent—risk factors and setting-related—usually temporary—risk factors. VTE is considered to be ‘provoked’ in the presence of a temporary or reversible risk factor (such as surgery, trauma, immobilization, pregnancy, oral contraceptive use or hormone replacement therapy) within the last 6 weeks to 3 months before diagnosis,14 and ‘unprovoked’ in the absence thereof. PE may also occur in the absence of any known risk factor. The presence of persistent—as opposed to major, temporary—risk factors may affect the decision on the duration of anticoagulation therapy after a first episode of PE.

Major trauma, surgery, lower limb fractures and joint replacements, and spinal cord injury, are strong provoking factors for VTE.9,15 Cancer is a well-recognized predisposing factor for VTE. The risk of VTE varies with different types of cancer;16,17 haematological malignancies, lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, pancreatic cancer and brain cancer carry the highest risk.18,19 Moreover, cancer is a strong risk factor for all-cause mortality following an episode of VTE.20

In fertile women, oral contraception is the most frequent predisposing factor for VTE.21,22 When occurring during pregnancy, VTE is a major cause of maternal mortality.23 The risk is highest in the third trimester of pregnancy and over the 6 weeks of the postpartum period, being up to 60 times higher 3 months after delivery, compared with the risk in non-pregnant women.23In vitro fertilization further increases the risk of pregnancy-associated VTE. In a cross-sectional study derived from a Swedish registry, the overall risk of PE (compared with the risk of age-matched women whose first child was born without in vitro fertilization) was particularly increased during the first trimester of pregnancy [hazard ratio (HR) 6.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.21–21.96]. The absolute number of women who suffered PE was low in both groups (3.0 vs. 0.4 cases per 10 000 pregnancies during the first trimester, and 8.1 vs. 6.0 per 10 000 pregnancies overall).24 In post-menopausal women who receive hormone replacement therapy, the risk of VTE varies widely depending on the formulation used.25

Infection has been found to be a common trigger for hospitalization for VTE.15,26,27 Blood transfusion and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are also associated with an increased risk of VTE.15,28

In children, PE is usually associated with DVT and is rarely unprovoked. Serious chronic medical conditions and central venous lines are considered to be likely triggers of PE.29

VTE may be viewed as part of the cardiovascular disease continuum and common risk factors—such as cigarette smoking, obesity, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus30–33—are shared with arterial disease, notably atherosclerosis.34–37 However, at least in part, this may be an indirect association, mediated by the effects of coronary artery disease and, in the case of smoking, cancer.38,39 Myocardial infarction and heart failure increase the risk of PE;40,41conversely, patients with VTE have an increased risk of subsequent myocardial infarction and stroke.42

2.3 Natural history

The first studies on the natural history of VTE were carried out in the setting of orthopaedic surgery during the 1960s.43 Evidence collected since this initial report has shown that DVT develops less frequently in non-orthopaedic surgery. The risk of VTE is highest during the first two post-operative weeks but remains elevated for two to three months. Antithrombotic prophylaxis significantly reduces the risk of perioperative VTE. The incidence of VTE is reduced with increasing duration of thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery and (to a lesser extent) cancer surgery: this association has not been shown for general surgery.44,45 The majority of patients with symptomatic DVT have proximal clots, complicated by PE in 40–50% of cases, often without clinical manifestations.44,45

Registries and hospital discharge datasets of unselected patients with PE or VTE yielded 30-day all-cause mortality rates between 9% and 11%, and three-month mortality ranging between 8.6% and 17%.46–48 Following the acute PE episode, resolution of pulmonary thrombi, as evidenced by lung perfusion defects, is frequently incomplete. In one study, lung perfusion scintigraphy demonstrated abnormalities in 35% of patients a year after acute PE, although the degree of pulmonary vascular obstruction was <15% in 90% of the cases.49 Two relatively recent cohort studies covering 173 and 254 patients yielded incidences approaching 30%.50,51 The incidence of confirmed chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) after unprovoked PE is currently estimated at approximately 1.5% (with a wide range reported by mostly small-cohort studies), with most cases appearing within 24 months of the index event.52,53

The risk of recurrence of VTE has been reviewed in detail.54–56 Based on historical data, the cumulative proportion of patients with early recurrence of VTE (on anticoagulant treatment) amounts to 2.0% at 2 weeks, 6.4% at 3 months and 8% at 6 months; more recent, randomized anticoagulation trials (discussed in the section on acute phase treatment) indicate that recurrence rates may have dropped considerably recently. The rate of recurrence is highest during the first two weeks and declines thereafter. During the early period, active cancer and failure to rapidly achieve therapeutic levels of anticoagulation appear to independently predict an increased risk of recurrence.56,57

The cumulative proportion of patients with late recurrence of VTE (after six months, and in most cases after discontinuation of anticoagulation) has been reported to reach 13% at 1 year, 23% at 5 years, and 30% at 10 years.56 Overall, the frequency of recurrence does not appear to depend on the clinical presentation (DVT or PE) of the first event, but recurrent VTE is likely to occur in the same clinical form as the index episode (i.e. if VTE recurs after PE, it will most likely be PE again). Recurrence is more frequent after multiple VTE episodes as opposed to a single event, and after unprovoked VTE as opposed to the presence of temporary risk factors, particularly surgery.58 It is also more frequent in women who continue hormone intake after a VTE episode, and in patients who have suffered PE or proximal vein thrombosis compared to distal (calf) vein thrombosis. On the other hand, factors for which an independent association with late recurrence have not been definitely established include age, male sex,59,60 a family history of VTE, and an increased body mass index.54,56 Elevated D-dimer levels, either during or after discontinuation of anticoagulation, indicate an increased risk of recurrence;61–63 on the other hand, single thrombophilic defects have a low predictive value and anticoagulation management based on thrombophilia testing has not been found to reduce VTE recurrence.64,65

2.4 Pathophysiology

Acute PE interferes with both the circulation and gas exchange. Right ventricular (RV) failure due to pressure overload is considered the primary cause of death in severe PE.

Pulmonary artery pressure increases only if more than 30–50% of the total cross-sectional area of the pulmonary arterial bed is occluded by thromboemboli.66 PE-induced vasoconstriction, mediated by the release of thromboxane A2 and serotonin, contributes to the initial increase in pulmonary vascular resistance after PE,67 an effect that can be reversed by vasodilators.68,69 Anatomical obstruction and vasoconstriction lead to an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and a proportional decrease in arterial compliance.70

The abrupt increase in pulmonary vascular resistance results in RV dilation, which alters the contractile properties of the RV myocardium via the Frank-Starling mechanism. The increase in RV pressure and volume leads to an increase in wall tension and myocyte stretch. RV contraction time is prolonged, while neurohumoral activation leads to inotropic and chronotropic stimulation. Together with systemic vasoconstriction, these compensatory mechanisms increase pulmonary artery pressure, improving flow through the obstructed pulmonary vascular bed, and thus temporarily stabilize systemic blood pressure (BP).71 The extent of immediate adaptation is limited, since a non-preconditioned, thin-walled right ventricle (RV) is unable to generate a mean pulmonary artery pressure above 40 mm Hg.

The prolongation of RV contraction time into early diastole in the left ventricle leads to leftward bowing of the interventricular septum.72 The desynchronization of the ventricles may be exacerbated by the development of right bundle-branch block. As a result, left ventricular (LV) filling is impeded in early diastole, and this may lead to a reduction of the cardiac output and contribute to systemic hypotension and haemodynamic instability.73

As described above, excessive neurohumoral activation in PE can be the result both of abnormal RV wall tension and of circulatory shock. The finding of massive infiltrates in the RV myocardium of patients who died within 48 hours of acute PE may be explained by high levels of epinephrine released as a result of the PE-induced ‘myocarditis’.74 This inflammatory response might explain the secondary haemodynamic destabilization which sometimes occurs 24–48 hours after acute PE, although early recurrence of PE may be an alternative explanation in some of these cases.75

Finally, the association between elevated circulating levels of biomarkers of myocardial injury and an adverse early outcome indicates that RV ischaemia is of pathophysiological significance in the acute phase of PE.76–78 Although RV infarction is uncommon after PE, it is likely that the imbalance between oxygen supply and demand can result in damage to cardiomyocytes and further reduce contractile forces.

The detrimental effects of acute PE on the RV myocardium and the circulation are summarized in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Key factors contributing to haemodynamic collapse in acute pulmonary embolism

Respiratory failure in PE is predominantly a consequence of haemodynamic disturbances.79 Low cardiac output results in desaturation of the mixed venous blood. In addition, zones of reduced flow in obstructed vessels, combined with zones of overflow in the capillary bed served by non-obstructed vessels, result in ventilation–perfusion mismatch, which contributes to hypoxaemia. In about one-third of patients, right-to-left shunting through a patent foramen ovale can be detected by echocardiography: this is caused by an inverted pressure gradient between the right atrium and left atrium and may lead to severe hypoxaemia and an increased risk of paradoxical embolization and stroke.80 Finally, even if they do not affect haemodynamics, small distal emboli may create areas of alveolar haemorrhage resulting in haemoptysis, pleuritis, and pleural effusion, which is usually mild. This clinical presentation is known as ‘pulmonary infarction’. Its effect on gas exchange is normally mild, except in patients with pre-existing cardiorespiratory disease.

2.5 Clinical classification of pulmonary embolism severity

The clinical classification of the severity of an episode of acute PE is based on the estimated PE-related early mortality risk defined by in-hospital or 30-day mortality (Figure 2). This stratification, which has important implications both for the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies proposed in these guidelines, is based on the patient's clinical status at presentation, with high-risk PE being suspected or confirmed in the presence of shock or persistent arterial hypotension and not high-risk PE in their absence.

Figure 2

Initial risk stratification of acute PE.

3. Diagnosis

Throughout these Guidelines and for the purpose of clinical management, ‘confirmed PE’ is defined as a probability of PE high enough to indicate the need for PE-specific treatment, and ‘excluded PE’ as a probability of PE low enough to justify withholding PE-specific treatment with an acceptably low risk.

3.1 Clinical presentation

PE may escape prompt diagnosis since the clinical signs and symptoms are non-specific (Table 3). When the clinical presentation raises the suspicion of PE in an individual patient, it should prompt further objective testing. In most patients, PE is suspected on the basis of dyspnoea, chest pain, pre-syncope or syncope, and/or haemoptysis.81–83 Arterial hypotension and shock are rare but important clinical presentations, since they indicate central PE and/or a severely reduced haemodynamic reserve. Syncope is infrequent, but may occur regardless of the presence of haemodynamic instability.84 Finally, PE may be completely asymptomatic and be discovered incidentally during diagnostic work-up for another disease or at autopsy.

Table 3

Clinical characteristics of patients with suspected PE in the emergency department (adapted from Pollack et al. (2011)).82

graphic
graphic

DVT = deep vein thrombosis.

Table 3

Clinical characteristics of patients with suspected PE in the emergency department (adapted from Pollack et al. (2011)).82

graphic
graphic

DVT = deep vein thrombosis.

Chest pain is a frequent symptom of PE and is usually caused by pleural irritation due to distal emboli causing pulmonary infarction.85 In central PE, chest pain may have a typical angina character, possibly reflecting RV ischaemia and requiring differential diagnosis with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or aortic dissection. Dyspnoea may be acute and severe in central PE; in small peripheral PE, it is often mild and may be transient. In patients with pre-existing heart failure or pulmonary disease, worsening dyspnoea may be the only symptom indicative of PE.

Knowledge of the predisposing factors for VTE is important in determining the likelihood of PE, which increases with the number of predisposing factors present; however, in as many as 30% of the patients with PE, no provoking factors can be detected.86 In blood gas analysis, hypoxaemia is considered a typical finding in acute PE, but up to 40% of the patients have normal arterial oxygen saturation and 20% a normal alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient.87,88 Hypocapnia is also often present. The chest X-ray is frequently abnormal and, although its findings are usually non-specific in PE, it is useful for excluding other causes of dyspnoea or chest pain.89 Electrocardiographic changes indicative of RV strain, such as inversion of T waves in leads V1–V4, a QR pattern in V1, S1Q3T3 pattern, and incomplete or complete right bundle-branch block, may be helpful. These electrocardiographic changes are usually found in more severe cases of PE;90 in milder cases, the only anomaly may be sinus tachycardia, present in 40% of patients. Finally, atrial arrhythmias, most frequently atrial fibrillation, may be associated with acute PE.

3.2 Assessment of clinical probability

Despite the limited sensitivity and specificity of individual symptoms, signs, and common tests, the combination of findings evaluated by clinical judgement or by the use of prediction rules allows to classify patients with suspected PE into distinct categories of clinical or pre-test probability that correspond to an increasing actual prevalence of confirmed PE. As the post-test (e.g. after computed tomography) probability of PE depends not only on the characteristics of the diagnostic test itself but also on pre-test probability, this has become a key step in all diagnostic algorithms for PE.

The value of clinical judgement has been confirmed in several large series,91–93 including the Prospective Investigation On Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED).94 Note that clinical judgement usually includes commonplace tests such as chest X-ray and electrocardiogram for differential diagnosis. However, clinical judgement lacks standardization; therefore, several explicit clinical prediction rules have been developed. Of these, the most frequently used prediction rule is the one offered by Wells et al. (Table 4).95 This rule has been validated extensively using both a three-category scheme (low, moderate, or high clinical probability of PE) and a two-category scheme (PE likely or unlikely).96–100 It is simple and based on information that is easy to obtain; on the other hand, the weight of one subjective item (‘alternative diagnosis less likely than PE’) may reduce the inter-observer reproducibility of the Wells rule.101–103 The revised Geneva rule is also simple and standardized (Table 4).93 Both have been adequately validated.104–106

Table 4

Clinical prediction rules for PE

graphic
graphic

b.p.m.= beats per minute; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; PE = pulmonary embolism.

Table 4

Clinical prediction rules for PE

graphic
graphic

b.p.m.= beats per minute; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; PE = pulmonary embolism.

More recently, both the Wells and the revised Geneva rule were simplified in an attempt to increase their adoption into clinical practice (Table 4),107,108 and the simplified versions were externally validated.105,109 Whichever is used, the proportion of patients with confirmed PE can be expected to be around 10% in the low-probability category, 30% in the moderate-probability category, and 65% in the high-clinical probability category when using the three-level classification.104 When the two-level classification is used, the proportion of patients with confirmed PE in the PE-unlikely category is around 12%.104

3.3 D-dimer testing

D-dimer levels are elevated in plasma in the presence of acute thrombosis because of simultaneous activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis. The negative predictive value of D-dimer testing is high and a normal D-dimer level renders acute PE or DVT unlikely. On the other hand, fibrin is also produced in a wide variety of conditions such as cancer, inflammation, bleeding, trauma, surgery and necrosis. Accordingly, the positive predictive value of elevated D-dimer levels is low and D-dimer testing is not useful for confirmation of PE.

A number of D-dimer assays are available.110,111 The quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or ELISA-derived assays have a diagnostic sensitivity of 95% or better and can therefore be used to exclude PE in patients with either a low or a moderate pre-test probability. In the emergency department, a negative ELISA D-dimer, in combination with clinical probability, can exclude the disease without further testing in approximately 30% of patients with suspected PE.100,112,113 Outcome studies have shown that the three-month thromboembolic risk was <1% in patients left untreated on the basis of a negative test result (Table 5);99,112–116 these findings were confirmed by a meta-analysis.117

Table 5

Diagnostic yield of various D-dimer assays in excluding acute PE according to outcome studies

graphic
graphic

CI = confidence interval; PE = pulmonary embolism.

aLow or intermediate clinical probability, or PE unlikely, depending on the studies.

Table 5

Diagnostic yield of various D-dimer assays in excluding acute PE according to outcome studies

graphic
graphic

CI = confidence interval; PE = pulmonary embolism.

aLow or intermediate clinical probability, or PE unlikely, depending on the studies.

Quantitative latex-derived assays and a whole-blood agglutination assay have a diagnostic sensitivity <95% and are thus often referred to as moderately sensitive. In outcome studies, those assays proved safe in ruling out PE in PE-unlikely patients as well as in patients with a low clinical probability.99,100,105 Their safety in ruling out PE has not been established in the intermediate clinical probability category. Point-of-care tests have moderate sensitivity, and data from outcome studies in PE are lacking, with the exception of a recent primary care-based study using the Simplify D-dimer assay,118 in which the three-month thromboembolic risk was 1.5% in PE-unlikely patients with a negative D-dimer.

The specificity of D-dimer in suspected PE decreases steadily with age, to almost 10% in patients >80 years.119 Recent evidence suggests using age-adjusted cut-offs to improve the performance of D-dimer testing in the elderly.120,121 In a recent meta-analysis, age-adjusted cut-off values (age x 10 µg/L above 50 years) allowed increasing specificity from 34–46% while retaining a sensitivity above 97%.122 A multicentre, prospective management study evaluated this age-adjusted cut-off in a cohort of 3346 patients. Patients with a normal age-adjusted D-dimer value did not undergo computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and were left untreated and formally followed up for a three-month period. Among the 766 patients who were 75 years or older, 673 had a non-high clinical probability. On the basis of D-dimer, using the age-adjusted cut-off (instead of the ‘standard’ 500 µg/L cut-off) increased the number of patients in whom PE could be excluded from 43 (6.4%; 95% CI 4.8–8.5%) to 200 (29.7%; 95% CI 26.4–33.3%), without any additional false-negative findings.123 D-dimer is also more frequently elevated in patients with cancer,124,125 in hospitalized patients,105,126 and during pregnancy.127,128 Thus, the number of patients in whom D-dimer must be measured to exclude one PE (number needed to test) varies between 3 in the emergency department and ≥10 in the specific situations listed above. The negative predictive value of a (negative) D-dimer test remains high in these situations.

3.4 Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography

Since the introduction of multi-detector computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography with high spatial and temporal resolution and quality of arterial opacification, computed tomographic (CT) angiography has become the method of choice for imaging the pulmonary vasculature in patients with suspected PE. It allows adequate visualization of the pulmonary arteries down to at least the segmental level.131–133 The PIOPED II trial observed a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 96% for (mainly four-detector) MDCT.134 PIOPED II also highlighted the influence of clinical probability on the predictive value of MDCT. In patients with a low or intermediate clinical probability of PE as assessed by the Wells rule, a negative CT had a high negative predictive value for PE (96% and 89%, respectively), whereas this was only 60% in those with a high pre-test probability. Conversely, the positive predictive value of a positive CT was high (92–96%) in patients with an intermediate or high clinical probability but much lower (58%) in patients with a low pre-test likelihood of PE. Therefore, clinicians should be particularly cautious in case of discordancy between clinical judgement and the MDCT result.

Four studies provided evidence in favour of computed tomography as a stand-alone imaging test for excluding PE. In a prospective management study covering 756 consecutive patients referred to the emergency department with a clinical suspicion of PE, all patients with either a high clinical probability or a non-high clinical probability and a positive ELISA D-dimer test underwent both lower limb ultrasonography and MDCT.113 The proportion of patients in whom—despite a negative MDCT—a proximal DVT was found on ultrasound was only 0.9% (95% CI 0.3–2.7).113 In another study,99 all patients classified as PE-likely by the dichotomized Wells rule, or those with a positive D-dimer test, underwent a chest MDCT. The three-month thromboembolic risk in the patients left untreated because of a negative CT was low (1.1%; 95% CI 0.6–1.9).99 Two randomized, controlled trials reached similar conclusions. In a Canadian trial comparing V/Q scan and CT (mostly MDCT), only seven of the 531 patients (1.3%) with a negative CT had a DVT, and one had a thromboembolic event during follow-up.135 Hence, the three-month thromboembolic risk would have been 1.5% (95% CI 0.8–2.9) if only CT had been used.135 A European study compared two diagnostic strategies based on D-dimer and MDCT, one with- and the other without lower limb compression venous ultrasonography (CUS).116 In the D-dimer–CT arm, the three-month thromboembolic risk was 0.3% (95% CI 0.1–1.2) among the 627 patients left untreated, based on a negative D-dimer or MDCT.

Taken together, these data suggest that a negative MDCT is an adequate criterion for excluding PE in patients with a non-high clinical probability of PE. Whether patients with a negative CT and a high clinical probability should be further investigated is controversial. MDCT showing PE at the segmental or more proximal level is adequate proof of PE in patients with a non-low clinical probability; however, the positive predictive value of MDCT is lower in patients with a low clinical probability of PE, and further testing may be considered, especially if the clots are limited to segmental or sub-segmental arteries.

The clinical significance of isolated sub-segmental PE on CT angiography is questionable. This finding was present in 4.7% (2.5–7.6%) of patients with PE imaged by single-detector CT angiography and 9.4% (5.5–14.2%) of those submitted to MDCT.136 The positive predictive value is low and inter-observer agreement is poor at this distal level.137 There may be a role for CUS in this situation, to ensure that the patient does not have DVT that would require treatment. In a patient with isolated sub-segmental PE and no proximal DVT, the decision on whether to treat should be made on an individual basis, taking into account the clinical probability and the bleeding risk.

Computed tomographic venography has been advocated as a simple way to diagnose DVT in patients with suspected PE, as it can be combined with chest CT angiography as a single procedure, using only one intravenous injection of contrast dye. In PIOPED II, combining CT venography with CT angiography increased sensitivity for PE from 83% to 90% and had a similar specificity (around 95%);134,138 however, the corresponding increase in negative predictive value was not clinically significant. CT venography adds a significant amount of irradiation, which may be a concern, especially in younger women.139 As CT venography and CUS yielded similar results in patients with signs or symptoms of DVT in PIOPED II,138 ultrasonography should be used instead of CT venography if indicated (see Section 3.10).

The incidental discovery of clinically unsuspected PE on CT is an increasingly frequent problem, arising in 1–2% of all thoracic CT examinations, most often in patients with cancer, but also among those with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or heart failure and history of atrial fibrillation.140–143 There are no robust data to guide the decision on how to manage unsuspected PE with anticoagulants, but most experts agree that patients with cancer and those with clots at the lobar or more proximal level should be treated with anticoagulants.144

3.5 Lung scintigraphy

Ventilation–perfusion scintigraphy (V/Q scan) is an established diagnostic test for suspected PE. It is safe and few allergic reactions have been described. The test is based on the intravenous injection of technetium (Tc)-99m-labelled macroaggregated albumin particles, which block a small fraction of the pulmonary capillaries and thereby enable scintigraphic assessment of lung perfusion. Perfusion scans are combined with ventilation studies, for which multiple tracers such as xenon-133 gas, Tc-99m-labelled aerosols, or Tc-99m-labelled carbon microparticles (Technegas) can be used. The purpose of the ventilation scan is to increase specificity: in acute PE, ventilation is expected to be normal in hypoperfused segments (mismatch).145,146 According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), the radiation exposure from a lung scan with 100 MBq of Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin particles is 1.1 mSv for an average sized adult, and thus is significantly lower than that of CT angiography (2–6 mSv).147,148

Being a radiation- and contrast medium-sparing procedure, the V/Q scan may preferentially be applied in outpatients with low clinical probability and a normal chest X-ray, in young (particularly female) patients, in pregnancy, in patients with history of contrast medium-induced anaphylaxis and strong allergic history, in severe renal failure, and in patients with myeloma and paraproteinaemia.149

Lung scan results are frequently classified according to the criteria established in the PIOPED study: normal or near-normal, low, intermediate (non-diagnostic), and high probability of PE.94 These criteria have been the subject of debate, following which they were revised.150,151 To facilitate communication with clinicians, a three-tier classification is preferable: normal scan (excluding PE), high-probability scan (considered diagnostic of PE in most patients), and non-diagnostic scan.135,152,153 Prospective clinical outcome studies suggested that it is safe to withhold anticoagulant therapy in patients with a normal perfusion scan. This was recently confirmed by a randomized trial comparing the V/Q scan with CT.135 An analysis from the recent PIOPED II study confirmed the effectiveness of the high-probability V/Q scan for diagnosing PE and of the normal perfusion scan for ruling it out.154 Performing only a perfusion scan is acceptable in patients with a normal chest X-ray; any perfusion defect in this situation will be considered to be a mismatch.155 The high frequency of non-diagnostic intermediate probability scans has been a cause for criticism, because they indicate the necessity for further diagnostic testing. Various strategies to overcome this problem have been proposed, notably the incorporation of clinical probability.91,156,157

Recent studies suggest that data acquisition in the tomographic mode in single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging, with or without low-dose CT may reduce the frequency of non-diagnostic scans.152,158–161 SPECT imaging may even allow the use of automated detection algorithms for PE.162 Large-scale prospective studies are needed to validate these new approaches.

3.6 Pulmonary angiography

Pulmonary angiography has for decades remained the ‘gold standard' for the diagnosis or exclusion of PE, but is rarely performed now as less-invasive CT angiography offers similar diagnostic accuracy.163 Pulmonary angiography is more often used to guide percutaneous catheter-directed treatment of acute PE. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) requires less contrast medium than conventional cineangiography and has excellent imaging quality for peripheral pulmonary vessels in patients who can hold their breath; it is less useful for imaging of the main pulmonary arteries, due to cardiac motion artefacts.

The diagnosis of acute PE is based on direct evidence of a thrombus in two projections, either as a filling defect or as amputation of a pulmonary arterial branch.94 Thrombi as small as 1–2 mm within the sub-segmental arteries can be visualized by DSA, but there is substantial inter-observer variability at this level.164,165 Indirect signs of PE, such as slow flow of contrast, regional hypoperfusion, and delayed or diminished pulmonary venous flow, are not validated and hence are not diagnostic. The Miller score may be used in quantifying the extent of luminal obstruction.166

Pulmonary angiography is not free of risk. In a study of 1111 patients, procedure-related mortality was 0.5%, major non-fatal complications occurred in 1%, and minor complications in 5%.167 The majority of deaths occurred in patients with haemodynamic compromise or respiratory failure. The risk of access-related bleeding complications is increased if thrombolysis is attempted in patients with PE diagnosed by pulmonary angiography.168

Haemodynamic measurements should always be recorded during pulmonary angiography for estimation of the severity of PE and because they may suggest alternative cardiopulmonary disorders. In patients with haemodynamic compromise, the amount of contrast agent should be reduced and non-selective injections avoided.169

3.7 Magnetic resonance angiography

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has been evaluated for several years in suspected PE but large-scale studies were published only recently.170,171 Their results show that this technique, although promising, is not yet ready for clinical practice due to its low sensitivity, high proportion of inconclusive MRA scans, and low availability in most emergency settings. The hypothesis—that a negative MRA combined with the absence of proximal DVT on CUS may safely rule out clinically significant PE—is being tested in a multicentre outcome study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02059551).

3.8 Echocardiography

Acute PE may lead to RV pressure overload and dysfunction, which can be detected by echocardiography. Given the peculiar geometry of the RV, there is no individual echocardiographic parameter that provides fast and reliable information on RV size or function. This is why echocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of PE have differed between studies. Because of the reported negative predictive value of 40–50%, a negative result cannot exclude PE.157,172,173 On the other hand, signs of RV overload or dysfunction may also be found in the absence of acute PE and be due to concomitant cardiac or respiratory disease.174

RV dilation is found in at least 25% of patients with PE, and its detection, either by echocardiography or CT, is useful for risk stratification of the disease. Echocardiographic findings—based either on a disturbed RV ejection pattern (so-called ‘60–60 sign’) or on depressed contractility of the RV free wall compared with the RV apex (‘McConnell sign’)—were reported to retain a high positive predictive value for PE, even in the presence of pre-existing cardiorespiratory disease.175 Additional echocardiographic signs of pressure overload may be required to avoid a false diagnosis of acute PE in patients with RV free wall hypokinesia or akinesia due to RV infarction, which may mimic the McConnell sign.176 Measurement of the tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) may also be useful.177 New echocardiographic parameters of RV function, derived from Doppler tissue imaging and wall strain assessment, were reported to be affected by the presence of acute PE, but they are non-specific and may be normal in haemodynamically stable patients, despite the presence of PE.178–181

Echocardiographic examination is not recommended as part of the diagnostic work-up in haemodynamically stable, normotensive patients with suspected (not high-risk) PE.157 This is in contrast to suspected high-risk PE, in which the absence of echocardiographic signs of RV overload or dysfunction practically excludes PE as the cause of haemodynamic instability. In the latter case, echocardiography may be of further help in the differential diagnosis of the cause of shock, by detecting pericardial tamponade, acute valvular dysfunction, severe global or regional LV dysfunction, aortic dissection, or hypovolaemia. Conversely, in a haemodynamically compromised patient with suspected PE, unequivocal signs of RV pressure overload and dysfunction justify emergency reperfusion treatment for PE if immediate CT angiography is not feasible.182

Mobile right heart thrombi are detected by transthoracic or transoesophageal echocardiography (or by CT angiography) in less than 4% of unselected patients with PE,183–185 but their prevalence may reach 18% in the intensive care setting.185 Mobile right heart thrombi essentially confirm the diagnosis of PE and their presence is associated with RV dysfunction and high early mortality.184,186,187 Consequently, transoesophageal echocardiography may be considered when searching for emboli in the main pulmonary arteries in specific clinical situations,188,189 and it can be of diagnostic value in haemodynamically unstable patients due to the high prevalence of bilateral central pulmonary emboli in most of these cases.190

In some patients with suspected acute PE, echocardiography may detect increased RV wall thickness and/or tricuspid insufficiency jet velocity beyond values compatible with acute RV pressure overload. In these cases, chronic pulmonary hypertension, and CTEPH in particular, should be included in the differential diagnosis.

3.9 Compression venous ultrasonography

In the majority of cases, PE originates from DVT in a lower limb. In a study using venography, DVT was found in 70% of patients with proven PE.191 Nowadays, lower limb CUS has largely replaced venography for diagnosing DVT. CUS has a sensitivity >90% and a specificity of approximately 95% for symptomatic DVT.192,193 CUS shows a DVT in 30–50% of patients with PE,116,192,193 and finding a proximal DVT in patients suspected of having PE is considered sufficient to warrant anticoagulant treatment without further testing.194

In the setting of suspected PE, CUS can be limited to a simple four-point examination (groin and popliteal fossa). The only validated diagnostic criterion for DVT is incomplete compressibility of the vein, which indicates the presence of a clot, whereas flow measurements are unreliable. The diagnostic yield of CUS in suspected PE may be increased further by performing complete ultrasonography, which includes the distal veins. Two recent studies assessed the proportion of patients with suspected PE and a positive D-dimer result, in whom a DVT could be detected by complete CUS.195,196 The diagnostic yield of complete CUS was almost twice that of proximal CUS, but a high proportion (26–36%) of patients with distal DVT had no PE on thoracic MDCT. In contrast, a positive proximal CUS result has a high positive predictive value for PE, as confirmed by data from a large prospective outcome study, in which 524 patients underwent both MDCT and CUS. The sensitivity of CUS for the presence of PE on MDCT was 39% and its specificity was 99%.194 The probability of a positive proximal CUS in suspected PE is higher in patients with signs and symptoms related to the leg veins than in asymptomatic patients.192,193

3.10 Diagnostic strategies

The prevalence of confirmed PE in patients undergoing diagnostic work-up because of suspicion of disease has been rather low (10–35%) in large series.99,100,113,116,197 Hence, the use of diagnostic algorithms is warranted, and various combinations of clinical assessment, plasma D-dimer measurement, and imaging tests have been proposed and validated. These strategies were tested in patients presenting with suspected PE in the emergency ward,99,113,114,116,197 during the hospital stay and more recently in the primary care setting.118,126 Failure to comply with evidence-based diagnostic strategies when withholding anticoagulation was associated with a significant increase in the number of VTE episodes and sudden cardiac death at three-month follow-up.198 The most straightforward diagnostic algorithms for suspected PE—with and without shock or hypotension—are presented in Figures 3 and 4, respectively; however, it is recognized that the diagnostic approach to suspected PE may vary, depending on the availability of—and expertise in—specific tests in various hospitals and clinical settings. Accordingly, Table 6 provides the necessary evidence for alternative evidence-based diagnostic algorithms.

Table 6

Validated diagnostic criteria (based on non-invasive tests) for diagnosing PE in patients without shock or hypotension according to clinical probability

graphic
graphic

+/green = valid diagnostic criterion (no further testing required); /red = invalid criterion (further testing mandatory); ±/yellow = controversial criterion (further testing to be considered).

aLow or intermediate probability lung scan according to the PIOPED classification.

CT = computed tomographic; CUS = proximal lower limb venous ultrasonography; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; PE = pulmonary embolism; PIOPED = Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis; V/Q scan = ventilation–perfusion scintigram.

Table 6

Validated diagnostic criteria (based on non-invasive tests) for diagnosing PE in patients without shock or hypotension according to clinical probability

graphic
graphic

+/green = valid diagnostic criterion (no further testing required); /red = invalid criterion (further testing mandatory); ±/yellow = controversial criterion (further testing to be considered).

aLow or intermediate probability lung scan according to the PIOPED classification.

CT = computed tomographic; CUS = proximal lower limb venous ultrasonography; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; PE = pulmonary embolism; PIOPED = Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis; V/Q scan = ventilation–perfusion scintigram.

Figure 3

Proposed diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected high-risk PE, i.e. presenting with shock or hypotension.

Figure 4

Proposed diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected not high-risk pulmonary embolism.

The diagnostic strategy for suspected acute PE in pregnancy is discussed in Section 8.1.

3.10.1 Suspected pulmonary embolism with shock or hypotension

The proposed strategy is shown in Figure 3. Suspected high-risk PE is an immediately life-threatening situation, and patients presenting with shock or hypotension present a distinct clinical problem. The clinical probability is usually high, and the differential diagnosis includes acute valvular dysfunction, tamponade, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and aortic dissection. The most useful initial test in this situation is bedside transthoracic echocardiography, which will yield evidence of acute pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction if acute PE is the cause of the patient's haemodynamic decompensation. In a highly unstable patient, echocardiographic evidence of RV dysfunction is sufficient to prompt immediate reperfusion without further testing. This decision may be strengthened by the (rare) visualization of right heart thrombi.184,199,200 Ancillary bedside imaging tests include transoesophageal echocardiography which, if available, may allow direct visualization of thrombi in the pulmonary artery and its main branches,188,190,201 and bedside CUS, which can detect proximal DVT. As soon as the patient can be stabilized by supportive treatment, final confirmation of the diagnosis by CT angiography should be sought.

For unstable patients admitted directly to the catheterization laboratory with suspected ACS, pulmonary angiography may be considered as a diagnostic procedure after the ACS has been excluded, provided that PE is a probable diagnostic alternative and particularly if percutaneous catheter-directed treatment is a therapeutic option.

3.10.2 Suspected pulmonary embolism without shock or hypotension

Strategy based on computed tomographic angiography (Figure 4)

Computed tomographic angiography has become the main thoracic imaging test for investigating suspected PE but, since most patients with suspected PE do not have the disease, CT should not be the first-line test.

In patients admitted to the emergency department, plasma D-dimer measurement, combined with clinical probability assessment, is the logical first step and allows PE to be ruled out in around 30% of patients, with a three-month thromboembolic risk in patients left untreated of <1%. D-dimer should not be measured in patients with a high clinical probability, owing to a low negative predictive value in this population.202 It is also less useful in hospitalized patients because the number needed to test to obtain a clinically relevant negative result is high.

In most centres, MDCT angiography is the second-line test in patients with an elevated D-dimer level and the first-line test in patients with a high clinical probability. CT angiography is considered to be diagnostic of PE when it shows a clot at least at the segmental level of the pulmonary arterial tree. False-negative results of MDCT have been reported in patients with a high clinical probability of PE;134 however, this situation is infrequent, and the three-month thromboembolic risk was low in these cases.99 Therefore, both the necessity of performing further tests and the nature of these tests in such patients remain controversial.

Value of lower limb compression ultrasonography

Under certain circumstances, CUS can still be useful in the diagnostic work-up of suspected PE. CUS shows a DVT in 30–50% of patients with PE,116,192,193 and finding proximal DVT in a patient suspected of PE is sufficient to warrant anticoagulant treatment without further testing.194 Hence, performing CUS before CT may be an option in patients with relative contraindications for CT such as in renal failure, allergy to contrast dye, or pregnancy.195,196

Value of ventilation–perfusion scintigraphy

In centres in which V/Q scintigraphy is readily available, it remains a valid option for patients with an elevated D-dimer and a contraindication to CT. Also, V/Q scintigraphy may be preferred over CT to avoid unnecessary radiation, particularly in younger and female patients in whom thoracic CT may raise the lifetime risk of breast cancer.139 V/Q lung scintigraphy is diagnostic (with either normal or high-probability findings) in approximately 30–50% of emergency ward patients with suspected PE.83,94,135,203 The proportion of diagnostic V/Q scans is higher in patients with a normal chest X-ray, and this supports the recommendation to use V/Q scan as the first-line imaging test for PE in younger patients.204

The number of patients with inconclusive findings may also be reduced by taking into account clinical probability.94 Thus, patients with a non-diagnostic lung scan and low clinical probability of PE have a low prevalence of confirmed PE.94,157,203 The negative predictive value of this combination is further increased by the absence of a DVT on lower-limb CUS. If a high-probability lung scan is obtained from a patient with low clinical probability of PE, confirmation by other tests may be considered on a case-by-case basis.

3.11 Areas of uncertainty

Despite considerable progress in the diagnosis of PE, several areas of uncertainty persist. The diagnostic value and clinical significance of sub-segmental defects on MDCT are still under debate.136,137 A recent retrospective analysis of two patient cohorts with suspected PE showed similar outcomes (in terms of three-month recurrence and mortality rates) between patients with sub-segmental and more proximal PE; outcomes were largely determined by comorbidities.205 The definition of sub-segmental PE has yet to be standardized and a single sub-segmental defect probably does not have the same clinical relevance as multiple, sub-segmental thrombi.

There is also growing evidence suggesting over-diagnosis of PE.206 A randomized comparison showed that, although CT detected PE more frequently than V/Q scanning, three-month outcomes were similar, regardless of the diagnostic method used.135 Data from the United States show an 80% rise in the apparent incidence of PE after the introduction of CT, without a significant impact on mortality.207,208

Some experts believe that patients with incidental (unsuspected) PE on CT should be treated,144 especially if they have cancer and a proximal clot, but solid evidence in support of this recommendation is lacking. The value and cost-effectiveness of CUS in suspected PE should be further clarified.

Finally, ‘triple rule-out’ (for coronary artery disease, PE and aortic dissection) CT angiography for patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain appears to be accurate for the detection of coronary artery disease.209 However, the benefits vs. risks (including increased radiation and contrast exposure) of such a diagnostic approach need thorough evaluation, given the low (<1%) prevalence of PE and aortic dissection in the studies published thus far.

Recommendations for diagnosis

graphic
graphic
graphic
graphic

CT = computed tomographic (pulmonary angiography); CUS = compression venous ultrasonography; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; MRA = magnetic resonance angiography; PE = pulmonary embolism; RV = right ventricular; TOE = transoesophageal echocardiography; V/Q = ventilation–perfusion.

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cReferences.

dRefers to multi-detector CT.

4. Prognostic assessment

4.1 Clinical parameters

Acute RV dysfunction is a critical determinant of outcome in acute PE. Accordingly, clinical symptoms and signs of acute RV failure such as persistent arterial hypotension and cardiogenic shock indicate a high risk of early death. Further, syncope and tachycardia—as well as routinely available clinical parameters related to pre-existing conditions and comorbidity—are associated with an unfavourable short-term prognosis. For example, in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER), age >70 years, systolic BP <90 mm Hg, respiratory rate >20 breaths/min, cancer, chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), were all identified as prognostic factors.48 In the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad Thomboembolica venosa (RIETE) study, immobilization for neurological disease, age >75 years, and cancer were independently associated with an increased risk of death within the first three months after acute VTE.47 The diagnosis of concomitant DVT has also been reported to be an independent predictor of death within the first three months following diagnosis.210

Various prediction rules based on clinical parameters have been shown to be helpful in the prognostic assessment of patients with acute PE. Of those, the pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI; Table 7) is the most extensively validated score to date.211–214 In one study,215 the PESI performed better than the older Geneva prognostic score216 for identification of patients with an adverse 30-day outcome. The principal strength of the PESI lies in the reliable identification of patients at low risk for 30-day mortality (PESI Class I and II). One randomized trial employed a low PESI as the inclusion criterion for home treatment of acute PE.217

Table 7

Original and simplified PESI

graphic
graphic

b.p.m. = beats per minute; PESI = Pulmonary embolism severity index.

abased on the sum of points.

Table 7

Original and simplified PESI

graphic
graphic

b.p.m. = beats per minute; PESI = Pulmonary embolism severity index.

abased on the sum of points.

Owing to the complexity of the original PESI, which includes 11 differently weighted variables, a simplified version known as sPESI (Table 7) has been developed and validated.218,219 In patients with PE, the sPESI was reported to quantify their 30-day prognosis better than the shock index (defined as heart rate divided by systolic BP),220 and a simplified PESI of 0 was at least as accurate for identification of low-risk patients as the imaging parameters and laboratory biomarkers proposed by the previous ESC Guidelines.221 Combination of the sPESI with troponin testing provided additional prognostic information,222 especially for identification of low-risk patients.76

4.2 Imaging of the right ventricle by echocardiography or computed tomographic angiography

Echocardiographic findings indicating RV dysfunction have been reported in ≥25% of patients with PE.223 They have been identified as independent predictors of an adverse outcome,224 but are heterogeneous and have proven difficult to standardize.225 Still, in haemodynamically stable, normotensive patients with PE, echocardiographic assessment of the morphology and function of the RV may help in prognostic stratification.

As already mentioned in the previous section on the diagnosis of PE, echocardiographic findings used to risk stratify patients with PE include RV dilation, an increased RV–LV diameter ratio, hypokinesia of the free RV wall, increased velocity of the jet of tricuspid regurgitation, decreased tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion, or combinations of the above. Meta-analyses have shown that RV dysfunction detected by echocardiography is associated with an elevated risk of short-term mortality in patients without haemodynamic instability, but its overall positive predictive value is low (Table 8).226,227 In addition to RV dysfunction, echocardiography can also identify right-to-left shunt through a patent foramen ovale and the presence of right heart thrombi, both of which are associated with increased mortality in patients with acute PE.80,184

Table 8

Imaging and laboratory testsa for prediction of earlyb mortality in acute PE

graphic
graphic

BNP = brain natriuretic peptide; CT = computed tomographic; H-FABP = heart-type fatty acid-binding protein; HR = hazard ratio; LV = left ventricular; NPV = negative predictive value; NR = not reported in the reference cited; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; OR = odds ratio; PE = pulmonary embolism; PPV = positive predictive value; RV = right ventricular.

aThe Table shows the results of meta-analyses or, in the absence thereof, of the largest prospective cohort studies.

bIn most studies, ‘early’ refers to the in-hospital period or the first 30 days after the index event.

cIn the studies included in this meta-analysis, cut-off values for the cardiac troponin tests used corresponded to the 99thpercentile of healthy subjects with a coefficient variation of <10%.

dHigh-sensitivity assay.

eThese studies included only normotensive patients and used a combined outcome (all-cause death or major cardiovascular complications).

Table 8

Imaging and laboratory testsa for prediction of earlyb mortality in acute PE

graphic
graphic

BNP = brain natriuretic peptide; CT = computed tomographic; H-FABP = heart-type fatty acid-binding protein; HR = hazard ratio; LV = left ventricular; NPV = negative predictive value; NR = not reported in the reference cited; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; OR = odds ratio; PE = pulmonary embolism; PPV = positive predictive value; RV = right ventricular.

aThe Table shows the results of meta-analyses or, in the absence thereof, of the largest prospective cohort studies.

bIn most studies, ‘early’ refers to the in-hospital period or the first 30 days after the index event.

cIn the studies included in this meta-analysis, cut-off values for the cardiac troponin tests used corresponded to the 99thpercentile of healthy subjects with a coefficient variation of <10%.

dHigh-sensitivity assay.

eThese studies included only normotensive patients and used a combined outcome (all-cause death or major cardiovascular complications).

Four-chamber views of the heart by CT angiography may detect RV enlargement (end-diastolic diameter, compared with that of the left ventricle) as an indicator of RV dysfunction. Following a number of early retrospective studies,227 the prognostic value of an enlarged RV on CT angiography was confirmed by a prospective multicentre cohort study of 457 patients (Table 8).228 In-hospital death or clinical deterioration occurred in 44 patients with- and in 8 patients without RV dysfunction on CT (14.5% vs. 5.2%; P < 0.004). Right ventricular dysfunction was an independent predictor for an adverse in-hospital outcome, both in the overall population (HR 3.5; 95% CI 1.6–7.7; P = 0.002) and in haemodynamically stable patients (HR 3.8; 95% CI 1.3–10.9; P = 0.007). Additional recent publications have confirmed these findings.229,230

4.3 Laboratory tests and biomarkers

4.3.1 Markers of right ventricular dysfunction

Right ventricular pressure overload is associated with increased myocardial stretch, which leads to the release of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal (NT)-proBNP. The plasma levels of natriuretic peptides reflect the severity of haemodynamic compromise and (presumably) RV dysfunction in acute PE.231 A meta-analysis found that 51% of 1132 unselected patients with acute PE had elevated BNP or NT-proBNP concentrations on admission. These patients had a 10% risk of early death (95% CI 8.0–13) and a 23% (95% CI 20–26) risk of an adverse clinical outcome.232

In normotensive patients with PE, the positive predictive value of elevated BNP or NT-proBNP concentrations for early mortality is low.233 In a prospective, multicentre cohort study that included 688 patients, NT-proBNP plasma concentrations of 600 pg/mL were identified as the optimal cut-off value for the identification of elevated risk (Table 8).234 On the other hand, low levels of BNP or NT-proBNP can identify patients with a favourable short-term clinical outcome based on their high negative predictive value.226,232,235,236 Haemodynamically stable patients with low NT-proBNP levels may be candidates for early discharge and outpatient treatment.237

4.3.2 Markers of myocardial injury

Transmural RV infarction despite patent coronary arteries has been found at autopsy of patients who died of massive PE.238 Elevated plasma troponin concentrations on admission have been reported in connection with PE and were associated with worse prognosis. A meta-analysis covering a total of 1985 patients showed elevated cardiac troponin I or -T concentrations in approximately 50% of the patients with acute PE (Table 8).239 Elevated troponin concentrations were associated with high mortality both in unselected patients [odds ratio (OR) 9.44; 95% CI 4.14–21.49] and in haemodynamically stable patients [OR 5.90; 95% CI 2.68–12.95], and the results were consistent for troponin I or -T; however, other reports have suggested a limited prognostic value of elevated troponins in normotensive patients.240

The reported positive predictive value of troponin elevation for PE-related early mortality ranges from 12–44%, while the negative predictive value is high, irrespective of the assays and cut-off values used. Recently developed high-sensitivity assays have improved the prognostic performance of this biomarker, particularly with regard to the exclusion of patients with an adverse short-term outcome.241 For example, in a prospective, multicentre cohort of 526 normotensive patients with acute PE, troponin T concentrations <14 pg/mL, measured by a high-sensitivity assay, had a negative predictive value of 98% with regard to a complicated clinical course, which was similar to that of the sPESI.76

Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP), an early marker of myocardial injury, was also found to possess prognostic value in acute PE.242,243 In normotensive patients, circulating H-FABP levels ≥6 ng/mL had a positive predictive value of 28% and a negative predictive value of 99% for an adverse 30-day outcome (Table 8).244 A simple score, based on the presence of tachycardia, syncope, and a positive bedside test for H-FABP, provided prognostic information similar to that of RV dysfunction on echocardiography.245,246

4.3.3 Other (non-cardiac) laboratory biomarkers

Elevated serum creatinine levels and a decreased (calculated) glomerular filtration rate are related to 30-day all-cause mortality in acute PE.247 Elevated neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and cystatin C, both indicating acute kidney injury, have also been found to be of prognostic value.248 Elevated D-dimer concentrations were associated with increased short-term mortality in some studies,249,250 while levels <1500 ng/mL had a negative predictive value of 99% for excluding three-month all-cause mortality.251

4.4 Combined modalities and scores

In patients with acute PE who appear haemodynamically stable at diagnosis, no individual clinical, imaging, or laboratory finding has been shown to predict risk of an adverse in-hospital outcome that could be considered high enough to justify primary reperfusion. As a result, various combinations of clinical findings with imaging and laboratory tests have been proposed and tested in registries and cohort studies in an attempt to improve risk stratification.222,246,254–259 The clinical relevance of most of these modalities and scores, particularly with regard to the therapeutic implications, remains to be determined; however, the combination of RV dysfunction on the echocardiogram (or CT angiogram) with a positive cardiac troponin test256,260 was used as an inclusion criterion in a recently published randomized thrombolysis trial,261 which enrolled 1006 normotensive patients with acute PE. Patients treated with standard anticoagulation had a 5.6% incidence of death or haemodynamic decompensation within the first 7 days following randomization.253

4.5 Prognostic assessment strategy

For prediction of early (in-hospital or 30-day) outcome in patients with acute PE, both the PE-related risk and the patient's clinical status and comorbidities should be taken into consideration. The definition for level of clinical risk is shown in Table 9. The risk-adjusted therapeutic strategies and algorithms recommended on the basis of this classification are discussed in the following section and summarized in Figure 5.

Table 9

Classification of patients with acute PE based on early mortality risk

graphic
graphic

PE = pulmonary embolism; PESI = Pulmonary embolism severity index; RV = right ventricular; sPESI = simplified Pulmonary embolism severity index.

aPESI Class III to V indicates moderate to very high 30-day mortality risk; sPESI ≥1 point(s) indicate high 30-day mortality risk.

bEchocardiographic criteria of RV dysfunction include RV dilation and/or an increased end-diastolic RV–LV diameter ratio (in most studies, the reported threshold value was 0.9 or 1.0); hypokinesia of the free RV wall; increased velocity of the tricuspid regurgitation jet; or combinations of the above. On computed tomographic (CT) angiography (four-chamber views of the heart), RV dysfunction is defined as an increased end-diastolic RV/LV (left ventricular) diameter ratio (with a threshold of 0.9 or 1.0).

cMarkers of myocardial injury (e.g. elevated cardiac troponin I or -T concentrations in plasma), or of heart failure as a result of (right) ventricular dysfunction (elevated natriuretic peptide concentrations in plasma).

dNeither calculation of the PESI (or sPESI) nor laboratory testing are considered necessary in patients with hypotension or shock.

ePatients in the PESI Class I–II, or with sPESI of 0, and elevated cardiac biomarkers or signs of RV dysfunction on imaging tests, are also to be classified into the intermediate-low-risk category. This might apply to situations in which imaging or biomarker results become available before calculation of the clinical severity index.

Table 9

Classification of patients with acute PE based on early mortality risk

graphic
graphic

PE = pulmonary embolism; PESI = Pulmonary embolism severity index; RV = right ventricular; sPESI = simplified Pulmonary embolism severity index.

aPESI Class III to V indicates moderate to very high 30-day mortality risk; sPESI ≥1 point(s) indicate high 30-day mortality risk.

bEchocardiographic criteria of RV dysfunction include RV dilation and/or an increased end-diastolic RV–LV diameter ratio (in most studies, the reported threshold value was 0.9 or 1.0); hypokinesia of the free RV wall; increased velocity of the tricuspid regurgitation jet; or combinations of the above. On computed tomographic (CT) angiography (four-chamber views of the heart), RV dysfunction is defined as an increased end-diastolic RV/LV (left ventricular) diameter ratio (with a threshold of 0.9 or 1.0).

cMarkers of myocardial injury (e.g. elevated cardiac troponin I or -T concentrations in plasma), or of heart failure as a result of (right) ventricular dysfunction (elevated natriuretic peptide concentrations in plasma).

dNeither calculation of the PESI (or sPESI) nor laboratory testing are considered necessary in patients with hypotension or shock.

ePatients in the PESI Class I–II, or with sPESI of 0, and elevated cardiac biomarkers or signs of RV dysfunction on imaging tests, are also to be classified into the intermediate-low-risk category. This might apply to situations in which imaging or biomarker results become available before calculation of the clinical severity index.

Figure 5

Risk-adjusted management strategies in acute PE (see Table 9 for definition of the risk categories).

At the stage of clinical suspicion of PE, haemodynamically unstable patients with shock or hypotension should immediately be identified as high-risk patients (Figure 2). They require an emergency diagnostic algorithm as outlined in the previous section and, if PE is confirmed, primary pharmacological (or, alternatively, surgical or interventional) reperfusion therapy.

Patients without shock or hypotension are not at high risk of an adverse early outcome. Further risk stratification should be considered after the diagnosis of PE has been confirmed, as this may influence the therapeutic strategy and the duration of the hospitalization (see Section 5.8). In these patients, risk assessment should begin with a validated clinical prognostic score, preferably the PESI or sPESI, its simplified version, to distinguish between intermediate and low risk. Around one-third of PE patients are at low risk of an early adverse outcome as indicated by a PESI Class I or II, or a simplified PESI of 0. On the other hand, in registries and cohort studies, patients in PESI Class III–V had a 30-day mortality rate of up to 24.5%,214 and those with a simplified PESI ≥1 up to 11%.218 Accordingly, normotensive patients in PESI Class ≥III or a simplified PESI of ≥1 are considered to constitute an intermediate-risk group. Within this category, further risk assessment should be considered, focusing on the status of the RV in response to the PE-induced acute pressure overload. Patients who display evidence of both RV dysfunction (by echocardiography or CT angiography) and elevated cardiac biomarker levels in the circulation (particularly a positive cardiac troponin test) should be classified into an intermediate-high-risk category. As discussed in more detail in the following section, close monitoring is recommended in these cases to permit early detection of haemodynamic decompensation and the need for initiation of rescue reperfusion therapy.253 On the other hand, patients in whom the RV is normal on echocardiography or CT angiography and/or cardiac biomarker levels are also normal, belong to an intermediate-low-risk group.

Data from registries and cohort studies suggest that patients in PESI Class I–II, or with sPESI of 0, but with elevated cardiac biomarkers or signs of RV dysfunction on imaging tests, should also be classified into the intermediate-low-risk category.76,222,262 Nevertheless, routine performance of imaging or laboratory tests in the presence of a low PESI or a simplified PESI of 0 is not considered necessary at present as, in these cases, it has not been shown to have therapeutic implications.

Recommendations for prognostic assessment

graphic
graphic

CT = computed tomographic (pulmonary angiography); PE = pulmonary embolism; PESI = pulmonary embolism severity index; sPESI = simplified pulmonary embolism severity index.

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cReferences.

5. Treatment in the acute phase

5.1 Haemodynamic and respiratory support

Acute RV failure with resulting low systemic output is the leading cause of death in patients with high-risk PE. Therefore, supportive treatment is vital in patients with PE and RV failure. Experimental studies indicate that aggressive volume expansion is of no benefit and may even worsen RV function by causing mechanical overstretch, or by reflex mechanisms that depress contractility.263 On the other hand, modest (500 mL) fluid challenge may help to increase cardiac index in patients with PE, low cardiac index, and normal BP.264

Use of vasopressors is often necessary, in parallel with (or while waiting for) pharmacological, surgical, or interventional reperfusion treatment. Norepinephrine appears to improve RV function via a direct positive inotropic effect, while also improving RV coronary perfusion by peripheral vascular alpha-receptor stimulation and the increase in systemic BP. Its use should probably be limited to hypotensive patients. Based on the results of small series, the use of dobutamine and/or dopamine may be considered for patients with PE, low cardiac index, and normal BP; however, raising the cardiac index above physiological values may aggravate the ventilation–perfusion mismatch by further redistributing flow from (partly) obstructed to unobstructed vessels.265 Epinephrine combines the beneficial properties of norepinephrine and dobutamine, without the systemic vasodilatory effects of the latter. It may therefore exert beneficial effects in patients with PE and shock.

Vasodilators decrease pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, but the main concern is the lack of specificity of these drugs for the pulmonary vasculature after systemic (intravenous) administration. According to data from small clinical studies, inhalation of nitric oxide may improve the haemodynamic status and gas exchange of patients with PE.266,267 Preliminary data suggest that levosimendan may restore right ventricular–pulmonary arterial coupling in acute PE by combining pulmonary vasodilation with an increase in RV contractility.268

Hypoxaemia and hypocapnia are frequently encountered in patients with PE, but they are of moderate severity in most cases. A patent foramen ovale may aggravate hypoxaemia due to shunting when right atrial- exceeds left atrial pressure.80 Hypoxaemia is usually reversed with administration of oxygen. When mechanical ventilation is required, care should be taken to limit its adverse haemodynamic effects. In particular, the positive intrathoracic pressure induced by mechanical ventilation may reduce venous return and worsen RV failure in patients with massive PE; therefore, positive end-expiratory pressure should be applied with caution. Low tidal volumes (approximately 6 mL/kg lean body weight) should be used in an attempt to keep the end-inspiratory plateau pressure <30 cm H2O.

Experimental evidence suggests that extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support can be an effective procedure in massive PE.269 This notion is supported by occasional case reports and patient series.270–272

5.2 Anticoagulation

In patients with acute PE, anticoagulation is recommended, with the objective of preventing both early death and recurrent symptomatic or fatal VTE. The standard duration of anticoagulation should cover at least 3 months (also see Section 6). Within this period, acute-phase treatment consists of administering parenteral anticoagulation [unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), or fondaparinux] over the first 5–10 days. Parenteral heparin should overlap with the initiation of a vitamin K antagonist (VKA); alternatively, it can be followed by administration of one of the new oral anticoagulants: dabigatran or edoxaban. If rivaroxaban or apixaban is given instead, oral treatment with one of these agents should be started directly or after a 1–2 day administration of UFH, LMWH or fondaparinux. In this latter case, acute-phase treatment consists of an increased dose of the oral anticoagulant over the first 3 weeks (for rivaroxaban), or over the first 7 days (for apixaban).

In some cases, extended anticoagulation beyond the first 3 months, or even indefinitely, may be necessary for secondary prevention, after weighing the individual patient's risk of recurrence vs. bleeding risk.

5.2.1 Parenteral anticoagulation

In patients with high or intermediate clinical probability for PE (see Section 3), parenteral anticoagulation should be initiated whilst awaiting the results of diagnostic tests. Immediate anticoagulation can be achieved with parenteral anticoagulants such as intravenous UFH, subcutaneous LMWH, or subcutaneous fondaparinux. LMWH or fondaparinux are preferred over UFH for initial anticoagulation in PE, as they carry a lower risk of inducing major bleeding and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).273–276 On the other hand, UFH is recommended for patients in whom primary reperfusion is considered, as well as for those with serious renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min), or severe obesity. These recommendations are based on the short half-life of UFH, the ease of monitoring its anticoagulant effects, and its rapid reversal by protamine. The dosing of UFH is adjusted, based on the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT; Web Addenda Table II).277

The LMWHs approved for the treatment of acute PE are listed in Table 10. LMWH needs no routine monitoring, but periodic measurement of anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa levels) may be considered during pregnancy.279 Peak values of anti-factor Xa activity should be measured 4 hours after the last injection and trough values just before the next dose of LMWH would be due; the target range is 0.6–1.0 IU/mL for twice-daily administration, and 1.0–2.0 IU/mL for once-daily administration.280

Table 10

Low molecular weight heparin and pentasaccharide (fondaparinux) approved for the treatment of pulmonary embolism

graphic
graphic

All regimens administered subcutaneously.

IU = international units; LMWH = low molecular weight heparin.

aOnce-daily injection of enoxaparin at the dosage of 1.5 mg/kg is approved for inpatient (hospital) treatment of PE in the United States and in some, but not all, European countries.

bIn cancer patients, dalteparin is given at a dose of 200 IU/kg body weight (maximum, 18 000 IU) once daily over a period of 1 month, followed by 150 IU/kg once daily for 5 months.278 After this period, anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist or a LMWH should be continued indefinitely or until the cancer is considered cured.

cNadroparin is approved for treatment of PE in some, but not all, European countries.

Table 10

Low molecular weight heparin and pentasaccharide (fondaparinux) approved for the treatment of pulmonary embolism

graphic
graphic

All regimens administered subcutaneously.

IU = international units; LMWH = low molecular weight heparin.

aOnce-daily injection of enoxaparin at the dosage of 1.5 mg/kg is approved for inpatient (hospital) treatment of PE in the United States and in some, but not all, European countries.

bIn cancer patients, dalteparin is given at a dose of 200 IU/kg body weight (maximum, 18 000 IU) once daily over a period of 1 month, followed by 150 IU/kg once daily for 5 months.278 After this period, anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist or a LMWH should be continued indefinitely or until the cancer is considered cured.

cNadroparin is approved for treatment of PE in some, but not all, European countries.

Fondaparinux is a selective factor Xa inhibitor administered once daily by subcutaneous injection at weight-adjusted doses, without the need for monitoring (Table 10). In patients with acute PE and no indication for thrombolytic therapy, fondaparinux was associated with recurrent VTE and major bleeding rates similar to those obtained with intravenous UFH.281 No proven cases of HIT have been reported with fondaparinux.282 Subcutaneous fondaparinux is contraindicated in patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min) because it will accumulate and increase the risk of haemorrhage. Accumulation also occurs in patients with moderate renal insufficiency (clearance 30–50 mL/min) and, therefore, the dose should be reduced by 50% in these patients.283

5.2.2 Vitamin K antagonists

Oral anticoagulants should be initiated as soon as possible, and preferably on the same day as the parenteral anticoagulant. VKAs have been the ‘gold standard' in oral anticoagulation for more than 50 years and warfarin, acenocoumarol, phenprocoumon, phenindione and flunidione remain the predominant anticoagulants prescribed for PE.284 Anticoagulation with UFH, LMWH, or fondaparinux should be continued for at least 5 days and until the international normalized ratio (INR) has been 2.0–3.0 for two consecutive days.285

Warfarin can be started at a dose of 10 mg in younger (e.g. <60 years of age), otherwise healthy outpatients, and at a dose of 5 mg in older patients and in those who are hospitalized. The daily dose is adjusted according to the INR over the next 5–7 days, aiming for an INR level of 2.0–3.0. Rapid-turnaround pharmacogenetic testing may increase the precision of warfarin dosing.286,287 In particular, variations in two genes may account for more than one-third of the dosing variability of warfarin. One gene determines the activity of cytochrome CYP2C9, the hepatic isoenzyme that metabolizes the S-enantiomer of warfarin into its inactive form, while the other determines the activity of vitamin K epoxide reductase, the enzyme that produces the active form of vitamin K.288 Pharmacogenetic algorithms incorporate genotype and clinical information and recommend warfarin doses according to integration of these data. A trial published in 2012 indicated that, compared with standard care, pharmacogenetic guidance of warfarin dosing resulted in a 10% absolute reduction in out-of-range INRs at one month, primarily due to fewer INR values <1.5; this improvement coincided with a 66% lower rate of DVT.289 In 2013, three large randomized trials were published.290–292 All used, as the primary endpoint, the percentage of time in therapeutic range (TTR) (a surrogate for the quality of anticoagulation) for the INR during the first 4–12 weeks of therapy. In 455 patients, genotype-guided doses of warfarin, with a point-of-care test, resulted in a significant but modest increase in TTR over the first 12 weeks, compared with a fixed 3-day loading-dose regimen (67.4% vs. 60.3%; P < 0.001). The median time to reaching a therapeutic INR was reduced from 29 to 21 days.292 Another study in 1015 patients compared warfarin loading—based on genotype data in combination with clinical variables—with a loading regimen based on the clinical data alone; no significant improvement was found in either group in terms of the TTR achieved between days 4 and 28 of therapy.291 Lack of improvement was also shown by a trial involving 548 patients, comparing acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon loading—based on point-of-care genotyping in combination with clinical variables (age, sex, height, weight, amiodarone use)—with a loading regimen based entirely on clinical information.290

In summary, the results of recent trials appear to indicate that pharmacogenetic testing, used on top of clinical parameters, does not improve the quality of anticoagulation. They also suggest that dosing based on the patient's clinical data is possibly superior to fixed loading regimens, and they point out the need to place emphasis on improving the infrastructure of anticoagulation management by optimizing the procedures that link INR measurement with provision of feedback to the patient and individually tailoring dose adjustments.

5.2.3 New oral anticoagulants

The design and principal findings of phase III clinical trials on the acute-phase treatment and standard duration of anticoagulation after PE or VTE with non-vitamin K-dependent new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are summarized in Table 11. In the RE-COVER trial, the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran was compared with warfarin for the treatment of VTE.293 The primary outcome was the 6-month incidence of recurrent, symptomatic, objectively confirmed VTE. Overall, 2539 patients were enrolled, 21% with PE only and 9.6% with PE plus DVT. Parenteral anticoagulation was administered for a mean of 10 days in both groups. With regard to the efficacy endpoint, dabigatran was non-inferior to warfarin (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.65–1.84). No significant differences were observed with regard to major bleeding episodes (Table 11), but there were fewer episodes of any bleeding with dabigatran (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59–0.85). Its twin study, RE-COVER II,294 enrolled 2589 patients and confirmed these results (primary efficacy outcome: HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.64-1.80; major bleeding: HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.36-1.32) (Table 11). For the pooled RE-COVER population, the HR for efficacy was 1.09 (95% CI 0.76-1.57) and for major bleeding 0.73 (95% CI 0.48-1.11).294

Table 11

Overview of phase III clinical trials with non-vitamin K-dependent new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the acute-phase treatment and standard duration of anticoagulation after VTE

graphic
graphic

b.i.d. = bis in die (twice daily); CRNM = clinically relevant non-major; DVT= deep vein thrombosis; o.d. = omni die (once daily); PE= pulmonary embolism; UFH = unfractionated heparin; VTE = venous thromboembolism.

a Approved doses of dabigatran are 150 mg b.i.d. and 110 mg b.i.d.

Table 11

Overview of phase III clinical trials with non-vitamin K-dependent new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for the acute-phase treatment and standard duration of anticoagulation after VTE

graphic
graphic

b.i.d. = bis in die (twice daily); CRNM = clinically relevant non-major; DVT= deep vein thrombosis; o.d. = omni die (once daily); PE= pulmonary embolism; UFH = unfractionated heparin; VTE = venous thromboembolism.

a Approved doses of dabigatran are 150 mg b.i.d. and 110 mg b.i.d.

In the EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE trials,295,296 single oral drug treatment with the direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily) was tested against enoxaparin/warfarin in patients with VTE using a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority design. In particular, EINSTEIN-PE enrolled 4832 patients who had acute symptomatic PE, with or without DVT. Rivaroxaban was non-inferior to standard therapy for the primary efficacy outcome of recurrent symptomatic VTE (HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.75–1.68). The principal safety outcome [major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding] occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment groups (HR for rivaroxaban, 0.90; 95% CI 0.76–1.07) (Table 11), but major bleeding was less frequent in the rivaroxaban group, compared with the standard-therapy group (1.1% vs. 2.2%, HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.31–0.79).

The Apixaban for the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis as First-line Therapy (AMPLIFY) study compared single oral drug treatment using the direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban (10 mg twice daily for 7 days, followed by 5 mg b.i.d.) with conventional therapy (enoxaparin/warfarin) in 5395 patients with acute VTE, 1836 of whom presented with PE (Table 11).297 The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent symptomatic VTE or death related to VTE. The principal safety outcomes were major bleeding alone, and major bleeding plus CRNM bleeding. Apixaban was non-inferior to conventional therapy for the primary efficacy outcome (relative risk [RR] 0.84; 95% CI 0.60–1.18). Major bleeding occurred less frequently under apixaban compared with conventional therapy (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.17–0.55; P < 0.001 for superiority) (Table 11). The composite outcome of major bleeding and CRNM bleeding occurred in 4.3% of the patients in the apixaban group, compared with 9.7% of those in the conventional-therapy group (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.36–0.55; P < 0.001).

The HokusaI–VTE study compared the direct factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban with conventional therapy in 8240 patients with acute VTE (3319 of whom presented with PE) who had initially received heparin for at least 5 days (Table 11).298 Patients received edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily (reduced to 30 mg once daily in the case of creatinine clearance of 30–50 mL/min or a body weight <60 kg), or warfarin. The study drug was administered for 3–12 months; all patients were followed up for 12 months. Edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin with respect to the primary efficacy outcome of recurrent symptomatic VTE or fatal PE (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.70–1.13). The principal safety outcome, major or CRNM bleeding, occurred less frequently in the edoxaban group (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71–0.94; P = 0.004 for superiority) (Table 11). In 938 patients who presented with acute PE and elevated NT-proBNP concentrations (≥500 pg/mL), the rate of recurrent VTE was 3.3% in the edoxaban group and 6.2% in the warfarin group (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28–0.98).

In summary, the results of the trials using NOACs in the treatment of VTE indicate that these agents are non-inferior (in terms of efficacy) and possibly safer (particularly in terms of major bleeding) than the standard heparin/VKA regimen.299 High TTR values were achieved under VKA treatment in all trials; on the other hand, the study populations included relatively young patients, very few of whom had cancer. At present, NOACs can be viewed as an alternative to standard treatment. At the moment of publication of these guidelines, rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban are approved for treatment of VTE in the European Union; edoxaban is currently under regulatory review. Experience with NOACs is still limited but continues to accumulate. Practical recommendations for the handling of NOACs in different clinical scenarios and the management of their bleeding complications have recently been published by the European Heart Rhythm Association.300

5.3 Thrombolytic treatment

Thrombolytic treatment of acute PE restores pulmonary perfusion more rapidly than anticoagulation with UFH alone.301,302 The early resolution of pulmonary obstruction leads to a prompt reduction in pulmonary artery pressure and resistance, with a concomitant improvement in RV function.302 The haemodynamic benefits of thrombolysis are confined to the first few days; in survivors, differences are no longer apparent at one week after treatment.301,303,304

The approved regimens of thrombolytic agents for PE are shown in Web Addenda Table III; the contraindications to thrombolysis are displayed in Web Addenda Table IV. Accelerated regimens administered over 2 hours are preferable to prolonged infusions of first-generation thrombolytic agents over 12–24 hours.305–308 Reteplase and desmoteplase have been tested against recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) in acute PE, with similar results in terms of haemodynamic parameters;309,310 tenecteplase was tested against placebo in patients with intermediate-risk PE.253,303,311 At present, none of these agents is approved for use in PE.

Unfractionated heparin infusion should be stopped during administration of streptokinase or urokinase; it can be continued during rtPA infusion. In patients receiving LMWH or fondaparinux at the time that thrombolysis is initiated, infusion of UFH should be delayed until 12 hours after the last LMWH injection (given twice daily), or until 24 hours after the last LMWH or fondaparinux injection (given once daily). Given the bleeding risks associated with thrombolysis and the possibility that it may become necessary to immediately discontinue or reverse the anticoagulant effect of heparin, it appears reasonable to continue anticoagulation with UFH for several hours after the end of thrombolytic treatment before switching to LMWH or fondaparinux.

Overall, >90% of patients appear to respond favourably to thrombolysis, as judged by clinical and echocardiographic improvement within 36 hours.313 The greatest benefit is observed when treatment is initiated within 48 hours of symptom onset, but thrombolysis can still be useful in patients who have had symptoms for 6–14 days.314

A review of randomized trials performed before 2004 indicated that thrombolysis may be associated with a reduction in mortality or recurrent PE in high-risk patients who present with haemodynamic instability.168 In a recent epidemiological report, in-hospital mortality attributable to PE was lower in unstable patients who received thrombolytic therapy, compared with those who did not (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.19–0.22; P<0.0001).315 Most contraindications to thrombolysis (Web Addenda Table IV) should be considered relative in patients with life-threatening, high-risk PE.

In the absence of haemodynamic compromise at presentation, the clinical benefits of thrombolysis have remained controversial for many years. In a randomized comparison of heparin vs. alteplase in 256 normotensive patients with acute PE and evidence of RV dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension—obtained by clinical examination, echocardiography, or right heart catheterization—thrombolytic treatment (mainly secondary thrombolysis) reduced the incidence of escalation to emergency treatment (from 24.6% to 10.2%; P = 0.004), without affecting mortality.252 More recently, the Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis (PEITHO) trial was published.253 This was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind comparison of thrombolysis with a single weight-adapted intravenous bolus of tenecteplase plus heparin vs. placebo plus heparin. Patients with acute PE were eligible for the study if they had RV dysfunction, confirmed by echocardiography or CT angiography, and myocardial injury confirmed by a positive troponin I or -T test. A total of 1006 patients were enrolled. The primary efficacy outcome, a composite of all-cause death or haemodynamic decompensation/collapse within 7 days of randomization, was significantly reduced with tenecteplase (2.6% vs. 5.6% in the placebo group; P = 0.015; OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23–0.88). The benefit of thrombolysis was mainly driven by a significant reduction in the rate of haemodynamic collapse (1.6% vs. 5.0%; P = 0.002); all-cause 7-day mortality was low: 1.2% in the tenecteplase group and 1.8% in the placebo group (P = 0.43). In another randomized study comparing LMWH alone vs. LMWH plus an intravenous bolus of tenecteplase in intermediate-risk PE, patients treated with tenecteplase had fewer adverse outcomes, better functional capacity, and greater quality of life at 3 months.311

Thrombolytic treatment carries a risk of major bleeding, including intracranial haemorrhage. Analysis of pooled data from trials using various thrombolytic agents and regimens reported intracranial bleeding rates between 1.9% and 2.2%.316,317 Increasing age and the presence of comorbidities have been associated with a higher risk of bleeding complications.318 The PEITHO trial showed a 2% incidence of haemorrhagic stroke after thrombolytic treatment with tenecteplase (versus 0.2% in the placebo arm) in patients with intermediate-high-risk PE. Major non-intracranial bleeding events were also increased in the tenecteplase group, compared with placebo (6.3% vs. 1.5%; P < 0.001).253 These results underline the need to improve the safety of thrombolytic treatment in patients at increased risk of intracranial or other life-threatening bleeding. A strategy using reduced-dose rtPA appeared to be safe in the setting of ‘moderate’ PE in a study that included 121 patients,319 and another trial on 118 patients with haemodynamic instability or ‘massive pulmonary obstruction’ reported similar results.320 An alternative approach may consist of local, catheter-delivered, ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis using small doses of a thrombolytic agent. (See Section 5.5.)

In patients with mobile right heart thrombi, the therapeutic benefits of thrombolysis remain controversial. Good results were reported in some series,199,200 but in other reports short-term mortality exceeded 20% despite thrombolysis.184,321,322

5.4 Surgical embolectomy

The first successful surgical pulmonary embolectomy was performed in 1924, several decades before the introduction of medical treatment for PE. Multidisciplinary teams enjoying the early and active involvement of cardiac surgeons have recently reintroduced the concept of surgical embolectomy for high-risk PE, and also for selected patients with intermediate-high-risk PE, particularly if thrombolysis is contraindicated or has failed. Surgical embolectomy has also been successfully performed in patients with right heart thrombi straddling the interatrial septum through a patent foramen ovale.323,324

Pulmonary embolectomy is technically a relatively simple operation. The site of surgical care does not appear to have a significant effect on operative outcomes, and thus patients need not be transferred to a specialized cardiothoracic centre if on-site embolectomy using extracorporeal circulation is possible.325 Transportable extracorporeal assistance systems with percutaneous femoral cannulation can be helpful in critical situations, ensuring circulation and oxygenation until definitive diagnosis.326,327 Following rapid transfer to the operating room and induction of anaesthesia and median sternotomy, normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass should be instituted. Aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic cardiac arrest should be avoided.328 With bilateral PA incisions, clots can be removed from both pulmonary arteries down to the segmental level under direct vision. Prolonged periods of post-operative cardiopulmonary bypass and weaning may be necessary for recovery of RV function.

With a rapid multidisciplinary approach and individualized indications for embolectomy before haemodynamic collapse, perioperative mortality rates of 6% or less have been reported.326,328–330 Pre-operative thrombolysis increases the risk of bleeding, but it is not an absolute contraindication to surgical embolectomy.331

Over the long term, the post-operative survival rate, World Health Organization functional class, and quality of life were favourable in published series.327,329,332,333

Patients presenting with an episode of acute PE superimposed on a history of long-lasting dyspnoea and pulmonary hypertension are likely to suffer from chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. These patients should be transferred to an expert centre for pulmonary endarterectomy (see Section 7).

5.5 Percutaneous catheter-directed treatment

The objective of interventional treatment is the removal of obstructing thrombi from the main pulmonary arteries to facilitate RV recovery and improve symptoms and survival.169 For patients with absolute contraindications to thrombolysis, interventional options include (i) thrombus fragmentation with pigtail or balloon catheter, (ii) rheolytic thrombectomy with hydrodynamic catheter devices, (iii) suction thrombectomy with aspiration catheters and (iv) rotational thrombectomy. On the other hand, for patients without absolute contraindications to thrombolysis, catheter-directed thrombolysis or pharmacomechanical thrombolysis are preferred approaches. An overview of the available devices and techniques for percutaneous catheter-directed treatment of PE is given in Web Addenda Table V.169,334

A review on interventional treatment included 35 non-randomized studies covering 594 patients.334 Clinical success, defined as stabilization of haemodynamic parameters, resolution of hypoxia, and survival to discharge, was 87%. The contribution of the mechanical catheter intervention per se to clinical success is unclear because 67% of patients also received adjunctive local thrombolysis. Publication bias probably resulted in underreporting of major complications (reportedly affecting 2% of interventions), which may include death from worsening RV failure, distal embolization, pulmonary artery perforation with lung haemorrhage, systemic bleeding complications, pericardial tamponade, heart block or bradycardia, haemolysis, contrast-induced nephropathy, and puncture-related complications.169

While anticoagulation with heparin alone has little effect on improvement of RV size and performance within the first 24–48 hours,304 the extent of early RV recovery after low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis appears comparable to that after standard-dose systemic thrombolysis.303,335 In a randomized, controlled clinical trial of 59 intermediate-risk patients, when compared with treatment by heparin alone, catheter-directed ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis—administering 10 mg t-PA per treated lung over 15 hours—significantly reduced the subannular RV/LV dimension ratio between baseline and 24-hour follow-up without an increase in bleeding complications.336

5.6 Venous filters

Venous filters are usually placed in the infrarenal portion of the inferior vena cava (IVC). If a thrombus is identified in the renal veins, suprarenal placement may be indicated. Venous filters are indicated in patients with acute PE who have absolute contraindications to anticoagulant drugs, and in patients with objectively confirmed recurrent PE despite adequate anticoagulation treatment. Observational studies suggest that insertion of a venous filter might reduce PE-related mortality rates in the acute phase,337,338 benefit possibly coming at the cost of an increased risk of recurrence of VTE.338

Complications associated with permanent IVC filters are common, although they are rarely fatal.339 Overall, early complications—which include insertion site thrombosis—occur in approximately 10% of patients. Placement of a filter in the superior vena cava carries the risk of pericardial tamponade.340 Late complications are more frequent and include recurrent DVT in approximately 20% of patients and post-thrombotic syndrome in up to 40%. Occlusion of the IVC affects approximately 22% of patients at 5 years and 33% at 9 years, regardless of the use and duration of anticoagulation.341,342

Eight-year follow-up of a randomized study on 400 patients with DVT (with or without PE), all of whom had initially received anticoagulant treatment for at least 3 months, showed that patients undergoing permanent IVC filter insertion had a reduced risk of recurrent PE—at the cost of an increased risk of recurrent DVT—and no overall effect on survival.341

Non-permanent IVC filters are classified as temporary or retrievable devices. Temporary filters must be removed within few days, while retrievable filters can be left in place for longer periods. When non-permanent filters are used, it is recommended that they be removed as soon as it is safe to use anticoagulants. Despite this, they are often left in situ for longer periods, with a late complication rate of at least 10%; this includes filter migration, tilting or deformation, penetration of the cava wall by filter limbs, fracturing of the filter and embolization of fragments, and thrombosis of the device.343,344

There are no data to support the routine use of venous filters in patients with free-floating thrombi in the proximal veins; in one series, among PE patients who received adequate anticoagulant treatment alone (without a venous filter), the recurrence rate was low (3.2%).345 There is also no evidence to support the use of IVC filters in patients scheduled for systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, or pulmonary thrombendarterectomy.

5.7 Early discharge and home treatment

When considering early discharge and outpatient treatment of patients with acute PE, the crucial issue is to select those patients who are at low risk of an adverse early outcome. A number of risk-prediction models have been developed (see Section 4).346 Of these, the PESI (Table 7) is the most extensively validated score to date.211–214 One randomized trial employed a low (Class I or II) PESI as one of the inclusion criteria for home treatment of acute PE.217 The simplified form of this index (sPESI) possesses a high sensitivity for identification of low-risk PE,76,221 but its value for selecting candidates for early discharge and home treatment has not yet been directly investigated.

The Hestia criteria comprise a set of clinical parameters that can easily be obtained at the bedside. In a single-arm management trial that used these criteria to select candidates for home treatment, the rate of recurrent VTE was 2.0% (0.8–4.3%) in patients with acute PE who were discharged within 24 hours.347 The Hestia criteria have not yet been externally validated.

The value of NT-proBNP as a laboratory biomarker for selecting candidates for home treatment has been evaluated in a single-arm management study in which, out of 152 patients (upper margin of the 95% CI: 2.4%) with clinically defined very low-risk PE and BNP levels <500 pg/mL, none died or suffered recurrence of VTE or major bleeding complications during three-month follow-up.237 The value of imaging procedures (echocardiography or CT scan) for excluding RV dysfunction before early discharge has not been investigated in clinical outcome trials.

Table 12 summarizes the designs of the recent multicentre clinical trials that investigated the three-month clinical outcome of patients with PE, who were discharged early or treated entirely as outpatients. Overall, the proportion of screened patients who were identified as eligible for home treatment ranged from 13–51%.348 Two of the studies were randomized, one allocating patients to receive either in-hospital treatment for only 3 days (followed by discharge) or a ‘full’ hospital stay,349 while the other assigned them to receive anticoagulation either entirely outside the hospital (patients were discharged within 24 hours) or partly in hospital.217 The first of these studies, in which a prospectively developed prediction rule was used to define low risk, was terminated prematurely because of an increased short-term mortality rate in the early-discharge arm; two patients (2.8%) in this arm died early, one from gastrointestinal bleeding and the other as a result of cardiac arrest in the presence of a right heart thrombus. Overall mortality was 4.2% in the early-discharge arm, as against 8.3% in the hospitalization arm.349 In the second trial, which was larger, there was one non-VTE related death in each treatment group (0.6%); one patient in the outpatient arm (0.6%) but none in the hospital group suffered non-fatal recurrent VTE.217 In a meta-analysis of 14 (mostly cohort-) studies, the pooled incidences of recurrent VTE, major bleeding and total mortality did not differ significantly between outpatients, patients discharged early, and those treated as inpatients.351

Table 12

Design of recent multicentre trials on home treatment of acute PE (modified from (348))

graphic
graphic

BP = (systolic) blood pressure; COPD = (severe) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CrCl = creatinine clearance; ED = emergency department(s); HIT = heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; i.v. = intravenous; LMWH = low molecular weight heparin; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PE = pulmonary embolism; PESI = Pulmonary embolism severity index (see Table 7); RV = right ventricular; s.c. = subcutaneous; TTE = transthoracic echocardiography; VKA = vitamin K antagonist.

Table 12

Design of recent multicentre trials on home treatment of acute PE (modified from (348))

graphic
graphic

BP = (systolic) blood pressure; COPD = (severe) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CrCl = creatinine clearance; ED = emergency department(s); HIT = heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; i.v. = intravenous; LMWH = low molecular weight heparin; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; PE = pulmonary embolism; PESI = Pulmonary embolism severity index (see Table 7); RV = right ventricular; s.c. = subcutaneous; TTE = transthoracic echocardiography; VKA = vitamin K antagonist.

5.8 Therapeutic strategies

An algorithm of the recommended therapeutic strategies for acute PE is shown in Figure 5.

5.8.1 Pulmonary embolism with shock or hypotension (high-risk pulmonary embolism)

Patients with PE presenting with shock or hypotension are at high risk of in-hospital death, particularly during the first few hours after admission. Besides haemodynamic and respiratory support, intravenous UFH should be administered to these patients as the preferred mode of initial anticoagulation, as LMWH or fondaparinux have not been tested in the setting of hypotension and shock.

Primary reperfusion treatment, particularly systemic thrombolysis, is the treatment of choice for patients with high-risk PE. In patients with contraindications to thrombolysis—and in those in whom thrombolysis has failed to improve the haemodynamic status—surgical embolectomy is recommended if surgical expertise and resources are available. As an alternative to surgery, percutaneous catheter-directed treatment should be considered if expertise with this method and the appropriate resources are available on site. In these cases, treatment decisions should be made by an interdisciplinary team involving a thoracic surgeon or interventional cardiologist, as appropriate.

5.8.2 Pulmonary embolism without shock or hypotension (intermediate- or low-risk pulmonary embolism)

For most cases of acute PE without haemodynamic compromise, LMWH or fondaparinux, given subcutaneously at weight-adjusted doses without monitoring, is the treatment of choice unless there is severe renal dysfunction.

Patients not suffering from shock or hypotension require further risk stratification after the diagnosis of PE has been confirmed. In these patients, risk assessment should begin with a validated clinical score, preferably the PESI or sPESI.

Low-risk patients in the PESI Class I or II, and probably those with sPESI of 0 (Table 9), should be considered for early discharge and outpatient treatment, if this appears feasible based on the patient's anticipated compliance as well as his/her family and social background. For all other patients, assessment of RV function by echocardiography (or CT angiography) and cardiac troponin testing should be considered.

Based on the results of a recently published randomized trial,253 and as explained in the section on prognostic assessment, patients with acute PE, an echocardiogram or CT scan indicating RV dysfunction, and a positive cardiac troponin test belong to an intermediate-high-risk group (Table 9). Full-dose systemic thrombolytic therapy, given as primary reperfusion therapy, can prevent potentially life-threatening haemodynamic decompensation or collapse in these patients, but this benefit is counterbalanced by a high risk of haemorrhagic stroke or major non-intracranial bleeding.253 Accordingly, systemic thrombolysis is not routinely recommended as primary treatment for patients with intermediate-high-risk PE, but should be considered if clinical signs of haemodynamic decompensation appear. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy or percutaneous catheter-directed treatment may be considered as alternative, ‘rescue’ procedures for patients with intermediate-high-risk PE, in whom haemodynamic decompensation appears imminent and the anticipated bleeding risk under systemic thrombolysis is high.

Other laboratory markers, such as BNP, NT-proBNP and H-FABP, have also been shown to possess additive prognostic value to clinical and imaging parameters in cohort studies; their potential therapeutic implications have not yet been investigated in prospective trials.

Normotensive patients in the PESI Class III or higher, or sPESI of at least 1, in whom the echocardiogram (or CT angiogram) or the cardiac troponin test—or both—are normal, belong to an intermediate-low-risk group. Anticoagulation is indicated. Existing evidence does not support primary reperfusion treatment. There is no evidence to suggest that bed rest has any beneficial effect on these patients' clinical outcome.

5.9 Areas of uncertainty

Although a large number of recent cohort studies have helped to further refine risk stratification in not-high-risk patients with confirmed PE, the clinical implications of prognostic assessment—and in particular the therapeutic strategy for patients at intermediate-high risk—warrant further investigation. It will be necessary to elaborate on (i) whether reduced-dose intravenous thrombolysis is indeed safe and effective and (ii) whether catheter-directed treatment can evolve to become a widely available (and affordable) alternative option. The results of the completed large phase III trials on the use of new oral anticoagulants in the treatment of PE and secondary prevention of VTE appear convincing and confirm that the breakthrough in anticoagulation therapy has extended to include VTE. Nevertheless, the accumulation of clinical experience with these drugs under ‘real world’ conditions will have to proceed at a prudent pace. Finally, further management trials are necessary to ‘crystallize' the criteria that might permit early discharge and home treatment of low-risk patients with acute PE.

Recommendations for acute phase treatment

graphic
graphic

PE = pulmonary embolism; UFH = unfractionated heparin.

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cReferences.

dIf appropriate expertise and resources are available on site.

Recommendations for acute phase treatment

graphic
graphic
graphic
graphic

* CAUTION: Edoxaban is currently subject to regulatory review for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in the European Union.

aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time; INR = international normalized ratio; LMWH = low molecular weight heparin; PE = pulmonary embolism; UFH = unfractionated heparin; VKA = vitamin K antagonist.

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cReferences.

dSee Table 9 for definition of the risk categories.

eRE-COVER and RE-COVER II are considered one large trial.

fCreatinine clearance <30 mL/min for rivaroxaban, dabigatran and edoxaban; and <25 mL/min for apixaban.

gIf appropriate expertise and resources are available on site.

Recommendations for venous filters

graphic
graphic

IVC = inferior vena cava; PE = pulmonary embolism.

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cReferences.

6. Duration of anticoagulation

The aim of anticoagulant treatment in patients with PE is to prevent recurrence of VTE. VKAs are used in most cases, while LMWH is preferred in patients with VTE and cancer.356,357 Three new oral anticoagulant agents have been evaluated in the extended treatment of VTE.

Most of the studies focusing on long-term anticoagulation for VTE have included patients with DVT, with or without PE, and only one study specifically focussed on patients with PE.358 The incidence of recurrent VTE does not depend on the clinical manifestation of the first event (i.e. it is similar after PE and after DVT); however, in patients who have suffered PE, VTE more frequently recurs as symptomatic PE while, in patients who have suffered DVT, it tends to recur more frequently as DVT.359

Clinical trials have evaluated various durations of anticoagulant treatment for VTE. The main findings of these studies were (i) patients with PE should receive at least 3 months of anticoagulant treatment, (ii) after withdrawal of anticoagulant treatment, the risk of recurrence if anticoagulants are stopped after 6 or 12 months can be expected to be similar to that after 3 months and (iii) indefinite treatment reduces the risk for recurrent VTE by about 90%, but this benefit is partially offset by a 1% or higher annual risk of major bleeding.360–363 In general, VKAs are highly effective in preventing recurrent VTE during treatment, but they do not eliminate the risk of subsequent recurrence after discontinuation of treatment.361,362 Thus, anticoagulants are discontinued when the perceived risk of anticoagulation-related bleeding and the inconvenience of remaining on treatment outweigh the risk of recurrent VTE.

Active cancer is a major risk factor for recurrence of VTE, the rate of recurrence being approximately 20% during the first 12 months after the index event.364,365 Therefore, patients with cancer are candidates for indefinite anticoagulant treatment after an initial episode of PE. In a randomized trial of patients with DVT and cancer, the LMWH dalteparin, given at the dose of 200 U/kg once daily for 4–6 weeks, followed by 75% of the initial dose given once daily for up to 6 months, was more effective than warfarin in preventing recurrent VTE.278 Accordingly, at least 3–6 months of treatment with LMWH are recommended for patients with VTE and cancer (see Section 8.2). The optimal treatment to be given after the first 6 months is less clear but treatment with LMWH or VKA is recommended as long as the disease is considered active.

With the exception of patients with cancer, the risk for recurrent VTE after discontinuation of treatment is related to the features of the index VTE event. A study that followed patients with a first episode of acute PE found that the recurrence rate after discontinuation of treatment was approximately 2.5% per year after PE associated with reversible risk factors compared with 4.5% per year after unprovoked PE.358 Similar observations were made in other prospective studies in patients with DVT.360 Recurrence rates may be higher, up to 10%, in the first year after withdrawal of anticoagulant treatment. As mentioned in the Introduction, VTE is held to be ‘provoked’ in the presence of a temporary or reversible risk factor (such as surgery, trauma, immobilization, pregnancy, oral contraceptive use or hormone replacement therapy) at the time of diagnosis, and ‘unprovoked’ in the absence thereof. For patients with provoked PE, treatment with a VKA for 3 months is preferable to a shorter period. Treatment for longer than 3 months is generally not recommended, provided that the transient risk factor no longer exists.358

The assessment of the risk of recurrence in patients with unprovoked PE is more complex.54–56 The following risk factors may help to identify patients at higher long-term relative risk of recurrence (1.5–2.0): (i) one or more previous episodes of VTE, (ii) antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, (iii) hereditary thrombophilia and (iv) residual thrombosis in the proximal veins. An additional risk factor for recurrence after PE was reported to be the persistence of RV dysfunction at hospital discharge as assessed by echocardiography.366 On the other hand, a negative D-dimer test one month after withdrawal of VKA seems to be a protective factor for recurrence of VTE (RR 0.4).367

Among carriers of molecular thrombophilia, patients with lupus anticoagulant, those with a confirmed deficit of protein C or protein S, and patients with homozygous factor V Leiden or homozygous prothrombin G20210A (PTG20210A), may be candidates for indefinite anticoagulant treatment after a first unprovoked VTE. No evidence of the clinical benefit of extended anticoagulant treatment is currently available for carriers of heterozygous factor V Leiden or PTG20210A.

There are no properly evaluated bleeding risk scores for patients receiving anticoagulant treatment for VTE. Based on currently available evidence, risk factors include (i) old age (particularly >75 years), (ii) previous gastrointestinal bleeding (particularly if not associated with a reversible or treatable cause), (iii) previous stroke, either haemorrhagic or ischaemic, (iv) chronic renal or hepatic disease, (v) concomitant antiplatelet therapy (to be avoided, if possible), (vi) other serious acute or chronic illness, (vii) poor anticoagulation control and (viii) sub-optimal monitoring of anticoagulant therapy.

Based on the balance between the risk of recurrence of VTE and that of bleeding, patients with unprovoked PE should be treated with VKA for at least 3 months. After this period, indefinite anticoagulation therapy should be considered for patients with a first unprovoked proximal DVT or PE and a low risk of bleeding, provided that this is consistent with the patient's preference. Notably, the term ‘indefinite anticoagulation’ is not synonymous with ‘lifelong treatment’; it simply indicates that the duration of treatment cannot be defined at three-month follow-up after the acute event. In these patients, the option to withdraw anticoagulant treatment should periodically be re-assessed, based on the dynamic balance between the risks of recurrence and bleeding. Lifelong treatment is recommended for most patients with a second unprovoked DVT or PE.

In two recent trials with a total of 1224 patients, extended therapy with aspirin (after termination of standard oral anticoagulation) was associated with a 30–35% reduction in the risk of recurrence after unprovoked DVT and/or PE.368,369 This corresponds to less than half of the risk reduction achieved by oral anticoagulants; on the other hand, the bleeding rates associated with aspirin were low (Table 13).

Table 13

Clinical trials on extended treatment of venous thromboembolism

graphic
graphic

b.i.d. = bis in die (twice daily); CRNM = clinically relevant non-major; SD = standard deviation; VKA = vitamin K antagonists; VTE = venous thromboembolism.

a‘Active’ denotes in the Table the direct oral thrombin or factor Xa inhibitor (or aspirin) tested; the comparator arm also received anticoagulation (a vitamin K antagonist) in some of the studies.

bIncidence per patient-year.

cApproved doses of dabigatran are 150 mg b.i.d. and 110 mg b.i.d.

dThis is the approved dose of apixaban for extended treatment.

Table 13

Clinical trials on extended treatment of venous thromboembolism

graphic
graphic

b.i.d. = bis in die (twice daily); CRNM = clinically relevant non-major; SD = standard deviation; VKA = vitamin K antagonists; VTE = venous thromboembolism.

a‘Active’ denotes in the Table the direct oral thrombin or factor Xa inhibitor (or aspirin) tested; the comparator arm also received anticoagulation (a vitamin K antagonist) in some of the studies.

bIncidence per patient-year.

cApproved doses of dabigatran are 150 mg b.i.d. and 110 mg b.i.d.

dThis is the approved dose of apixaban for extended treatment.

6.1 New oral anticoagulants for extended treatment

Three NOACs have been evaluated in the extended treatment of patients with VTE: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. In all studies, patients with PE made up approximately one-third of the entire study population, while the remaining two-thirds were patients with DVT but no clinically overt PE. To be included in the extended studies, patients needed to have completed the initial and long-term anticoagulation phase.

The design and principal findings of the recent trials on extended anticoagulation are summarized in Table 13. Dabigatran was compared with warfarin or placebo in two different studies. In RE-MEDY, 2866 patients were randomized to receive dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, or warfarin (INR 2–3). Dabigatran was non-inferior to warfarin for the prevention of confirmed recurrent symptomatic VTE or VTE-related death (HR 1.44; 95% CI 0.78-2.64; P = 0.01 for non-inferiority).370 The rate of major bleeding was 0.9% under dabigatran, compared with 1.8% under warfarin (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.27–1.02). In the RE-SONATE study, 1353 patients were randomized to dabigatran or placebo for an additional anticoagulation period of 6 months.370) Dabigatran was associated with a 92% risk reduction in symptomatic recurrent VTE or unexplained death (HR 0.08; 95% CI 0.02–0.25). A 0.3% rate of major bleeding was observed in the dabigatran group vs. 0% in the placebo group; major or CRNM bleeding occurred in 5.3% and 1.8% of the patients, respectively (HR 2.92; 95% CI 1.52–5.60).370

The randomized, double-blind EINSTEIN Extension study assessed the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban for extended treatment of VTE.295 An additional 6- or 12-month course of rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) was compared with placebo in patients who had completed 6–12 months of anticoagulation treatment for a first VTE. Rivaroxaban had superior efficacy over placebo for preventing recurrent VTE (1.3% vs. 7.1%; HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.09–0.39). Non-fatal major bleeding occurred in 0.7% of patients in the rivaroxaban arm vs. none in the placebo arm. The incidence of major or CRNM bleeding was 6.0% in the rivaroxaban group and 1.2% in the placebo group (HR 5.19; 95% CI 2.3–11.7).

The AMPLIFY Extension study was a double-blind trial in which patients with VTE were randomized to receive two different doses of apixaban (2.5 mg or 5 mg twice daily) or placebo.371 Patients were eligible for inclusion if there was clinical equipoise regarding the continuation or cessation of anticoagulation therapy. The study treatment was given for a 12-month period. Symptomatic recurrent VTE or death from any cause occurred in 11.6% of patients receiving placebo, compared with 3.8% of those receiving 2.5 mg of apixaban (HR 0.33 vs. placebo; 95% CI 0.22–0.48) and with 4.2% of the patients who were receiving 5 mg of apixaban (HR 0.36 vs. placebo; 95% CI 0.25–0.53). The rates of major bleeding were 0.5% in the placebo group, 0.2% in the 2.5 mg apixaban group, and 0.1% in the 5 mg apixaban group; major or CRNM bleeding occurred in 2.7%, 3.2% (HR 1.20 vs. placebo; 95% CI 0.69–2.10) and 4.3% (HR 1.62 vs. placebo; 95% CI 0.96–2.73) of the patients, respectively.

In summary, the results of the trials using NOACs in the extended treatment of VTE are in line with those of the studies that tested these agents in the acute-phase treatment and standard duration of anticoagulation after PE or VTE (discussed in the previous section). They indicate that NOACs are both effective (in terms of prevention of symptomatic or fatal recurrence of VTE) and safe (particularly in terms of major bleeding)—probably safer than standard VKA regimens.

Recommendations for duration of anticoagulation after pulmonary embolism

graphic
graphic

LMWH = low molecular weight heparin; PE = pulmonary embolism; VKA = vitamin K antagonist.

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cReferences.

dLong-term data on patients taking new oral anticoagulants for secondary PE prophylaxis are not yet available.

eB refers to the evidence available for each drug separately.

7. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

7.1 Epidemiology

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is a debilitating disease caused by chronic obstruction of major pulmonary arteries. Although the exact prevalence and annual incidence of CTEPH is unknown, data from the United Kingdom suggest that this condition may occur in approximately five individuals per million population per year.378 According to the 2009 ESC Guidelines on pulmonary hypertension (PH)379 and the recently updated clinical classification of PH,380 CTEPH is listed as a distinct subgroup of PH (group 4).

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension has been reported to be a long-term complication of PE, with a reported cumulative incidence of 0.1–9.1% within the first two years after a symptomatic PE event.381 The large margin of error is probably due to referral bias, absence of early symptoms, and the difficulty in differentiating ‘true’ acute PE from an acute episode superimposed on pre-existing CTEPH. Routine screening for CTEPH after PE is not supported by current evidence; a significant number of CTEPH cases develop in the absence of previous acute PE.

7.2 Pathophysiology

The available evidence indicates that CTEPH is primarily caused by pulmonary thromboembolism. In a recent international registry, a clinical history of VTE was recorded in 80% of patients with CTEPH.382 Inadequate anticoagulation, large thrombus mass, residual thrombi, and recurrence of VTE may contribute to the development of CTEPH. On the other hand, CTEPH does not share the same risk factor profile with VTE and has been associated with only a few specific thrombophilic factors. These include the presence of lupus anticoagulant or antiphospholipid antibodies and elevated levels of coagulation factor VIII.4,383 It has been proposed that, in some patients, PE may be followed by a pulmonary vascular remodelling process modified by infection,384 inflammation,385 circulating and vascular-resident progenitor cells,386,387 thyroid hormone replacement, or malignancy.4 Hypercoagulation, ‘sticky’ red blood cells, high platelet counts, and ‘uncleavable’ fibrinogen may further contribute to obliteration of the pulmonary arteries in CTEPH.388 In addition, non-plasmatic risk factors such as splenectomy, ventriculoatrial shunt for hydrocephalus therapy, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic osteomyelitis are associated with a higher incidence and a worse prognosis of CTEPH.4,389

Apart from major pulmonary vascular obstruction, the pathophysiology of CTEPH includes a pulmonary microvascular disease,390 which may be responsible for the poor outcome in some cases of pulmonary endarterectomy.391 This condition may originate from a high-flow or high-pressure state in previously unaffected vessels, or may be driven by hypoxia, infection, or inflammation.

7.3 Clinical presentation and diagnosis

The median age of patients at diagnosis of CTEPH is 63 years, and both genders are equally affected;392 paediatric cases are rare.393,394 Clinical symptoms and signs are non-specific or absent in early CTEPH, with signs of right heart failure only becoming evident in advanced disease; thus, early diagnosis remains a challenge in CTEPH, with a median time of 14 months between onset of symptoms and diagnosis in expert centres.392 When present, the clinical symptoms of CTEPH may resemble those of acute PE, or of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (iPAH); in the latter context, oedema and haemoptysis occur more often in CTEPH, while syncope is more common in iPAH.

The diagnosis of CTEPH is based on findings obtained after at least 3 months of effective anticoagulation, in order to discriminate this condition from ‘sub-acute’ PE. These findings are: Some patients, particularly those with complete unilateral obstruction, may present with normal pulmonary haemodynamics at rest, despite symptomatic disease. These patients are also considered as having CTEPH and managed accordingly. Suitable terminology to describe this condition of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary vascular disease is still lacking.

  • mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mm Hg, with pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤15 mm Hg;

  • at least one (segmental) perfusion defect detected by perfusion lung scan, or pulmonary artery obstruction seen by MDCT angiography or conventional pulmonary cineangiography.

An algorithm for CTEPH diagnosis is shown in Figure 6. While MDCT angiography is the investigation of choice for the diagnosis of acute PE, planar V/Q lung scan remains the main first-line imaging modality for CTEPH, as it carries a 96–97% sensitivity and 90–95% specificity for the diagnosis.395 By contrast, in iPAH and pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, perfusion scans are either normal or show sub-segmental defects.396

Figure 6

Algorithm for the diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (adapted from Lang et al. (2010)).397

Right heart catheterization is an essential diagnostic tool. Mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure are key haemodynamic parameters. In candidates for surgery, pulmonary vascular resistance has prognostic value.398

Multi-detector CT angiography has become an established imaging technique for CTEPH,399 but CT alone cannot rule out the disease.397 CT angiography may help identify complications of the disease, such as pulmonary artery distension, resulting in left main coronary artery compression.

A high-resolution CT scan of the chest delivers images of the lung parenchyma, and identifies emphysema, bronchial disease or interstitial lung disease, as well as infarcts, vascular- and pericardial malformations, and thoracic wall deformities. Perfusion inequalities manifest as a mosaic parenchymal pattern with dark areas corresponding to relatively decreased perfusion. Although a mosaic pattern is frequent in CTEPH, it can also be observed in up to 12% of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.400 Magnetic resonance imaging of the pulmonary vasculature is still considered inferior to CT,401 but this modality, as well angioscopy,402 intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography, may be used according to local experience and practice.

The final step in the diagnostic pathway is side-selective pulmonary angiography in the anterior-posterior and lateral projections, illustrating pulmonary artery webs and bands, wall irregularities, stenoses, aneurysms, and complete vascular obstructions, as well as bronchial collaterals.

7.4 Treatment and prognosis

A proposed algorithm for CTEPH treatment is displayed in Figure 7. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice for the disease. In Europe, in-hospital mortality is currently as low as 4.7% in expert centres.398 The majority of patients experience substantial relief from symptoms and near-normalization of haemodynamics.391,398,403 In contrast to surgical embolectomy for acute PE, treatment of CTEPH necessitates a true endarterectomy through the medial layer of the pulmonary arteries, which is performed under deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest.404

Figure 7

Algorithm for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (adapted from Ghofrani et al. (2013)).412

The operability of patients with CTEPH is determined by multiple factors that cannot easily be standardized; these are related to the suitability of the patient, the expertise of the surgical team, and available resources. General criteria include pre-operative New York Heart Association functional class II–IV and the surgical accessibility of thrombi in the main, lobar, or segmental pulmonary arteries. Advanced age per se is no contraindication for surgery. There is no pulmonary vascular resistance threshold or measure of RV dysfunction that absolutely precludes PEA.

Patients who do not undergo surgery, or suffer from persistent or residual pulmonary hypertension after PEA, face a poor prognosis. Advances in balloon pulmonary angioplasty are continuing in an attempt to make this technique a therapeutic alternative for selected patients with non-operable CTEPH.405–408

Optimal medical treatment for CTEPH consists of anticoagulants, diuretics, and oxygen. Lifelong anticoagulation is recommended, even after PEA, while no data exist on the efficacy and safety of new direct oral anticoagulants. Although there is no consensus, routine cava filter placement is not justified by the available evidence. Pulmonary microvascular disease in CTEPH has provided the rationale for use of drugs approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).409 These drugs may be justified (i) in inoperable patients, (ii) in patients with persistent or residual pulmonary hypertension after PEA or (iii) in the presence of an unacceptable surgical risk–benefit ratio.

The dual endothelin antagonist bosentan was evaluated over 16 weeks in 157 patients with inoperable CTEPH or persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension after PEA; the primary combined endpoint of a decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and an increase in the 6-minute walking distance was not met.410 PVR is defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure minus pulmonary artery wedge pressure, divided by cardiac output. Riociguat, a soluble, oral stimulator of guanylate cyclase, was administered to 261 of 446 screened patients with inoperable CTEPH—or persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension after PEA—for 16 weeks, and led to a mean increase of 39 metres in the 6-minute walking distance (P < 0.001; primary endpoint) and to a least-squared mean difference of 246 dyn.cm.s−5 in pulmonary vascular resistance (P < 0.001; secondary endpoint); the time to clinical worsening remained unchanged.411 Riociguat has received approval for use in the treatment of adults with persistent or recurrent CTEPH after surgical treatment, or inoperable CTEPH, to improve exercise capacity and WHO functional class. Off-label use of drugs approved for PAH, or the use of riociguat as a therapeutic bridge to PEA in patients considered to be at high risk due to poor haemodynamics, is currently not justified.

Recommendations for chronic thomboembolic pulmonary hypertension

graphic
graphic

CTEPH = chronic thomboembolic pulmonary hypertension; PE = pulmonary embolism; PEA = pulmonary endarterectomy.

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cReferences.

8. Specific problems

8.1 Pregnancy

Pulmonary embolism is the leading cause of pregnancy-related maternal death in developed countries.415 The risk of PE is higher in the post-partum period, particularly after a caesarean section. Recommendations for the management of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy are included in the 2011 ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy.416 The present section is in agreement with those guidelines.

Pregnancy does not alter the clinical features of PE but, as pregnant women often complain of breathlessness, this symptom should be interpreted with caution. Arterial blood should be drawn with the patient in the upright position, as the partial pressure of oxygen may be lower in the supine position during the third trimester. Data on the validity of clinical prediction rules for PE in pregnancy are lacking, but a recent retrospective series of 125 pregnant women who were referred for CT angiography showed that no patient with an original Wells score of <6 points had a PE.417 These data need to be confirmed in large-scale prospective studies.

8.1.1 Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy

Exposure of the foetus to ionizing radiation is a concern when investigating suspected PE during pregnancy; although this concern is largely overruled by the hazards of missing a potentially fatal diagnosis. This is particularly true for pregnant patients with suspected high-risk PE. Moreover, erroneously assigning a diagnosis of PE to a pregnant woman is also fraught with risks, since it unnecessarily exposes the mother and foetus to the risks of anticoagulant treatment and will impact on delivery plans, future contraception, and thromboprophylaxis during future pregnancies. Therefore, investigations should aim at diagnostic certainty.

The usefulness of D-dimer in pregnancy is controversial. A normal D-dimer value has the same exclusion value for PE in pregnant women as for other patients with suspected PE but is found more rarely, because plasma D-dimer levels physiologically increase throughout pregnancy.127,418 Study of a series of pregnant patients with suspected DVT found that an agglutination assay would have ruled out the disease in 55% of the cases with a negative predictive value of 100%.418 The same study attempted to establish higher cut-off levels in pregnancy for several commonly used D-dimer assays.419 These thresholds await prospective validation and, in the meantime, the usual D-dimer cut-off value should apply to rule out PE in pregnancy. If the D-dimer result is abnormal, diagnostic work-up may continue with lower-limb CUS, since proximal DVT warrants anticoagulation treatment and makes thoracic imaging unnecessary. If ultrasonography is negative, the diagnosis should be pursued.

The amount of radiation absorbed by the foetus during different diagnostic tests is shown in Table 14. The danger threshold for injury to the foetus is considered to be 50 mSv (50 000 µGy),420 and all radiological tests fall well below this figure; nevertheless lung scintigraphy, when available, may be preferred over CT because it avoids the high radiation dose delivered to the female breast by CT angiography and the resulting small but significant increase of the lifetime risk of breast cancer.421 As a rule, a ventilation lung scan is unnecessary as the chest X-ray is usually normal, thus further limiting radiation exposure. The diagnostic yield of scintigraphy is around 80%, with 70% of tests yielding normal perfusion scans and 5–10% yielding high-probability scans.422–428 This is at least as high as that of CT in this particular population, due to a higher proportion of inconclusive CT scans during pregnancy.425 A normal perfusion scan and a negative CT are equally safe for ruling out PE in pregnancy, as shown by several retrospective series.427,429

Table 14

Estimated radiation absorbed in procedures used for diagnosing PE (adapted from Bajc et al. (2009)430 and Chunilal et al. (2009)).431

graphic
graphic

mSv = milisievert; PE = pulmonary embolism

Table 14

Estimated radiation absorbed in procedures used for diagnosing PE (adapted from Bajc et al. (2009)430 and Chunilal et al. (2009)).431

graphic
graphic

mSv = milisievert; PE = pulmonary embolism

Conventional pulmonary angiography carries a significantly higher radiation exposure for the foetus (2.2–3.7 mSv) and should be avoided during pregnancy.420

8.1.2 Treatment of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy

The treatment of PE in pregnancy is based on heparin anticoagulation, because heparin does not cross the placenta and is not found in breast milk in significant amounts. Increasing experience suggests that LMWHs are safe in pregnancy,432–435 and their use is endorsed in several reports.436,437 Treatment should consist of a weight-adjusted dose of LMWH. Adaptation according to anti-Xa monitoring may be considered in women at extremes of body weight or with renal disease, but routine monitoring is generally not justified.279,436,437 Unfractionated heparin is not contraindicated in pregnancy, although it requires aPTT monitoring and is probably more likely to cause osteoporosis if used for longer periods. Fondaparinux should not be used in pregnancy due to the lack of data. VKAs cross the placenta and are associated with a well-defined embryopathy during the first trimester. Administration of VKAs in the third trimester can result in foetal and neonatal haemorrhage, as well as placental abruption. Warfarin may be associated with central nervous system anomalies throughout pregnancy. New oral anticoagulants are contraindicated in pregnant patients.

The management of labour and delivery require particular attention. Epidural analgesia cannot be used unless LMWH has been discontinued at least 12 hours before delivery. Treatment can be resumed 12–24 hours after removal of the epidural catheter. Close collaboration between the obstetrician, the anaesthesiologist, and the attending physician is recommended.

After delivery, heparin treatment may be replaced by anticoagulation with VKA. Anticoagulant treatment should be administered for at least 6 weeks after delivery and with a minimum overall treatment duration of 3 months. VKAs can be given to breast-feeding mothers.

Published data on 28 pregnant women treated with thrombolytic agents—mainly with rtPA at the dose of 100 mg over 2 hours—suggest that the risk of complications for the mother may be similar to that in the non-pregnant population.438 Thrombolytic treatment should not be used peripartum, except for critical cases.

Recommendations for pulmonary embolism in pregnancy

graphic
graphic

CT = computed tomographic; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; LMWH = low molecular weight heparin; PE = pulmonary embolism.

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cReferences.

8.2 Pulmonary embolism and cancer

The overall risk of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients is four times as great as in the general population.8 Although the largest absolute numbers of VTE episodes occur in patients with lung, colon, and prostate cancer, the relative risk for VTE is highest in multiple myeloma, brain, and pancreatic cancer (46-, 20-, and 16-fold increased vs. healthy controls, respectively).439 In the metastatic stage, stomach, bladder, uterine, renal, and lung cancer are also associated with a high incidence of VTE.17

Patients receiving chemotherapy have a six-fold increase in the adjusted risk ratio for VTE compared with a healthy population.8 Nevertheless, prophylactic anticoagulation is not routinely recommended during ambulatory anti-cancer chemotherapy, with the exception of thalidomide- or lenalidomide-based regimens in multiple myeloma.440,441 LMWH or VKA are not effective in preventing thrombosis related to the use of permanent central venous lines in cancer patients.441

The risk of VTE increases over 90-fold in the first 6 weeks after cancer surgery, compared with that in healthy controls, and is second only to the risk of VTE after hip or knee replacement surgery. Notably, the risk of VTE after cancer surgery remains elevated (up to 30-fold) between the fourth and twelfth post-operative month.442 Continued vigilance is therefore necessary, as currently recommended prophylactic anticoagulation covers only the first 30 days after cancer surgery.

8.2.1 Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer

Malignancy is taken into account in the estimation of clinical probability of PE (see Section 3). A negative D-dimer test has the same diagnostic value as in non-cancer patients. On the other hand, D-dimer levels are non-specifically increased in many patients with cancer. In one study, raising the D-dimer cut-off level to 700 µg/L, or using age-dependent cut-off levels, increased the proportion of cancer patients in whom PE could be ruled out from 8.4 to 13% and 12%, respectively; the corresponding false-negative rates appeared acceptable.443 This strategy needs further validation.

The widespread use of CT scanners has resulted in an increasing number of incidentally diagnosed, asymptomatic PEs in cancer patients.444 Their significance, particularly if limited to segmental or sub-segmental arteries, is unclear; however, in view of the high risk of an adverse outcome reported by uncontrolled studies,445–449 the treatment strategies recommended for symptomatic PE should be also considered for incidental PE found in patients with malignancy.

8.2.2 Prognosis for pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer

Cancer is a risk factor for an adverse outcome in acute PE. In a multivariate analysis of 570 patients with PE, the presence of cancer tripled the 30-day risk of death, shock, or recurrence of PE.257 In the RIETE registry, in patients with and without cancer, all-cause three-month mortality were 26.4% and 4.1% respectively (P < 0.001). Among over 35 000 patients with VTE, cancer was the strongest independent risk factor for both all-cause and PE-related mortality.20 The worse outcome is due to the increased bleeding risk during anticoagulation therapy and to the high rate of recurrence of VTE.450–454

The risk of recurrence of PE in cancer was recently assessed in a cohort study of 543 patients and was validated in an independent set of 819 patients.453 A suggested score predicting risk of recurrence included breast cancer (minus 1 point), tumour node metastasis Stage I or II (minus 1 point), female sex, lung cancer, and previous VTE (plus 1 point each). Patients with a score ≤0 were at low risk (≤4.5%) and those with a score >1 were at high risk (≥19%) of recurrence of VTE.453 The score may assist in making individually tailored decisions regarding the duration of anticoagulant treatment.

8.2.3 Management of pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer

When selecting the mode of anticoagulation in patients with cancer and acute PE, LMWH administered in the acute phase (except for high-risk PE) and continued over the first 3–6 months should be considered as first-line therapy. However, this strategy is based largely on the results of a single trial with an observed 50% reduction in the rate of recurrence of VTE without increased bleeding risk, as compared with the early transition from heparin to VKA.376,377 Evidence regarding treatment of cancer-related PE with fondaparinux and the new oral anticoagulants is limited.

Chronic anticoagulation may consist of continuation of LMWH, transition to VKA, or discontinuation of anticoagulation. The decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis after considering the success of anti-cancer therapy, the estimated risk of recurrence of VTE, the bleeding risk, and the preference of the patient. Periodic reassessment of the risk–benefit ratio of chronic anticoagulant treatment is a reasonable strategy.

Recurrence of VTE in cancer patients on VKA or LMWH therapy may be managed by changing to the highest permitted dose of LMWH or opting for vena cava filter placement.455 Venous filters should primarily be considered when anticoagulation is impossible due to haemorrhage; however, the risk of filter thrombosis in the absence of anticoagulation may be particularly high in cancer patients. In a recent prospective, randomized trial in cancer patients with DVT or PE, no clinical advantage was found in placement of a vena cava filter in addition to anticoagulation with fondaparinux.456

8.2.4 Occult cancer presenting as unprovoked pulmonary embolism

Approximately 10% of patients presenting with unprovoked PE will develop cancer within the next 5–10 years, with the majority of cases appearing in the first 1–2 years after diagnosis of PE.457 Recently, Sorensen et al. reported that cancer will emerge with a similarly high incidence after unprovoked VTE and after that provoked by surgery, but more often than after post-traumatic VTE.458 The evidence supporting screening for occult cancer after unprovoked VTE is inconclusive. Di Nisio et al. recommended, as the most effective and least harmful approach for such patients, a screening strategy of performing pelvic and abdominal CT combined with mammography and sputum cytology.459 However, when such an extensive screening strategy was compared with basic clinical evaluation, no benefit was found in terms of 5-year survival.460 Therefore, the search for occult cancer after an episode of VTE may be restricted to careful history, physical examination, basic laboratory tests, and a chest X-ray.461,462

Recommendations for pulmonary embolism in cancer

graphic
graphic

LMWH = low molecular weight heparin; PE = pulmonary embolism.

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cReferences.

8.3 Non-thrombotic pulmonary embolism

Different cell types can cause non-thrombotic embolization, including adipocytes, haematopoietic, amniotic, trophoblastic, and tumour cells. In addition, bacteria, fungi, parasites, foreign materials, and gas can lead to PE. Symptoms are similar to those of acute VTE and include dyspnoea, tachycardia, chest pain, cough, and occasionally haemoptysis, cyanosis, and syncope.

Diagnosis of non-thrombotic PE can be a challenge.464 In the case of small particles, microemboli cannot be detected on CT images. An overview of typical imaging findings for the various types of non-thrombotic PE has been provided.465 Given the rarity of this disease, clinical evidence is limited and mainly based on small case series.

8.3.1 Septic embolism

Septic embolism to the pulmonary circulation is a relatively rare clinical event and is commonly associated with right-sided endocarditis. Risk factors include intravenous drug abuse and infected indwelling catheters or pacemaker wires. Other causes include septic thrombophlebitis from the tonsils and the jugular, dental, and pelvic regions. The diagnosis is based on identifying the source of septic emboli, positive blood culture tests, and chest X-ray or CT after considering the clinical context. Although Staphylococcus aureus is the most common bacterial pathogen, the increasing number of immunocompromised patients—and those with indwelling catheters and vascular prostheses—leads to a rise in the incidence of anaerobic gram positive and -negative bacteria, bacterioide species, and fungi.466 Specific treatment of the responsible bacterial or fungal micro-organism is necessary.

8.3.2 Foreign-material pulmonary embolism

The increasing use of interventional techniques in modern medicine has drastically increased the incidence of foreign-material PE.467 Examples of foreign material include silicone, broken catheters, guide wires, vena cava filters, coils for embolization, and endovascular stent components. If possible, intravascular foreign objects should be removed, since the material may cause further thrombosis and sepsis.

8.3.3 Fat embolism

Embolization of fat occurs in almost all patients with pelvic or long-bone fractures and in those undergoing endomedullary nailing or placement of knee and hip prostheses, but also during lipid and propofol infusion, intra-osseous infusion and bone marrow harvest, and in sickle cell disease, fatty liver disease, pancreatitis, and after liposuction. Pulmonary involvement is not only due to vascular obstruction but also to the release of substances triggering an inflammatory cascade, thus explaining why some patients with fat embolism develop acute respiratory distress syndrome.468

The classical triad of fat embolization is characterized by altered mental status, respiratory distress, and petechial rash occurring typically 12–36 hours after injury. Fat globules can be found in blood, urine, sputum, broncho-alveolar lavage, and cerebrospinal fluid.469 In most cases the condition is self-limiting. Treatment should be supportive. Although the successful use of high doses of methyl prednisolone has been reported in humans, along with the positive effects of phorbol myristate acetate and sivelestat in animals, there is no evidence that these drugs alter the course of the disease.470

8.3.4 Air embolism

Although air embolism can occur in both the venous and arterial systems, venous emboli are more common. Venous air embolization is often an iatrogenic complication of the manipulation of central venous and haemodialysis catheters. The lethal volume of air after injection in humans is estimated to range from 100 to 500 mL.471 The major effect of venous air embolism is the obstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract, or of the pulmonary arterioles, by a mixture of air bubbles and fibrin. Although the diagnosis can be made by X-ray or echocardiography, CT scanning may be the most sensitive diagnostic test, showing a unique picture of round or mirror-shaped densities localized ventrally in the supine patient.465 Treatment includes maintenance of the circulation, prevention of further entry of gas, and volume expansion. The patient should be placed in the left lateral decubitus position to prevent right ventricular outflow obstruction by airlock.472 In the case of large amounts of central air, aspiration with the use of a central venous catheter might be an option. Administration of up to 100% oxygen can decrease bubble size by establishing a diffusion gradient that favours elimination of the gas.471

8.3.5 Amniotic fluid embolism

Amniotic fluid embolism is a rare but catastrophic complication unique to pregnancy. Estimated incidences, obtained through validated case identification, range between 1.9 and 2.5 cases per 100 000 maternities.473 The most likely mechanism is that amniotic fluid is forced into the uterine veins during normal labour or when the placenta is disrupted by surgery or trauma. As a consequence, pulmonary vessels are obstructed by cell groups and meconium, and an inflammatory reaction occurs due to the release of active metabolites. The majority of patients develop seizures. Some patients are diagnosed with pulmonary oedema and acute respiratory distress syndrome later in the course of the event. Mortality is high—up to 21%, even in recent cohort studies.473 Management should be supportive.

8.3.6 Tumour embolism

Pulmonary intravascular tumour emboli are seen in up to 26% of autopsies of patients with solid malignancies, although the diagnosis is rarely made before death.474 Carcinoma of the prostate gland, digestive system, liver, and breast is most commonly implicated. Radiologically, tumour microembolism may mimic many lung conditions, including pneumonia, tuberculosis, and interstitial lung disease, whereas tumour macroembolism is indistinguishable from VTE. Treatment should target the underlying malignant disease.

9. Appendix

ESC National Cardiac Societies actively involved in the review process of the 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism.

Austria, Austrian Society of Cardiology, Nika Skoro-Sajer – Azerbaijan, Azerbaijan Society of Cardiology, Ruslan Najafov – Belarus, Belorussian Scientific Society of Cardiologists, Svetlana Sudzhaeva – Belgium, Belgian Society of Cardiology, Michel De Pauw – Bosnia and Herzegovina, Association of Cardiologists of Bosnia & Herzegovina, Fahir Baraković – Bulgaria, Bulgarian Society of Cardiology, Mariya Tokmakova – Croatia, Croatian Cardiac Society, Bosko Skoric – Czech Republic, Czech Society of Cardiology, Richard Rokyta – Denmark, Danish Society of Cardiology, Morten Lock Hansen – Estonia, Estonian Society of Cardiology, Märt Elmet – Finland, Finnish Cardiac Society, Veli-Pekka Harjola – France, French Society of Cardiology, Guy Meyer – Georgia, Georgian Society of Cardiology, Archil Chukhrukidze – Germany, German Cardiac Society, Stephan Rosenkranz – Greece, Hellenic Cardiological Society, Aristides Androulakis – Hungary, Hungarian Society of Cardiology, Tamás Forster – Italy, Italian Federation of Cardiology, Francesco Fedele – Kyrgyzstan, Kyrgyz Society of Cardiology, Talant Sooronbaev – Latvia, Latvian Society of Cardiology, Aija Maca – Lithuania, Lithuanian Society of Cardiology, Egle Ereminiene – Malta, Maltese Cardiac Society, Josef Micallef – Norway, Norwegian Society of Cardiology, Arne Andreasen – Poland, Polish Cardiac Society, Marcin Kurzyna – Portugal, Portuguese Society of Cardiology, Daniel Ferreira – Romania, Romanian Society of Cardiology, Antoniu Octavian Petris – Russia, Russian Society of Cardiology, Sergey Dzemeshkevich – Serbia, Cardiology Society of Serbia, Milika Asanin – Slovakia, Slovak Society of Cardiology, Iveta Šimkova – Spain, Spanish Society of Cardiology, Manuel Anguita – Sweden, Swedish Society of Cardiology, Christina Christersson – The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Macedonian FYR Society of Cardiology, Nela Kostova – Tunisia, Tunisian Society of Cardiology and Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Hedi Baccar – Turkey, Turkish Society of Cardiology, Leyla Elif Sade – Ukraine, Ukrainian Association of Cardiology, Alexander Parkhomenko – United Kingdom, British Cardiovascular Society, Joanna Pepke-Zaba.

References

1
Heit
JA
The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the community
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
2008
, vol. 
28
 
3
(pg. 
370
-
372
)
2
Cohen
AT
Agnelli
G
Anderson
FA
Arcelus
JI
Bergqvist
D
Brecht
JG
Greer
IA
Heit
JA
Hutchinson
JL
Kakkar
AK
Mottier
D
Oger
E
Samama
MM
Spannagl
M
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality
Thromb Haemost
2007
, vol. 
98
 
4
(pg. 
756
-
764
)
3
Klok
FA
van Kralingen
KW
van Dijk
AP
Heyning
FH
Vliegen
HW
Kaptein
AA
Huisman
MV
Quality of life in long-term survivors of acute pulmonary embolism
Chest
2010
, vol. 
138
 
6
(pg. 
1432
-
1440
)
4
Bonderman
D
Wilkens
H
Wakounig
S
Schäfers
HJ
Jansa
P
Lindner
J
Simkova
I
Martischnig
AM
Dudczak
J
Sadushi
R
Skoro-Sajer
N
Klepetko
W
Lang
IM
Risk factors for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Eur Respir J
2009
, vol. 
33
 
2
(pg. 
325
-
331
)
5
Condliffe
R
Kiely
DG
Gibbs
JS
Corris
PA
Peacock
AJ
Jenkins
DP
Goldsmith
K
Coghlan
JG
Pepke-Zaba
J
Prognostic and aetiological factors in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Eur Respir J
2009
, vol. 
33
 
2
(pg. 
332
-
338
)
6
Fanikos
J
Piazza
G
Zayaruzny
M
Goldhaber
SZ
Long-term complications of medical patients with hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism
Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
102
 
4
(pg. 
688
-
693
)
7
Stein
PD
Henry
JW
Prevalence of acute pulmonary embolism among patients in a general hospital and at autopsy
Chest
1995
, vol. 
108
 
4
(pg. 
978
-
981
)
8
Heit
JA
III
Silverstein
MD
Mohr
DN
Petterson
TM
O'Fallon
WM
Melton
LJ
III
Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study
Arch Intern Med
2000
, vol. 
160
 
6
(pg. 
809
-
815
)
9
Anderson
FA
Jr.
Spencer
FA
Risk factors for venous thromboembolism
Circulation
2003
, vol. 
107
 
23 Suppl 1
(pg. 
I9
-
I16
)
10
Biss
TT
Brandão
LR
Kahr
WH
Chan
AK
Williams
S
Clinical features and outcome of pulmonary embolism in children
Br J Haematol
2008
, vol. 
142
 
5
(pg. 
808
-
818
)
11
Andrew
M
David
M
Adams
M
Ali
K
Anderson
R
Barnard
D
Bernstein
M
Brisson
L
Cairney
B
DeSai
D
Grant
R
Israels
S
Jardine
L
Luke
B
Massicotte
P
Silva
M
Venous thromboembolic complications (VTE) in children: first analyses of the Canadian Registry of VTE
Blood
1994
, vol. 
83
 
5
(pg. 
1251
-
1257
)
12
Stein
PD
Kayali
F
Olson
RE
Incidence of venous thromboembolism in infants and children: data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey
J Pediatr
2004
, vol. 
145
 
4
(pg. 
563
-
565
)
13
van Ommen
CH
Heijboer
H
Büller
HR
Hirasing
RA
Heijmans
HS
Peters
M
Venous thromboembolism in childhood: a prospective two-year registry in The Netherlands
J Pediatr
2001
, vol. 
139
 
5
(pg. 
676
-
681
)
14
Kearon
C
Akl
EA
Duration of anticoagulant therapy for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
Blood
2014
, vol. 
123
 
12
(pg. 
1794
-
1801
)
15
Rogers
MA
Levine
DA
Blumberg
N
Flanders
SA
Chopra
V
Langa
KM
Triggers of hospitalization for venous thromboembolism
Circulation
2012
, vol. 
125
 
17
(pg. 
2092
-
2099
)
16
Ku
GH
White
RH
Chew
HK
Harvey
DJ
Zhou
H
Wun
T
Venous thromboembolism in patients with acute leukemia: incidence, risk factors, and effect on survival
Blood
2009
, vol. 
113
 
17
(pg. 
3911
-
3917
)
17
Chew
HK
Wun
T
Harvey
D
Zhou
H
White
RH
Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its effect on survival among patients with common cancers
Arch Intern Med
2006
, vol. 
166
 
4
(pg. 
458
-
464
)
18
Blom
JW
Doggen
CJ
Osanto
S
Rosendaal
FR
Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis
JAMA
2005
, vol. 
293
 
6
(pg. 
715
-
722
)
19
Timp
JF
Braekkan
SK
Versteeg
HH
Cannegieter
SC
Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis
Blood
2013
, vol. 
122
 
10
(pg. 
1712
-
1723
)
20
Gussoni
G
Frasson
S
La Regina
M
Di Micco
P
Monreal
M
Three-month mortality rate and clinical predictors in patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer. Findings from the RIETE registry
Thromb Res
2013
, vol. 
131
 
1
(pg. 
24
-
30
)
21
Blanco-Molina
A
Rota
LL
Di Micco
P
Brenner
B
Trujillo-Santos
J
Ruiz-Gamietea
A
Monreal
M
Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy, postpartum or during contraceptive use
Thromb Haemost
2010
, vol. 
103
 
2
(pg. 
306
-
311
)
22
Blanco-Molina
A
Trujillo-Santos
J
Tirado
R
Cañas
I
Riera
A
Valdés
M
Monreal
M
Venous thromboembolism in women using hormonal contraceptives. Findings from the RIETE Registry
Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
101
 
3
(pg. 
478
-
482
)
23
Pomp
ER
Lenselink
AM
Rosendaal
FR
Doggen
CJ
Pregnancy, the postpartum period and prothrombotic defects: risk of venous thrombosis in the MEGA study
J Thromb Haemost
2008
, vol. 
6
 
4
(pg. 
632
-
637
)
24
Henriksson
P
Westerlund
E
Wallén
H
Brandt
L
Hovatta
O
Ekbom
A
Incidence of pulmonary and venous thromboembolism in pregnancies after in vitro fertilisation: cross sectional study
BMJ
2013
, vol. 
346
 pg. 
e8632
 
25
Sweetland
S
Beral
V
Balkwill
A
Liu
B
Benson
VS
Canonico
M
Green
J
Reeves
GK
Venous thromboembolism risk in relation to use of different types of post-menopausal hormone therapy in a large prospective study
J Thromb Haemost
2012
, vol. 
10
 
11
(pg. 
2277
-
2286
)
26
Clayton
TC
Gaskin
M
Meade
TW
Recent respiratory infection and risk of venous thromboembolism: case-control study through a general practice database
Int J Epidemiol
2011
, vol. 
40
 
3
(pg. 
819
-
827
)
27
Smeeth
L
Cook
C
Thomas
S
Hall
AJ
Hubbard
R
Vallance
P
Risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after acute infection in a community setting
Lancet
2006
, vol. 
367
 
9516
(pg. 
1075
-
1079
)
28
Khorana
AA
Kuderer
NM
Culakova
E
Lyman
GH
Francis
CW
Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis
Blood
2008
, vol. 
111
 
10
(pg. 
4902
-
4907
)
29
Dijk
FN
Curtin
J
Lord
D
Fitzgerald
DA
Pulmonary embolism in children
Paediatr Respir Rev
2012
, vol. 
13
 
2
(pg. 
112
-
122
)
30
Piazza
G
Goldhaber
SZ
Venous thromboembolism and atherothrombosis: an integrated approach
Circulation
2010
, vol. 
121
 
19
(pg. 
2146
-
2150
)
31
Severinsen
MT
Kristensen
SR
Johnsen
SP
Dethlefsen
C
Tjonneland
A
Overvad
K
Smoking and venous thromboembolism: a Danish follow-up study
J Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
7
 
8
(pg. 
1297
-
1303
)
32
Steffen
LM
Cushman
M
Peacock
JM
Heckbert
SR
Jacobs
DR
Jr.
Rosamond
WD
Folsom
AR
Metabolic syndrome and risk of venous thromboembolism: Longitudinal Investigation of Thromboembolism Etiology
J Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
7
 
5
(pg. 
746
-
751
)
33
Ageno
W
Becattini
C
Brighton
T
Selby
R
Kamphuisen
PW
Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis
Circulation
2008
, vol. 
117
 
1
(pg. 
93
-
102
)
34
Montecucco
F
Mach
F
Should we focus on “venous vulnerability” instead of “plaque vulnerability” in symptomatic atherosclerotic patients?
Thromb Haemost
2011
, vol. 
106
 
6
(pg. 
995
-
996
)
35
Piazza
G
Goldhaber
SZ
Lessard
DM
Goldberg
RJ
Emery
C
Spencer
FA
Venous thromboembolism in patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis
Thromb Haemost
2011
, vol. 
106
 
6
(pg. 
1095
-
1102
)
36
Gresele
P
Momi
S
Migliacci
R
Endothelium, venous thromboembolism and ischaemic cardiovascular events
Thromb Haemost
2010
, vol. 
103
 
1
(pg. 
56
-
61
)
37
Fox
EA
Kahn
SR
The relationship between inflammation and venous thrombosis. A systematic review of clinical studies
Thromb Haemost
2005
, vol. 
94
 
2
(pg. 
362
-
365
)
38
Enga
KF
Braekkan
SK
Hansen-Krone
IJ
Le Cessie
S
Rosendaal
FR
Hansen
JB
Cigarette smoking and the risk of venous thromboembolism: the Tromso Study
J Thromb Haemost
2012
, vol. 
10
 
10
(pg. 
2068
-
2074
)
39
Wattanakit
K
Lutsey
PL
Bell
EJ
Gornik
H
Cushman
M
Heckbert
SR
Rosamond
WD
Folsom
AR
Association between cardiovascular disease risk factors and occurrence of venous thromboembolism. A time-dependent analysis
Thromb Haemost
2012
, vol. 
108
 
3
(pg. 
508
-
515
)
40
Sørensen
HT
Horvath-Puho
E
Lash
TL
Christiansen
CF
Pesavento
R
Pedersen
L
Baron
JA
Prandoni
P
Heart disease may be a risk factor for pulmonary embolism without peripheral deep venous thrombosis
Circulation
2011
, vol. 
124
 
13
(pg. 
1435
-
1441
)
41
Prandoni
P
Pesavento
R
Sorensen
HT
Gennaro
N
Dalla
VF
Minotto
I
Perina
F
Pengo
V
Pagnan
A
Prevalence of heart diseases in patients with pulmonary embolism with and without peripheral venous thrombosis: findings from a cross-sectional survey
Eur J Intern Med
2009
, vol. 
20
 
5
(pg. 
470
-
473
)
42
Sørensen
HT
Horvath-Puho
E
Pedersen
L
Baron
JA
Prandoni
P
Venous thromboembolism and subsequent hospitalisation due to acute arterial cardiovascular events: a 20-year cohort study
Lancet
2007
, vol. 
370
 
9601
(pg. 
1773
-
1779
)
43
Kakkar
VV
Howe
CT
Flanc
C
Clarke
MB
Natural history of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis
Lancet
1969
, vol. 
2
 
7614
(pg. 
230
-
232
)
44
Dalen
JE
Pulmonary embolism: what have we learned since Virchow? Natural history, pathophysiology, and diagnosis
Chest
2002
, vol. 
122
 
4
(pg. 
1440
-
1456
)
45
Kearon
C
Natural history of venous thromboembolism
Circulation
2003
, vol. 
107
 
(23 Suppl 1)
 
I22–I30
46
Aujesky
D
Obrosky
DS
Stone
RA
Auble
TE
Perrier
A
Cornuz
J
Roy
PM
Fine
MJ
A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism
Arch Intern Med
2006
, vol. 
166
 
2
(pg. 
169
-
175
)
47
Laporte
S
Mismetti
P
Décousus
H
Uresandi
F
Otero
R
Lobo
JL
Monreal
M
Clinical predictors for fatal pulmonary embolism in 15,520 patients with venous thromboembolism: findings from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa (RIETE) Registry
Circulation
2008
, vol. 
117
 
13
(pg. 
1711
-
1716
)
48
Goldhaber
SZ
Visani
L
De Rosa
M
Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER)
Lancet
1999
, vol. 
353
 
9162
(pg. 
1386
-
1389
)
49
Miniati
M
Monti
S
Bottai
M
Scoscia
E
Bauleo
C
Tonelli
L
Dainelli
A
Giuntini
C
Survival and restoration of pulmonary perfusion in a long-term follow-up of patients after acute pulmonary embolism
Medicine (Baltimore)
2006
, vol. 
85
 
5
(pg. 
253
-
262
)
50
Cosmi
B
Nijkeuter
M
Valentino
M
Huisman
MV
Barozzi
L
Palareti
G
Residual emboli on lung perfusion scan or multidetector computed tomography after a first episode of acute pulmonary embolism
Intern Emerg Med
2011
, vol. 
6
 
6
(pg. 
521
-
528
)
51
Sanchez
O
Helley
D
Couchon
S
Roux
A
Delaval
A
Trinquart
L
Collignon
MA
Fischer
AM
Meyer
G
Perfusion defects after pulmonary embolism: risk factors and clinical significance
J Thromb Haemost
2010
, vol. 
8
 
6
(pg. 
1248
-
1255
)
52
Becattini
C
Agnelli
G
Pesavento
R
Silingardi
M
Poggio
R
Taliani
MR
Ageno
W
Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after a first episode of pulmonary embolism
Chest
2006
, vol. 
130
 
1
(pg. 
172
-
175
)
53
Pengo
V
Lensing
AW
Prins
MH
Marchiori
A
Davidson
BL
Tiozzo
F
Albanese
P
Biasiolo
A
Pegoraro
C
Iliceto
S
Prandoni
P
Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism
N Engl J Med
2004
, vol. 
350
 
22
(pg. 
2257
-
2264
)
54
Kyrle
PA
Rosendaal
FR
Eichinger
S
Risk assessment for recurrent venous thrombosis
Lancet
2010
, vol. 
376
 
9757
(pg. 
2032
-
2039
)
55
Zhu
T
Martinez
I
Emmerich
J
Venous thromboembolism: risk factors for recurrence
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
2009
, vol. 
29
 
3
(pg. 
298
-
310
)
56
Heit
JA
Predicting the risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence
Am J Hematol
2012
, vol. 
87
 
Suppl 1
(pg. 
S63
-
S67
)
57
Heit
JA
Lahr
BD
Petterson
TM
Bailey
KR
Ashrani
AA
Melton
LJ
III
Heparin and warfarin anticoagulation intensity as predictors of recurrence after deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: a population-based cohort study
Blood
2011
, vol. 
118
 
18
(pg. 
4992
-
4999
)
58
Iorio
A
Kearon
C
Filippucci
E
Marcucci
M
Macura
A
Pengo
V
Siragusa
S
Palareti
G
Risk of recurrence after a first episode of symptomatic venous thromboembolism provoked by a transient risk factor: a systematic review
Arch Intern Med
2010
, vol. 
170
 
19
(pg. 
1710
-
1716
)
59
Douketis
J
Tosetto
A
Marcucci
M
Baglin
T
Cosmi
B
Cushman
M
Kyrle
P
Poli
D
Tait
RC
Iorio
A
Risk of recurrence after venous thromboembolism in men and women: patient level meta-analysis
BMJ
2011
, vol. 
342
 pg. 
d813
 
60
Lijfering
WM
Veeger
NJ
Middeldorp
S
Hamulyák
K
Prins
MH
Büller
HR
van der Meer
J
A lower risk of recurrent venous thrombosis in women compared with men is explained by sex-specific risk factors at time of first venous thrombosis in thrombophilic families
Blood
2009
, vol. 
114
 
10
(pg. 
2031
-
2036
)
61
Cosmi
B
Legnani
C
Tosetto
A
Pengo
V
Ghirarduzzi
A
Testa
S
Prisco
D
Poli
D
Tripodi
A
Marongiu
F
Palareti
G
Usefulness of repeated D-dimer testing after stopping anticoagulation for a first episode of unprovoked venous thromboembolism: the PROLONG II prospective study
Blood
2010
, vol. 
115
 
3
(pg. 
481
-
488
)
62
Rodger
MA
Kahn
SR
Wells
PS
Anderson
DA
Chagnon
I
Le
GG
Solymoss
S
Crowther
M
Perrier
A
White
R
Vickars
L
Ramsay
T
Betancourt
MT
Kovacs
MJ
Identifying unprovoked thromboembolism patients at low risk for recurrence who can discontinue anticoagulant therapy
CMAJ
2008
, vol. 
179
 
5
(pg. 
417
-
426
)
63
Eichinger
S
Minar
E
Bialonczyk
C
Hirschl
M
Quehenberger
P
Schneider
B
Weltermann
A
Wagner
O
Kyrle
PA
D-dimer levels and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism
JAMA
2003
, vol. 
290
 
8
(pg. 
1071
-
1074
)
64
Coppens
M
Reijnders
JH
Middeldorp
S
Doggen
CJ
Rosendaal
FR
Testing for inherited thrombophilia does not reduce the recurrence of venous thrombosis
J Thromb Haemost
2008
, vol. 
6
 
9
(pg. 
1474
-
1477
)
65
Kearon
C
Julian
JA
Kovacs
MJ
Anderson
DR
Wells
P
Mackinnon
B
Weitz
JI
Crowther
MA
Dolan
S
Turpie
AG
Geerts
W
Solymoss
S
van Nguyen
P
Demers
C
Kahn
SR
Kassis
J
Rodger
M
Hambleton
J
Gent
M
Ginsberg
JS
Influence of thrombophilia on risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism while on warfarin: results from a randomized trial
Blood
2008
, vol. 
112
 
12
(pg. 
4432
-
4436
)
66
McIntyre
KM
Sasahara
AA
The hemodynamic response to pulmonary embolism in patients without prior cardiopulmonary disease
Am J Cardiol
1971
, vol. 
28
 
3
(pg. 
288
-
294
)
67
Smulders
YM
Pathophysiology and treatment of haemodynamic instability in acute pulmonary embolism: the pivotal role of pulmonary vasoconstriction
Cardiovasc Res
2000
, vol. 
48
 
1
(pg. 
23
-
33
)
68
Delcroix
M
Mélot
C
Lejeune
P
Leeman
M
Naeije
R
Effects of vasodilators on gas exchange in acute canine embolic pulmonary hypertension
Anesthesiology
1990
, vol. 
72
 
1
(pg. 
77
-
84
)
69
Huet
Y
Brun-Buisson
C
Lemaire
F
Teisseire
B
Lhoste
F
Rapin
M
Cardiopulmonary effects of ketanserin infusion in human pulmonary embolism
Am Rev Respir Dis
1987
, vol. 
135
 
1
(pg. 
114
-
117
)
70
Lankhaar
JW
Westerhof
N
Faes
TJ
Marques
KM
Marcus
JT
Postmus
PE
Vonk-Noordegraaf
A
Quantification of right ventricular afterload in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
2006
, vol. 
291
 
(4):H1731–H1737
71
Molloy
WD
Lee
KY
Girling
L
Schick
U
Prewitt
RM
Treatment of shock in a canine model of pulmonary embolism
Am Rev Respir Dis
1984
, vol. 
130
 
5
(pg. 
870
-
874
)
72
Marcus
JT
Gan
CT
Zwanenburg
JJ
Boonstra
A
Allaart
CP
Götte
MJ
Vonk-Noordegraaf
A
Interventricular mechanical asynchrony in pulmonary arterial hypertension: left-to-right delay in peak shortening is related to right ventricular overload and left ventricular underfilling
J Am Coll Cardiol
2008
, vol. 
51
 
7
(pg. 
750
-
757
)
73
Mauritz
GJ
Marcus
JT
Westerhof
N
Postmus
PE
Vonk-Noordegraaf
A
Prolonged right ventricular post-systolic isovolumic period in pulmonary arterial hypertension is not a reflection of diastolic dysfunction
Heart
2011
, vol. 
97
 
6
(pg. 
473
-
478
)
74
Begieneman
MP
van de Goot
FR
van der Bilt
IA
Vonk Noordegraaf
A
Spreeuwenberg
MD
Paulus
WJ
van Hinsbergh
VW
Visser
FC
Niessen
HW
Pulmonary embolism causes endomyocarditis in the human heart
Heart
2008
, vol. 
94
 
4
(pg. 
450
-
456
)
75
Hull
RD
Raskob
GE
Hirsh
J
Jay
RM
Leclerc
JR
Geerts
WH
Rosenbloom
D
Sackett
DL
Anderson
C
Harrison
L
Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis
N Engl J Med
1986
, vol. 
315
 
18
(pg. 
1109
-
1114
)
76
Lankeit
M
Jiménez
D
Kostrubiec
M
Dellas
C
Hasenfuss
G
Pruszczyk
P
Konstantinides
S
Predictive value of the high-sensitivity troponin T assay and the simplified pulmonary embolism severity index in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective validation study
Circulation
2011
, vol. 
124
 
24
(pg. 
2716
-
2724
)
77
Lankeit
M
Kempf
T
Dellas
C
Cuny
M
Tapken
H
Peter
T
Olschewski
M
Konstantinides
S
Wollert
KC
Growth differentiation factor-15 for prognostic assessment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2008
, vol. 
177
 
9
(pg. 
1018
-
1025
)
78
Mehta
NJ
Jani
K
Khan
IA
Clinical usefulness and prognostic value of elevated cardiac troponin I levels in acute pulmonary embolism
Am Heart J
2003
, vol. 
145
 
5
(pg. 
821
-
825
)
79
Burrowes
KS
Clark
AR
Tawhai
MH
Blood flow redistribution and ventilation-perfusion mismatch during embolic pulmonary arterial occlusion
Pulm Circ
2011
, vol. 
1
 
3
(pg. 
365
-
376
)
80
Konstantinides
S
Geibel
A
Kasper
W
Olschewski
M
Blümel
L
Just
H
Patent foramen ovale is an important predictor of adverse outcome in patients with major pulmonary embolism [see comments]
Circulation
1998
, vol. 
97
 
19
(pg. 
1946
-
1951
)
81
Miniati
M
Prediletto
R
Formichi
B
Marini
C
Di Ricco
G
Tonelli
L
Allescia
G
Pistolesi
M
Accuracy of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1999
, vol. 
159
 
3
(pg. 
864
-
871
)
82
Pollack
CV
Schreiber
D
Goldhaber
SZ
Slattery
D
Fanikos
J
O'Neil
BJ
Thompson
JR
Hiestand
B
Briese
BA
Pendleton
RC
Miller
CD
Kline
JA
Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: initial report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry)
J Am Coll Cardiol
2011
, vol. 
57
 
6
(pg. 
700
-
706
)
83
Wells
PS
Ginsberg
JS
Anderson
DR
Kearon
C
Gent
M
Turpie
AG
Bormanis
J
Weitz
J
Chamberlain
M
Bowie
D
Barnes
D
Hirsh
J
Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Ann Intern Med
1998
, vol. 
129
 
12
(pg. 
997
-
1005
)
84
Thames
MD
Alpert
JS
Dalen
JE
Syncope in patients with pulmonary embolism
JAMA
1977
, vol. 
238
 
23
(pg. 
2509
-
2511
)
85
Stein
PD
Henry
JW
Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pulmonary embolism stratified according to their presenting syndromes
Chest
1997
, vol. 
112
 
4
(pg. 
974
-
979
)
86
White
RH
The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism
Circulation
2003
, vol. 
107
 
23 Suppl 1
(pg. 
I4
-
I8
)
87
Rodger
MA
Carrier
M
Jones
GN
Rasuli
P
Raymond
F
Djunaedi
H
Wells
PS
Diagnostic Value of Arterial Blood Gas Measurement in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2000
, vol. 
162
 
6
(pg. 
2105
-
2108
)
88
Stein
PD
Goldhaber
SZ
Henry
JW
Miller
AC
Arterial blood gas analysis in the assessment of suspected acute pulmonary embolism
Chest
1996
, vol. 
109
 
1
(pg. 
78
-
81
)
89
Elliott
CG
Goldhaber
SZ
Visani
L
DeRosa
M
Chest radiographs in acute pulmonary embolism. Results from the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry
Chest
2000
, vol. 
118
 
1
(pg. 
33
-
38
)
90
Geibel
A
Zehender
M
Kasper
W
Olschewski
M
Klima
C
Konstantinides
SV
Prognostic value of the ECG on admission in patients with acute major pulmonary embolism
Eur Respir J
2005
, vol. 
25
 
5
(pg. 
843
-
848
)
91
Miniati
M
Pistolesi
M
Marini
C
Di Ricco
G
Formichi
B
Prediletto
R
Allescia
G
Tonelli
L
Sostman
HD
Giuntini
C
Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISA-PED)
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
1996
, vol. 
154
 
5
(pg. 
1387
-
1393
)
92
Musset
D
Parent
F
Meyer
G
Maître
S
Girard
P
Leroyer
C
Revel
MP
Carette
MF
Laurent
M
Charbonnier
B
Laurent
F
Mal
H
Nonent
M
Lancar
R
Grenier
P
Simonneau
G
Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study
Lancet
2002
, vol. 
360
 
9349
(pg. 
1914
-
1920
)
93
Le Gal
G
Righini
M
Roy
PM
Sanchez
O
Aujesky
D
Bounameaux
H
Perrier
A
Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score
Ann Intern Med
2006
, vol. 
144
 
3
(pg. 
165
-
171
)
94
PIOPED Investigators
Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED)
JAMA
1990
, vol. 
263
 
20
(pg. 
2753
-
2759
)
95
Wells
PS
Anderson
DR
Rodger
M
Ginsberg
JS
Kearon
C
Gent
M
Turpie
AG
Bormanis
J
Weitz
J
Chamberlain
M
Bowie
D
Barnes
D
Hirsh
J
Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer
Thromb Haemost
2000
, vol. 
83
 
3
(pg. 
416
-
420
)
96
Anderson
DR
Kovacs
MJ
Dennie
C
Kovacs
G
Stiell
I
Dreyer
J
McCarron
B
Pleasance
S
Burton
E
Cartier
Y
Wells
PS
Use of spiral computed tomography contrast angiography and ultrasonography to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department
J Emerg Med
2005
, vol. 
29
 
4
(pg. 
399
-
404
)
97
Kearon
C
Ginsberg
JS
Douketis
J
Turpie
AG
Bates
SM
Lee
AY
Crowther
MA
Weitz
JI
Brill-Edwards
P
Wells
P
Anderson
DR
Kovacs
MJ
Linkins
LA
Julian
JA
Bonilla
LR
Gent
M
An evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a randomized trial
Ann Intern Med
2006
, vol. 
144
 
11
(pg. 
812
-
821
)
98
Söhne
M
Kamphuisen
PW
van Mierlo
PJ
Büller
HR
Diagnostic strategy using a modified clinical decision rule and D-dimer test to rule out pulmonary embolism in elderly in- and outpatients
Thromb Haemost
2005
, vol. 
94
 
1
(pg. 
206
-
210
)
99
van Belle
A
Büller
HR
Huisman
MV
Huisman
PM
Kaasjager
K
Kamphuisen
PW
Kramer
MH
Kruip
MJ
Kwakkel-van Erp
JM
Leebeek
FW
Nijkeuter
M
Prins
MH
Sohne
M
Tick
LW
Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography
JAMA
2006
, vol. 
295
 
2
(pg. 
172
-
179
)
100
Wells
PS
Anderson
DR
Rodger
M
Stiell
I
Dreyer
JF
Barnes
D
Forgie
M
Kovacs
G
Ward
J
Kovacs
MJ
Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer
Ann Intern Med
2001
, vol. 
135
 
2
(pg. 
98
-
107
)
101
Rodger
MA
Maser
E
Stiell
I
Howley
HE
Wells
PS
The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Thromb Res
2005
, vol. 
116
 
2
(pg. 
101
-
107
)
102
Runyon
MS
Webb
WB
Jones
AE
Kline
JA
Comparison of the unstructured clinician estimate of pretest probability for pulmonary embolism to the Canadian score and the Charlotte rule: a prospective observational study
Acad Emerg Med
2005
, vol. 
12
 
7
(pg. 
587
-
593
)
103
Wolf
SJ
McCubbin
TR
Feldhaus
KM
Faragher
JP
Adcock
DM
Prospective validation of Wells Criteria in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Ann Emerg Med
2004
, vol. 
44
 
5
(pg. 
503
-
510
)
104
Ceriani
E
Combescure
C
Le Gal
G
Nendaz
M
Perneger
T
Bounameaux
H
Perrier
A
Righini
M
Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
J Thromb Haemost
2010
, vol. 
8
 
5
(pg. 
957
-
970
)
105
Douma
RA
Mos
IC
Erkens
PM
Nizet
TA
Durian
MF
Hovens
MM
van Houten
AA
Hofstee
HM
Klok
FA
ten Cate
H
Ullmann
EF
Büller
HR
Kamphuisen
PW
Huisman
MV
Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study
Ann Intern Med
2011
, vol. 
154
 
11
(pg. 
709
-
718
)
106
Lucassen
W
Geersing
GJ
Erkens
PM
Reitsma
JB
Moons
KG
Büller
H
van Weert
HC
Clinical decision rules for excluding pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis
Ann Intern Med
2011
, vol. 
155
 
7
(pg. 
448
-
460
)
107
Gibson
NS
Sohne
M
Kruip
MJ
Tick
LW
Gerdes
VE
Bossuyt
PM
Wells
PS
Büller
HR
Further validation and simplification of the Wells clinical decision rule in pulmonary embolism
Thromb Haemost
2008
, vol. 
99
 
1
(pg. 
229
-
234
)
108
Klok
FA
Mos
IC
Nijkeuter
M
Righini
M
Perrier
A
Le Gal
G
Huisman
MV
Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism
Arch Intern Med
2008
, vol. 
168
 
19
(pg. 
2131
-
2136
)
109
Douma
RA
Gibson
NS
Gerdes
VE
Büller
HR
Wells
PS
Perrier
A
Le Gal
G
Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism
Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
101
 
1
(pg. 
197
-
200
)
110
Di Nisio
M
Squizzato
A
Rutjes
AW
Büller
HR
Zwinderman
AH
Bossuyt
PM
Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer test for exclusion of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review
J Thromb Haemost
2007
, vol. 
5
 
2
(pg. 
296
-
304
)
111
Stein
PD
Hull
RD
Patel
KC
Olson
RE
Ghali
WA
Brant
R
Biel
RK
Bharadia
V
Kalra
NK
D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review
Ann Intern Med
2004
, vol. 
140
 
8
(pg. 
589
-
602
)
112
Perrier
A
Roy
PM
Aujesky
D
Chagnon
I
Howarth
N
Gourdier
AL
Leftheriotis
G
Barghouth
G
Cornuz
J
Hayoz
D
Bounameaux
H
Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study
Am J Med
2004
, vol. 
116
 
5
(pg. 
291
-
299
)
113
Perrier
A
Roy
PM
Sanchez
O
Le Gal
G
Meyer
G
Gourdier
AL
Furber
A
Revel
MP
Howarth
N
Davido
A
Bounameaux
H
Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism
N Engl J Med
2005
, vol. 
352
 
17
(pg. 
1760
-
1768
)
114
Perrier
A
Desmarais
S
Miron
MJ
de Moerloose
P
Lepage
R
Slosman
D
Didier
D
Unger
PF
Patenaude
JV
Bounameaux
H
Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients
Lancet
1999
, vol. 
353
 
9148
(pg. 
190
-
195
)
115
Kruip
MJ
Slob
MJ
Schijen
JH
van der Hulle
C
Büller
HR
Use of a clinical decision rule in combination with D-dimer concentration in diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective management study
Arch Intern Med
2002
, vol. 
162
 
14
(pg. 
1631
-
1635
)
116
Righini
M
Le Gal
G
Aujesky
D
Roy
PM
Sanchez
O
Verschuren
F
Rutschmann
O
Nonent
M
Cornuz
J
Thys
F
Le Manach
CP
Revel
MP
Poletti
PA
Meyer
G
Mottier
D
Perneger
T
Bounameaux
H
Perrier
A
Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomised non-inferiority trial
Lancet
2008
, vol. 
371
 
9621
(pg. 
1343
-
1352
)
117
Carrier
M
Righini
M
Djurabi
RK
Huisman
MV
Perrier
A
Wells
PS
Rodger
M
Wuillemin
WA
Le Gal
G
VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies
Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
101
 
5
(pg. 
886
-
892
)
118
Geersing
GJ
Erkens
PM
Lucassen
WA
Büller
HR
Cate
HT
Hoes
AW
Moons
KG
Prins
MH
Oudega
R
van Weert
HC
Stoffers
HE
Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism using the Wells rule and qualitative D-dimer testing in primary care: prospective cohort study
BMJ
2012
, vol. 
345
 pg. 
e6564
 
119
Righini
M
Goehring
C
Bounameaux
H
Perrier
A
Effects of age on the performance of common diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism
Am J Med
2000
, vol. 
109
 
5
(pg. 
357
-
361
)
120
Douma
RA
Le
GG
Sohne
M
Righini
M
Kamphuisen
PW
Perrier
A
Kruip
MJ
Bounameaux
H
Büller
HR
Roy
PM
Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts
BMJ
2010
, vol. 
340
 pg. 
c1475
 
121
Penaloza
A
Roy
PM
Kline
J
Verschuren
F
Le Gal
G
Quentin-Georget
S
Delvau
N
Thys
F
Performance of age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off to rule out pulmonary embolism
J Thromb Haemost
2012
, vol. 
10
 
7
(pg. 
1291
-
1296
)
122
Schouten
HJ
Geersing
GJ
Koek
HL
Zuithoff
NP
Janssen
KJ
Douma
RA
van Delden
JJ
Moons
KG
Reitsma
JB
Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ
2013
, vol. 
346
 pg. 
f2492
 
123
Righini
M
Van Es
J
den Exter
PL
Roy
PM
Verschuren
F
Ghuysen
A
Rutschmann
OT
Sanchez
O
Jaffrelot
M
Trinh-Duc
A
Le
GallC
Moustafa
F
Principe
A
van Houten
AA
Ten Wolde
M
Douma
RA
Hazelaar
G
Erkens
PM
van Kralingen
KW
Grootenboers
MJ
Durian
MF
Cheung
YW
Meyer
G
Bounameaux
H
Huisman
MV
Kamphuisen
PW
Le Gal
G
Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study
JAMA
2014
, vol. 
311
 
11
(pg. 
1117
-
1124
)
124
Di Nisio
M
Söhne
M
Kamphuisen
PW
Büller
HR
D-Dimer test in cancer patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism
J Thromb Haemost
2005
, vol. 
3
 
6
(pg. 
1239
-
1242
)
125
Righini
M
Le Gal
G
De Lucia
S
Roy
PM
Meyer
G
Aujesky
D
Bounameaux
H
Perrier
A
Clinical usefulness of D-dimer testing in cancer patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Thromb Haemost
2006
, vol. 
95
 
4
(pg. 
715
-
719
)
126
Miron
MJ
Perrier
A
Bounameaux
H
de
MP
Slosman
DO
Didier
D
Junod
A
Contribution of noninvasive evaluation to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients
Eur Respir J
1999
, vol. 
13
 
6
(pg. 
1365
-
1370
)
127
Chabloz
P
Reber
G
Boehlen
F
Hohlfeld
P
de Moerloose
P
TAFI antigen and D-dimer levels during normal pregnancy and at delivery
Br J Haematol
2001
, vol. 
115
 
1
(pg. 
150
-
152
)
128
Francalanci
I
Comeglio
P
Liotta
AA
Cellai
AP
Fedi
S
Parretti
E
Mello
G
Prisco
D
Abbate
R
D-dimer concentrations during normal pregnancy, as measured by ELISA
Thromb Res
1995
, vol. 
78
 
5
(pg. 
399
-
405
)
129
Leclercq
MG
Lutisan
JG
van Marwijk Kooy
M
Kuipers
BF
Oostdijk
AH
van der Leur
JJ
Büller
HR
Ruling out clinically suspected pulmonary embolism by assessment of clinical probability and D-dimer levels: a management study
Thromb Haemost
2003
, vol. 
89
 
1
(pg. 
97
-
103
)
130
Ten Wolde
M
Hagen
PJ
Macgillavry
MR
Pollen
IJ
Mairuhu
AT
Koopman
MM
Prins
MH
Hoekstra
OS
Brandjes
DP
Postmus
PE
Büller
HR
Non-invasive diagnostic work-up of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism; results of a management study
J Thromb Haemost
2004
, vol. 
2
 
7
(pg. 
1110
-
1117
)
131
Ghaye
B
Szapiro
D
Mastora
I
Delannoy
V
Duhamel
A
Remy
J
Remy-Jardin
M
Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis?
Radiology
2001
, vol. 
219
 
3
(pg. 
629
-
636
)
132
Patel
S
Kazerooni
EA
Cascade
PN
Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary artery visualization at multi-detector row CT
Radiology
2003
, vol. 
227
 
2
(pg. 
455
-
460
)
133
Remy-Jardin
M
Remy
J
Wattinne
L
Giraud
F
Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique: comparison with pulmonary angiography
Radiology
1992
, vol. 
185
 
2
(pg. 
381
-
387
)
134
Stein
PD
Fowler
SE
Goodman
LR
Gottschalk
A
Hales
CA
Hull
RD
Leeper
KV
Jr.
Popovich
J
Jr.
Quinn
DA
Sos
TA
Sostman
HD
Tapson
VF
Wakefield
TW
Weg
JG
Woodard
PK
Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism
N Engl J Med
2006
, vol. 
354
 
22
(pg. 
2317
-
2327
)
135
Anderson
DR
Kahn
SR
Rodger
MA
Kovacs
MJ
Morris
T
Hirsch
A
Lang
E
Stiell
I
Kovacs
G
Dreyer
J
Dennie
C
Cartier
Y
Barnes
D
Burton
E
Pleasance
S
Skedgel
C
O'Rouke
K
Wells
PS
Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs. ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial
JAMA
2007
, vol. 
298
 
23
(pg. 
2743
-
2753
)
136
Carrier
M
Righini
M
Wells
PS
Perrier
A
Anderson
DR
Rodger
MA
Pleasance
S
Le Gal
G
Subsegmental pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography: incidence and clinical implications. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management outcome studies
J Thromb Haemost
2010
, vol. 
8
 
8
(pg. 
1716
-
1722
)
137
Stein
PD
Goodman
LR
Hull
RD
Dalen
JE
Matta
F
Diagnosis and management of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism: review and assessment of the options
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost
2012
, vol. 
18
 
1
(pg. 
20
-
26
)
138
Goodman
LR
Stein
PD
Matta
F
Sostman
HD
Wakefield
TW
Woodard
PK
Hull
R
Yankelevitz
DF
Beemath
A
CT venography and compression sonography are diagnostically equivalent: data from PIOPED II
AJR Am J Roentgenol
2007
, vol. 
189
 
5
(pg. 
1071
-
1076
)
139
Brenner
DJ
Hall
EJ
Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure
N Engl J Med
2007
, vol. 
357
 
22
(pg. 
2277
-
2284
)
140
Farrell
C
Jones
M
Girvin
F
Ritchie
G
Murchison
JT
Unsuspected pulmonary embolism identified using multidetector computed tomography in hospital outpatients
Clin Radiol
2010
, vol. 
65
 
1
(pg. 
1
-
5
)
141
Jia
CF
Li
YX
Yang
ZQ
Zhang
ZH
Sun
XX
Wang
ZQ
Prospective evaluation of unsuspected pulmonary embolism on coronary computed tomographic angiography
J Comput Assist Tomogr
2012
, vol. 
36
 
2
(pg. 
187
-
190
)
142
Palla
A
Rossi
G
Falaschi
F
Marconi
L
Pistolesi
M
Prandoni
P
Is incidentally detected pulmonary embolism in cancer patients less severe? A case-control study
Cancer Invest
2012
, vol. 
30
 
2
(pg. 
131
-
134
)
143
Sahut D'Izarn
M
Caumont Prim
A
Planquette
B
Revel
MP
Avillach
P
Chatellier
G
Sanchez
O
Meyer
G
Risk factors and clinical outcome of unsuspected pulmonary embolism in cancer patients: a case-control study
J Thromb Haemost
2012
, vol. 
10
 
10
(pg. 
2032
-
2038
)
144
Kearon
C
Akl
EA
Comerota
AJ
Prandoni
P
Bounameaux
H
Goldhaber
SZ
Nelson
ME
Wells
PS
Gould
MK
Dentali
F
Crowther
M
Kahn
SR
Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest
2012
, vol. 
141
 
2 Suppl
(pg. 
e419S
-
e494S
)
145
Alderson
PO
Scintigraphic evaluation of pulmonary embolism
Eur J Nucl Med
1987
13 Suppl
(pg. 
S6
-
10
)
146
Miller
RF
O'Doherty
MJ
Pulmonary nuclear medicine
Eur J Nucl Med
1992
, vol. 
19
 
5
(pg. 
355
-
368
)
147
Roach
PJ
Schembri
GP
Bailey
DL
V/Q scanning using SPECT and SPECT/CT
J Nucl Med
2013
, vol. 
54
 
9
(pg. 
1588
-
1596
)
148
Schembri
GP
Miller
AE
Smart
R
Radiation dosimetry and safety issues in the investigation of pulmonary embolism
Semin Nucl Med
2010
, vol. 
40
 
6
(pg. 
442
-
454
)
149
Reid
JH
Coche
EE
Inoue
T
Kim
EE
Dondi
M
Watanabe
N
Mariani
G
Is the lung scan alive and well? Facts and controversies in defining the role of lung scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of MDCT
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
2009
, vol. 
36
 
3
(pg. 
505
-
521
)
150
Gottschalk
A
Sostman
HD
Coleman
RE
Juni
JE
Thrall
J
McKusick
KA
Froelich
JW
Alavi
A
Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study. Part II. Evaluation of the scintigraphic criteria and interpretations
J Nucl Med
1993
, vol. 
34
 
7
(pg. 
1119
-
1126
)
151
Sostman
HD
Coleman
RE
DeLong
DM
Newman
GE
Paine
S
Evaluation of revised criteria for ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Radiology
1994
, vol. 
193
 
1
(pg. 
103
-
107
)
152
Bajc
M
Olsson
B
Palmer
J
Jonson
B
Ventilation/Perfusion SPECT for diagnostics of pulmonary embolism in clinical practice
J Intern Med
2008
, vol. 
264
 
4
(pg. 
379
-
387
)
153
Glaser
JE
Chamarthy
M
Haramati
LB
Esses
D
Freeman
LM
Successful and safe implementation of a trinary interpretation and reporting strategy for V/Q lung scintigraphy
J Nucl Med
2011
, vol. 
52
 
10
(pg. 
1508
-
1512
)
154
Sostman
HD
Stein
PD
Gottschalk
A
Matta
F
Hull
R
Goodman
L
Acute pulmonary embolism: sensitivity and specificity of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in PIOPED II study
Radiology
2008
, vol. 
246
 
3
(pg. 
941
-
946
)
155
Stein
PD
Terrin
ML
Gottschalk
A
Alavi
A
Henry
JW
Value of ventilation/perfusion scans vs. perfusion scans alone in acute pulmonary embolism
Am J Cardiol
1992
, vol. 
69
 
14
(pg. 
1239
-
1241
)
156
Miniati
M
Monti
S
Bauleo
C
Scoscia
E
Tonelli
L
Dainelli
A
Catapano
G
Formichi
B
Di Ricco
G
Prediletto
R
Carrozzi
L
Marini
C
A diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism based on standardised pretest probability and perfusion lung scanning: a management study
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
2003
, vol. 
30
 
11
(pg. 
1450
-
1456
)
157
Roy
PM
Colombet
I
Durieux
P
Chatellier
G
Sors
H
Meyer
G
Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism
BMJ
2005
, vol. 
331
 
(7511):259
158
Collart
JP
Roelants
V
Vanpee
D
Lacrosse
M
Trigaux
JP
Delaunois
L
Gillet
JB
De Coster
P
Vander Borght
T
Is a lung perfusion scan obtained by using single photon emission computed tomography able to improve the radionuclide diagnosis of pulmonary embolism?
Nucl Med Commun
2002
, vol. 
23
 
11
(pg. 
1107
-
1113
)
159
Corbus
HF
Seitz
JP
Larson
RK
Stobbe
DE
Wooten
W
Sayre
JW
Chavez
RD
Unguez
CE
Diagnostic usefulness of lung SPET in pulmonary thromboembolism: an outcome study
Nucl Med Commun
1997
, vol. 
18
 
10
(pg. 
897
-
906
)
160
Reinartz
P
Wildberger
JE
Schaefer
W
Nowak
B
Mahnken
AH
Buell
U
Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multislice spiral CT
J Nucl Med
2004
, vol. 
45
 
9
(pg. 
1501
-
1508
)
161
Gutte
H
Mortensen
J
Jensen
CV
Johnbeck
CB
von der Recke
P
Petersen
CL
Kjaergaard
J
Kristoffersen
US
Kjaer
A
Detection of pulmonary embolism with combined ventilation-perfusion SPECT and low-dose CT: head-to-head comparison with multidetector CT angiography
J Nucl Med
2009
, vol. 
50
 
12
(pg. 
1987
-
1992
)
162
Reinartz
P
Kaiser
HJ
Wildberger
JE
Gordji
C
Nowak
B
Buell
U
SPECT imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: automated detection of match and mismatch defects by means of image-processing techniques
J Nucl Med
2006
, vol. 
47
 
6
(pg. 
968
-
973
)
163
van Beek
EJ
Reekers
JA
Batchelor
DA
Brandjes
DP
Büller
HR
Feasibility, safety and clinical utility of angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Eur Radiol
1996
, vol. 
6
 
4
(pg. 
415
-
419
)
164
Diffin
DC
Leyendecker
JR
Johnson
SP
Zucker
RJ
Grebe
PJ
Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography
AJR Am J Roentgenol
1998
, vol. 
171
 
4
(pg. 
1085
-
1089
)
165
Stein
PD
Henry
JW
Gottschalk
A
Reassessment of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: relation of interpreter agreement to the order of the involved pulmonary arterial branch
Radiology
1999
, vol. 
210
 
3
(pg. 
689
-
691
)
166
Miller
GA
Sutton
GC
Kerr
IH
Gibson
RV
Honey
M
Comparison of streptokinase and heparin in treatment of isolated acute massive pulmonary embolism
Br Heart J
1971
, vol. 
33
 
(4):616
167
Stein
PD
Athanasoulis
C
Alavi
A
Greenspan
RH
Hales
CA
Saltzman
HA
Vreim
CE
Terrin
ML
Weg
JG
Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism
Circulation
1992
, vol. 
85
 
2
(pg. 
462
-
468
)
168
Wan
S
Quinlan
DJ
Agnelli
G
Eikelboom
JW
Thrombolysis compared with heparin for the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials
Circulation
2004
, vol. 
110
 
6
(pg. 
744
-
749
)
169
Engelberger
RP
Kucher
N
Catheter-based reperfusion treatment of pulmonary embolism
Circulation
2011
, vol. 
124
 
19
(pg. 
2139
-
2144
)
170
Revel
MP
Sanchez
O
Couchon
S
Planquette
B
Hernigou
A
Niarra
R
Meyer
G
Chatellier
G
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for an acute pulmonary embolism: results of the ‘IRM-EP’ study
J Thromb Haemost
2012
, vol. 
10
 
5
(pg. 
743
-
750
)
171
Stein
PD
Chenevert
TL
Fowler
SE
Goodman
LR
Gottschalk
A
Hales
CA
Hull
RD
Jablonski
KA
Leeper
KV
Jr.
Naidich
DP
Sak
DJ
Sostman
HD
Tapson
VF
Weg
JG
Woodard
PK
Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III)
Ann Intern Med
2010
, vol. 
152
 
7
(pg. 
434
-
3
)
172
Grifoni
S
Olivotto
I
Cecchini
P
Pieralli
F
Camaiti
A
Santoro
G
Conti
A
Agnelli
G
Berni
G
Short-term clinical outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure, and echocardiographic right ventricular dysfunction
Circulation
2000
, vol. 
101
 
24
(pg. 
2817
-
2822
)
173
Torbicki
A
Kurzyna
M
Ciurzynski
M
Pruszczyk
P
Pacho
R
Kuch-Wocial
A
Szulc
M
Proximal pulmonary emboli modify right ventricular ejection pattern
Eur Respir J
1999
, vol. 
13
 
3
(pg. 
616
-
621
)
174
Bova
C
Greco
F
Misuraca
G
Serafini
O
Crocco
F
Greco
A
Noto
A
Diagnostic utility of echocardiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Am J Emerg Med
2003
, vol. 
21
 
3
(pg. 
180
-
183
)
175
Kurzyna
M
Torbicki
A
Pruszczyk
P
Burakowska
B
Fijałkowska
A
Kober
J
Oniszh
K
Kuca
P
Tomkowski
W
Burakowski
J
Wawrzyńska
L
Disturbed right ventricular ejection pattern as a new Doppler echocardiographic sign of acute pulmonary embolism
Am J Cardiol
2002
, vol. 
90
 
5
(pg. 
507
-
511
)
176
Casazza
F
Bongarzoni
A
Capozi
A
Agostoni
O
Regional right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism and right ventricular infarction
Eur J Echocardiogr
2005
, vol. 
6
 
1
(pg. 
11
-
14
)
177
Pruszczyk
P
Goliszek
S
Lichodziejewska
B
Kostrubiec
M
Ciurzyński
M
Kurnicka
K
Dzikowska-Diduch
O
Palczewski
P
Wyzgal
A
Prognostic Value of Echocardiography in Normotensive Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
2014
, vol. 
7
 
6
(pg. 
553
-
560
)
178
Rudski
LG
Lai
WW
Afilalo
J
Hua
L
Handschumacher
MD
Chandrasekaran
K
Solomon
SD
Louie
EK
Schiller
NB
Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
2010
, vol. 
23
 
7
(pg. 
685
-
713
)
179
Platz
E
Hassanein
AH
Shah
A
Goldhaber
SZ
Solomon
SD
Regional right ventricular strain pattern in patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Echocardiography
2012
, vol. 
29
 
4
(pg. 
464
-
470
)
180
Sugiura
E
Dohi
K
Onishi
K
Takamura
T
Tsuji
A
Ota
S
Yamada
N
Nakamura
M
Nobori
T
Ito
M
Reversible right ventricular regional non-uniformity quantified by speckle-tracking strain imaging in patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
2009
, vol. 
22
 
12
(pg. 
1353
-
1359
)
181
Hsiao
SH
Chang
SM
Lee
CY
Yang
SH
Lin
SK
Chiou
KR
Usefulness of tissue Doppler parameters for identifying pulmonary embolism in patients with signs of pulmonary hypertension
Am J Cardiol
2006
, vol. 
98
 
5
(pg. 
685
-
690
)
182
Kucher
N
Luder
CM
Dörnhöfer
T
Windecker
S
Meier
B
Hess
OM
Novel management strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Eur Heart J
2003
, vol. 
24
 
4
(pg. 
366
-
376
)
183
Mansencal
N
Attias
D
Caille
V
Desperramons
J
Guiader
J
El Hajjam
M
Lacombe
P
Abi
N
I
Jardin
F
Vieillard-Baron
A
Dubourg
O
Computed tomography for the detection of free-floating thrombi in the right heart in acute pulmonary embolism
Eur Radiol
2011
, vol. 
21
 
2
(pg. 
240
-
245
)
184
Torbicki
A
Galiè
N
Covezzoli
A
Rossi
E
De Rosa
M
Goldhaber
SZ
Right heart thrombi in pulmonary embolism: results from the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry
J Am Coll Cardiol
2003
, vol. 
41
 
12
(pg. 
2245
-
2251
)
185
Casazza
F
Bongarzoni
A
Centonze
F
Morpurgo
M
Prevalence and prognostic significance of right-sided cardiac mobile thrombi in acute massive pulmonary embolism
Am J Cardiol
1997
, vol. 
79
 
10
(pg. 
1433
-
1435
)
186
Mollazadeh
R
Ostovan
MA
Abdi Ardekani
AR
Right cardiac thrombus in transit among patients with pulmonary thromboemboli
Clin Cardiol
2009
, vol. 
32
 
(6):E27–E31
187
Rose
PS
Punjabi
NM
Pearse
DB
Treatment of right heart thromboemboli
Chest
2002
, vol. 
121
 
3
(pg. 
806
-
814
)
188
Krivec
B
Voga
G
Zuran
I
Skale
R
Pareznik
R
Podbregar
M
Noc
M
Diagnosis and treatment of shock due to massive pulmonary embolism: approach with transesophageal echocardiography and intrapulmonary thrombolysis
Chest
1997
, vol. 
112
 
5
(pg. 
1310
-
1316
)
189
Pruszczyk
P
Torbicki
A
Kuch-Wocial
A
Szulc
M
Pacho
R
Diagnostic value of transoesophageal echocardiography in suspected haemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism
Heart
2001
, vol. 
85
 
6
(pg. 
628
-
634
)
190
Pruszczyk
P
Torbicki
A
Pacho
R
Chlebus
M
Kuch-Wocial
A
Pruszynski
B
Gurba
H
Noninvasive diagnosis of suspected severe pulmonary embolism: transesophageal echocardiography vs. spiral CT
Chest
1997
, vol. 
112
 
3
(pg. 
722
-
728
)
191
Hull
RD
Hirsh
J
Carter
CJ
Jay
RM
Dodd
PE
Ockelford
PA
Coates
G
Gill
GJ
Turpie
AG
Doyle
DJ
Büller
HR
Raskob
GE
Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan
Ann Intern Med
1983
, vol. 
98
 
6
(pg. 
891
-
899
)
192
Kearon
C
Ginsberg
JS
Hirsh
J
The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
Ann Intern Med
1998
, vol. 
129
 
12
(pg. 
1044
-
1049
)
193
Perrier
A
Bounameaux
H
Ultrasonography of leg veins in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism
Ann Intern Med
1998
, vol. 
128
 
3
(pg. 
243
-
245
)
194
Le Gal
G
Righini
M
Sanchez
O
Roy
PM
Baba-Ahmed
M
Perrier
A
Bounameaux
H
A positive compression ultrasonography of the lower limb veins is highly predictive of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography in suspected patients
Thromb Haemost
2006
, vol. 
95
 
6
(pg. 
963
-
966
)
195
Elias
A
Colombier
D
Victor
G
Elias
M
Arnaud
C
Juchet
H
Ducassé
JL
Didier
A
Colin
C
Rousseau
H
Nguyen
F
Joffre
F
Diagnostic performance of complete lower limb venous ultrasound in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism
Thromb Haemost
2004
, vol. 
91
 
1
(pg. 
187
-
195
)
196
Righini
M
Le
GG
Aujesky
D
Roy
PM
Sanchez
O
Verschuren
F
Kossovsky
M
Bressollette
L
Meyer
G
Perrier
A
Bounameaux
H
Complete venous ultrasound in outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism
J Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
7
 
3
(pg. 
406
-
412
)
197
Kline
JA
Webb
WB
Jones
AE
Hernandez-Nino
J
Impact of a rapid rule-out protocol for pulmonary embolism on the rate of screening, missed cases, and pulmonary vascular imaging in an urban US emergency department
Ann Emerg Med
2004
, vol. 
44
 
5
(pg. 
490
-
502
)
198
Roy
PM
Meyer
G
Vielle
B
Le Gall
C
Verschuren
F
Carpentier
F
Leveau
P
Furber
A
Appropriateness of diagnostic management and outcomes of suspected pulmonary embolism
Ann Intern Med
2006
, vol. 
144
 
3
(pg. 
157
-
164
)
199
Ferrari
E
Benhamou
M
Berthier
F
Baudouy
M
Mobile thrombi of the right heart in pulmonary embolism: delayed disappearance after thrombolytic treatment
Chest
2005
, vol. 
127
 
3
(pg. 
1051
-
1053
)
200
Pierre-Justin
G
Pierard
LA
Management of mobile right heart thrombi: a prospective series
Int J Cardiol
2005
, vol. 
99
 
3
(pg. 
381
-
388
)
201
Vieillard-Baron
A
Qanadli
SD
Antakly
Y
Fourme
T
Loubières
Y
Jardin
F
Dubourg
O
Transesophageal echocardiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with acute cor pulmonale: a comparison with radiological procedures
Intensive Care Med
1998
, vol. 
24
 
5
(pg. 
429
-
433
)
202
Righini
M
Aujesky
D
Roy
PM
Cornuz
J
de Moerloose
P
Bounameaux
H
Perrier
A
Clinical usefulness of D-dimer depending on clinical probability and cutoff value in outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Arch Intern Med
2004
, vol. 
164
 
22
(pg. 
2483
-
2487
)
203
Perrier
A
Miron
MJ
Desmarais
S
de Moerloose
P
Slosman
D
Didier
D
Unger
PF
Junod
A
Patenaude
JV
Bounameaux
H
Using clinical evaluation and lung scan to rule out suspected pulmonary embolism: Is it a valid option in patients with normal results of lower-limb venous compression ultrasonography?
Arch Intern Med
2000
, vol. 
160
 
4
(pg. 
512
-
516
)
204
Stein
PD
Sostman
HD
Dalen
JE
Bailey
DL
Bajc
M
Goldhaber
SZ
Goodman
LR
Gottschalk
A
Hull
RD
Matta
F
Pistolesi
M
Tapson
VF
Weg
JG
Wells
PS
Woodard
PK
Controversies in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost
2011
, vol. 
17
 
2
(pg. 
140
-
149
)
205
den Exter
PL
Van Es
J
Klok
FA
Kroft
LJ
Kruip
MJ
Kamphuisen
PW
Büller
HR
Huisman
MV
Risk profile and clinical outcome of symptomatic subsegmental acute pulmonary embolism
Blood
2013
, vol. 
122
 
7
(pg. 
1144
-
1149
)
206
Wiener
RS
Schwartz
LM
Woloshin
S
When a test is too good: how CT pulmonary angiograms find pulmonary emboli that do not need to be found
BMJ
2013
, vol. 
347
  
f3368
207
Tsai
J
Grosse
SD
Grant
AM
Hooper
WC
Atrash
HK
Trends in in-hospital deaths among hospitalizations with pulmonary embolism
Arch Intern Med
2012
, vol. 
172
 
12
(pg. 
960
-
961
)
208
Wiener
RS
Schwartz
LM
Woloshin
S
Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis
Arch Intern Med
2011
, vol. 
171
 
9
(pg. 
831
-
837
)
209
Ayaram
D
Bellolio
MF
Murad
MH
Laack
TA
Sadosty
AT
Erwin
PJ
Hollander
JE
Montori
VM
Stiell
IG
Hess
EP
Triple rule-out computed tomographic angiography for chest pain: a diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis
Acad Emerg Med
2013
, vol. 
20
 
9
(pg. 
861
-
871
)
210
Jiménez
D
Aujesky
D
Díaz
G
Monreal
M
Otero
R
Martí
D
Marin
E
Aracil
E
Sueiro
A
Yusen
RD
Prognostic significance of deep vein thrombosis in patients presenting with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2010
, vol. 
181
 
9
(pg. 
983
-
991
)
211
Chan
CM
Woods
C
Shorr
AF
The validation and reproducibility of the pulmonary embolism severity index
J Thromb Haemost
2010
, vol. 
8
 
7
(pg. 
1509
-
1514
)
212
Donzé
J
Le Gal
G
Fine
MJ
Roy
PM
Sanchez
O
Verschuren
F
Cornuz
J
Meyer
G
Perrier
A
Righini
M
Aujesky
D
Prospective validation of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index. A clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism
Thromb Haemost
2008
, vol. 
100
 
5
(pg. 
943
-
948
)
213
Vanni
S
Nazerian
P
Pepe
G
Baioni
M
Risso
M
Grifoni
G
Viviani
G
Grifoni
S
Comparison of two prognostic models for acute pulmonary embolism: clinical vs. right ventricular dysfunction-guided approach
J Thromb Haemost
2011
, vol. 
9
 
10
(pg. 
1916
-
1923
)
214
Aujesky
D
Obrosky
DS
Stone
RA
Auble
TE
Perrier
A
Cornuz
J
Roy
PM
Fine
MJ
Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2005
, vol. 
172
 
8
(pg. 
1041
-
1046
)
215
Jiménez
D
Yusen
RD
Otero
R
Uresandi
F
Nauffal
D
Laserna
E
Conget
F
Oribe
M
Cabezudo
MA
Díaz
G
Prognostic models for selecting patients with acute pulmonary embolism for initial outpatient therapy
Chest
2007
, vol. 
132
 
1
(pg. 
24
-
30
)
216
Wicki
J
Perrier
A
Perneger
TV
Bounameaux
H
Junod
AF
Predicting adverse outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: a risk score
Thromb Haemost
2000
, vol. 
84
 
4
(pg. 
548
-
552
)
217
Aujesky
D
Roy
PM
Verschuren
F
Righini
M
Osterwalder
J
Egloff
M
Renaud
B
Verhamme
P
Stone
RA
Legall
C
Sanchez
O
Pugh
NA
N'gako
A
Cornuz
J
Hugli
O
Beer
HJ
Perrier
A
Fine
MJ
Yealy
DM
Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial
Lancet
2011
, vol. 
378
 
9785
(pg. 
41
-
48
)
218
Jiménez
D
Aujesky
D
Moores
L
Gómez
V
Lobo
JL
Uresandi
F
Otero
R
Monreal
M
Muriel
A
Yusen
RD
Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism
Arch Intern Med
2010
, vol. 
170
 
15
(pg. 
1383
-
1389
)
219
Righini
M
Roy
PM
Meyer
G
Verschuren
F
Aujesky
D
Le Gal
G
The Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI): validation of a clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism
J Thromb Haemost
2011
, vol. 
9
 
10
(pg. 
2115
-
2117
)
220
Sam
A
Sánchez
D
Gómez
V
Wagner
C
Kopecna
D
Zamarro
C
Moores
L
Aujesky
D
Yusen
R
Jiménez
CD
The shock index and the simplified PESI for identification of low-risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Eur Respir J
2011
, vol. 
37
 
4
(pg. 
762
-
766
)
221
Lankeit
M
Gomez
V
Wagner
C
Aujesky
D
Recio
M
Briongos
S
Moores
LK
Yusen
RD
Konstantinides
S
Jimenez
D
A strategy combining imaging and laboratory biomarkers in comparison with a simplified clinical score for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Chest
2012
, vol. 
141
 
4
(pg. 
916
-
922
)
222
Spirk
D
Aujesky
D
Husmann
M
Hayoz
D
Baldi
T
Frauchiger
B
Banyai
M
Baumgartner
I
Kucher
N
Cardiac troponin testing and the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index. The SWIss Venous Thromboembolism Registry (SWIVTER)
Thromb Haemost
2011
, vol. 
106
 
5
(pg. 
978
-
984
)
223
Kreit
JW
The impact of right ventricular dysfunction on the prognosis and therapy of normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism
Chest
2004
, vol. 
125
 
4
(pg. 
1539
-
1545
)
224
Kucher
N
Rossi
E
De Rosa
M
Goldhaber
SZ
Prognostic role of echocardiography among patients with acute pulmonary embolism and a systolic arterial pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher
Arch Intern Med
2005
, vol. 
165
 
15
(pg. 
1777
-
1781
)
225
ten Wolde
M
Söhne
M
Quak
E
Mac Gillavry
MR
Büller
HR
Prognostic value of echocardiographically assessed right ventricular dysfunction in patients with pulmonary embolism
Arch Intern Med
2004
, vol. 
164
 
15
(pg. 
1685
-
1689
)
226
Coutance
G
Cauderlier
E
Ehtisham
J
Hamon
M
Hamon
M
The prognostic value of markers of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis
Crit Care
2011
, vol. 
15
 
(2):R103
227
Sanchez
O
Trinquart
L
Colombet
I
Durieux
P
Huisman
MV
Chatellier
G
Meyer
G
Prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with haemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism: a systematic review
Eur Heart J
2008
, vol. 
29
 
12
(pg. 
1569
-
1577
)
228
Becattini
C
Agnelli
G
Vedovati
MC
Pruszczyk
P
Casazza
F
Grifoni
S
Salvi
A
Bianchi
M
Douma
R
Konstantinides
S
Lankeit
M
Duranti
M
Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis and risk stratification in a single test
Eur Heart J
2011
, vol. 
32
 
13
(pg. 
1657
-
1663
)
229
Trujillo-Santos
J
den Exter
PL
Gómez
V
Del
CH
Moreno
C
van der Hulle
T
Huisman
MV
Monreal
M
Yusen
RD
Jiménez
D
Computed tomography-assessed right ventricular dysfunction and risk stratification of patients with acute non-massive pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis
J Thromb Haemost
2013
, vol. 
11
 
10
(pg. 
1823
-
1832
)
230
Becattini
C
Agnelli
G
Germini
F
Vedovati
MC
Computed tomography to assess risk of death in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis
Eur Respir J
2014
, vol. 
43
 
6
(pg. 
1678
-
1690
)
231
Henzler
T
Roeger
S
Meyer
M
Schoepf
UJ
Nance
JW
Jr.
Haghi
D
Kaminski
WE
Neumaier
M
Schoenberg
SO
Fink
C
Pulmonary embolism: CT signs and cardiac biomarkers for predicting right ventricular dysfunction
Eur Respir J
2012
, vol. 
39
 
4
(pg. 
919
-
926
)
232
Klok
FA
Mos
IC
Huisman
MV
Brain-type natriuretic peptide levels in the prediction of adverse outcome in patients with pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2008
, vol. 
178
 
4
(pg. 
425
-
430
)
233
Kucher
N
Goldhaber
SZ
Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Circulation
2003
, vol. 
108
 
18
(pg. 
2191
-
2194
)
234
Lankeit
M
Jimenez
D
Kostrubiec
M
Dellas
C
Kuhnert
K
Hasenfuss
G
Pruszczyk
P
Konstantinides
S
Validation of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide cut-off values for risk stratification of pulmonary embolism
Eur Respir J
2014
, vol. 
43
 
6
(pg. 
1669
-
1677
)
235
Vuilleumier
N
Le Gal
G
Verschuren
F
Perrier
A
Bounameaux
H
Turck
N
Sanchez
JC
Mensi
N
Perneger
T
Hochstrasser
D
Righini
M
Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification in non-massive pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study
J Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
7
 
3
(pg. 
391
-
398
)
236
Kostrubiec
M
Pruszczyk
P
Bochowicz
A
Pacho
R
Szulc
M
Kaczynska
A
Styczynski
G
Kuch-Wocial
A
Abramczyk
P
Bartoszewicz
Z
Berent
H
Kuczynska
K
Biomarker-based risk assessment model in acute pulmonary embolism
Eur Heart J
2005
, vol. 
26
 
20
(pg. 
2166
-
2172
)
237
Agterof
MJ
Schutgens
RE
Snijder
RJ
Epping
G
Peltenburg
HG
Posthuma
EF
Hardeman
JA
van der Griend
R
Koster
T
Prins
MH
Biesma
DH
Out of hospital treatment of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a low NT-proBNP level
J Thromb Haemost
2010
, vol. 
8
 
6
(pg. 
1235
-
1241
)
238
Coma-Canella
I
Gamallo
C
Martinez Onsurbe
P
Lopez-Sendon
J
Acute right ventricular infarction secondary to massive pulmonary embolism
Eur Heart J
1988
, vol. 
9
 
5
(pg. 
534
-
540
)
239
Becattini
C
Vedovati
MC
Agnelli
G
Prognostic value of troponins in acute pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis
Circulation
2007
, vol. 
116
 
4
(pg. 
427
-
433
)
240
Jiménez
D
Uresandi
F
Otero
R
Lobo
JL
Monreal
M
Martí
D
Zamora
J
Muriel
A
Aujesky
D
Yusen
RD
Troponin-based risk stratification of patients with acute nonmassive pulmonary embolism: systematic review and metaanalysis
Chest
2009
, vol. 
136
 
4
(pg. 
974
-
982
)
241
Lankeit
M
Friesen
D
Aschoff
J
Dellas
C
Hasenfuss
G
Katus
H
Konstantinides
S
Giannitsis
E
Highly sensitive troponin T assay in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Eur Heart J
2010
, vol. 
31
 
15
(pg. 
1836
-
1844
)
242
Boscheri
A
Wunderlich
C
Langer
M
Schoen
S
Wiedemann
B
Stolte
D
Elmer
G
Barthel
P
Strasser
RH
Correlation of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein with mortality and echocardiographic data in patients with pulmonary embolism at intermediate risk
Am Heart J
2010
, vol. 
160
 
2
(pg. 
294
-
300
)
243
Puls
M
Dellas
C
Lankeit
M
Olschewski
M
Binder
L
Geibel
A
Reiner
C
Schäfer
K
Hasenfuss
G
Konstantinides
S
Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein permits early risk stratification of pulmonary embolism
Eur Heart J
2007
, vol. 
28
 
2
(pg. 
224
-
229
)
244
Dellas
C
Puls
M
Lankeit
M
Schafer
K
Cuny
M
Berner
M
Hasenfuss
G
Konstantinides
S
Elevated heart-type fatty acid-binding protein levels on admission predict an adverse outcome in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism
J Am Coll Cardiol
2010
, vol. 
55
 
19
(pg. 
2150
-
2157
)
245
Lankeit
M
Friesen
D
Schafer
K
Hasenfuss
G
Konstantinides
S
Dellas
C
A simple score for rapid risk assessment of non-high-risk pulmonary embolism
Clin Res Cardiol
2013
, vol. 
102
 
1
(pg. 
73
-
80
)
246
Dellas
C
Tschepe
M
Seeber
V
Zwiener
I
Kuhnert
K
Schafer
K
Hasenfuss
G
Konstantinides
S
Lankeit
M
A novel H-FABP assay and a fast prognostic score for risk assessment of normotensive pulmonary embolism
Thromb Haemost
2014
, vol. 
111
 
5
247
Kostrubiec
M
Łabyk
A
Pedowska-Włoszek
J
Pacho
S
Wojciechowski
A
Jankowski
K
Ciurzyński
M
Pruszczyk
P
Assessment of renal dysfunction improves troponin-based short-term prognosis in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism
J Thromb Haemost
2010
, vol. 
8
 
4
(pg. 
651
-
658
)
248
Kostrubiec
M
Łabyk
A
Pedowska-Włloszek
J
Dzikowska-Diduch
O
Wojciechowski
A
Garlińska
M
Ciurzyński
M
Pruszczyk
P
Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, cystatin C and eGFR indicate acute kidney injury and predict prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Heart
2012
, vol. 
98
 
16
(pg. 
1221
-
1228
)
249
Becattini
C
Lignani
A
Masotti
L
Forte
MB
Agnelli
G
D-dimer for risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism
J Thromb Thrombolysis
2012
, vol. 
33
 
1
(pg. 
48
-
57
)
250
Lobo
JL
Zorrilla
V
Aizpuru
F
Grau
E
Jiménez
D
Palareti
G
Monreal
M
D-dimer levels and 15-day outcome in acute pulmonaryembolism. Findings from the RIETE Registry
J Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
7
 
11
(pg. 
1795
-
1801
)
251
Aujesky
D
Roy
PM
Guy
M
Cornuz
J
Sanchez
O
Perrier
A
Prognostic value of D-dimer in patients with pulmonary embolism
Thromb Haemost
2006
, vol. 
96
 
4
(pg. 
478
-
482
)
252
Konstantinides
S
Geibel
A
Heusel
G
Heinrich
F
Kasper
W
Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin alone in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism
N Engl J Med
2002
, vol. 
347
 
15
(pg. 
1143
-
1150
)
253
Meyer
G
Vicaut
E
Danays
T
Agnelli
G
Becattini
C
Beyer-Westendorf
J
Bluhmki
E
Bouvaist
H
Brenner
B
Couturaud
F
Dellas
C
Empen
K
Franca
A
Galiè
N
Geibel
A
Goldhaber
SZ
Jimenez
D
Kozak
M
Kupatt
C
Kucher
N
Lang
IM
Lankeit
M
Meneveau
N
Pacouret
G
Palazzini
M
Petris
A
Pruszczyk
P
Rugolotto
M
Salvi
A
Schellong
S
Sebbane
M
Sobkowicz
B
Stefanovic
BS
Thiele
H
Torbicki
A
Verschuren
F
Konstantinides
SV
Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism
N Engl J Med
2014
, vol. 
370
 
15
(pg. 
1402
-
1411
)
254
Jiménez
D
Aujesky
D
Moores
L
Gómez
V
Martí
D
Briongos
S
Monreal
M
Barrios
V
Konstantinides
S
Yusen
RD
Combinations of prognostic tools for identification of high-risk normotensive patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism
Thorax
2011
, vol. 
66
 
1
(pg. 
75
-
81
)
255
Agterof
MJ
Schutgens
RE
Moumli
N
Eijkemans
MJ
van der Griend
R
Tromp
EA
Biesma
DH
A prognostic model for short term adverse events in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism
Am J Hematol
2011
, vol. 
86
 
8
(pg. 
646
-
649
)
256
Becattini
C
Casazza
F
Forgione
C
Porro
F
Fadin
BM
Stucchi
A
Lignani
A
Conte
L
Imperadore
F
Bongarzoni
A
Agnelli
G
Acute pulmonary embolism: external validation of an integrated risk stratification model
Chest
2013
, vol. 
144
 
5
(pg. 
1539
-
1545
)
257
Sanchez
O
Trinquart
L
Caille
V
Couturaud
F
Pacouret
G
Meneveau
N
Verschuren
F
Roy
PM
Parent
F
Righini
M
Perrier
A
Lorut
C
Tardy
B
Benoit
MO
Chatellier
G
Meyer
G
Prognostic factors for pulmonary embolism: the prep study, a prospective multicenter cohort study
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2010
, vol. 
181
 
2
(pg. 
168
-
173
)
258
Jiménez
D
Kopecna
D
Tapson
V
Briese
B
Schreiber
D
Lobo
JL
Monreal
M
Aujesky
D
Sanchez
O
Meyer
G
Konstantinides
S
Yusen
RD
on behalf of the Protect Investigators
Derivation and validation of multimarker prognostication for normotensive patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2014
, vol. 
189
 
6
(pg. 
718
-
726
)
259
Bova
C
Sanchez
O
Prandoni
P
Lankeit
M
Konstantinides
S
Vanni
S
Jiménez
D
Identification of intermediate-risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism
Eur Respir J
2014
260
Binder
L
Pieske
B
Olschewski
M
Geibel
A
Klostermann
B
Reiner
C
Konstantinides
S
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide or troponin testing followed by echocardiography for risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism
Circulation
2005
, vol. 
112
 
11
(pg. 
1573
-
1579
)
261
The PEITHO Steering Committee
Single-bolus tenecteplase plus heparin compared with heparin alone for normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism who have evidence of right ventricular dysfunction and myocardial injury: rationale and design of the Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis (PEITHO) trial
Am Heart J
2012
, vol. 
163
 
1
(pg. 
33
-
38
)
262
Sanchez
O
Trinquart
L
Planquette
B
Couturaud
F
Verschuren
F
Caille
V
Meneveau
N
Pacouret
G
Roy
PM
Righini
M
Perrier
A
Bertoletti
L
Parent
F
Lorut
C
Meyer
G
Echocardiography and pulmonary embolism severity index have independent prognostic roles in pulmonary embolism
Eur Respir J
2013
, vol. 
42
 
3
(pg. 
681
-
688
)
263
Ghignone
M
Girling
L
Prewitt
RM
Volume expansion versus norepinephrine in treatment of a low cardiac output complicating an acute increase in right ventricular afterload in dogs
Anesthesiology
1984
, vol. 
60
 
2
(pg. 
132
-
135
)
264
Mercat
A
Diehl
JL
Meyer
G
Teboul
JL
Sors
H
Hemodynamic effects of fluid loading in acute massive pulmonary embolism
Crit Care Med
1999
, vol. 
27
 
3
(pg. 
540
-
544
)
265
Manier
G
Castaing
Y
Influence of cardiac output on oxygen exchange in acute pulmonary embolism
Am Rev Respir Dis
1992
, vol. 
145
 
1
(pg. 
130
-
136
)
266
Capellier
G
Jacques
T
Balvay
P
Blasco
G
Belle
E
Barale
F
Inhaled nitric oxide in patients with pulmonary embolism
Intensive Care Med
1997
, vol. 
23
 
10
(pg. 
1089
-
1092
)
267
Szold
O
Khoury
W
Biderman
P
Klausner
JM
Halpern
P
Weinbroum
AA
Inhaled nitric oxide improves pulmonary functions following massive pulmonary embolism: a report of four patients and review of the literature
Lung
2006
, vol. 
184
 
1
(pg. 
1
-
5
)
268
Kerbaul
F
Gariboldi
V
Giorgi
R
Mekkaoui
C
Guieu
R
Fesler
P
Gouin
F
Brimioulle
S
Collart
F
Effects of levosimendan on acute pulmonary embolism-induced right ventricular failure
Crit Care Med
2007
, vol. 
35
 
8
(pg. 
1948
-
1954
)
269
Kjaergaard
B
Rasmussen
BS
de Neergaard
S
Rasmussen
LH
Kristensen
SR
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support may be an efficient rescue of patients after massive pulmonary embolism. An experimental porcine study
Thromb Res
2012
, vol. 
129
 
(4):e147–e151
270
Delnoij
TS
Accord
RE
Weerwind
PW
Donker
DW
Atrial trans-septal thrombus in massive pulmonary embolism salvaged by prolonged extracorporeal life support after thromboembolectomy. A bridge to right-sided cardiovascular adaptation
Acute Card Care
2012
, vol. 
14
 
4
(pg. 
138
-
140
)
271
Leick
J
Liebetrau
C
Szardien
S
Willmer
M
Rixe
J
Nef
H
Rolf
A
Hamm
C
Mollmann
H
Percutaneous circulatory support in a patient with cardiac arrest due to acute pulmonary embolism
Clin Res Cardiol
2012
, vol. 
101
 
12
(pg. 
1017
-
1020
)
272
Taniguchi
S
Fukuda
W
Fukuda
I
Watanabe
K
Saito
Y
Nakamura
M
Sakuma
M
Outcome of pulmonary embolectomy for acute pulmonary thromboembolism: analysis of 32 patients from a multicentre registry in Japan
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
2012
, vol. 
14
 
1
(pg. 
64
-
67
)
273
Cossette
B
Pelletier
ME
Carrier
N
Turgeon
M
Leclair
C
Charron
P
Echenberg
D
Fayad
T
Farand
P
Evaluation of bleeding risk in patients exposed to therapeutic unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin: a cohort study in the context of a quality improvement initiative
Ann Pharmacother
2010
, vol. 
44
 
6
(pg. 
994
-
1002
)
274
van Dongen
CJ
van den Belt
AG
Prins
MH
Lensing
AW
Fixed dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparins vs. adjusted dose unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2004
4
pg. 
CD001100
 
275
Stein
PD
Hull
RD
Matta
F
Yaekoub
AY
Liang
J
Incidence of thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients with venous thromboembolism
Am J Med
2009
, vol. 
122
 
10
(pg. 
919
-
930
)
276
Prandoni
P
Siragusa
S
Girolami
B
Fabris
F
The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in medical patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin: a prospective cohort study
Blood
2005
, vol. 
106
 
9
(pg. 
3049
-
3054
)
277
Raschke
RA
Gollihare
B
Peirce
JC
The effectiveness of implementing the weight-based heparin nomogram as a practice guideline
Arch Intern Med
1996
, vol. 
156
 
15
(pg. 
1645
-
1649
)
278
Lee
AY
Levine
MN
Baker
RI
Bowden
C
Kakkar
AK
Prins
M
Rickles
FR
Julian
JA
Haley
S
Kovacs
MJ
Gent
M
Low-molecular-weight heparin vs. a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
N Engl J Med
2003
, vol. 
349
 
2
(pg. 
146
-
153
)
279
Middeldorp
S
How I treat pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism
Blood
2011
, vol. 
118
 
20
(pg. 
5394
-
5400
)
280
Samama
MM
Poller
L
Contemporary laboratory monitoring of low molecular weight heparins
Clin Lab Med
1995
, vol. 
15
 
1
(pg. 
119
-
123
)
281
Büller
HR
Davidson
BL
Decousus
H
Gallus
A
Gent
M
Piovella
F
Prins
MH
Raskob
G
van den Berg-Segers
AE
Cariou
R
Leeuwenkamp
O
Lensing
AW
Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism
N Engl J Med
2003
, vol. 
349
 
18
(pg. 
1695
-
1702
)
282
Warkentin
TE
Maurer
BT
Aster
RH
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia associated with fondaparinux
N Engl J Med
2007
, vol. 
356
 
25
(pg. 
2653
-
2655
)
283
Garcia
DA
Baglin
TP
Weitz
JI
Samama
MM
Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest
2012
, vol. 
141
 
2 Suppl
(pg. 
e24S
-
e43S
)
284
De Caterina
R
Husted
S
Wallentin
L
Andreotti
F
Arnesen
H
Bachmann
F
Baigent
C
Huber
K
Jespersen
J
Kristensen
SD
Lip
GY
Morais
J
Rasmussen
LH
Siegbahn
A
Verheugt
FW
Weitz
JI
Vitamin K antagonists in heart disease: Current status and perspectives (Section III). Position Paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis - Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease
Thromb Haemost
2013
, vol. 
110
 
6
(pg. 
1087
-
1107
)
285
British Thoracic Society
Optimum duration of anticoagulation for deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Research Committee of the British Thoracic Society
Lancet
1992
, vol. 
340
 
8824
(pg. 
873
-
876
)
286
Carlquist
JF
Anderson
JL
Using pharmacogenetics in real time to guide warfarin initiation: a clinician update
Circulation
2011
, vol. 
124
 
23
(pg. 
2554
-
2559
)
287
Epstein
RS
Moyer
TP
Aubert
RE
O Kane
DJ
Xia
F
Verbrugge
RR
Gage
BF
Teagarden
JR
Warfarin genotyping reduces hospitalization rates results from the MM-WES (Medco-Mayo Warfarin Effectiveness study)
J Am Coll Cardiol
2010
, vol. 
55
 
25
(pg. 
2804
-
2812
)
288
Jonas
DE
McLeod
HL
Genetic and clinical factors relating to warfarin dosing
Trends Pharmacol Sci
2009
, vol. 
30
 
7
(pg. 
375
-
386
)
289
Anderson
JL
Horne
BD
Stevens
SM
Woller
SC
Samuelson
KM
Mansfield
JW
Robinson
M
Barton
S
Brunisholz
K
Mower
CP
Huntinghouse
JA
Rollo
JS
Siler
D
Bair
TL
Knight
S
Muhlestein
JB
Carlquist
JF
A randomized and clinical effectiveness trial comparing two pharmacogenetic algorithms and standard care for individualizing warfarin dosing (CoumaGen-II)
Circulation
2012
, vol. 
125
 
16
(pg. 
1997
-
2005
)
290
Verhoef
TI
Ragia
G
de Boer
A
Barallon
R
Kolovou
G
Kolovou
V
Konstantinides
S
Le Cessie
S
Maltezos
E
van der Meer
FJ
Redekop
WK
Remkes
M
Rosendaal
FR
van Schie
RM
Tavridou
A
Tziakas
D
Wadelius
M
Manolopoulos
VG
Maitland-van der Zee
AH
A randomized trial of genotype-guided dosing of acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon
N Engl J Med
2013
, vol. 
369
 
24
(pg. 
2304
-
2312
)
291
Kimmel
SE
French
B
Kasner
SE
Johnson
JA
Anderson
JL
Gage
BF
Rosenberg
YD
Eby
CS
Madigan
RA
McBane
RB
Abdel-Rahman
SZ
Stevens
SM
Yale
S
Mohler
ER
III
Fang
MC
Shah
V
Horenstein
RB
Limdi
NA
Muldowney
JA
III
Gujral
J
Delafontaine
P
Desnick
RJ
Ortel
TL
Billett
HH
Pendleton
RC
Geller
NL
Halperin
JL
Goldhaber
SZ
Caldwell
MD
Califf
RM
Ellenberg
JH
A pharmacogenetic versus a clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing
N Engl J Med
2013
, vol. 
369
 
24
(pg. 
2283
-
2293
)
292
Pirmohamed
M
Burnside
G
Eriksson
N
Jorgensen
AL
Toh
CH
Nicholson
T
Kesteven
P
Christersson
C
Wahlström
B
Stafberg
C
Zhang
JE
Leathart
JB
Kohnke
H
Maitland-van der Zee
AH
Williamson
PR
Daly
AK
Avery
P
Kamali
F
Wadelius
M
A randomized trial of genotype-guided dosing of warfarin
N Engl J Med
2013
, vol. 
369
 
24
(pg. 
2294
-
2303
)
293
Schulman
S
Kearon
C
Kakkar
AK
Mismetti
P
Schellong
S
Eriksson
H
Baanstra
D
Schnee
J
Goldhaber
SZ
Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism
N Engl J Med
2009
, vol. 
361
 
24
(pg. 
2342
-
2352
)
294
Schulman
S
Kakkar
AK
Goldhaber
SZ
Schellong
S
Eriksson
H
Mismetti
P
Christiansen
AV
Friedman
J
Le
MF
Peter
N
Kearon
C
Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with dabigatran or warfarin and pooled analysis
Circulation
2014
, vol. 
129
 
7
(pg. 
764
-
772
)
295
Bauersachs
R
Berkowitz
SD
Brenner
B
Büller
HR
Decousus
H
Gallus
AS
Lensing
AW
Misselwitz
F
Prins
MH
Raskob
GE
Segers
A
Verhamme
P
Wells
P
Agnelli
G
Bounameaux
H
Cohen
A
Davidson
BL
Piovella
F
Schellong
S
Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism
N Engl J Med
2010
, vol. 
363
 
26
(pg. 
2499
-
2510
)
296
Büller
HR
Prins
MH
Lensin
AW
Decousus
H
Jacobson
BF
Minar
E
Chlumsky
J
Verhamme
P
Wells
P
Agnelli
G
Cohen
A
Berkowitz
SD
Bounameaux
H
Davidson
BL
Misselwitz
F
Gallus
AS
Raskob
GE
Schellong
S
Segers
A
Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism
N Engl J Med
2012
, vol. 
366
 
14
(pg. 
1287
-
1297
)
297
Agnelli
G
Büller
HR
Cohen
A
Curto
M
Gallus
AS
Johnson
M
Masiukiewicz
U
Pak
R
Thompson
J
Raskob
GE
Weitz
JI
Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism
N Engl J Med
2013
, vol. 
369
 
9
(pg. 
799
-
808
)
298
Büller
HR
Decousus
H
Grosso
MA
Mercuri
M
Middeldorp
S
Prins
MH
Raskob
GE
Schellong
SM
Schwocho
L
Segers
A
Shi
M
Verhamme
P
Wells
P
Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism
N Engl J Med
2013
, vol. 
369
 
15
(pg. 
1406
-
1415
)
299
van der Hulle
T
Kooiman
J
den Exter
PL
Dekkers
OM
Klok
FA
Huisman
MV
Effectiveness and safety of novel oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
J Thromb Haemost
2014
, vol. 
12
 
3
(pg. 
320
-
328
)
300
Heidbuchel
H
Verhamme
P
Alings
M
Antz
M
Hacke
W
Oldgren
J
Sinnaeve
P
Camm
AJ
Kirchhof
P
EHRA practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: executive summary
Eur Heart J
2013
, vol. 
34
 
27
(pg. 
2094
-
2106
)
301
Dalla-Volta
S
Palla
A
Santolicandro
A
Giuntini
C
Pengo
V
Visioli
O
Zonzin
P
Zanuttini
D
Barbaresi
F
Agnelli
G
PAIMS 2: alteplase combined with heparin versus heparin in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Plasminogen activator Italian multicenter study 2
J Am Coll Cardiol
1992
, vol. 
20
 
3
(pg. 
520
-
526
)
302
Goldhaber
SZ
Haire
WD
Feldstein
ML
Miller
M
Toltzis
R
Smith
JL
Taveira da Silva
AM
Come
PC
Lee
RT
Parker
JA
Alteplase versus heparin in acute pulmonary embolism: randomised trial assessing right-ventricular function and pulmonary perfusion
Lancet
1993
, vol. 
341
 
8844
(pg. 
507
-
511
)
303
Becattini
C
Agnelli
G
Salvi
A
Grifoni
S
Pancaldi
LG
Enea
I
Balsemin
F
Campanini
M
Ghirarduzzi
A
Casazza
F
Bolus tenecteplase for right ventricle dysfunction in hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism
Thromb Res
2010
, vol. 
125
 
(3):e82–e86
304
Konstantinides
S
Tiede
N
Geibel
A
Olschewski
M
Just
H
Kasper
W
Comparison of alteplase versus heparin for resolution of major pulmonary embolism
Am J Cardiol
1998
, vol. 
82
 
8
(pg. 
966
-
970
)
305
Goldhaber
SZ
Kessler
CM
Heit
J
Markis
J
Sharma
GV
Dawley
D
Nagel
JS
Meyerovitz
M
Kim
D
Vaughan
DE
Randomised controlled trial of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator versus urokinase in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism
Lancet
1988
, vol. 
2
 
8606
(pg. 
293
-
298
)
306
Meneveau
N
Schiele
F
Vuillemenot
A
Valette
B
Grollier
G
Bernard
Y
Bassand
JP
Streptokinase vs. alteplase in massive pulmonary embolism. A randomized trial assessing right heart haemodynamics and pulmonary vascular obstruction
Eur Heart J
1997
, vol. 
18
 
7
(pg. 
1141
-
1148
)
307
Meneveau
N
Schiele
F
Metz
D
Valette
B
Attali
P
Vuillemenot
A
Grollier
G
Elaerts
J
Mossard
JM
Viel
JF
Bassand
JP
Comparative efficacy of a two-hour regimen of streptokinase versus alteplase in acute massive pulmonary embolism: immediate clinical and hemodynamic outcome and one-year follow-up
J Am Coll Cardiol
1998
, vol. 
31
 
5
(pg. 
1057
-
1063
)
308
Meyer
G
Sors
H
Charbonnier
B
Kasper
W
Bassand
JP
Kerr
IH
Lesaffre
E
Vanhove
P
Verstraete
M
Effects of intravenous urokinase versus alteplase on total pulmonary resistance in acute massive pulmonary embolism: a European multicenter double-blind trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
1992
, vol. 
19
 
2
(pg. 
239
-
245
)
309
Tebbe
U
Graf
A
Kamke
W
Zahn
R
Forycki
F
Kratzsch
G
Berg
G
Hemodynamic effects of double bolus reteplase versus alteplase infusion in massive pulmonary embolism
Am Heart J
1999
, vol. 
138
 
1 Pt 1
(pg. 
39
-
44
)
310
Tebbe
U
Bramlage
P
Graf
A
Lechleitner
P
Bode
C
Riess
FC
Clemens
N
Al Rawi
Y
Konstantinides
S
Goldhaber
SZ
Desmoteplase in acute massive pulmonary thromboembolism
Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
101
 
3
(pg. 
557
-
562
)
311
Kline
JA
Nordenholz
KE
Courtney
DM
Kabrhel
C
Jones
AE
Rondina
MT
Diercks
DB
Klinger
JR
Hernandez
J
Treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism with tenecteplase or placebo: cardiopulmonary outcomes at three months (TOPCOAT): Multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial
J Thromb Haemost
2014
312
van De Werf
F
Ardissino
D
Betriu
A
Cokkinos
DV
Falk
E
Fox
KA
Julian
D
Lengyel
M
Neumann
FJ
Ruzyllo
W
Thygesen
C
Underwood
SR
Vahanian
A
Verheugt
FW
Wijns
W
Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur Heart J
2003
, vol. 
24
 
1
(pg. 
28
-
66
)
313
Meneveau
N
Séronde
MF
Blonde
MC
Legalery
P
Didier-Petit
K
Briand
F
Caulfield
F
Schiele
F
Bernard
Y
Bassand
JP
Management of unsuccessful thrombolysis in acute massive pulmonary embolism
Chest
2006
, vol. 
129
 
4
(pg. 
1043
-
1050
)
314
Daniels
LB
Parker
JA
Patel
SR
Grodstein
F
Goldhaber
SZ
Relation of duration of symptoms with response to thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary embolism
Am J Cardiol
1997
, vol. 
80
 
2
(pg. 
184
-
188
)
315
Stein
PD
Matta
F
Thrombolytic therapy in unstable patients with acute pulmonary embolism: saves lives but underused
Am J Med
2012
, vol. 
125
 
5
(pg. 
465
-
470
)
316
Kanter
DS
Mikkola
KM
Patel
SR
Parker
JA
Goldhaber
SZ
Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism. Frequency of intracranial hemorrhage and associated risk factors
Chest
1997
, vol. 
111
 
5
(pg. 
1241
-
1245
)
317
Levine
MN
Goldhaber
SZ
Gore
JM
Hirsh
J
Califf
RM
Hemorrhagic complications of thrombolytic therapy in the treatment of myocardial infarction and venous thromboembolism
Chest
1995
, vol. 
108
 
4 Suppl
(pg. 
291S
-
301S
)
318
Mikkola
KM
Patel
SR
Parker
JA
Grodstein
F
Goldhaber
SZ
Increasing age is a major risk factor for hemorrhagic complications after pulmonary embolism thrombolysis
Am Heart J
1997
, vol. 
134
 
1
(pg. 
69
-
72
)
319
Sharifi
M
Bay
C
Skrocki
L
Rahimi
F
Mehdipour
M
Moderate pulmonary embolism treated with thrombolysis (from the “MOPETT” Trial)
Am J Cardiol
2013
, vol. 
111
 
2
(pg. 
273
-
277
)
320
Wang
C
Zhai
Z
Yang
Y
Wu
Q
Cheng
Z
Liang
L
Dai
H
Huang
K
Lu
W
Zhang
Z
Cheng
X
Shen
YH
Efficacy and safety of low dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for the treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism: a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial
Chest
2010
, vol. 
137
 
2
(pg. 
254
-
262
)
321
Chartier
L
Béra
J
Delomez
M
Asseman
P
Beregi
JP
Bauchart
JJ
Warembourg
H
Théry
C
Free-floating thrombi in the right heart: diagnosis, management, and prognostic indexes in 3 8 consecutive patients
Circulation
1999
, vol. 
99
 
21
(pg. 
2779
-
2783
)
322
Kinney
EL
Wright
RJ
Efficacy of treatment of patients with echocardiographically detected right-sided heart thrombi: a meta-analysis
Am Heart J
1989
, vol. 
118
 
3
(pg. 
569
-
573
)
323
Myers
PO
Bounameaux
H
Panos
A
Lerch
R
Kalangos
A
Impending paradoxical embolism: systematic review of prognostic factors and treatment
Chest
2010
, vol. 
137
 
1
(pg. 
164
-
170
)
324
Mathew
TC
Ramsaran
EK
Aragam
JR
Impending paradoxic embolism in acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis by transesophageal echocardiography and treatment by emergent surgery
Am Heart J
1995
, vol. 
129
 
4
(pg. 
826
-
827
)
325
Kilic
A
Shah
AS
Conte
JV
Yuh
DD
Nationwide outcomes of surgical embolectomy for acute pulmonary embolism
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2013
, vol. 
145
 
2
(pg. 
373
-
377
)
326
Malekan
R
Saunders
PC
Yu
CJ
Brown
KA
Gass
AL
Spielvogel
D
Lansman
SL
Peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: comprehensive therapy for high-risk massive pulmonary embolism
Ann Thorac Surg
2012
, vol. 
94
 
1
(pg. 
104
-
108
)
327
Takahashi
H
Okada
K
Matsumori
M
Kano
H
Kitagawa
A
Okita
Y
Aggressive surgical treatment of acute pulmonary embolism with circulatory collapse
Ann Thorac Surg
2012
, vol. 
94
 
3
(pg. 
785
-
791
)
328
Leacche
M
Unic
D
Goldhaber
SZ
Rawn
JD
Aranki
SF
Couper
GS
Mihaljevic
T
Rizzo
RJ
Cohn
LH
Aklog
L
Byrne
JG
Modern surgical treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: results in 47 consecutive patients after rapid diagnosis and aggressive surgical approach
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2005
, vol. 
129
 
5
(pg. 
1018
-
1023
)
329
Aymard
T
Kadner
A
Widmer
A
Basciani
R
Tevaearai
H
Weber
A
Schmidli
J
Carrel
T
Massive pulmonary embolism: surgical embolectomy versus thrombolytic therapy: should surgical indications be revisited?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
2013
, vol. 
43
 
1
(pg. 
90
-
94
)
330
Fukuda
I
Taniguchi
S
Fukui
K
Minakawa
M
Daitoku
K
Suzuki
Y
Improved outcome of surgical pulmonary embolectomy by aggressive intervention for critically ill patients
Ann Thorac Surg
2011
, vol. 
91
 
3
(pg. 
728
-
732
)
331
Aklog
L
Williams
CS
Byrne
JG
Goldhaber
SZ
Acute pulmonary embolectomy: a contemporary approach
Circulation
2002
, vol. 
105
 
12
(pg. 
1416
-
1419
)
332
Greelish
JP
Leacche
M
Solenkova
NS
Ahmad
RM
Byrne
JG
Improved midterm outcomes for type A (central) pulmonary emboli treated surgically
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2011
, vol. 
142
 
6
(pg. 
1423
-
1429
)
333
Vohra
HA
Whistance
RN
Mattam
K
Kaarne
M
Haw
MP
Barlow
CW
Tsang
GM
Livesey
SA
Ohri
SK
Early and late clinical outcomes of pulmonary embolectomy for acute massive pulmonary embolism
Ann Thorac Surg
2010
, vol. 
90
 
6
(pg. 
1747
-
1752
)
334
Kuo
WT
Gould
MK
Louie
JD
Rosenberg
JK
Sze
DY
Hofmann
LV
Catheter-directed therapy for the treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis of modern techniques
J Vasc Interv Radiol
2009
, vol. 
20
 
11
(pg. 
1431
-
1440
)
335
Engelberger
RP
Kucher
N
Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review
Eur Heart J
2014
, vol. 
35
 
12
(pg. 
758
-
764
)
336
Kucher
N
Boekstegers
P
Müller
OJ
Kupatt
C
Beyer-Westendorf
J
Heitzer
T
Tebbe
U
Horstkotte
J
Müller
R
Blessing
E
Greif
M
Lange
P
Hoffmann
RT
Werth
S
Barmeyer
A
Härtel
D
Grünwald
H
Empen
K
Baumgartner
I
Randomized, controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism
Circulation
2014
, vol. 
129
 
4
(pg. 
479
-
486
)
337
Stein
PD
Matta
F
Keyes
DC
Willyerd
GL
Impact of vena cava filters on in-hospital case fatality rate from pulmonary embolism
Am J Med
2012
, vol. 
125
 
5
(pg. 
478
-
484
)
338
Muriel
A
Jiménez
D
Aujesky
D
Bertoletti
L
Decousus
H
Laporte
S
Mismetti
P
Muñoz
FJ
Yusen
R
Monreal
M
RIETE Investigators
Survival effects of inferior vena cava filter in patients with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism and a significant bleeding risk
J Am Coll Cardiol
2014
, vol. 
63
 
16
(pg. 
1675
-
1683
)
339
Hann
CL
Streiff
MB
The role of vena caval filters in the management of venous thromboembolism
Blood Rev
2005
, vol. 
19
 
4
(pg. 
179
-
202
)
340
Kucher
N
Clinical practice. Deep-vein thrombosis of the upper extremities
N Engl J Med
2011
, vol. 
364
 
9
(pg. 
861
-
869
)
341
PREPIC StudyGroup
Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study
Circulation
2005
, vol. 
112
 
3
(pg. 
416
-
422
)
342
Failla
PJ
Reed
KD
Summer
WR
Karam
GH
Inferior vena caval filters: key considerations
Am J Med Sci
2005
, vol. 
330
 
2
(pg. 
82
-
87
)
343
Zhu
X
Tam
MD
Bartholomew
J
Newman
JS
Sands
MJ
Wang
W
Retrievability and device-related complications of the G2 filter: a retrospective study of 139 filter retrievals
J Vasc Interv Radiol
2011
, vol. 
22
 
6
(pg. 
806
-
812
)
344
Karmy-Jones
R
Jurkovich
GJ
Velmahos
GC
Burdick
T
Spaniolas
K
Todd
SR
McNally
M
Jacoby
RC
Link
D
Janczyk
RJ
Ivascu
FA
McCann
M
Obeid
F
Hoff
WS
McQuay
N
Jr.
Tieu
BH
Schreiber
MA
Nirula
R
Brasel
K
Dunn
JA
Gambrell
D
Huckfeldt
R
Harper
J
Schaffer
KB
Tominaga
GT
Vinces
FY
Sperling
D
Hoyt
D
Coimbra
R
Rosengart
MR
Forsythe
R
Cothren
C
Moore
EE
Haut
ER
Hayanga
AJ
Hird
L
White
C
Grossman
J
Nagy
K
Livaudais
W
Wood
R
Zengerink
I
Kortbeek
JB
Practice patterns and outcomes of retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients: an AAST multicenter study
J Trauma
2007
, vol. 
62
 
1
(pg. 
17
-
24
)
345
Pacouret
G
Alison
D
Pottier
JM
Bertrand
P
Charbonnier
B
Free-floating thrombus and embolic risk in patients with angiographically confirmed proximal deep venous thrombosis. A prospective study
Arch Intern Med
1997
, vol. 
157
 
3
(pg. 
305
-
308
)
346
Squizzato
A
Donadini
MP
Galli
L
Dentali
F
Aujesky
D
Ageno
W
Prognostic clinical prediction rules to identify a low-risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
J Thromb Haemost
2012
, vol. 
10
 
7
(pg. 
1276
-
1290
)
347
Zondag
W
Mos
IC
Creemers-Schild
D
Hoogerbrugge
AD
Dekkers
OM
Dolsma
J
Eijsvogel
M
Faber
LM
Hofstee
HM
Hovens
MM
Jonkers
GJ
van Kralingen
KW
Kruip
MJ
Vlasveld
T
DE Vreede
MJ
Huisman
MV
Outpatient treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: the Hestia Study
J Thromb Haemost
2011
, vol. 
9
 
8
(pg. 
1500
-
1507
)
348
Lankeit
M
Konstantinides
S
Is it time for home treatment of pulmonary embolism?
Eur Respir J
2012
, vol. 
40
 
3
(pg. 
742
-
749
)
349
Otero
R
Uresandi
F
Jiménez
D
Cabezudo
MA
Oribe
M
Nauffal
D
Conget
F
Rodríguez
C
Cayuela
A
Home treatment in pulmonary embolism
Thromb Res
2010
, vol. 
126
 
1
(pg. 
e1
-
e5
)
350
Uresandi
F
Otero
R
Cayuela
A
Cabezudo
MA
Jimenez
D
Laserna
E
Conget
F
Oribe
M
Nauffal
D
[A clinical prediction rule for identifying short-term risk of adverse events in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism]
Arch Bronconeumol
2007
, vol. 
43
 
11
(pg. 
617
-
622
)
351
Zondag
W
Kooiman
J
Klok
FA
Dekkers
OM
Huisman
MV
Outpatient versus inpatient treatment in patients with pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis
Eur Respir J
2013
, vol. 
42
 
1
(pg. 
134
-
144
)
352
Brandjes
DP
Heijboer
H
Büller
HR
de Rijk
M
Jagt
H
ten Cate
JW
Acenocoumarol and heparin compared with acenocoumarol alone in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis
N Engl J Med
1992
, vol. 
327
 
21
(pg. 
1485
-
1489
)
353
Büller
HR
Davidson
BL
Decousus
H
Gallus
A
Gent
M
Piovella
F
Prins
MH
Raskob
G
Segers
AE
Cariou
R
Leeuwenkamp
O
Lensing
AW
Fondaparinux or enoxaparin for the initial treatment of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis: a randomized trial
Ann Intern Med
2004
, vol. 
140
 
11
(pg. 
867
-
873
)
354
Hull
RD
Raskob
GE
Rosenbloom
D
Panju
AA
Brill-Edwards
P
Ginsberg
JS
Hirsh
J
Martin
GJ
Green
D
Heparin for 5 days as compared with 10 days in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis
N Engl J Med
1990
, vol. 
322
 
18
(pg. 
1260
-
1264
)
355
Decousus
H
Leizorovicz
A
Parent
F
Page
Y
Tardy
B
Girard
P
Laporte
S
Faivre
R
Charbonnier
B
Barral
FG
Huet
Y
Simonneau
G
A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group [see comments]
N Engl J Med
1998
, vol. 
338
 
7
(pg. 
409
-
415
)
356
Lee
AY
Rickles
FR
Julian
JA
Gent
M
Baker
RI
Bowden
C
Kakkar
AK
Prins
M
Levine
MN
Randomized comparison of low molecular weight heparin and coumarin derivatives on the survival of patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism
J Clin Oncol
2005
, vol. 
23
 
10
(pg. 
2123
-
2129
)
357
Kakkar
AK
Levine
MN
Kadziola
Z
Lemoine
NR
Low
V
Patel
HK
Rustin
G
Thomas
M
Quigley
M
Williamson
RC
Low molecular weight heparin, therapy with dalteparin, and survival in advanced cancer: the fragmin advanced malignancy outcome study (FAMOUS)
J Clin Oncol
2004
, vol. 
22
 
10
(pg. 
1944
-
1948
)
358
Agnelli
G
Prandoni
P
Becattini
C
Silingardi
M
Taliani
MR
Miccio
M
Imberti
D
Poggio
R
Ageno
W
Pogliani
E
Porro
F
Zonzin
P
Extended oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of pulmonary embolism
Ann Intern Med
2003
, vol. 
139
 
1
(pg. 
19
-
25
)
359
Murin
S
Romano
PS
White
RH
Comparison of outcomes after hospitalization for deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
Thromb Haemost
2002
, vol. 
88
 
3
(pg. 
407
-
414
)
360
Schulman
S
Granqvist
S
Holmström
M
Carlsson
A
Lindmarker
P
Nicol
P
Eklund
SG
Nordlander
S
Lärfars
G
Leijd
B
Linder
O
Loogna
E
The duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a second episode of venous thromboembolism. The Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group
N Engl J Med
1997
, vol. 
336
 
6
(pg. 
393
-
398
)
361
Schulman
S
The effect of the duration of anticoagulation and other risk factors on the recurrence of venous thromboembolisms. Duration of Anticoagulation Study Group
Wien Med Wochenschr
1999
, vol. 
149
 
2–4
(pg. 
66
-
69
)
362
Douketis
JD
Gu
CS
Schulman
S
Ghirarduzzi
A
Pengo
V
Prandoni
P
The risk for fatal pulmonary embolism after discontinuing anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism
Ann Intern Med
2007
, vol. 
147
 
11
(pg. 
766
-
774
)
363
Schulman
S
Rhedin
AS
Lindmarker
P
Carlsson
A
Lärfars
G
Nicol
P
Loogna
E
Svensson
E
Ljungberg
B
Walter
H
A comparison of six weeks with six months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism. Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group
N Engl J Med
1995
, vol. 
332
 
25
(pg. 
1661
-
1665
)
364
Joung
S
Robinson
B
Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients in Christchurch, 1995–1999
N Z Med J 2002
, vol. 
115
 
1155
(pg. 
257
-
260
)
365
Hutten
BA
Prins
MH
Gent
M
Ginsberg
J
Tijssen
JG
Büller
HR
Incidence of recurrent thromboembolic and bleeding complications among patients with venous thromboembolism in relation to both malignancy and achieved international normalized ratio: a retrospective analysis
J Clin Oncol
2000
, vol. 
18
 
17
(pg. 
3078
-
3083
)
366
Grifoni
S
Vanni
S
Magazzini
S
Olivotto
I
Conti
A
Zanobetti
M
Polidori
G
Pieralli
F
Peiman
N
Becattini
C
Agnelli
G
Association of persistent right ventricular dysfunction at hospital discharge after acute pulmonary embolism with recurrent thromboembolic events
Arch Intern Med
2006
, vol. 
166
 
19
(pg. 
2151
-
2156
)
367
Palareti
G
Cosmi
B
Legnani
C
Tosetto
A
Brusi
C
Iorio
A
Pengo
V
Ghirarduzzi
A
Pattacini
C
Testa
S
Lensing
AW
Tripodi
A
D-dimer testing to determine the duration of anticoagulation therapy
N Engl J Med
2006
, vol. 
355
 
17
(pg. 
1780
-
1789
)
368
Becattini
C
Agnelli
G
Schenone
A
Eichinger
S
Bucherini
E
Silingardi
M
Bianchi
M
Moia
M
Ageno
W
Vandelli
MR
Grandone
E
Prandoni
P
Aspirin for preventing the recurrence of venous thromboembolism
N Engl J Med
2012
, vol. 
366
 
21
(pg. 
1959
-
1967
)
369
Brighton
TA
Eikelboom
JW
Mann
K
Mister
R
Gallus
A
Ockelford
P
Gibbs
H
Hague
W
Xavier
D
Diaz
R
Kirby
A
Simes
J
Low-dose aspirin for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism
N Engl J Med
2012
, vol. 
367
 
21
(pg. 
1979
-
1987
)
370
Schulman
S
Kearon
C
Kakkar
AK
Schellong
S
Eriksson
H
Baanstra
D
Kvamme
AM
Friedman
J
Mismetti
P
Goldhaber
SZ
Extended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism
N Engl J Med
2013
, vol. 
368
 
8
(pg. 
709
-
718
)
371
Agnelli
G
Büller
HR
Cohen
A
Curto
M
Gallus
AS
Johnson
M
Porcari
A
Raskob
GE
Weitz
JI
Apixaban for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism
N Engl J Med
2013
, vol. 
368
 
8
(pg. 
699
-
708
)
372
Levine
MN
Hirsh
J
Gent
M
Turpie
AG
Weitz
J
Ginsberg
J
Geerts
W
LeClerc
J
Neemeh
J
Powers
P
Optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy: a randomized trial comparing four weeks with three months of warfarin in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis
Thromb Haemost
1995
, vol. 
74
 
2
(pg. 
606
-
611
)
373
Optimum duration of anticoagulation for deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
Research Committee of the British Thoracic Society
Lancet
1992
, vol. 
340
 
8824
(pg. 
873
-
876
)
374
Campbell
IA
Bentley
DP
Prescott
RJ
Routledge
PA
Shetty
HG
Williamson
IJ
Anticoagulation for three versus six months in patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, or both: randomised trial
BMJ
2007
, vol. 
334
 
(7595):674
375
Kearon
C
Gent
M
Hirsh
J
Weitz
J
Kovacs
MJ
Anderson
DR
Turpie
AG
Green
D
Ginsberg
JS
Wells
P
MacKinnon
B
Julian
JA
A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1999 Jul 22;341(4):298]
N Engl J Med
1999
, vol. 
340
 
12
(pg. 
901
-
907
)
376
Akl
EA
Labedi
N
Barba
M
Terrenato
I
Sperati
F
Muti
P
Schunemann
H
Anticoagulation for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2011
6
 
CD006650
377
Akl
EA
Vasireddi
SR
Gunukula
S
Barba
M
Sperati
F
Terrenato
I
Muti
P
Schünemann
H
Anticoagulation for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2011
, vol. 
(4)
  
CD006649
378
Pepke-Zaba
J
Jansa
P
Kim
NH
Naeije
R
Simonneau
G
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: role of medical therapy
Eur Respir J
2013
, vol. 
41
 
4
(pg. 
985
-
990
)
379
Galiè
N
Hoeper
MM
Humbert
M
Torbicki
A
Vachiery
JL
Barbera
JA
Beghetti
M
Corris
P
Gaine
S
Gibbs
JS
Gomez-Sanchez
MA
Jondeau
G
Klepetko
W
Opitz
C
Peacock
A
Rubin
L
Zellweger
M
Simonneau
G
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension
Eur Respir J
2009
, vol. 
34
 
6
(pg. 
1219
-
1263
)
380
Simonneau
G
Gatzoulis
MA
Adatia
I
Celermajer
D
Denton
C
Ghofrani
A
Gomez Sanchez
MA
Krishna Kumar
R
Landzberg
M
Machado
RF
Olschewski
H
Robbins
IM
Souza
R
Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension
J Am Coll Cardiol
2013
, vol. 
62
 
25 Suppl
(pg. 
D34
-
D41
)
381
Lang
IM
Pesavento
R
Bonderman
D
Yuan
JX
Risk factors and basic mechanisms of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a current understanding
Eur Respir J
2013
, vol. 
41
 
2
(pg. 
462
-
468
)
382
Lang
IM
Simonneau
G
Pepke-Zaba
JW
Mayer
E
Ambrož
D
Blanco
I
Torbicki
A
Mellemkjaer
S
Yaici
A
Delcroix
M
Factors associated with diagnosis and operability of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. A case-control study
Thromb Haemost
2013
, vol. 
110
 
(1):83-91
383
Wong
CL
Szydlo
R
Gibbs
S
Laffan
M
Hereditary and acquired thrombotic risk factors for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis
2010
, vol. 
21
 
3
(pg. 
201
-
206
)
384
Bonderman
D
Jakowitsch
J
Redwan
B
Bergmeister
H
Renner
MK
Panzenbock
H
Adlbrecht
C
Georgopoulos
A
Klepetko
W
Kneussl
M
Lang
IM
Role for staphylococci in misguided thrombus resolution of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
2008
, vol. 
28
 
4
(pg. 
678
-
684
)
385
Quarck
R
Nawrot
T
Meyns
B
Delcroix
M
C-reactive protein: a new predictor of adverse outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension
J Am Coll Cardiol
2009
, vol. 
53
 
14
(pg. 
1211
-
1218
)
386
Firth
AL
Yao
W
Ogawa
A
Madani
MM
Lin
GY
Yuan
JX
Multipotent mesenchymal progenitor cells are present in endarterectomized tissues from patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol
2010
, vol. 
298
 
(5):C1217–C1225
387
Yao
W
Firth
AL
Sacks
RS
Ogawa
A
Auger
WR
Fedullo
PF
Madani
MM
Lin
GY
Sakakibara
N
Thistlethwaite
PA
Jamieson
SW
Rubin
LJ
Yuan
JX
Identification of putative endothelial progenitor cells (CD34+CD133+Flk-1+) in endarterectomized tissue of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
2009
, vol. 
296
 
(6):L870–L878
388
Morris
TA
Marsh
JJ
Chiles
PG
Magaña
MM
Liang
NC
Soler
X
Desantis
DJ
Ngo
D
Woods
VL
Jr.
High prevalence of dysfibrinogenemia among patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Blood
2009
, vol. 
114
 
9
(pg. 
1929
-
1936
)
389
Bonderman
D
Skoro-Sajer
N
Jakowitsch
J
Adlbrecht
C
Dunkler
D
Taghavi
S
Klepetko
W
Kneussl
M
Lang
IM
Predictors of outcome in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Circulation
2007
, vol. 
115
 
16
(pg. 
2153
-
2158
)
390
Delcroix
M
Vonk Noordegraaf
A
Fadel
E
Lang
I
Simonneau
G
Naeije
R
Vascular and right ventricular remodelling in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Eur Respir J
2013
, vol. 
41
 
1
(pg. 
224
-
232
)
391
Madani
MM
Auger
WR
Pretorius
V
Sakakibara
N
Kerr
KM
Kim
NH
Fedullo
PF
Jamieson
SW
Pulmonary endarterectomy: recent changes in a single institution's experience of more than 2,700 patients
Ann Thorac Surg
2012
, vol. 
94
 
1
(pg. 
97
-
103
)
392
Pepke-Zaba
J
Delcroix
M
Lang
I
Mayer
E
Jansa
P
Ambrož
D
Treacy
C
D'Armini
AM
Morsolini
M
Snijder
R
Bresser
P
Torbicki
A
Kristensen
B
Lewczuk
J
Simkova
I
Barberà
JA
de Perrot
M
Hoeper
MM
Gaine
S
Speich
R
Gomez-Sanchez
MA
Kovacs
G
Hamid
AM
Jaïs
X
Simonneau
G
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): results from an international prospective registry
Circulation
2011
, vol. 
124
 
18
(pg. 
1973
-
1981
)
393
Berger
RM
Beghetti
M
Humpl
T
Raskob
GE
Ivy
DD
Jing
ZC
Bonnet
D
Schulze-Neick
I
Barst
RJ
Clinical features of paediatric pulmonary hypertension: a registry study
Lancet
2012
, vol. 
379
 
9815
(pg. 
537
-
546
)
394
Beghetti
M
Berger
RM
Schulze-Neick
I
Day
RW
Pulido
T
Feinstein
J
Barst
RJ
Humpl
T
Diagnostic evaluation of paediatric pulmonary hypertension in current clinical practice
Eur Respir J
2013
, vol. 
42
 
3
(pg. 
689
-
700
)
395
Tunariu
N
Gibbs
SJ
Win
Z
Gin-Sing
W
Graham
A
Gishen
P
Al-Nahhas
A
Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is more sensitive than multidetector CTPA in detecting chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease as a treatable cause of pulmonary hypertension
J Nucl Med
2007
, vol. 
48
 
5
(pg. 
680
-
684
)
396
Seferian
A
Helal
B
Jaïs
X
Girerd
B
Price
LC
Günther
S
Savale
L
Dorfmüller
P
Parent
F
Sitbon
O
Humbert
M
Simonneau
G
Montani
D
Ventilation/perfusion lung scan in pulmonary veno-occlusive disease
Eur Respir J
2012
, vol. 
40
 
1
(pg. 
75
-
83
)
397
Lang
IM
Plank
C
Sadushi-Kolici
R
Jakowitsch
J
Klepetko
W
Maurer
G
Imaging in pulmonary hypertension
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
2010
, vol. 
3
 
12
(pg. 
1287
-
1295
)
398
Mayer
E
Jenkins
D
Lindner
J
D'Armini
A
Kloek
J
Meyns
B
Ilkjaer
LB
Klepetko
W
Delcroix
M
Lang
I
Pepke-Zaba
J
Simonneau
G
Dartevelle
P
Surgical management and outcome of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: results from an international prospective registry
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2011
, vol. 
141
 
3
(pg. 
702
-
710
)
399
Cummings
KW
Bhalla
S
Multidetector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography: beyond acute pulmonary embolism
Radiol Clin North Am
2010
, vol. 
48
 
1
(pg. 
51
-
65
)
400
Sherrick
AD
Swensen
SJ
Hartman
TE
Mosaic pattern of lung attenuation on CT scans: frequency among patients with pulmonary artery hypertension of different causes
AJR Am J Roentgenol
1997
, vol. 
169
 
1
(pg. 
79
-
82
)
401
Ley
S
Ley-Zaporozhan
J
Pitton
MB
Schneider
J
Wirth
GM
Mayer
E
Düber
C
Kreitner
KF
Diagnostic performance of state-of-the-art imaging techniques for morphological assessment of vascular abnormalities in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)
Eur Radiol
2012
, vol. 
22
 
3
(pg. 
607
-
616
)
402
Shure
D
Gregoratos
G
Moser
KM
Fiberoptic angioscopy: role in the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary arterial obstruction
Ann Intern Med
1985
, vol. 
103
 
6) (Pt 1
(pg. 
844
-
850
)
403
Jenkins
DP
Madani
M
Mayer
E
Kerr
K
Kim
N
Klepetko
W
Morsolini
M
Dartevelle
P
Surgical treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Eur Respir J
2013
, vol. 
41
 
3
(pg. 
735
-
742
)
404
Vuylsteke
A
Sharples
L
Charman
G
Kneeshaw
J
Tsui
S
Dunning
J
Wheaton
E
Klein
A
Arrowsmith
J
Hall
R
Jenkins
D
Circulatory arrest versus cerebral perfusion during pulmonary endarterectomy surgery (PEACOG): a randomised controlled trial
Lancet
2011
, vol. 
378
 
9800
(pg. 
1379
-
1387
)
405
Mizoguchi
H
Ogawa
A
Munemasa
M
Mikouchi
H
Ito
H
Matsubara
H
Refined balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
2012
, vol. 
5
 
6
(pg. 
748
-
755
)
406
Andreassen
AK
Ragnarsson
A
Gude
E
Geiran
O
Andersen
R
Balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Heart
2013
, vol. 
99
 
19
(pg. 
1415
-
20
)
407
Inami
T
Kataoka
M
Shimura
N
Ishiguro
H
Yanagisawa
R
Taguchi
H
Fukuda
K
Yoshino
H
Satoh
T
Pulmonary Edema Predictive Scoring Index (PEPSI), a New Index to Predict Risk of Reperfusion Pulmonary Edema and Improvement of Hemodynamics in Percutaneous Transluminal Pulmonary Angioplasty
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
2013
, vol. 
6
 
7
(pg. 
725
-
736
)
408
Kataoka
M
Inami
T
Hayashida
K
Shimura
N
Ishiguro
H
Abe
T
Tamura
Y
Ando
M
Fukuda
K
Yoshino
H
Satoh
T
Percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
2012
, vol. 
5
 
6
(pg. 
756
-
762
)
409
Pepke-Zaba
J
Jansa
P
Kim
NH
Naejie
R
Simonneau
G
Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Role of medical therapy
Eur Respir J
2013
, vol. 
41
 
4
(pg. 
985
-
90
)
410
Jais
X
D'Armini
AM
Jansa
P
Torbicki
A
Delcroix
M
Ghofrani
HA
Hoeper
MM
Lang
IM
Mayer
E
Pepke-Zaba
J
Perchenet
L
Morganti
A
Simonneau
G
Rubin
LJ
Bosentan for treatment of inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: BENEFiT (Bosentan Effects in iNopErable Forms of chronIc Thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
2008
, vol. 
52
 
25
(pg. 
2127
-
2134
)
411
Ghofrani
HA
D'Armini
AM
Grimminger
F
Hoeper
MM
Jansa
P
Kim
NH
Mayer
E
Simonneau
G
Wilkins
MR
Fritsch
A
Neuser
D
Weimann
G
Wang
C
Riociguat for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
N Engl J Med
2013
, vol. 
369
 
4
(pg. 
319
-
329
)
412
Kim
NH
Delcroix
M
Jenkins
DP
Channick
R
Dartevelle
P
Jansa
P
Lang
I
Madani
MM
Ogino
H
Pengo
V
Mayer
E
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
J Am Coll Cardiol
2013
, vol. 
62
 
(25 Suppl)
 
D92–D99
413
Jamieson
SW
Kapelanski
DP
Sakakibara
N
Manecke
GR
Thistlethwaite
PA
Kerr
KM
Channick
RN
Fedullo
PF
Auger
WR
Pulmonary endarterectomy: experience and lessons learned in 1,500 cases
Ann Thorac Surg
2003
, vol. 
76
 
5
(pg. 
1457
-
1462
)
414
Rubin
LJ
Hoeper
MM
Klepetko
W
Galiè
N
Lang
IM
Simonneau
G
Current and future management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: from diagnosis to treatment responses
Proc Am Thorac Soc
2006
, vol. 
3
 
7
(pg. 
601
-
607
)
415
Sullivan
EA
Ford
JB
Chambers
G
Slaytor
EK
Maternal mortality in Australia, 1973–1996
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
, vol. 
2004
 
5
(pg. 
452
-
457
44
416
Regitz-Zagrosek
V
Blomstrom
LC
Borghi
C
Cifkova
R
Ferreira
R
Foidart
JM
Gibbs
JS
Gohlke-Baerwolf
C
Gorenek
B
Iung
B
Kirby
M
Maas
AH
Morais
J
Nihoyannopoulos
P
Pieper
PG
Presbitero
P
Roos-Hesselink
JW
Schaufelberger
M
Seeland
U
Torracca
L
ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Eur Heart J
2011
, vol. 
32
 
24
(pg. 
3147
-
3197
)
417
O'Connor
C
Moriarty
J
Walsh
J
Murray
J
Coulter-Smith
S
Boyd
W
The application of a clinical risk stratification score may reduce unnecessary investigations for pulmonary embolism in pregnancy
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
2011
, vol. 
24
 
12
(pg. 
1461
-
1464
)
418
Chan
WS
Chunilal
S
Lee
A
Crowther
M
Rodger
M
Ginsberg
JS
A red blood cell agglutination D-dimer test to exclude deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy
Ann Intern Med
2007
, vol. 
147
 
3
(pg. 
165
-
170
)
419
Chan
WS
Lee
A
Spencer
FA
Chunilal
S
Crowther
M
Wu
W
Johnston
M
Rodger
M
Ginsberg
JS
D-dimer testing in pregnant patients: towards determining the next 'level' in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis
J Thromb Haemost
2010
, vol. 
8
 
5
(pg. 
1004
-
1011
)
420
Ginsberg
JS
Hirsh
J
Rainbow
AJ
Coates
G
Risks to the fetus of radiologic procedures used in the diagnosis of maternal venous thromboembolic disease
Thromb Haemost
1989
, vol. 
61
 
2
(pg. 
189
-
196
)
421
Einstein
AJ
Henzlova
MJ
Rajagopalan
S
Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography
JAMA
2007
, vol. 
298
 
3
(pg. 
317
-
323
)
422
Revel
MP
Cohen
S
Sanchez
O
Collignon
MA
Thiam
R
Redheuil
A
Meyer
G
Frija
G
Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: diagnosis with lung scintigraphy or CT angiography?
Radiology
2011
, vol. 
258
 
2
(pg. 
590
-
598
)
423
Shahir
K
Goodman
LR
Tali
A
Thorsen
KM
Hellman
RS
Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: CT pulmonary angiography versus perfusion scanning
AJR Am J Roentgenol
2010
, vol. 
195
 
(3):W214–W220
424
Cahill
AG
Stout
MJ
Macones
GA
Bhalla
S
Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy using computed-tomographic angiography or ventilation-perfusion
Obstet Gynecol
2009
, vol. 
114
 
1
(pg. 
124
-
129
)
425
Ridge
CA
McDermott
S
Freyne
BJ
Brennan
DJ
Collins
CD
Skehan
SJ
Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: comparison of pulmonary CT angiography and lung scintigraphy
AJR Am J Roentgenol
2009
, vol. 
193
 
5
(pg. 
1223
-
1227
)
426
Scarsbrook
AF
Bradley
KM
Gleeson
FV
Perfusion scintigraphy: diagnostic utility in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolic disease
Eur Radiol
2007
, vol. 
17
 
10
(pg. 
2554
-
2560
)
427
Chan
WS
Ray
JG
Murray
S
Coady
GE
Coates
G
Ginsberg
JS
Suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: clinical presentation, results of lung scanning, and subsequent maternal and pediatric outcomes
Arch Intern Med
2002
, vol. 
162
 
10
(pg. 
1170
-
1175
)
428
Balan
KK
Critchley
M
Vedavathy
KK
Smith
ML
Vinjamuri
S
The value of ventilation-perfusion imaging in pregnancy
Br J Radiol
1997
, vol. 
70
 
832
(pg. 
338
-
340
)
429
Bourjeily
G
Khalil
H
Raker
C
Martin
S
Auger
P
Chalhoub
M
Larson
L
Miller
M
Outcomes of negative multi-detector computed tomography with pulmonary angiography in pregnant women suspected of pulmonary embolism
Lung
2012
, vol. 
190
 
1
(pg. 
105
-
111
)
430
Bajc
M
Neilly
JB
Miniati
M
Schuemichen
C
Meignan
M
Jonson
B
EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy : Part 1. Pulmonary imaging with ventilation/perfusion single photon emission tomography
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
2009
, vol. 
36
 
8
(pg. 
1356
-
1370
)
431
Chunilal
SD
Bates
SM
Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and prevention
Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
101
 
3
(pg. 
428
-
438
)
432
Romualdi
E
Dentali
F
Rancan
E
Squizzato
A
Steidl
L
Middeldorp
S
Ageno
W
Anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature
J Thromb Haemost
2013
, vol. 
11
 
2
(pg. 
270
-
281
)
433
Greer
IA
Nelson-Piercy
C
Low-molecular-weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: a systematic review of safety and efficacy
Blood
2005
, vol. 
106
 
2
(pg. 
401
-
407
)
434
Rodie
VA
Thomson
AJ
Stewart
FM
Quinn
AJ
Walker
ID
Greer
IA
Low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: a case series
BJOG
2002
, vol. 
109
 
9
(pg. 
1020
-
1024
)
435
Lepercq
J
Conard
J
Borel-Derlon
A
Darmon
JY
Boudignat
O
Francoual
C
Priollet
P
Cohen
C
Yvelin
N
Schved
JF
Tournaire
M
Borg
JY
Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy: a retrospective study of enoxaparin safety in 624 pregnancies
BJOG
2001
, vol. 
108
 
11
(pg. 
1134
-
1140
)
436
Bates
SM
Greer
IA
Middeldorp
S
Veenstra
DL
Prabulos
AM
Vandvik
PO
VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest
2012
, vol. 
141
 
2 Suppl
(pg. 
e691S
-
e736S
)
437
Segal
JB
Streiff
MB
Hofmann
LV
Thornton
K
Bass
EB
Management of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review for a practice guideline
Ann Intern Med
2007
, vol. 
146
 
3
(pg. 
211
-
222
)
438
Leonhardt
G
Gaul
C
Nietsch
HH
Buerke
M
Schleussner
E
Thrombolytic therapy in pregnancy
J Thromb Thrombolysis
2006
, vol. 
21
 
3
(pg. 
271
-
276
)
439
Cronin-Fenton
DP
Søndergaard
F
Pedersen
LA
Fryzek
JP
Cetin
K
Acquavella
J
Baron
JA
Sørensen
HT
Hospitalisation for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients and the general population: a population-based cohort study in Denmark, 1997–2006
Br J Cancer
2010
, vol. 
103
 
7
(pg. 
947
-
953
)
440
Palumbo
A
Cavo
M
Bringhen
S
Zamagni
E
Romano
A
Patriarca
F
Rossi
D
Gentilini
F
Crippa
C
Galli
M
Nozzoli
C
Ria
R
Marasca
R
Montefusco
V
Baldini
L
Elice
F
Callea
V
Pulini
S
Carella
AM
Zambello
R
Benevolo
G
Magarotto
V
Tacchetti
P
Pescosta
N
Cellini
C
Polloni
C
Evangelista
A
Caravita
T
Morabito
F
Offidani
M
Tosi
P
Boccadoro
M
Aspirin, warfarin, or enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide: a phase III, open-label, randomized trial
J Clin Oncol
2011
, vol. 
29
 
8
(pg. 
986
-
993
)
441
Akl
EA
Vasireddi
SR
Gunukula
S
Yosuico
VE
Barba
M
Sperati
F
Cook
D
Schünemann
H
Anticoagulation for patients with cancer and central venous catheters
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2011
, vol. 
(4)
  
CD006468
442
Sweetland
S
Green
J
Liu
B
Berrington de Gonzáles
A
Canonico
M
Reeves
G
Beral
V
Duration and magnitude of the postoperative risk of venous thromboembolism in middle aged women: prospective cohort study
BMJ
2009
, vol. 
339
 pg. 
b4583
 
443
Douma
RA
van Sluis
GL
Kamphuisen
PW
Sohne
M
Leebeek
FW
Bossuyt
PM
Büller
HR
Clinical decision rule and D-dimer have lower clinical utility to exclude pulmonary embolism in cancer patients. Explanations and potential ameliorations
Thromb Haemost
2010
, vol. 
104
 
4
(pg. 
831
-
836
)
444
Dentali
F
Ageno
W
Becattini
C
Galli
L
Gianni
M
Riva
N
Imberti
D
Squizzato
A
Venco
A
Agnelli
G
Prevalence and clinical history of incidental, asymptomatic pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis
Thromb Res
2010
, vol. 
125
 
6
(pg. 
518
-
522
)
445
Engelke
C
Manstein
P
Rummeny
EJ
Marten
K
Suspected and incidental pulmonary embolism on multidetector-row CT: analysis of technical and morphological factors influencing the diagnosis in a cross-sectional cancer centre patient cohort
Clin Radiol
2006
, vol. 
61
 
1
(pg. 
71
-
80
)
446
Paddon
AJ
Incidental pulmonary embolism detected by routine CT in patients with cancer
Cancer Imaging
2005
, vol. 
5
 
1
(pg. 
25
-
26
)
447
den Exter
PL
Hooijer
J
Dekkers
OM
Huisman
MV
Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism and mortality in patients with cancer incidentally diagnosed with pulmonary embolism: a comparison with symptomatic patients
J Clin Oncol
2011
, vol. 
29
 
17
(pg. 
2405
-
2409
)
448
Abdel-Razeq
HN
Mansour
AH
Ismael
YM
Incidental pulmonary embolism in cancer patients: clinical characteristics and outcome: a comprehensive cancer center experience
Vasc Health Risk Manag
2011
, vol. 
7
 (pg. 
153
-
158
)
449
Sun
JM
Kim
TS
Lee
J
Park
YH
Ahn
JS
Kim
H
Kwon
OJ
Lee
KS
Park
K
Ahn
MJ
Unsuspected pulmonary emboli in lung cancer patients: the impact on survival and the significance of anticoagulation therapy
Lung Cancer
2010
, vol. 
69
 
3
(pg. 
330
-
336
)
450
Ruíz-Giménez
N
Suárez
C
González
R
Nieto
JA
Todolí
JA
Samperiz
AL
Monreal
M
Predictive variables for major bleeding events in patients presenting with documented acute venous thromboembolism. Findings from the RIETE Registry
Thromb Haemost
2008
, vol. 
100
 
1
(pg. 
26
-
31
)
451
Nieto
JA
Camara
T
Gonzalez-Higueras
E
Ruiz-Gimenez
N
Guijarro
R
Marchena
PJ
Monreal
M
RIETE
I
Clinical outcome of patients with major bleeding after venous thromboembolism. Findings from the RIETE Registry
Thromb Haemost
2008
, vol. 
100
 
5
(pg. 
789
-
796
)
452
Levitan
N
Dowlati
A
Remick
SC
Tahsildar
HI
Sivinski
LD
Beyth
R
Rimm
AA
Rates of initial and recurrent thromboembolic disease among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy. Risk analysis using Medicare claims data
Medicine (Baltimore)
1999
, vol. 
78
 
5
(pg. 
285
-
291
)
453
Louzada
ML
Carrier
M
Lazo-Langner
A
Dao
V
Kovacs
MJ
Ramsay
TO
Rodger
MA
Zhang
J
Lee
AY
Meyer
G
Wells
PS
Development of a clinical prediction rule for risk stratification of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism
Circulation
2012
, vol. 
126
 
4
(pg. 
448
-
454
)
454
Trujillo-Santos
J
Nieto
JA
Tiberio
G
Piccioli
A
Di Micco
P
Prandoni
P
Monreal
M
Predicting recurrences or major bleeding in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism. Findings from the RIETE Registry
Thromb Haemost
2008
, vol. 
100
 
3
(pg. 
435
-
439
)
455
Carrier
M
Le Gal
G
Cho
R
Tierney
S
Rodger
M
Lee
AY
Dose escalation of low molecular weight heparin to manage recurrent venous thromboembolic events despite systemic anticoagulation in cancer patients
J Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
7
 
5
(pg. 
760
-
765
)
456
Barginear
MF
Gralla
RJ
Bradley
TP
Ali
SS
Shapira
I
Greben
C
Nier-Shoulson
N
Akerman
M
Lesser
M
Budman
DR
Investigating the benefit of adding a vena cava filter to anticoagulation with fondaparinux sodium in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism in a prospective randomized clinical trial
Support Care Cancer
2012
, vol. 
20
 
11
(pg. 
2865
-
2872
)
457
Trujillo-Santos
J
Prandoni
P
Rivron-Guillot
K
Román
P
Sánchez
R
Tiberio
G
Monreal
M
Clinical outcome in patients with venous thromboembolism and hidden cancer: findings from the RIETE Registry
J Thromb Haemost
2008
, vol. 
6
 
2
(pg. 
251
-
255
)
458
Sørensen
HT
Svaerke
C
Farkas
DK
Christiansen
CF
Pedersen
L
Lash
TL
Prandoni
P
Baron
JA
Superficial and deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and subsequent risk of cancer
Eur J Cancer
2012
, vol. 
48
 
4
(pg. 
586
-
593
)
459
Di Nisio
M
Otten
HM
Piccioli
A
Lensing
AW
Prandoni
P
Büller
HR
Prins
MH
Decision analysis for cancer screening in idiopathic venous thromboembolism
J Thromb Haemost
2005
, vol. 
3
 
11
(pg. 
2391
-
2396
)
460
van Doormaal
FF
Terpstra
W
Van Der Griend
R
Prins
MH
Nijziel
MR
Van De Ree
MA
Büller
HR
Dutilh
JC
ten Cate-Hoek
A
Van Den Heiligenberg
SM
Van Der Meer
J
Otten
JM
Is extensive screening for cancer in idiopathic venous thromboembolism warranted?
J Thromb Haemost
2011
, vol. 
9
 
1
(pg. 
79
-
84
)
461
Farge
D
Debourdeau
P
Beckers
M
Baglin
C
Bauersachs
RM
Brenner
B
Brilhante
D
Falanga
A
Gerotzafias
GT
Haim
N
Kakkar
AK
Khorana
AA
Lecumberri
R
Mandala
M
Marty
M
Monreal
M
Mousa
SA
Noble
S
Pabinger
I
Prandoni
P
Prins
MH
Qari
MH
Streiff
MB
Syrigos
K
Bounameaux
H
Büller
HR
International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
J Thromb Haemost
2013
, vol. 
11
 
1
(pg. 
56
-
70
)
462
Mandala
M
Falanga
A
Roila
F
ESMO Guidelines Working Group
Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines
Ann Oncol
2011
22 Suppl 6
 
vi85–vi92
463
Paddon
AJ
Incidental pulmonary embolism detected by routine CT in patients with cancer
Cancer Imaging
2005
, vol. 
5
 
1
(pg. 
25
-
26
)
464
Montagnana
M
Cervellin
G
Franchini
M
Lippi
G
Pathophysiology, clinics and diagnostics of non-thrombotic pulmonary embolism
J Thromb Thrombolysis
2011
, vol. 
31
 
4
(pg. 
436
-
444
)
465
Bach
AG
Restrepo
CS
Abbas
J
Villanueva
A
Lorenzo Dus
MJ
Schöpf
R
Imanaka
H
Lehmkuhl
L
Tsang
FH
Saad
FF
Lau
E
Rubio Alvarez
J
Battal
B
Behrmann
C
Spielmann
RP
Surov
A
Imaging of nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism: biological materials, nonbiological materials, and foreign bodies
Eur J Radiol
2013
, vol. 
82
 
(3):e120–e141
466
Sakuma
M
Sugimura
K
Nakamura
M
Takahashi
T
Kitamukai
O
Yazu
T
Yamada
N
Ota
M
Kobayashi
T
Nakano
T
Shirato
K
Unusual pulmonary embolism: septic pulmonary embolism and amniotic fluid embolism
Circ J
2007
, vol. 
71
 
5
(pg. 
772
-
775
)
467
Wolf
F
Schernthaner
RE
Dirisamer
A
Schoder
M
Funovics
M
Kettenbach
J
Langenberger
H
Stadler
A
Loewe
C
Lammer
J
Cejna
M
Endovascular management of lost or misplaced intravascular objects: experiences of 12 years
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
2008
, vol. 
31
 
3
(pg. 
563
-
568
)
468
Parisi
DM
Koval
K
Egol
K
Fat embolism syndrome
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)
2002
, vol. 
31
 
9
(pg. 
507
-
512
)
469
Jorens
PG
Van
ME
Snoeckx
A
Parizel
PM
Nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism
Eur Respir J
2009
, vol. 
34
 
2
(pg. 
452
-
474
)
470
Lin
CC
Liu
PH
Kao
SJ
Chen
HI
Effects of phorbol myristate acetate and sivelestat on the lung injury caused by fat embolism in isolated lungs
J Biomed Sci
2012
, vol. 
19
 pg. 
3
 
471
Orebaugh
SL
Venous air embolism: clinical and experimental considerations
Crit Care Med
1992
, vol. 
20
 
8
(pg. 
1169
-
1177
)
472
Muth
CM
Shank
ES
Gas embolism
N Engl J Med
2000
, vol. 
342
 
7
(pg. 
476
-
482
)
473
Knight
M
Berg
C
Brocklehurst
P
Kramer
M
Lewis
G
Oats
J
Roberts
CL
Spong
C
Sullivan
E
van Roosmalen
J
Zwart
J
Amniotic fluid embolism incidence, risk factors and outcomes: a review and recommendations
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
2012
, vol. 
12
 pg. 
7
 
474
Roberts
KE
Hamele-Bena
D
Saqi
A
Stein
CA
Cole
RP
Pulmonary tumor embolism: a review of the literature
Am J Med
2003
, vol. 
115
 
3
(pg. 
228
-
232
)

Author notes

ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG): Jose Luis Zamorano (Chairperson) (Spain), Stephan Achenbach (Germany), Helmut Baumgartner (Germany), Jeroen J. Bax (Netherlands), Hector Bueno (Spain), Veronica Dean (France), Christi Deaton (UK), Çetin Erol (Turkey), Robert Fagard (Belgium), Roberto Ferrari (Italy), David Hasdai (Israel), Arno Hoes (Netherlands), Paulus Kirchhof (Germany/UK), Juhani Knuuti (Finland), Philippe Kolh (Belgium), Patrizio Lancellotti (Belgium), Ales Linhart (Czech Republic), Petros Nihoyannopoulos (UK), Massimo F. Piepoli (Italy), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Per Anton Sirnes (Norway), Juan Luis Tamargo (Spain), Michal Tendera (Poland), Adam Torbicki (Poland), William Wijns (Belgium), Stephan Windecker (Switzerland).

Document Reviewers: Çetin Erol (CPG Review Coordinator) (Turkey), David Jimenez (Review Coordinator) (Spain), Walter Ageno (Italy), Stefan Agewall (Norway), Riccardo Asteggiano (Italy), Rupert Bauersachs (Germany), Cecilia Becattini (Italy), Henri Bounameaux (Switzerland), Harry R. Bü ller (Netherlands), Constantinos H. Davos (Greece), Christi Deaton (UK), Geert-Jan Geersing (Netherlands), Miguel Angel Gómez Sanchez (Spain), Jeroen Hendriks (Netherlands), Arno Hoes (Netherlands), Mustafa Kilickap (Turkey), Viacheslav Mareev (Russia), Manuel Monreal (Spain), Joao Morais (Portugal), Petros Nihoyannopoulos (UK), Bogdan A. Popescu (Romania), Olivier Sanchez (France), Alex C. Spyropoulos (USA).

The disclosure forms provided by the experts involved in the development of these guidelines are available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines.

Representing the European Respiratory Society

Other ESC entities having participated in the development of this document:

ESC Associations: Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA), European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), Heart Failure Association (HFA), ESC Councils: Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (CCNAP), Council for Cardiology Practice (CCP), Council on Cardiovascular Primary Care (CCPC)

ESC Working Groups: Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac Computed Tomography, Peripheral Circulation, Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function, Thrombosis.

Disclaimer: The ESC Guidelines represent the views of the ESC and were produced after careful consideration of the scientific and medical knowledge and the evidence available at the time of their publication.

The ESC is not responsible in the event of any contradiction, discrepancy and/or ambiguity between the ESC Guidelines and any other official recommendations or guidelines issued by the relevant public health authorities, in particular in relation to good use of healthcare or therapeutic strategies. Health professionals are encouraged to take the ESC Guidelines fully into account when exercising their clinical judgment, as well as in the determination and the implementation of preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic medical strategies; however, the ESC Guidelines do not override, in any way whatsoever, the individual responsibility of health professionals to make appropriate and accurate decisions in consideration of each patient's health condition and in consultation with that patient and, where appropriate and/or necessary, the patient's caregiver. Nor do the ESC Guidelines exempt health professionals from taking into full and careful consideration the relevant official updated recommendations or guidelines issued by the competent public health authorities, in order to manage each patient's case in light of the scientifically accepted data pursuant to their respective ethical and professional obligations. It is also the health professional's responsibility to verify the applicable rules and regulations relating to drugs and medical devices at the time of prescription.

National Cardiac Societies document reviewers: listed in the Appendix.

Supplementary data

Comments

2 Comments
IV Enoxaparin for Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
9 October 2014
Meng Liu (with Zhiling Liu)
Physician, Department of emergency, Hunan provincial people's Hospital, Changsha, China.

Initial IV loading dose of 30 mg enoxaparin was recommended for the treatment of ACS because it allows to immediately reaching therapeutic and steady-state conditions, and it's safe and efficacious (1, 2). In the acute phase of PE, similar emergency situation as ACS, IV enoxaparin treatment was not mentioned by current guidelines (3). In patients with acute PE, anticoagulation is objectively preventing both early death and recurrent symptomatic or fatal VET (3). In our opinion, therapeutic anticoagulation with IV enoxaparin seems to be more efficacious for patients in whom primary reperfusion is not considered, and could be a reasonable treatment option for patients in whom primary reperfusion is considered.

Literature

1.Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, Jaffe AS, Jneid H, Kelly RF, Kontos MC, Levine GN, Liebson PR, Mukherjee D, Peterson ED, Sabatine MS, Smalling RW, Zieman SJ. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 18. pii: S0735-1097(14)06279-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017.

2. Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Bl?mstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, Di Mario C, Dickstein K, Ducrocq G, Fernandez-Aviles F, Gershlick AH, Giannuzzi P, Halvorsen S, Huber K, Juni P, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Lenzen MJ, Mahaffey KW, Valgimigli M, van 't Hof A, Widimsky P, Zahger D. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2569-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

3. Authors/Task Force Members, Konstantinides S, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Gali? N, Gibbs JSR, Huisman M, Humbert M, Kucher N, Lang I, Lankeit M, Lekakis J, Maack C, Mayer E, Meneveau N, Perrier A, Pruszczyk P, Rasmussen LH, Schindler TH, Svitil P, Noordegraaf AV, Zamorano JL, Zompatori M, Zamorano JL, Torbicki A, Erol C, Deaton C, Hoes A, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). European Heart Journal. 2014.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared

Submitted on 09/10/2014 8:00 PM GMT
CTEPH : An elegant and inexpensive approach for definitive exclusion
23 September 2014
Mattia Arrigo (with Lars C. Huber)
Resident, University Hospital Zurich

The cumulative incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) as long-term sequela after acute pulmonary embolism is not exactly known. Several studies have reported a rate of 1-2% (1,2), which might be underreported due to the fact that patients claim non- specific symptoms and the awareness for the disease is still low. Early diagnosis of CTEPH thus is challenging. The diagnostic model proposed by Klok and coworkers (3), based on evaluation of three ECG parameters and measurement of NT-proBNP seems to provide an excellent negative predictive value, even if the incidence of CTEPH would be underestimated. The use of this algorithm may avoid complications and costs associated with unnecessary tests. In our opinion, this elegant and inexpensive approach for definitive exclusion of CTEPH deserves being mentioned in the current guidelines (4).

Mattia Arrigo (1) Lars C. Huber (2)

1) University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland 2) Division of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

Literature

1. Pengo V, Lensing AWA, Prins MH, Marchiori A, Davidson BL, Tiozzo F, Albanese P, Biasiolo A, Pegoraro C, Iliceto S, Prandoni P, Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Study Group. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2257-2264. 2. Becattini C, Agnelli G, Pesavento R, Silingardi M, Poggio R, Taliani MR, Ageno W. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after a first episode of pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2006;130:172-175. 3. Klok FA, Surie S, Kempf T, Eikenboom J, van Straalen JP, van Kralingen KW, van Dijk APJ, Vliegen HW, Bresser P, Wollert KC, Huisman MV. A simple non-invasive diagnostic algorithm for ruling out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients after acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2011;128:21-26. 4. Authors/Task Force Members, Konstantinides S, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Gali? N, Gibbs JSR, Huisman M, Humbert M, Kucher N, Lang I, Lankeit M, Lekakis J, Maack C, Mayer E, Meneveau N, Perrier A, Pruszczyk P, Rasmussen LH, Schindler TH, Svitil P, Noordegraaf AV, Zamorano JL, Zompatori M, Zamorano JL, Torbicki A, Erol C, Deaton C, Hoes A, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). European Heart Journal. 2014.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared

Submitted on 23/09/2014 8:00 PM GMT