Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility

  • Chest
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the in vivo measurement precision of a software tool for volumetric analysis of pulmonary nodules from two consecutive low-dose multi-row detector CT scans. A total of 151 pulmonary nodules (diameter 2.2–20.5 mm, mean diameter 7.4±4.5 mm) in ten subjects with pulmonary metastases were examined with low-dose four-detector-row CT (120 kVp, 20 mAs (effective), collimation 4×1 mm, normalized pitch 1.75, slice thickness 1.25 mm, reconstruction increment 0.8 mm; Somatom VolumeZoom, Siemens). Two consecutive low-dose scans covering the whole lung were performed within 10 min. Nodule volume was determined for all pulmonary nodules visually detected in both scans using the volumetry tool included in the Siemens LungCare software. The 95% limits of agreement between nodule volume measurements on different scans were calculated using the Bland and Altman method for assessing measurement agreement. Intra- and interobserver agreement of volume measurement were determined using repetitive measurements of 50 randomly selected nodules at the same scan by the same and different observers. Taking into account all 151 nodules, 95% limits of agreement were −20.4 to 21.9% (standard error 1.5%); they were −19.3 to 20.4% (standard error 1.7%) for 105 nodules <10 mm. Limits of agreement were −3.9 to 5.7% for intraobserver and −5.5 to 6.6% for interobserver agreement. Precision of in vivo volumetric analysis of nodules with an automatic volumetry software tool was sufficiently high to allow for detection of clinically relevant growth in small pulmonary nodules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V et al. (2003) Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 13:2378-2383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sone S, Takashima S, Li F et al. (1998) Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet 351:1242–1245

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H et al. (1996) Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral-CT versus radiography. Radiology 201:798–802

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF et al. (1999) Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354:99–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M et al. (2002) Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. Radiology 222:773–781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA et al. (2002) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:508–513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Obuchowski NA et al. (2001) Multi-slice computed tomography as a screening tool for colon cancer, lung cancer and coronary heart disease. Eur Radiol 11:1975–1985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Munden RF, Pugatch RD, Liptay MJ, Sugarbaker DJ, Le LU (1997) Small pulmonary lesions detected at CT: clinical importance. Radiology 202:105–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI (2000) Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217:251–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yankelevitz DF, Gupta R, Zhao B, Henschke CI (1999) Small pulmonary nodules: evaluation with repeat CT—preliminary experience. Radiology 212:561–566

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Tarver RD et al. (2002) Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning. Radiology 223:798–805

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wormanns D, Diederich S, Lentschig MG, Winter F, Heindel W (2000) Spiral CT of pulmonary nodules: interobserver variation in assessment of lesion size. Eur Radiol 10:710–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Udupa JK, LeBlanc VR, Schmidt H et al. (2002) A methodology for evaluating image segmentation algorithms. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Medical Imaging 2002: Image processing. Proc SPIE 4684:266–277

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fan L, Qian J, Odry BL et al. (2002) Automatic segmentation of pulmonary nodules by using dynamic 3D cross-correlation for interactive CAD systems. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Medical Imaging 2002: Image processing. Proc SPIE 4684:1362–1369

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (8476):307–310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, Heindel W, Diederich S (2002) Clinical evaluation of the reproducibility of volume measurements of pulmonary nodules. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Medical Imaging 2002: Image processing. Proc SPIE 4684:316–322

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kohl G, Schaller S, Klotz E et al. (2002) Segmentation of pulmonary nodules: influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on reproducibility of volume measurements (abstracts). Medical Imaging 2002: Image processing. Proc SPIE 4684

  18. Hasegawa M, Sone S, Takashima S et al. (2000) Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. Br J Radiol 73:1252–1259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI (1997) Does 2-year stability imply that pulmonary nodules are benign? AJR 168:325–328

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Aoki T, Nakata H, Watanabe H et al. (2000) Evolution of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas: CT findings correlated with histology and tumor doubling time. AJR 174:763–768

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Steele JD, Buell P (1973) Asymptomatic solitary pulmonary nodules: host survival, tumor size, and growth rate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 65:140–151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss W (1971) Peripheral measurable bronchogenic carcinoma: growth rate and period of risk after therapy. Am Rev Resp Dis 103:198–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. Am J Roentgenol. 178:1053–1057

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dag Wormanns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wormanns, D., Kohl, G., Klotz, E. et al. Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 14, 86–92 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2132-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2132-0

Keywords

Navigation