Original article
The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90052-OGet rights and content

Abstract

The use of proxy raters of patients' quality of life has been suggested as a means of facilitating the factoring of quality-of-life considerations explicitly into the medical decision-making process and of resolving the problem of missing data in longitudinal quality-of-life investigations. This review addresses two questions related to the potential role of such proxy raters in clinical research and practice: (1) to what extent are health care providers and lay individuals involved in the care of patients (“significant others”) able to assess accurately the quality of life of patients with chronic disease? and (2) under what conditions, if any, is inclusion of such proxy ratings in quality-of-life investigations warranted? Although the extant literature yields few unequivocal findings, a number of clear trends can be identified: (i) health care providers and significant others tend, in general, to underestimate patients' quality of life; (ii) health care providers and significant others appear to evaluate patients' quality of life with a comparable degree of (in)accuracy; (iii) health care providers tend to underrate the pain intensity of their patients; (iv) proxy ratings appear to be more accurate when the information sought is concrete and observable; and (v) while significant others' ratings tend to be more accurate when they live in close proximity to the patient, they can also be biased by the caregiving function of the rater. There is need for more methodologically sound studies that: (a) incorporate head-to-head comparisons of health care providers and significant others as proxy raters; (b) employ well-validated quality-of-life measures; and (3) employ a longitudinal design in order to examine the effect of changes in patients' health status over time on the ability of proxies to provide valid quality-of-life assessments.

References (109)

  • M.A. Okun et al.

    Physician- and self-ratings of health, neuroticism, and subjective well-being among men and women

    Pers Indiv Diff

    (1984)
  • J. O'Brien et al.

    The use of next-of-kin to estimate pain in cancer patients

    Pain

    (1988)
  • K. Ell et al.

    Longitudinal analysis of psychological adaptation among family members of patients with cancer

    J Psychosom Res

    (1988)
  • M. Waltz

    Marital context and post-infarction quality of life: is it social support or something more?

    Soc Sci Med

    (1986)
  • J. Magaziner et al.

    Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1988)
  • K.M. Rowat et al.

    Living with chronic pain: the spouse's perspective

    Pain

    (1985)
  • D.W. Swanson et al.

    The family's viewpoint of chronic pain

    Pain

    (1980)
  • M. Burisch

    You don't always get what you pay for: measuring depression with short and simple versus long and sophisticated scales

    J Res Pers

    (1984)
  • G.R. Morrow et al.

    Development of brief measures of psychosocial adjustment to medical illness applied to cancer patients

    Gen Hosp Psychol

    (1981)
  • R. Melzack

    The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods

    Pain

    (1975)
  • N.K. Aaronson et al.

    Multidimensional approach to the measurement of quality of life in lung cancer clinical trials

  • D.F. Cella et al.

    Measuring quality of life today: methodological aspects

    Oncology

    (1990)
  • C. McMillen Moinpour et al.

    Quality of life endpoints in cancer clinical trials: Review and recommendations

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1989)
  • E.C. Nelson et al.

    The measurement of health status in clinical practice

    Med Care

    (1989)
  • A.M. Epstein et al.

    Using proxies to evaluate quality of life. Can they provide valid information about patients' health status and satisfaction with medical care?

    Med Care

    (1989)
  • H. Schipper

    Guidelines and caveats for quality of life measurement in clinical practice and research

    Oncology

    (1990)
  • D.M. Finkelstein et al.

    A pilot study of the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) Scale for the assessment of quality of life for metastatic lung cancer patients

    Am J Clin Oncol

    (1988)
  • P.A. Ganz et al.

    Estimating the quality of life in a clinical trial of patients with metastatic lung cancer using the Karnofsky Performance Status and the Functional Living IndexCancer

    Cancer

    (1988)
  • A. Coates et al.

    Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies

    N Engl J Med

    (1987)
  • N.K. Aaronson

    Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methodological issues

    Contr Clin Trials

    (1989)
  • C.C. Schag et al.

    Assessing problems of cancer patients: Psychometric properties of the Cancer Inventory of Problem Situations

    Health Psychol

    (1990)
  • M.L. Slevin et al.

    Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?

    Br J Cancer

    (1988)
  • J.W. Yates et al.

    Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Kamofsky Performance Status

    Cancer

    (1980)
  • A.C. Schag et al.

    Karnofsky Performance status revisited: reliability, validity and guidelines

    J Clin Oncol

    (1984)
  • A. Grieco et al.

    Investigation of the Karnofsky Performance Status as a measure of quality of life

    Health Psychol

    (1984)
  • V. Mor et al.

    The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale: an examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting

    Cancer

    (1984)
  • R.A. Pearlman et al.

    Quality of life in chronic diseases: perceptions of elderly patients

    J Gerontol

    (1988)
  • G.A. Presant

    Quality of life in cancer patients: who measures what?

    Am J Clin Oncol

    (1984)
  • P.J. Selby et al.

    The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients

    Br J Cancer

    (1984)
  • T.J. Starr et al.

    Quality of life and resuscitation decisions in elderly patients

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1986)
  • L.D. Camp et al.

    Comparison of medical, surgical, and oncology patients' descriptions of pain and nurses' documentation of pain assessments

    J Adv Nurs

    (1987)
  • J.M. Hunt et al.

    Patients with protracted pain: A survey conducted at the London Hospital

    J Med Ethics

    (1977)
  • M.A. Rankin

    Use of drugs for pain with cancer patients

    Cancer Nurs

    (1982)
  • M.A. Rankin et al.

    Nurses' perceptions of cancer patients' pain

    Cancer Nurs

    (1984)
  • S. Holmes et al.

    Patients' and nurses' perceptions of symptom distress in cancer

    J Adv Nurs

    (1989)
  • S.A. Husted et al.

    Oncology clients' affective states and their nurses' expectations of clients' affective states

    Cancer Nurs

    (1985)
  • B.M. Jennings et al.

    Systematic misperception: oncology patients' self-reported affective states and their care-givers' perceptions

    Cancer Nurs

    (1981)
  • L.R. Derogatis et al.

    Cancer patients and their physicians in the perception of psychological symptoms

    Psychosomatics

    (1976)
  • T. Sensky et al.

    Physicians' perception of anxiety and depression among their outpatients: relationships with patients and doctors' satisfaction with their interviews

    J R Coll Phys London

    (1989)
  • K.W. Bridges et al.

    Psychiatric illness in inpatients with neurological disorders: patients' views on discussion of emotional problems with neurologists

    Br Med J

    (1984)
  • Cited by (694)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text