Case ReportSildenafil as Adjunct Therapy to High-Dose Epoprostenol in a Patient with Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease
Introduction
Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a disease in a subset of patients with pulmonary hypertension histologically characterized by fibrous occlusion of the smaller pulmonary veins. In most cases, PVOD is refractory to medical treatment and is generally associated with a progressively deteriorating clinical course1. Although occasional and temporary favourable response to some agents has been reported, treatment with vasodilators, such as prostacyclin (PGI2), in patients with PVOD is controversial because of concerns regarding not only systemic hypotension or increasing intra-pulmonary shunt flow but also precipitation of pulmonary oedema.1, 2
Recently, sildenafil, a specific phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitor widely approved for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, is reported to decrease pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in patients with pulmonary hypertension.3 This novel vasodilating agent might, therefore, also be a treatment option for patients with PVOD, and progress in medical treatment of PVOD might be possible with a combination of treatment modalities.
Here we report a patient with PVOD with heart failure, who had been resistant to treatment including continuous intra-venous high-dose PGI2, but who exhibited marked improvement after the initiation of adjunct oral sildenafil therapy with no major adverse effect.
Section snippets
Case Report
A 39-year-old businessman with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III functional limitation was emergently hospitalized with a chief complaint of dyspnoea in March 2001. Chest radiography revealed pulmonary congestion and cardiomegaly. Improvement of symptoms and oxygenation were noted over time with no treatment except temporary inhalation of oxygen, but bilateral interstitial infiltrates remained. Bronchoscopy findings and histological analysis of a transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB)
Discussion
Patients with PVOD exhibit a rapidly progressive course leading to death within 2 years of diagnosis. Medical therapy is ineffective in most cases. The symptom of the present case first appeared in March 2001, followed by second attack of dyspnoea in December 2001, gradually progressed and finally worsened in July 2003. The clinical course also gradually progressed during these 2 years in the present case. Differentiation between PVOD and primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) is often difficult
References (6)
- et al.
Massive pulmonary edema and death after prostacyclin infusion in a patient with pulmonary veno-occlusive disease
Chest
(1998) - et al.
Effects of continuous iv prostacyclin in a patient with pulmonary veno-occlusive disease
Chest
(2002) - et al.
Effect of prostacyclin on microvascular pressures in a patient with pulmonary veno-occlusive disease
Chest
(1995)
Cited by (28)
Patient-specific and gene-corrected induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells elucidate single-cell phenotype of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease
2022, Stem Cell ReportsCitation Excerpt :Another frequently used drug for PAH patients is sildenafil, which is a type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor that reduces pulmonary arterial pressure by increasing the levels of cGMP and nitric oxide in the pulmonary vasculature (Dhariwal and Bavdekar, 2015; Galiè et al., 2005). In a previous study, the patient developed acute pulmonary edema after the introduction of sildenafil (Duarte et al., 2020; Kuroda et al., 2006). We treated the PVOD-iPSC-ECs at 5, 10, and 20 μM concentrations, and the results revealed that sildenafil exhibited a slight upregulation on PVOD-iPSC-EC proliferation capacity (Figures 6A and 6F).
Use of vasodilators for the treatment of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis: A systematic review
2019, Respiratory InvestigationCitation Excerpt :As a result, 23 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and three full-text articles were excluded due to only reporting acute vasodilator testing results. Finally, 20 studies with 64 patients who received vasodilator therapy were included in qualitative synthesis (Fig. 1, Table 1) [7,8,10–14,19,21–32], and there were no studies were included in quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) because all articles were case reports or case series. In the quality assessment of selected articles, serious limitations related to non-randomized controlled trials were observed including serious inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision (Table 2).
Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease
2018, Revue des Maladies RespiratoiresEarly Onset Noninfectious Pulmonary Syndromes after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
2017, Clinics in Chest MedicineCitation Excerpt :Additional potential therapies include diuretics, inotropes, and pulmonary vasodilators (eg, calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists, prostanoids).126,128 In contrast to PAH, historical experience with pulmonary vasodilators in PVOD demonstrates mixed results.137–139 Vasodilators may cause harm and even death in patients with predominantly postcapillary vascular constriction.
The First Experience of Pulmonary Veno-occlusive Disease Treatment With Macitentan and Sildenafil
2017, Revista Espanola de CardiologiaPulmonary Capillary Hemangiomatosis and Pulmonary Veno-occlusive Disease
2016, Clinics in Chest MedicineCitation Excerpt :Initiation of these therapies frequently leads to increased transcapillary pressures and pulmonary edema following pulmonary arterial vasodilation and can result in rapid clinical deterioration or death. Nonetheless, there are case reports of clinical improvement with intravenous and inhaled prostacyclins,10,38–41 phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5-I),42–44 and endothelin receptor antagonists.45 For this reason, experts have recommended cautious consideration of these therapies in patients with PVOD.38