Elsevier

Respiratory Medicine

Volume 99, Issue 4, April 2005, Pages 384-395
Respiratory Medicine

EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW
Long-acting β2-agonists in asthma: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2005.01.003Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Summary

According to major asthma management guidelines, long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) should be used only when asthma remains symptomatic in patients already receiving regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). A large Cochrane systematic review provides evidence that LABAs are safe and beneficial in control of asthma; sub-group analyses indicating that this is true when ICSs are used and in their absence. Two other Cochrane systematic reviews have found that LABAs are more effective than regular short-acting β2-agonists, and are as effective as theophylline with fewer side-effects. These reviews support guidelines in the use of LABA as additional therapy when asthma is inadequately controlled by ICS at moderate dose. However, guidelines may be too conservative, and more studies in stable mild asthma comparing their use and safety with placebo and ICS are required.

Keywords

Asthma
Adrenergic β-agonists
Theophylline
Disease management
Review
Systematic

Cited by (0)

The following Cochrane reviews are cited in this evidence-based review: Walters EH, et al. Inhaled long-acting beta agonists for stable chronic asthma. The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2003; Walters EH, et al. Regular treatment with long-acting beta agonists versus daily regular treatment with short acting beta agonists in adults and children with stable asthma. The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003; Shah L, et al. Long-acting beta-agonists versus theophylline for maintenance treatment of asthma. The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2003.