Organ preservation
Retrograde flush perfusion with low-potassium solutions for improvement of experimental pulmonary preservation

This manuscript was accepted for presentation at the 20th Annual Meeting and Scientific Sessions of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Osaka, Japan, April 5–8, 2000.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-2498(00)00189-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Optimal preservation of post-ischemic organ function is a continuing challenge in clinical lung transplantation. Retrograde instillation of preservation solutions has the theoretic advantage of achieving homogeneous distribution in the lung because of perfusing both the pulmonary and the bronchial circulation. So far, we have seen no experimental studies that include stereologic analysis of intrapulmonary edema concerning the influence of retrograde preservation on post-ischemic lung function after preservation with Perfadex and Celsior.

Methods

In an extracorporeal rat model, we perfused 8 lungs, each, using either antegrade or retrograde perfusion technique with Celsior (CEant/CEret) and Perfadex (PERant/PERret). Results were compared with low-potassium Euro-Collins. Post-ischemic lungs were reventilated and reperfused mechanically. We continuously monitored relative oxygenation capacity (ROC), pulmonary artery pressure, flush time, and wet/dry ratio. Furthermore, we used stereologic means to evaluate edema formation. Statistics comprised different analysis of variance models.

Results

Relative oxygen capacity of CEant-protected lungs was superior to that of PERant preservation (p = 0.05). Use of PERret resulted in significantly higher ROC as compared with PERant (p < 0.001) and was comparable to results obtained with CE-preservation, which was not further improved with retrograde application.

Conclusion

Celsior provides better lung preservation than does Perfadex when administered antegradely. Retrograde application of Perfadex results in significant functional improvement as compared with antegrade perfusion, which reaches the standard of Celsior-protected organs. Additional in vivo experiments in combination with ultrastructural analysis are warranted to further evaluate retrograde delivery of preservation solutions, which could be used in clinical lung transplantation to further optimize current results.

Section snippets

Surgical methods and functional assessment

Lungs of 40 anesthetized and mechanically ventilated male inbred Sprague-Dawley rats (400 to 500 g) were used for the experiments. All animals received humane care in compliance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care, formulated by the National Society for Medical Research, and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Pub. No. 80–23, revised 1985). We performed

Flush perfusion time

The perfusion time was significantly lower in the Celsior groups compared with Perfadex, both with an antegrade (CEant, 66 ± 14sec; PERant, 102 ± 15sec; p = 0.005) and a retrograde technique (CEret, 64 ± 17sec; PERret, 115 ± 26sec; p < 0.001). Retrograde application of either solution generally did not have any significant effect on the flush time compared with the corresponding antegrade application (CE, p > 0.8; PER, p > 0.3). Preservation time was longest but extremely variable in the LPEC

Comment

Lung transplantation is an effective treatment for many types of end-stage pulmonary disease. Compared with initial results, improved outcome mainly relates to optimized immunosuppression regimens and modified protocols for pulmonary preservation. However, early graft dysfunction remains a continuing problem, resulting from multifactorial lung injury starting within the donor and continuing through harvesting, organ storage, implantation, and post-ischemic reperfusion. Currently modified EC

Conclusions

Celsior provides better lung preservation than does Perfadex when administered antegradely. Retrograde application results in significant functional improvement of Perfadex-preserved lungs as compared with antegrade perfusion and reaches the standard of Celsior-protected organs, but fails to further optimize the preservation quality of Celsior.

Additional experiments using an in vivo porcine model with extended ischemic and post-ischemic observation periods have been initiated to further clarify

References (29)

  • D.N Hopkinson et al.

    Pulmonary graft preservationa worldwide survey of current clinical practice

    J Heart Lung Transplant

    (1998)
  • F Sakamaki et al.

    Reduced lipid peroxydation and ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation using low-potassium dextran solution for lung preservation

    Am J Resp Crit Care Med

    (1997)
  • R.F Roberts et al.

    A comparison of the new preservation solution Celsior to Euro-Collins and University of Wisconsin solutions in lung reperfusion injury

    Transplantation

    (1999)
  • D Mulvin et al.

    The effect of prostacyclin as a constituent of a preservation solution in protecting lungs from ischemic injury because of its vasodilator properties

    Transplantation

    (1990)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Brain Death and Its Influence on the Lungs of the Donor: How Is It Prevented?

      2009, Transplantation Proceedings
      Citation Excerpt :

      Chest radiographs should also be performed every 3–4 hours, looking for possible mucus or inflammation cell collections.9 Finally, it has been proposed that retrograde flushing of the lung can remove various potential harmful molecules and improve the quality of the graft.37,39,40 The “autonomic storm” that follows BD is a well described induction factor for pulmonary edema due to increased pulmonary capillary pressure and increased capillary permeability.7,14

    • Late Retrograde Perfusion of Donor Lungs Does Not Decrease the Severity of Primary Graft Dysfunction

      2008, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Retrograde perfusion of pulmonary grafts presents a number of theoretical advantages including a more homogenous distribution of the perfusate through a low resistance venous system, flushing the bronchial circulation through the bronchopulmonary anastomoses and evacuating blood clots, debris, and fat emboli from the pulmonary vascular bed [7, 15, 16]. Experimentally, retrograde flushing improves oxygenation, decreases airway resistance, and reduces edema formation [6, 8, 17]. Also, histologic and ultrastructural studies have shown better preservation of type I pneumocytes, capillary endothelial cells, bronchial epithelial cells, and surfactant function [18, 19].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text