Chapter Fourteen - Bifunctional Compounds for the Treatment of COPD

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-396492-2.00014-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a disease of increasing incidence with a high unmet medical need, and new and more effective therapies are urgently required. Bronchodilators are central to symptom relief, and current therapeutic approaches include combinations of bronchodilators and anti-inflammatories often delivered by inhalation. Reviewed herein is an evolving paradigm in which two pharmacophores are covalently linked in a single molecule. The rationale for choosing the specific pairings and the advantages and challenges of this strategy are described. Examples include β agonists/muscarinic receptor antagonists, PDE4 inhibitors/muscarinic receptor antagonists, and β agonists/PDE4 inhibitors.

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic lung disease considered to be of high unmet medical need. The disease is characterized by airflow obstruction which is only partially reversible and is often progressive in nature.1 The pulmonary symptoms are caused by pathological changes in the lungs particularly associated with small airways disease (obstructive bronchiolitis) and emphysema (alveolar tissue destruction). In addition to a compromised lung function, the disease may also be associated with chronic cough and sputum production and systemic components such as cachexia and depression. COPD is often associated with a number of comorbidities, most notably cardiovascular disease. Long-term cigarette smoking is the most common risk factor for COPD, but exposure of the lungs to other environmental noxious particles or gases has also been implicated. Such exposures are believed to contribute to a chronic inflammatory process that underlies the disease progression in predisposed individuals. Chronic inflammatory processes lead to structural remodeling including narrowing of the small airways and parenchymal destruction and loss of lung elastic recoil which causes the loss of lung function.1 COPD is of increasing concern as a major public health problem with increasing rates of morbidity and mortality. It is projected to be the fourth major burden of disease and the third leading cause of death by 2030.(2), (3)

Inhaled bronchodilators are central to symptomatic relief in COPD and two major classes exist: β2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta agonists) and anticholinergics (Fig. 14.1). Beta agonists act on β2 receptors, which are seven-transmembrane domain-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) situated on the smooth muscle cells in the airways. There are three subtypes of β adrenoceptors (β1–β3) which mediate the actions of adrenaline and noradrenaline. β1 Receptors are present in the heart, and agonist binding can elicit both increases in heart rate and force of contraction. Functional selectivity of agonists for β2 over β1 receptors is therefore desirable as it could increase the therapeutic index for β2-mediated bronchodilation over unwanted β1-mediated increases in heart rate. β2 Receptors are coupled to Gs proteins which activate adenylyl cyclase leading to formation of cyclic AMP. This elevation of intracellular cyclic AMP leads to relaxation of the smooth muscle and bronchodilation.5 Muscarinic receptors are seven-transmembrane-spanning GPCRs which mediate acetylcholine (ACh) signaling from the cell surface. There are a total of five muscarinic receptor subtypes (M1–M5) of which M1, M2, and M3 are present in the lungs. M1 and M3 receptors are coupled to Gq proteins and utilize calcium as a second messenger through the action of phospholipase C and inositol triphosphate, whereas M2 receptors are Gi linked which decreases cellular cyclic AMP levels and inhibits voltage-gated calcium channels.6 Muscarinic receptor antagonists act to block ACh signaling, thereby inhibiting the airway smooth muscle contraction which leads to bronchoconstriction. Muscarinic M1 receptors are located on parasympathetic nerve ganglia and are responsible for facilitation of nerve transmission. M2 receptors are located on postganglionic parasympathetic nerves and are the predominant receptor subtype on airway smooth muscle. The function of M2 receptors is autoinhibitory which serves to maintain a tight regulation of ACh release. Muscarinic M3 receptors are also located on airway smooth muscle cells and mediate airway smooth muscle contraction. Blockade of both M1 and M3 muscarinic receptor subtypes inhibits cholinergic-mediated bronchoconstriction. Presently, long-acting β2 agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) are used as the standard of care for symptomatic control in COPD.7

Recently, roflumilast, a novel oral anti-inflammatory agent that inhibits phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) enzyme activity, was approved for treatment of moderate and severe COPD associated with chronic bronchitis in patients at risk of exacerbations.8 While the clinical effect of roflumilast and related PDE4 inhibitors are as anti-inflammatory agents rather than as bronchodilators, PDE4 is present in airway smooth muscle cells and is responsible for the hydrolysis of cyclic AMP, which is important in bronchodilation. This compound has been shown to be effective in improving lung function as an add-on to the LABA, salmeterol and the LAMA, tiotropium bromide.9 To date, to the authors’ knowledge, no inhaled PDE4 inhibitors have progressed to registration trials in pulmonary disease. The pursuit of PDE4 subtype selective inhibitors has also been an area of high pharmaceutical industry interest as a way to achieve clinical efficacy and improve the systemic adverse effects associated with the compound drug class.10 There is also emerging preclinical evidence that dual PDE3/PDE4 inhibitors can combine bronchodilatory effects via direct PDE3 inhibition and act as an anti-inflammatory, which could be an alternative novel therapeutic approach.11

Inhaled glucocorticoids have a broad range of anti-inflammatory actions through binding and activating cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-α. Upon glucocorticoid binding with GR-α, the complex formed translocates to the cellular nucleus where it can bind with a glucocorticoid response element in the promoter region of target genes to modulate gene expression. Glucocorticoids can mediate both gene repression (transrepression) and gene induction (transactivation) to exert their anti-inflammatory effects.12 The level of efficacy achieved by inhaled glucocorticoids in COPD remains a controversial topic but they do improve symptoms, lung function, and reduce exacerbations in more severe patients.1 The combination of an inhaled β2 agonist and glucocorticoid therapies has been shown to be superior to individual treatments alone with respect to lung function and health status as well as reducing disease-related exacerbations in patients with moderate to severe disease.13

Combination products consisting of two medications and two modes of action have been highly successful. Seretide®/Advair®, a combination of the LABA, salmeterol, and the inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate, used for both COPD and asthma, was the prescription drug with the third highest sales in 2010.14 Coadministration of two mechanistically distinct chemical entities is one approach for combination drug therapy, but it is also possible to use a “bifunctional compound,” also referred as a “dual selective pharmacology molecule,” which is a single chemical entity with two distinct pharmacophores covalently bonded. While the design seems conceptually simple, connection points and linkers must be chosen carefully, as the choices can significantly impact the activity of either pharmacophore. The compounds, being the combination of two pharmacophores, tend to have high molecular weights, but the net molecular size may offer an advantage as an inhaled therapeutic, because it can result in greater lung retention and lower oral bioavailability, thereby reducing systemic exposure and related downstream toxicology issues.15 Due to the size of the molecules and the inherent flexibility of many of the linkers, it may also be a challenge to obtain crystalline compounds for development. However, a single chemical entity with two activities would offer multiple advantages, including matched pharmacokinetics, simplified formulation, and simplified clinical development.16 Significantly, there is potential for a combination product consisting of a novel bifunctional compound and a separate additional medication in a single device to deliver three mechanisms. The alternative development and engineering of an inhaler capable of delivering these separate drugs, with unique disease-related mechanisms, is yet to be realized.

Described herein are novel bifunctional molecules designed through linking of pharmacophores of approved therapeutic targets: muscarinic antagonists, β agonists, and PDE4 inhibitors. Additional combination examples, such as neutrophil elastase inhibitor/muscarinic antagonist17 or epithelial sodium channel inhibitor/β agonist,18 have also been disclosed.

Section snippets

Muscarinic receptor antagonist–β2 agonist

Clinical trials have demonstrated that the combination of an individually dosed muscarinic antagonist along with a β agonist provides greater bronchodilation than either component alone.19 The two mechanisms are complementary, with the β2 agonist increasing cyclic AMP, leading to smooth muscle relaxation, while the muscarinic antagonist blocks ACh-mediated bronchoconstriction. Furthermore, the addition of a β2 agonist actually decreases the amount of ACh released, thereby amplifying the effect

Conclusions

There remains great need for the discovery and development of more efficacious and novel treatments for COPD. The development of bifunctional molecules may be ideally suited toward inhaled delivery, given their physical chemical properties, which should favor lung retention while minimizing systemic adverse effects and toxicity. In the absence of more sophisticated delivery devices that could deliver multiple combinations, the utilization of bifunctional compounds has been predicted to be a

References (71)

  • M. Johnson

    J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

    (2006)
  • C.P. Page et al.

    Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.

    (2012)
  • V. Boswell-Smith et al.

    J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

    (2006)
  • M.G. Matera et al.

    Trends Pharm. Sci.

    (2011)
  • M. Cazzola et al.

    Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther.

    (2010)
  • A.D. Hughes et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2011)
  • L.H. Jones et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2011)
  • L.M. Fabbri et al.

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • L. Provins et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2006)
  • L. Provins et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2007)
  • J.N. Hamblin et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2008)
  • S.L. Tannheimer et al.

    Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther.

    (2012)
  • W. Shan et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2012)
  • Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of...
  • C.C. Mathers et al.

    PLoS Med.

    (2006)
  • K.R. Chapman et al.

    Eur. Respir. J.

    (2006)
  • H. Meurs et al.
  • R. Gosens et al.

    Respir. Res.

    (2006)
  • D.I. Lainé

    Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (2010)
  • ...
  • N.J. Gross et al.

    COPD

    (2010)
  • R. Newton et al.

    Mol. Pharmacol.

    (2007)
  • P.M. Calverley et al.

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2007)
  • J. Arrowsmith

    Nat. Rev. Drug Dis.

    (2012)
  • C. Robinson et al.

    Future Med. Chem.

    (2011)
  • Finch, H.; Ray, N. C.; Edwards, C. Patent Application WO 060203,...
  • Johnson, M. R.; Hirsch, A. J.; Boucher, R. C.; Zhang, J. Patent Application WO 146869,...
  • A.D. Hughes et al.

    Future Med. Chem.

    (2011)
  • Theravance. Press Release October 27, 2011....
  • Mammen, M.; Dunham, S.; Hughes, A.; Lee, T. W.; Husfeld, C.; Stangeland, E. Patent Application WO 074246,...
  • N.C. Ray et al.

    Expert Opin.

    (2009)
  • Chudasama, R.; Kennedy, A.; Kindon, L. J.; Mallet, F. P. Patent Application WO 090859,...
  • Chao, R. S.; Rapta, M.; Colson, P. Patent Application WO 023454,...
  • R. Naito et al.

    Chem. Pharm. Bull.

    (1998)
  • T. Steinfeld et al.

    Mol. Pharmacol.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Sappanone A: A natural PDE4 inhibitor with dual anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities from the heartwood of Caesalpinia sappan L.

      2023, Journal of Ethnopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These two threats are inextricably linked, and the patients are trapped in the vicious cycle of oxidative stress and chronic inflammation (Biswas, 2016). Currently, the development of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant bifunctional drugs for the treatment of COPD (Page and Cazzola, 2017; Gary and Michael, 2012) has become a promising therapeutic strategy because they can interrupt that vicious cycle. On the one hand, inflammation can lead to exaggerated oxidative stress.

    • Cyclic nucleotide-based therapeutics for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

      2014, Current Opinion in Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These molecules contain two pharmacophores that are joined covalently by an appropriately defined ‘spacer’ at, so-called, linker sites (Figure 5, [154,155]). Bifunctional ligands typically have a high molecular weight, which may have advantages for an inhaled drug as they often display greater lung retention, low oral bioavailability and, accordingly, reduced systemic exposure [154]. Moreover, the development of bifunctional ligands is simplified in terms of matched pharmacokinetics, formulation and identical deposition characteristics [155].

    • New avenues for phosphodiesterase inhibitors in asthma

      2021, Journal of Experimental Pharmacology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text