Abstract
The main goal of clinical practice guidelines is to help clinical decision by practitioners, who can not integrate in their daily practice all the published data concerning new technologies and knowledge. Guidelines also have growing applications in the ethical, legal, socio-economic, public policy and health care funding fields. This article describes the various methodologies that have been proposed to develop guidelines. These methods rely to varying degrees on formal methods of analysis of scientific evidence and expert opinions. Then a step by step process is described, that should ensure a rigorous, feasible and explicit guideline development and lead to valid and applicable recommendations. In order for guidelines to be used, they have to be efficiently implemented. Respective efficiency and justification of educational and coercive methods of implementation are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A (1973) Small area variations in health care delivery. Science 182:1102–1108
Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A (1982) Variations in medical care among small areas: Sci Am 246:120–134
Chassin MR, Brook RH, Park RE, Keesey J, Fink A, Kosecoff J, Kahn K, Merrick N, Solomon DH (1986) Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the medicare population. N Engl J Med 314:285–290
Chassin Mr, Kosecoff J, Park RE, Winslow CM, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, Keesey J, Fink A, Solomon DH, Brook RH (1987) Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. JAMA 1987, 258, 2533–2537
Woolf SH (1990) Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developments. Arch Intern Med 150:1811–1818
Institute of Medicine (1990) Council on Health Care Technology. Consensus development at the NH: improving the program. National Academy Press, Washington
Andreasen PB (1988) Consensus conferences in different countries. Aims and perspectives. Int Technol Assess Health Care 4:305–308
Institute of Medicine (1990) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guideline. Directions for a new program. National Academy Press, Washington
Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH (1986) Physician rating of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health 76:766–772
Woolf SH (1992) Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med 152:946–952
Eddy DM (1990) Practice policies: where do they come from? JAMA 263:1265, 1269, 1272, 1275
Office of Medical Applications of Research (1988) Guidelines for the selection and management of consensus development conferences. National Institute of Health, September
Council on Health Care Technology (1990) Improving consensus for health technology assessment: an international perspective. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (1979) The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J 121:1193–1254
US Preventive Services Task Force (1989) Guide to clinical preventive services: an assessment of the effectiveness of 169 interventions. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL (1992) Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 102 [Suppl] 305S-311S
Brook RH (1989) Practice guidelines and practicing medicine. Are they compatible? JAMA 262:3027–3030
Chassin MR (1990) Practice guidelines: best hope for quality improvement in the 1990s. J Occup Med 32:1199–1206
White LJ, Ball JR (1985) The clinical efficacy project of the American College of Physicians. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1:169–174
Woolf S-H (1991) Manual for clinical practice guideline development: a protocol for experts panels convened by the office of the forum for quality and effectiveness in health care. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, Md
Eddy DM (1990) Guidelines for policy statements: the explicit appraoch: JAMA 263:2239–2243
Battista RN, Fletcher SW (1988) Making recommendations on preventive practices: methodological issues. Am J Prev Med 4:53–67
Eddy DM (1990) Practice policies: guidelines for methods. JAMA 263:1839–1841
General Accounting Office (1991) Practice guidelines: the experience of medical specialty societies. Report to Congressional Requesters, Washington: GAO
Health Services Research Group (1992) Standards, guidelines and clinical policies. Can Med Assoc J 146:833–837
Woolf SH; Battista RN, Anderson GM, Logan AG, Wang E (1990) Assessing the clinical effectiveness of preventive maneuvers: analytic principles and systematic methods in reviewing evidence and developing clinical practice recommendations. A report by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. J Clin Epidemiol 43:891–905
Eddy DM (1991) A manual for assessing health practices and designing practice policies. The explicit approach. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia
Lara M, Goodman C (1990) National priorities for the assessment of clinical conditions and medical technologies. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington
Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH (1984) Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 74:979–983
Vinokur A, Burnstein E, Sechrest L, Wortman PM (1985) Group decision making by experts: field study of panels evaluating medical technologies. J Pers Soc Psychol 49:70–84
Leape LL, Park RE, Kahan JP, Brook RH (1992) Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition. Qual Assur Health Care 4:151–159
McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals: V. To distinguish useful from useless or even harmful therapy. Can Med Assoc J 124:1156–1162
McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals: II. To learn about a diagnositc test. Can Med Assoc 124:703–710
McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals: III. To learn the clinical course and prognosis of a disease. Can Med Assoc J 124:869–872
McMaster University Health Sciences Centre (1981) How to read clinical journals. IV. To determine etiology and causation. Can Med Assoc 124:985–990
Jaeschke R, Sackett DL (1989) Research methods for obtaining primary evidence. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 5:503–519
How to read a clinical journal. In: Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Tugwell P (eds) Clinical epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine, Little Brown and Co, Boston, pp 285–320
Chalmers TC, Smith H, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D, Ambroz A (1981) A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clin Trials 2:31–49
Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1988) Guidelines for reading literature reviews. Can Med Assoc J 138:697–703
Chalmers TC, Hewett P, Reitman D, Sachs HS (1989) Selection and evaluation of empirical research in technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 5:503–519
Eddy DM (1990) Comparing benefits and harms: the balance sheet. JAMA 263:2493–2505
Weinstein MC, Fineberg H (1990) Clinical decision analysis. Saunders, Philadelphia
Thacker SB (1988) Meta-analysis: a quantitative approach to research integration. JAMA 259:1685–1689
Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, Schachter RA (1990) A bayesian method for synthetizing evidence: the confidence profile method. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 6:31–55
Delahaye F, Landrivon G, Ecochard R, Colin C (1991) Meta-analysis. Health Policy 19:185–196
Drummond M, Stoddart G, Labelle R, Cushman R (1987) Health conomics: an introduction for clinicians. Ann Intern Med 107:88–92
Eddy DM (1990) Connecting value and costs. Whom do we ask, and what doe we ask them? JAMA 264:1737–1739
Eisenberg JM (1989) A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices. JAMA 262:459–471
Guyatt G, Drummond M, Stoddart G, Haynes B, Bennett K, Labelle R, Feeny D, Tugwell P (1986) Guidelines for the clinical and economic evaluation of health care technologies. Soc Sci Med 22:393–408
Health Services Research Group (1992) Studying patients preferences in health care decision making. Can Med Assoc J 147: 859–864
Eddy DM (1991) Rationing by patient choice. JAMA 265:105–108
Eddy DM (1990) Guidelines for policy statements: the explicit approach. JAMA 263:2239–2243
Linton AL, Peachey DK (1990) Guidelines for medical practice: the reasons why. Can Med Ass J 143:485–490
Weinstein MC, Stason WB (1977) Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med 296: 716–721
Drummond MF (1981) Welfare economics and cost benefit analysis in health care. Scot J Political Economy 28:125–145
Harvey M, Roberts SCJ (1987) Clinical guidelines, medical litigation, and the current medical defence system. Lancet 1:145–147
Irshfedl EB (1991) Should practice parameters be the standard of care in malpractice litigation? JAMA 266:2886–2891
Brennan TA (1991) Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: collision or cohesion? J Health Polit Policy Law 16:67–85
Irshfeld EB (1991) Practice parameters and the malpractice liability of physicians. JAMA 263:1556–1562
Grol R (1992) Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual Health Care 1:184–191
Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW (1990) Clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 113:645–646
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine — a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:2420–2425
Grol R (1990) National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract 40:361–364
Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick P, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ (1989) Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med 321:1306–1311
Wortman PM, Vinokur A, Sechrest L (1988) Do consensus conferences work? A process evaluation of the NIH consensus development program. J Health Polit Policy Law 13:469–498
Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH, Chassin MR, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, Kosecoff J, Solomon DH (1989) Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice. Am J Public Health 79:445–447
Lomas J (1991) Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations. Annu Rev Publ Health 12:41–65
Donabedian A (1989) Institutional and professional responsibilities in quality assurance. Qual Assur Health Care 1:3–11
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roche, N., Durieux, P. Clinical practice guidelines: From methodological to practical issues. Intensive Care Med 20, 593–601 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705730
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705730