Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the in vivo measurement precision of a software tool for volumetric analysis of pulmonary nodules from two consecutive low-dose multi-row detector CT scans. A total of 151 pulmonary nodules (diameter 2.2–20.5 mm, mean diameter 7.4±4.5 mm) in ten subjects with pulmonary metastases were examined with low-dose four-detector-row CT (120 kVp, 20 mAs (effective), collimation 4×1 mm, normalized pitch 1.75, slice thickness 1.25 mm, reconstruction increment 0.8 mm; Somatom VolumeZoom, Siemens). Two consecutive low-dose scans covering the whole lung were performed within 10 min. Nodule volume was determined for all pulmonary nodules visually detected in both scans using the volumetry tool included in the Siemens LungCare software. The 95% limits of agreement between nodule volume measurements on different scans were calculated using the Bland and Altman method for assessing measurement agreement. Intra- and interobserver agreement of volume measurement were determined using repetitive measurements of 50 randomly selected nodules at the same scan by the same and different observers. Taking into account all 151 nodules, 95% limits of agreement were −20.4 to 21.9% (standard error 1.5%); they were −19.3 to 20.4% (standard error 1.7%) for 105 nodules <10 mm. Limits of agreement were −3.9 to 5.7% for intraobserver and −5.5 to 6.6% for interobserver agreement. Precision of in vivo volumetric analysis of nodules with an automatic volumetry software tool was sufficiently high to allow for detection of clinically relevant growth in small pulmonary nodules.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V et al. (2003) Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 13:2378-2383
Sone S, Takashima S, Li F et al. (1998) Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet 351:1242–1245
Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H et al. (1996) Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral-CT versus radiography. Radiology 201:798–802
Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF et al. (1999) Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354:99–105
Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M et al. (2002) Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 222:773–781
Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA et al. (2002) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:508–513
Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Obuchowski NA et al. (2001) Multi-slice computed tomography as a screening tool for colon cancer, lung cancer and coronary heart disease. Eur Radiol 11:1975–1985
Munden RF, Pugatch RD, Liptay MJ, Sugarbaker DJ, Le LU (1997) Small pulmonary lesions detected at CT: clinical importance. Radiology 202:105–110
Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI (2000) Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217:251–256
Yankelevitz DF, Gupta R, Zhao B, Henschke CI (1999) Small pulmonary nodules: evaluation with repeat CT—preliminary experience. Radiology 212:561–566
Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Tarver RD et al. (2002) Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning. Radiology 223:798–805
Wormanns D, Diederich S, Lentschig MG, Winter F, Heindel W (2000) Spiral CT of pulmonary nodules: interobserver variation in assessment of lesion size. Eur Radiol 10:710–713
Udupa JK, LeBlanc VR, Schmidt H et al. (2002) A methodology for evaluating image segmentation algorithms. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Medical Imaging 2002: Image processing. Proc SPIE 4684:266–277
Fan L, Qian J, Odry BL et al. (2002) Automatic segmentation of pulmonary nodules by using dynamic 3D cross-correlation for interactive CAD systems. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Medical Imaging 2002: Image processing. Proc SPIE 4684:1362–1369
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (8476):307–310
Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, Heindel W, Diederich S (2002) Clinical evaluation of the reproducibility of volume measurements of pulmonary nodules. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Medical Imaging 2002: Image processing. Proc SPIE 4684:316–322
Kohl G, Schaller S, Klotz E et al. (2002) Segmentation of pulmonary nodules: influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on reproducibility of volume measurements (abstracts). Medical Imaging 2002: Image processing. Proc SPIE 4684
Hasegawa M, Sone S, Takashima S et al. (2000) Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol 73:1252–1259
Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI (1997) Does 2-year stability imply that pulmonary nodules are benign? AJR 168:325–328
Aoki T, Nakata H, Watanabe H et al. (2000) Evolution of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas: CT findings correlated with histology and tumor doubling time. AJR 174:763–768
Steele JD, Buell P (1973) Asymptomatic solitary pulmonary nodules: host survival, tumor size, and growth rate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 65:140–151
Weiss W (1971) Peripheral measurable bronchogenic carcinoma: growth rate and period of risk after therapy. Am Rev Resp Dis 103:198–208
Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. Am J Roentgenol. 178:1053–1057
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wormanns, D., Kohl, G., Klotz, E. et al. Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14, 86–92 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2132-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2132-0