Clinical and Laboratory ObservationThe Need for Quality Improvement in Sweat Testing Infants after Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis
Section snippets
Methods
Three sets of data concerning QNS rates were collected and analyzed in 2009 and 2010: a national survey of 110 pediatric CFF accredited care centers (“CFF Annual Application”); a national survey to 48 state leaders involved in newborn screening for CF (NBS Special Interest Group (“NBS-SIG”); and a review of sweat test data prospectively collected by the Illinois Department of Public Health NBS program, which includes 13 Illinois and 2 Missouri sites performing sweat testing for Illinois infants
Results
We found that QNS rates were often high and generally variable in the national survey (Table I). The t tests were performed comparing the QNS rate with regard to collection method of pad (gauze or filter paper) versus Macroduct coil according to age . For infants ≤3 months, t = 1; P = .321, with a 95% CI of 1.46 to 4.38. For individuals >3 months of age, t = 1.75; P = .086, with a 95% CI of -0.15 to 2.3. It can be inferred that with regard to QNS rates, no one collection method is superior to
Discussion
Determining QNS rates is important because a very high rate signifies a problem in sweat collection. Routine monitoring of the QNS rate should trigger evaluation of the sweat testing protocol. The CFF annual application and the NBS-SIG data reveal that young infants can be successfully sweat tested. On average, 92.8% of individuals yielded sufficient sweat for analysis. The CFF annual application, the NBS-SIG data, and the Illinois data all support the QNS metric for infants 3 months of age and
References (5)
- et al.
Sweat testing infants detected by cystic fibrosis newborn screening
J Pediatr
(2005) - et al.
Sweat chloride concentrations in infants homozygous or heterozygous for F508 cystic fibrosis
Pediatrics
(1996)
Cited by (37)
Variability of the sweat test in children with Cystic Fibrosis previously CRMS/CFSPID: A retrospective monocenter experience
2023, Journal of Cystic FibrosisStandards of care guidance for sweat testing; phase two of the ECFS quality improvement programme
2022, Journal of Cystic FibrosisCitation Excerpt :A high proportion of QNS is indicative of possible methodological shortcomings requiring action such as: training of personnel, re-evaluation of procedures and/or technical inspection of devices. Strategies to minimize QNS rates are outlined in Appendix A [18]. Sweat may be collected at remote sites and transported to the laboratory for analysis as long as strict storage conditions can be adhered to.
A paper-based length of stain analytical device for naked eye (readout-free) detection of cystic fibrosis
2019, Analytica Chimica ActaCitation Excerpt :The minimum acceptable amount required for an accurate test is 75 mg of sweat collected on 2 × 2-inch pads or 15 μL of sweat collected in Macroduct coils. Lower amounts are not sufficient for analysis [3]. Also many false positive and false negative results may occur, mainly due to the presence of such unmeasured anions as lactate and bicarbonate [4].
Sweat test for cystic fibrosis: Wearable sweat sensor vs. standard laboratory test
2018, Journal of Cystic FibrosisCitation Excerpt :For laboratory analysis of sweat concentration using the Macroduct device, a minimum sweat volume of 15 μL is required, and samples with smaller volumes are designated “quantity not sufficient” (QNS). QNS is frequently encountered in conventional sweat tests, especially in infants younger than 3 months [9,10]. The wearable sensor directly measures the chloride concentration of a thin layer of sweat between the sensor and skin, and hence does not require a large volume.
Feasibility and normal values of an integrated conductivity (Nanoduct™) sweat test system in healthy newborns
2017, Journal of Cystic FibrosisCitation Excerpt :Collecting sufficient sweat for analysis is a challenge in small infants and some guidelines recommend delaying the test until the infant is more than two weeks of age or weighs more than 3 kg [3–5]. Although for infants below three months of age test failure rates of up to 40% have been reported [6–10], North American recommendations aim for a failure rate of 10% or less for sweat tests in NBS programs [2,6]. Since the invention of the sweat test based on the pad method by Gibson and Cooke 60 years ago [11,12], sweat testing has evolved.
Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis: Consensus Guidelines from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
2017, Journal of Pediatrics
V.L. serves as a consultant regarding sweat testing performance and receives honoraria for this activity. S.M. serves as an advisor and speaker’s bureau member for Genentech, for which she has received honoraria, and is a member of the Illinois Department of Public Health Genetic and Metabolic Diseases Advisory Committee. P.F. is the CFF National Facilitator for Newborn Screening and receives honoraria for that work. Z.L. declares no conflicts of interest.