Original article
The effect of age on methacholine response

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(85)90783-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Bronchial reactivity to inhaled methacholine exists in subjects with asthma but may occur in subjects with allergic rhinitis, chronic lung diseases, and during respiratory infections. In the absence of these factors, we found that age also has a significant effect on the methacholine response. One hundred forty-eight subjects, 5 to 76 years of age, were studied as normal control subjects in a natural history of asthma study. The methacholine response was measured by standard techniques. The analysis demonstrated that age had a significant effect on the methacholine response. In addition to known factors influencing the results of methacholine inhalation, young and older subjects may exhibit bronchial responses that may falsely suggest hyperreactive airway disease.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (161)

  • Asthma in an aging world

    2023, Asthma in the 21st Century: New Research Advances
  • Is aging a “comorbidity” of asthma?

    2018, Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
  • Design, synthesis and H<inf>1</inf>-antihistaminic activity of novel 1-substituted-4-(3-chlorophenyl)-[1,2,4] triazolo [4,3-a] quinazolin-5(4H)-ones

    2015, Journal of Saudi Chemical Society
    Citation Excerpt :

    The real breakthrough of non-sedative antihistamines came in the early eighties of the twentieth century when the discovery of modern antihistamines was found to exhibit potent antihistaminic activity without sleep-inducing effects (Carr and Meyer, 1982). Condensed heterocycles containing a new generation of H1-antihistamines (e.g. loratadine, azelastine and flazelastine) that do not possess the above mentioned pharmacophore for H1-antihistamines gave way for the discovery of many novel antihistamines temelastine and mangostin (Hopp et al., 1985; Chairungsrilerd et al., 1996). Quinazolinones are associated with a wide range of biological and pharmacological activities such as analgesic (Mallareddy and Sattur, 1984), anti-inflammatory (Mallareddy et al., 1987), antifungal (Kumar et al., 1997; Bartroli et al., 1998), antiviral (Mukherji et al., 1980) and antihistaminic activities (Raghuramrao et al., 1986; Devsingh et al., 2001; Raju et al., 1999).

  • Environmental Determinants of Lung Aging

    2014, The Lung: Development, Aging and the Environment: Second Edition
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text