Original contribution
Evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging—a promising technique?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0730-725X(95)02010-QGet rights and content

Abstract

The evaluation of a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is one of the most frequently encountered challenges in thoracic radiology. In addition to a “state-of-the-art” evaluation of SPNs with CT and biopsy techniques, recently the assessment of the enhancement characteristics with iodinized contrast agents has shown its potential to improve the characterization of SPNs. We investigated whether dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is suitable to assess the degree and kinetics of MR contrast enhancement and whether this technique could help in the noninvasive specification of SPNs. We studied prospectively 21 patients with SPNs. T1-weighted and proton density-weighted spoiled gradient-echo breath-hold images (2D-FLASH) were obtained before and after the administration of Gd-DTPA in a standard dosage of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight. The maximum enhancement and the initial velocity of contrast uptake were assessed and correlated with pathohistological findings. To quantify contrast enhancement, we used the relative signal intensity increase (Srel) and the recently introduced enhancement factor (EF) and contrast uptake equivalent (CE). Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI proved to be well suited for the assessment of the contrast enhancement characteristics of SPNs. Significant differences were found in the degree and kinetics of contrast enhancement for specific types of nodules. Malignant neoplastic SPNs enhanced stronger and faster than benign neoplastic SPNs. The strongest and fastest enhancement, however, was found in a benign type of nodules where histology revealed inflammatory/fibrous lesions. These differences in contrast enhancement between the different pathohistological groups were more significant when EF and CE rather than Srel was used for the quantification of contrast enhancement. The results of this study indicate a potential role for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the preoperative noninvasive evaluation of SPNs using EF and CE as contrast uptake assessment parameters.

References (27)

  • S.J. Swenson et al.

    An integrated approach to evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule

  • E.A. Zerhouni et al.

    CT of the pulmonary nodule: A cooperative study

    Radiology

    (1986)
  • S.S. Siegelman et al.

    Solitary pulmonary nodule: CT assessment

    Radiology

    (1986)
  • J.T. Littleton et al.

    Pulmonary masses: Contrast enhancement

    Radiology

    (1990)
  • S.J. Swensen et al.

    Solitary pulmonary nodule: CT evaluation of enhancement with iodinated contrast material—a preliminary report

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • C.J. Herold et al.

    Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: Evaluation with MR imaging

    Radiology

    (1989)
  • I.M. Feuerstein et al.

    Pulmonary metastases: MR imaging with surgical correlation-a prospective study

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • A.E. Stillman et al.

    Breath-hold FLASH imaging of pulmonary nodules

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • N.L. Müller et al.

    Pulmonary nodules: Detection using magnetic resonance and computed tomography

    Radiology

    (1985)
  • W.C. Werthmuller et al.

    Gadolinium-DTPA enhancement of lung radiation fibrosis

    J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.

    (1989)
  • G.R. Cherryman

    A prospective comparison of gadolinum-dimeglumid enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced CT scanning in the detection of brain metastasis arising from small cell lung cancer

  • C.V. Bundschuh et al.

    Distinguishing between scar and recurrent herniated disk in postoperative patients: Value of contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging

    AJNR

    (1990)
  • W.A. Kaiser et al.

    MR imaging of the breast: Fast imaging sequences with and without gadolinium-dimeglumid

    Radiology

    (1989)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Update of MR Imaging for Evaluation of Lung Cancer

      2018, Radiologic Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, Çakmak and colleagues85 showed that the minimum ADC performed better than the lesion-to-spinal cord SI ratio, with an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve for the minimum ADC (0.931; 95% CI, 0.868–0.993), which was greater than that for lesion-to-spinal cord SI ratio (0.801; 95% CI, 0.675–0.926; P = .029). Dynamic CE-enhanced MR imaging with 2-dimensional, multislice or 3D SE, turbo SE, and/or GRE sequences has been used for differentiating malignant from benign nodules with 1.5T and 3T MR imaging systems (Table 3).17–20,86–91 Dynamic CE MR imaging has been reported to have a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy ranging from 55% to 100%, 54% to 100%, and 75% to 96%, respectively, in differentiating malignant from benign nodules.17–20,86–91

    • Diagnostic and clinical utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in indeterminate pulmonary nodules: a metaanalysis

      2016, Clinical Imaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      Informativeness may also be represented graphically by a likelihood ratio scattergram or matrix, suggesting that dynamic MRI was useful for confirmation or exclusion of presence of malignant pulmonary nodule (Fig. 7). Since the clinical application of gadolinium contrast material, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is being recommended for differentiating malignant from benign nodules and tumors [4,7–16,19–21]. In addition, as a result of advances in MRI systems and pulse sequences, enhancement patterns within nodules and parameters determined from signal intensity–time course curves can be assessed visually.

    • Lung perfusion CT: The differentiation of cavitary mass

      2010, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recent technological advances in helical multidetector CT allow precise evaluations of hemodynamic characteristics in tissue. Some authors have reported the usefulness of dynamic CT in the work-up of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) [4–12,19]. Recent studies using manually-defined ROI indicate that enhancement of malignant SPNs is greater than that of benign SPNs depicted on CT scans and MR images [2,3,8,13,20].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text