TY - JOUR T1 - Comparing Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT) JF - European Respiratory Journal JO - Eur Respir J SP - 561 LP - 566 DO - 10.1183/09031936.00173710 VL - 38 IS - 3 AU - B.B. Koolen AU - M.W.H. Pijnenburg AU - H.J.L. Brackel AU - A.M. Landstra AU - N.J. van den Berg AU - P.J.F.M. Merkus AU - W.C.J. Hop AU - A.A.P.H. Vaessen-Verberne Y1 - 2011/09/01 UR - http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/38/3/561.abstract N2 - Several tools are useful in detecting uncontrolled asthma in children. The aim of this study was to compare Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines with the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) in detecting uncontrolled asthma in children. 145 children with asthma filled in a web-based daily diary card for 4 weeks on symptoms, use of rescue medication and limitations of activities, followed by either the C-ACT or ACT. For predicting uncontrolled asthma, score cut-off points of 19 were used for C-ACT and ACT. According to GINA guidelines, asthma was uncontrolled in 71 (51%) children and completely controlled in 19 (14%) children. The area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curves for C-ACT and ACT versus GINA guidelines were 0.89 and 0.92, respectively. Cut-off points of 19 for C-ACT and ACT resulted in a sensitivity of 33% and 66% in predicting uncontrolled asthma, respectively. C-ACT and ACT correlate well with GINA criteria in predicting uncontrolled asthma, but commonly used cut-off points for C-ACT and ACT seem to underestimate the proportion of children with uncontrolled asthma as defined by GINA. ER -