Table 1—

Distribution of aberrant murine double minute clone 2(MDM2), nucleophosmin (NPM) and p14 alternate reading frame (arf) expression according to histological classification

HistologyHigh MDM2NPM nucleolar relocalisedp14arf
NegativeNucleolar relocalisedAberrant expression#
Normal5/26 (19)0/15 (0)4/16 (25)0/16 (0)4/16 (25)
Hyperplasia8/36 (22)2/22 (9)4/26 (15)1/26 (4)5/26 (19)
Metaplasia9/32 (28)1/22 (5)4/24 (17)1/24 (4)5/24 (21)
Mild dysplasia16/20 (80)***1/16 (6)2/16 (13)1/16 (7)3/16 (20)
Moderate dysplasia14/18 (80)4/17 (24)¶,+5/18 (29)2/18 (11)7/18 (40)
Severe dysplasia15/19 (76)4/18 (22)9/18 (50)***4/18 (22)***13/18 (72)***
In situ carcinoma13/16 (81)2/16 (13)9/16 (56)2/16 (18)11/16 (74)
Invasive carcinoma9/12 (75)6/10 (60)5/10 (50)2/10 (20)7/10 (70)
Overall89/179 (50)20/136 (15)42/144 (29)13/144 (9)55/144 (38)
  • Data are expressed as number of biopsies with aberrant protein expressed/total number of assessed biopsies (%). #: total of negative and nucleolar localised groups. : stage at which protein expression changed significantly. +: p = 0.001; ***: p<0.001; p-values obtained by Chi-squared test for a linear trend.