Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical practice guidelines: From methodological to practical issues

  • Review Articles
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of clinical practice guidelines is to help clinical decision by practitioners, who can not integrate in their daily practice all the published data concerning new technologies and knowledge. Guidelines also have growing applications in the ethical, legal, socio-economic, public policy and health care funding fields. This article describes the various methodologies that have been proposed to develop guidelines. These methods rely to varying degrees on formal methods of analysis of scientific evidence and expert opinions. Then a step by step process is described, that should ensure a rigorous, feasible and explicit guideline development and lead to valid and applicable recommendations. In order for guidelines to be used, they have to be efficiently implemented. Respective efficiency and justification of educational and coercive methods of implementation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A (1973) Small area variations in health care delivery. Science 182:1102–1108

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A (1982) Variations in medical care among small areas: Sci Am 246:120–134

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chassin MR, Brook RH, Park RE, Keesey J, Fink A, Kosecoff J, Kahn K, Merrick N, Solomon DH (1986) Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the medicare population. N Engl J Med 314:285–290

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chassin Mr, Kosecoff J, Park RE, Winslow CM, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, Keesey J, Fink A, Solomon DH, Brook RH (1987) Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. JAMA 1987, 258, 2533–2537

    Google Scholar 

  5. Woolf SH (1990) Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developments. Arch Intern Med 150:1811–1818

    Google Scholar 

  6. Institute of Medicine (1990) Council on Health Care Technology. Consensus development at the NH: improving the program. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andreasen PB (1988) Consensus conferences in different countries. Aims and perspectives. Int Technol Assess Health Care 4:305–308

    Google Scholar 

  8. Institute of Medicine (1990) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guideline. Directions for a new program. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  9. Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH (1986) Physician rating of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health 76:766–772

    Google Scholar 

  10. Woolf SH (1992) Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med 152:946–952

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eddy DM (1990) Practice policies: where do they come from? JAMA 263:1265, 1269, 1272, 1275

    Google Scholar 

  12. Office of Medical Applications of Research (1988) Guidelines for the selection and management of consensus development conferences. National Institute of Health, September

  13. Council on Health Care Technology (1990) Improving consensus for health technology assessment: an international perspective. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  14. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (1979) The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J 121:1193–1254

    Google Scholar 

  15. US Preventive Services Task Force (1989) Guide to clinical preventive services: an assessment of the effectiveness of 169 interventions. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL (1992) Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 102 [Suppl] 305S-311S

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brook RH (1989) Practice guidelines and practicing medicine. Are they compatible? JAMA 262:3027–3030

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chassin MR (1990) Practice guidelines: best hope for quality improvement in the 1990s. J Occup Med 32:1199–1206

    Google Scholar 

  19. White LJ, Ball JR (1985) The clinical efficacy project of the American College of Physicians. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  20. Woolf S-H (1991) Manual for clinical practice guideline development: a protocol for experts panels convened by the office of the forum for quality and effectiveness in health care. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, Md

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eddy DM (1990) Guidelines for policy statements: the explicit appraoch: JAMA 263:2239–2243

    Google Scholar 

  22. Battista RN, Fletcher SW (1988) Making recommendations on preventive practices: methodological issues. Am J Prev Med 4:53–67

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eddy DM (1990) Practice policies: guidelines for methods. JAMA 263:1839–1841

    Google Scholar 

  24. General Accounting Office (1991) Practice guidelines: the experience of medical specialty societies. Report to Congressional Requesters, Washington: GAO

    Google Scholar 

  25. Health Services Research Group (1992) Standards, guidelines and clinical policies. Can Med Assoc J 146:833–837

    Google Scholar 

  26. Woolf SH; Battista RN, Anderson GM, Logan AG, Wang E (1990) Assessing the clinical effectiveness of preventive maneuvers: analytic principles and systematic methods in reviewing evidence and developing clinical practice recommendations. A report by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. J Clin Epidemiol 43:891–905

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eddy DM (1991) A manual for assessing health practices and designing practice policies. The explicit approach. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lara M, Goodman C (1990) National priorities for the assessment of clinical conditions and medical technologies. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH (1984) Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 74:979–983

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vinokur A, Burnstein E, Sechrest L, Wortman PM (1985) Group decision making by experts: field study of panels evaluating medical technologies. J Pers Soc Psychol 49:70–84

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leape LL, Park RE, Kahan JP, Brook RH (1992) Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition. Qual Assur Health Care 4:151–159

    Google Scholar 

  32. McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals: V. To distinguish useful from useless or even harmful therapy. Can Med Assoc J 124:1156–1162

    Google Scholar 

  33. McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals: II. To learn about a diagnositc test. Can Med Assoc 124:703–710

    Google Scholar 

  34. McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals: III. To learn the clinical course and prognosis of a disease. Can Med Assoc J 124:869–872

    Google Scholar 

  35. McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals. IV. To determine etiology and causation. Can Med Assoc 124:985–990

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jaeschke R, Sackett DL (1989) Research methods for obtaining primary evidence. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 5:503–519

    Google Scholar 

  37. How to read a clinical journal. In: Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P (eds) Clinical epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine, Little Brown and Co, Boston, pp 285–320

  38. Chalmers TC, Smith H, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D, Ambroz A (1981) A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clin Trials 2:31–49

    Google Scholar 

  39. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1988) Guidelines for reading literature reviews. Can Med Assoc J 138:697–703

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chalmers TC, Hewett P, Reitman D, Sachs HS (1989) Selection and evaluation of empirical research in technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 5:503–519

    Google Scholar 

  41. Eddy DM (1990) Comparing benefits and harms: the balance sheet. JAMA 263:2493–2505

    Google Scholar 

  42. Weinstein MC, Fineberg H (1990) Clinical decision analysis. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  43. Thacker SB (1988) Meta-analysis: a quantitative approach to research integration. JAMA 259:1685–1689

    Google Scholar 

  44. Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, Schachter RA (1990) A bayesian method for synthetizing evidence: the confidence profile method. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 6:31–55

    Google Scholar 

  45. Delahaye F, Landrivon G, Ecochard R, Colin C (1991) Meta-analysis. Health Policy 19:185–196

    Google Scholar 

  46. Drummond M, Stoddart G, Labelle R, Cushman R (1987) Health conomics: an introduction for clinicians. Ann Intern Med 107:88–92

    Google Scholar 

  47. Eddy DM (1990) Connecting value and costs. Whom do we ask, and what doe we ask them? JAMA 264:1737–1739

    Google Scholar 

  48. Eisenberg JM (1989) A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices. JAMA 262:459–471

    Google Scholar 

  49. Guyatt G, Drummond M, Stoddart G, Haynes B, Bennett K, Labelle R, Feeny D, Tugwell P (1986) Guidelines for the clinical and economic evaluation of health care technologies. Soc Sci Med 22:393–408

    Google Scholar 

  50. Health Services Research Group (1992) Studying patients preferences in health care decision making. Can Med Assoc J 147: 859–864

    Google Scholar 

  51. Eddy DM (1991) Rationing by patient choice. JAMA 265:105–108

    Google Scholar 

  52. Eddy DM (1990) Guidelines for policy statements: the explicit approach. JAMA 263:2239–2243

    Google Scholar 

  53. Linton AL, Peachey DK (1990) Guidelines for medical practice: the reasons why. Can Med Ass J 143:485–490

    Google Scholar 

  54. Weinstein MC, Stason WB (1977) Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med 296: 716–721

    Google Scholar 

  55. Drummond MF (1981) Welfare economics and cost benefit analysis in health care. Scot J Political Economy 28:125–145

    Google Scholar 

  56. Harvey M, Roberts SCJ (1987) Clinical guidelines, medical litigation, and the current medical defence system. Lancet 1:145–147

    Google Scholar 

  57. Irshfedl EB (1991) Should practice parameters be the standard of care in malpractice litigation? JAMA 266:2886–2891

    Google Scholar 

  58. Brennan TA (1991) Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: collision or cohesion? J Health Polit Policy Law 16:67–85

    Google Scholar 

  59. Irshfeld EB (1991) Practice parameters and the malpractice liability of physicians. JAMA 263:1556–1562

    Google Scholar 

  60. Grol R (1992) Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual Health Care 1:184–191

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW (1990) Clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 113:645–646

    Google Scholar 

  62. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine — a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:2420–2425

    Google Scholar 

  63. Grol R (1990) National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract 40:361–364

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick P, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ (1989) Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med 321:1306–1311

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wortman PM, Vinokur A, Sechrest L (1988) Do consensus conferences work? A process evaluation of the NIH consensus development program. J Health Polit Policy Law 13:469–498

    Google Scholar 

  66. Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH, Chassin MR, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, Kosecoff J, Solomon DH (1989) Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice. Am J Public Health 79:445–447

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lomas J (1991) Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations. Annu Rev Publ Health 12:41–65

    Google Scholar 

  68. Donabedian A (1989) Institutional and professional responsibilities in quality assurance. Qual Assur Health Care 1:3–11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roche, N., Durieux, P. Clinical practice guidelines: From methodological to practical issues. Intensive Care Med 20, 593–601 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705730

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705730

Key words

Navigation