Table 1– Characteristics of the studies on long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and objectively defined chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
First author [ref.]/locationYear of study/ population/age of participantsStudy design/ follow-upMarkers of exposure to air pollutionDefinition of COPDHandling of asthmaEffect estimate (95% CI)Study limitations
Andersen [14]/Copenhagen and Aarhus, Denmark1993–2006/1786 patients admitted to hospital for COPD from cohort of 52 799 participants/50–64 yearsLongitudinal study: Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort/13–17 yearsPollutants: modelled home NO2, NOx (dispersion model) Traffic proximity: presence of a major road within 50 m of residential address at baseline Traffic load: total number of kilometres travelled within 200 m of address at baselineFirst hospital admission due to COPD (discharge diagnoses) between baseline (1993–1997) and June 27, 2006Data on participants admitted to hospital for asthma and other diseases were collectedHR for NO2 35-year mean level 1.08 (1.02–1.14) per 5.8 μg·m−3 HR per IQR increase for NO2 25-year mean level 1.07 (1.01–1.13) per 6.4 μg·m−3 HR per IQR increase for NO2 15-year mean level 1.05 (1.00–1.11) per 6.3 μg·m−3 HR per IQR increase for NOx 35-year mean level 1.05 (1.01–1.10) per 12.4 μg·m−3 HR per IQR increase for NOx 25-year mean level 1.04 (0.99–1.09) per 12.6 μg·m−3 HR per IQR increase for NOx 15-year mean level 1.03 (0.97–1.09) per 11.6 μg·m−3 HR per IQR increase for major road 1.04 (0.89–1.21) HR for traffic load 1.01 (0.97–1.05) per 5.8×103 vehicle km per dayPopulation was defined by hospital admission using discharge diagnosis of COPD, no lung function measurement
Karakatsani [20]/Athens, Greece1990–1996/Case series 1: 168 cases and 168 matched controls from Athens Case series 2: 84 cases, a subset of case series 1 that met criteria for clinical diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema or COPD/≥34 yearsNested case–control from EPIC Greece/Case series 2: 5 yearsPollutants: inverse distance-weighted mean from 3 nearest fixed-site monitors used to estimate NO2 concentrations for boroughs; past 5 and 20 years Traffic proximity: noneCase-series 1: reported history of COPD, chronic bronchitis, emphysema or respiratory symptoms Case-series 2: subset of above, with COPD defined based on clinical assessment (n=84), including 31 cases with FEV1/VC <88% (males) and 89% (females)Asthmatics or subjects with wheezing in childhood and adulthood were excludedOR per quartile of NO2, recent 5-years exposure: case series 1 (all), 1.18 (0.94–1.49); case series 2, 1.37 (1.05–1.79) OR per quartile of NO2, recent 20 years exposure: case series 1 (all), 1.10 (0.84–1.43); case series 2, 1.31 (0.95–1.79) OR for NO2, recent 5-year exposure for persons exposed to the highest quartile versus all others: case series 1 (all), 1.46 (0.82–2.59); case series 2, 2.01 (1.05–3.86) ORs for NO2, recent 20-year exposure for persons exposed to the highest quartile versus all others: case series 1 (all), 1.39 (0.73–2.67); case series 2, 1.46 (0.67–3.19) Data on the size of the quartiles are not availableNo local traffic-related pollution information Only a subset of cases (n=31) were based on lung function alone; not GOLD cut-off. ERS criteria used to define COPD
Nuvolone [13]/Pisa-Cascina area, Italy1991–1993/2062 subjects from the general population living in the Pisa-Cascina/8–97 years (mean 45.9 and 48.9 years for males and females, respectively)Cross sectional/Not indicatedPollutants: none Traffic proximity: residential distance to a specified main road; exposure groups defined as highly exposed (living <100 m from the main road), moderately exposed (100–250 m) and unexposed (250–800 m)GOLD: FEV1/FVC <0.7 using pre-bronchodilator lung function measurementsNot specified whether asthmatics were excluded from the analyses, though probably excluded as “asthma” was a separate outcome used in this analysisFor males living <100 m of main road, COPD diagnosis OR 1.80 (1.03–3.08); 100–250 m, OR 1.21 (0.69–2.13) For females living <100 m of main road, COPD diagnosis OR 1.60 (0.71–3.59); 100–250 m OR 0.99 (0.39–2.51) For males living <100 m of main road, reduced FEV1/FVC <70% OR 2.07 (1.11–3.87); 100–250 m, OR 2.53 (1.42–4.53) For females living <100 m of main road, reduced FEV1/FVC <70% OR 1.01 (0.48–2.14); 100–250 m OR 0.88 (0.41–1.89)Only distance to the nearest road, no air pollutants, COPD defined using questionnaire-reported diagnosis of chronic bronchitis or emphysema Cross-sectional analyses
Pujades-Rodriguez [11]/Nottingham, UK1991/2599 subjects from the general population of the Gedling area, Nottingham/18–70 yearsCross sectional analyses/9 yearsPollutants: modelled NO2 at home (dispersion model) Traffic proximity: distance of residence to the nearest road (150 m cut-off and 3 distance bands of 50 m from 0–150 m)GOLD: FEV1/FVC <0.7 using pre-bronchodilator lung function measurementsNot specified whether asthmatics were excluded from the analyses, though probably excluded as “asthma” was a separate outcome used in this analysisOR for ≤150 m distance (>150 m as ref.): 0.97 (0.68–1.37) OR for distance bands (100–150 m as ref.): <50 m 1.54 (0.69–3.45); for 50–100 m 1.67 (0.79–3.49) OR for quintiles of modelled NO2 (<33.92 μg·m−3 as ref.): for 33.92 – 34.23 μg·m−3, 1.09 (0.68–1.73); for 34.23–34.73 μg·m−3, 0.95 (0.60–1.52); for 34.73–36.79 μg·m−3, 0.91 (0.57–1.45); for >36.79 μg·m−3, 1.07 (0.68–1.68)Modelled residential NO2 had extremely small contrasts with the 5 categories ranging from <33.92 μg·m−3 (lowest) to >36.79 μg·m−3 (highest) Unclear to what extent distance reflected true contrasts in exposure Cross-sectional analysis
Pujades-Rodriguez [21]/England, UKAssessments in 1995, 1996 and 2001/48 145 adults from the general population/>16 yearsCross-sectional surveys, Health urvey for England/5 yearsPollutants: none Traffic proximity: residential proximity to the nearest main roadGOLD: FEV1/FVC <0.7 using pre-bronchodilator lung function measurementsNot specified whether asthmatics were excluded from the analyses, though probably excluded as “asthma” was a separate outcome used in this analysisOR ≤150 m of a main road (>150 m as ref.): 0.96 (0.89–1.03) OR for bands of distance (120–150 m as ref.): <30 m, 0.94 (0.77–1.13); 30–60 m, 0.97 (0.80–1.18); 60–90 m, 0.94 (0.78–1.14); 90–120 m, 0.97 (0.81–1.17)Using postcode to identify residential address No pollutant estimates
Schikowski [22]/Ruhr area, Germany1985–1994/4262 females of general population of Ruhr/54–55 years at baselineConsecutive cross-sectional studies (SALIA)/5 yearsPollutants: background concentrations of PM10 and NO2, measured within up to 8 km of each participant’s residence Traffic proximity: distance of residence to nearest major roadGOLD: FEV1/FVC <0.7 using pre-bronchodilator lung function measurementsAsthmatics with physician diagnosis or those using asthma medication were excluded from the analyses.OR for <100 m of road: 1.79 (1.06–3.02) OR for IQR increase of 16 μg·m−3 in annual mean NO2: 1.39 (1.20–1.63) OR for IQR increase of 16 μg·m−3 in 5-year mean NO2: 1.43 (1.23–1.66) OR for IQR increase of 7 μg·m−3 in annual mean PM10: 1.37 (0.98–1.92) OR for IQR increase of 7 μg·m−3 in 5-year mean PM10: 1.33 (1.03–1.72)Only females Narrow age group Cross-sectional analyses
Schikowski [23]/Ruhr area, GermanyBaseline: 1985–1994/4874 females from the general population of Ruhr/54–55 years at baselineCohort study (SALIA)/12–20 yearsPollutants: background concentrations of PM10, measured ≤8 km of each participant’s residence Traffic proximity: distance of residence to nearest major road (≤100 m with >10 cars per day)GOLD: FEV1/FVC <0.7 using pre-bronchodilator lung function measurementsAsthmatics with physician diagnosis or those using asthma medication were excluded from the analyses.OR for <100 m of road: 1.69 (0.90–3.18) OR for IQR increase of 7 μg·m−3 in 5-year mean PM10: 1.25 (0.79–1.99)Only females Small study sample for follow-up
Schikowski [12]/Ruhr area, GermanyBaseline: 1985–1994 Follow-up: 2006–2009/Baseline: 4874 females of the general population living in Ruhr Follow-up: 395 females with spirometry at follow-up of the general population/Mean at baseline: 54 years Mean at follow-up: >70 yearsCohort study (SALIA)/12–20 yearsPollutants: background concentrations of PM10 and NO2, measured within up to 8 km of each participant’s residence Traffic proximity: distance of residence to nearest major roadGOLD: FEV1/FVC <0.7 using pre-bronchodilator lung function measurementsAsthmatics with physician diagnosis or those using asthma medication were excluded from the analyses.Parameter estimate for follow-up time (unit 10 years) for mild COPD and PM10 exposure by 20 μg·m−3: 20.61 (7.81–33.41) NO2 exposure by 10 μg·m−3: 9.12 (4.78–13.46) Moderate COPD and PM10 exposure by 20 μg·m−3: 8.02 (0.01–16.03) NO2 exposure by 10 μg·m−3: 2.73 (0.03–5.43) Parameter estimate for mild COPD and a decline in NO2 exposure by 10 μg·m−3 per 10 years: −4.64 (−8.03– −1.26) Decline in PM10 by 20 μg·m−3 per 10 years: −14.62 (−25.88– −3.36) Moderate COPD and NO2 decline: −1.66 (−3.8– −0.048) PM10 decline: −6.20 (−13.33–0.94)Only females Small study sample for follow-up Design issues
  • EPIC: European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; SALIA: Study on the Influence of Air Pollution on Lung, Inflammation and Aging; NOx: nitrogen oxides; PM10: particulate matter with an aerodynamic cut-off diameter ≤10 μm; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; VC: vital capacity; GOLD: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; FVC: forced vital capacity; HR: hazard ratio; IQR: interquartile range; ERS: European Respiratory Society.