Table 1

Selection of recent epidemiological studies of hypersensitivity pneumonitis, focusing on differences in prevalence rates in relation to diagnostic methods and type of exposure

Author [ref.]LocationSubjects studied nPrevalence (%)
QQ + SQ + S + further tests
Farmers
 Babbott, 16Vermont, USA2100.48
 Gruchow, 17Wisconsin, USA14440.42
 Marcer, 18Italy29322.61.2
 Saia, 19Italy2491.4
 Malmberg, 20Sweden51219*
 Depierre, 21France176315.34.4∼0.5–1
 Malmberg, 22Sweden6702∼0.25
 Stanford, 23Ireland38010.41.70.5
 Vohlonen, 24Finland67901.7
 Dalphin, 25France57031.4
Pigeon breeders
 Banham, 26Scotland27710.47.5
 Bourke, 27Scotland20831
 De Castro, 28Canary Islands34386.4
Tobacco industry
 Huuskonen, 29Finland5726145.3
Isocyanates
 Vandenplas, 30Canada1674.7
 Baur, 31Germany17800.9∼0.6∼0.9
Nacre factory
 Orriols, 32Spain26∼40–5023∼20
Machine operators
 Bernstein, 33Ohio, USA1637.537.5∼31
  • Q: questionnaire

  • S: serology

  • *: febrile reactions after exposure to organic dust