Original article
The influence of diagnostic access bias on the epidemiology of sarcoidosis: A population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1935–1984

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90060-1Get rights and content

Abstract

A population-based study was conducted among residents of Rochester, Minnesota from 1935–1984 to examine the influence of diagnostic access bias on the incidence and mode of presentation of clinically recognized sarcoidosis. Immigrants had an elevated risk of sarcoidosis and were more likely to present with asymptomatic sarcoidosis diagnosed on routine screening chest radiographs. Similar patterns were observed for health professionals, a group with markedly greater access to the diagnostic procedures which label them as having sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis exhibits a spectrum of manifestations, ranging from a totally asymptomatic process discernible only by specific diagnostic scrutiny to a clinically obvious presentation with significant morbidity. For disease entities such as this, apparent patterns of occurrence may depend on differential access in the study population to the maneuvers necessary for diagnosis. Diagnostic access bias, in addition to other diagnostic biases, deserves more careful scrutiny in epidemiologic research.

References (32)

  • F.K. Romer

    Notification of sarcoidosis in Denmark. The “true” incidence?

    Z Erkrank Atm-Org

    (1977)
  • J.W. Cooch

    Sarcoidosis in the United States Army, 1952 through 1956

    Am Rev Resp Dis

    (1961)
  • A.Z. Keller

    Anatomic sites, age attributes, and rates of sarcoidosis in U.S. veterans

    Am Rev Resp Dis

    (1973)
  • P.E. Sartwell et al.

    Epidemiology of sarcoidosis in the U.S. Navy

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1974)
  • M. Terris et al.

    Incidence of diagnosed sarcoidosis in Louisiana

    Am Rev Resp Dis

    (1963)
  • E.A. Bresnitz et al.

    Epidemiology of sarcoidosis

    Epidemiol Rev

    (1983)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Post-9/11 sarcoidosis in WTC-exposed firefighters and emergency medical service workers

      2017, Respiratory Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, there is no agreed-upon baseline rate of sarcoidosis in the US. Published incidence and prevalence rates of sarcoidosis in non-WTC-exposed populations, which are often used as comparison rates for WTC-exposed, are highly variable and population dependent, based on race/ethnicity, geography [6,7], socioeconomic status and access to healthcare [8]. The access to care issue is of particular importance in sarcoidosis as a substantial proportion of cases (30–50% by various estimates) are asymptomatic [9], of which a significant proportion resolve spontaneously over time, leading to an unknown amount of undetected and unreported disease.

    • Sarcoidosis of the peripheral nervous system

      2013, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      An accurate estimate of the prevalence or incidence of sarcoidosis is probably not available. The reasons for this are: lack of consistent disease criteria; variability of disease presentation, and lack of sensitive and specific diagnostic tests, resulting in under recognition and misdiagnosis of the disease (Hennessy et al., 1988). Significant heterogeneity in disease presentation and severity occurs among different ethnic and racial groups.

    • Sarcoidosis and testicular cancer: A case series and literature review

      2010, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
      Citation Excerpt :

      Epidemiological studies of sarcoidosis and malignancy have potential confounding factors. It is known that the majority of cases of sarcoidosis are subclinical and that populations with access to diagnostic imaging have a higher rate of a diagnosis of sarcoidosis [10]. Imaging of patients with malignancy is therefore more likely to yield a diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

    • Autoimmune T cell responses to antigenic peptides presented by bronchoalveolar lavage cell HLA-DR molecules in sarcoidosis

      2009, Clinical Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previously, it has been reported that sarcoidosis more commonly occurred in people who had been in contact with the disease before diagnosis (e.g., by contact with household members, colleagues at work and close friends) [29]. Studies have also reported an increased prevalence of sarcoidosis in health care workers, especially nurses [29,30], although those studies may be subject to diagnostic access bias since health care workers are more likely to have routine screening chest radiographs that would detect asymptomatic sarcoidosis [31]. It is also noteworthy that the two patients with the highest anti-vimentin reactivity both had extrapulmonary disease manifestations (skin and neurological, respectively).

    • Epidemiological features of Turkish patients with sarcoidosis

      2009, Respiratory Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second method includes cases with definite diagnosis. However, it is thought that the real incidence rate should be higher than that of calculated as cases with definite diagnosis, because 31–68% of patients diagnosed with chest X-ray screening were asymptomatic.25,27,39–41 The case number of the autopsy studies are 10 times greater than the numbers of other methods.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This investigation was supported in part by research grant AR30582 from the National Institutes of Health.

    View full text