Table. 3—

Average, peak and trough response in forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC), and the comparison between treatment regimens

VariableAverage#PeakTrough
0–12 h0–24 h12–24 h
FEV1 response L
 T0.127±0.010.085±0.010.043±0.010.220±0.010.100±0.02
 F0.086±0.010.062±0.010.038±0.010.223±0.010.059±0.02
 T+F0.234±0.010.160±0.010.086±0.010.354±0.010.138±0.02
  T+F versus T0.107 (0.072–0.142)0.075 (0.042–0.108)0.043 (0.008–0.079)0.134 (0.094–0.175)0.037 (-0.005–0.079)
   p-value<0.0001<0.0001<0.02<0.00010.08
  T+F versus F0.147 (0.112–0.182)0.098 (0.065–0.131)0.048 (0.013–0.084)0.131 (0.090–0.171)0.079 (0.037–0.121)
   p-value<0.0001<0.0001<0.01<0.0001<0.0005
  T versus F0.040 (0.006–0.075)0.023 (-0.010–0.056)0.005 (-0.030–0.041)-0.004 (-0.044–0.036)0.042 (0.000–0.083)
   p-value<0.030.170.770.86<0.05
FVC response L
 T0.234±0.020.155±0.020.076±0.030.430±0.030.157±0.03
 F0.147±0.020.091±0.020.036±0.030.437±0.030.083±0.03
 T+F0.414±0.020.274±0.020.133±0.030.678±0.030.234±0.03
  T+F versus T0.180 (0.117–0.242)0.118 (0.057–0.180)0.057 (-0.013–0.127)0.249 (0.169–0.328)0.078 (0.002–0.153)
   p-value<0.00010.00020.11<0.0001<0.05
  T+F versus F0.267 (0.204–0.330)0.182 (0.120–0.244)0.097 (0.027–0.168)0.242 (0.161–0.322)0.151 (0.076–0.227)
   p-value<0.0001<0.0001<0.01<0.0001<0.001
  T versus F0.088 (0.025–0.150)0.064 (0.003–0.125)0.040 (-0.029–0.110)-0.007 (-0.086–0.072)0.074 (-0.001–0.148)
   p-value<0.01<0.050.250.860.054
  • Data are presented as mean±se and mean (95% confidence interval), unless otherwise stated. Means are adjusted for period, centre and patient within centre. T: tiotropium q.d.; F: formoterol b.i.d.; T+F: tiotropium plus formoterol q.d.#: the average was calculated as the area under the curve from zero time to 12 or 24 h (or 12–24 h), respectively, using the trapezoidal rule divided by the corresponding duration (i.e. 12 or 24 h) to give the result in litres.