Mandibular advancement and obstructive sleep apnoea: a method for determining effective mandibular protrusion

L. C. Dort, E. Hadjuk, J. E. Remmers


The objectives of the study were to test the hypotheses that it is possible, during routine polysomnography (PSG), to prospectively identify favourable candidates for mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) therapy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and to accurately estimate an optimal protrusive distance at which to fabricate the MRA.

A series of subjects underwent a remotely controlled mandibular positioner (RCMP) test during PSG monitoring. The ability of the RCMP test to eliminate OSA and the target protrusion at which that occurred was compared with the success of a custom oral MRA in the 33 subjects who completed the protocol.

The RCMP test was a success in 15 subjects and a failure in 18 subjects. Appliance therapy was initiated in 38 subjects and completed in 33. MRA therapy was successful at target protrusion in 80% of subjects who had a successful RCMP test and failed in 78% of those who failed the RCMP test.

In conclusion the remotely controlled mandibular positioner test outcome demonstrated a statistically significant association with mandibular repositioning appliance outcome. The target protrusion determined during the remotely controlled mandibular positioner test was the effective therapeutic protrusion in subjects with a successful remotely controlled mandibular positioner test.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a condition that affects 4–9% of adults 14. OSA is a risk factor for hypertension and consequent cardiovascular morbidity, as well as excessive daytime sleepiness, and it's associated impairment in function and quality of life 5. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for this disorder, but compliance can be problematic 69. The rate of refusal to begin or continue CPAP in the first week varies 5–50% 10. A further 12–25% of subjects are expected to discontinue CPAP within 3 yrs 10. Side-effects and problems of CPAP that affect compliance include stuffy or dry nasal passages, mask irritation, awakenings, machine noise, claustrophobia and gastric distention. Oral appliances (OAs) are an alternative to CPAP therapy. Crossover studies comparing OAs and CPAP 1115 have generally shown OAs to be less effective (15–55% therapeutic success) than CPAP. Patients have reportedly preferred OA therapy to CPAP 1215. Trials comparing OA therapy to no treatment or inactive controls have been shown to be effective in treating 45–70% of patients with OSA. It is likely that OAs are perceived as being less intrusive and less disruptive to personal life than CPAP 1619. Mandibular repositioning appliances (MRA) are a category of promising OAs used to treat OSA. In this approach, the mandible is repositioned ventrally and inferiorly by the appliance, thereby enhancing pharyngeal patency 20. Mandibular protrusion has shown to have a “dose-dependent” effect on the pharyngeal cross-sectional area 21.

Adjustable MRAs allow progressive protrusion of the mandible under clinical supervision. Determining the effective protrusive setting for an appliance usually takes place over several weeks and may involve multiple visits to the dental provider's office. This long regimen delays the implementation of effective therapy, which may increase the cost of therapy and decrease compliance.

Identifying patients who are likely to be successful MRA candidates would be desirable from both therapeutic and financial perspectives. Clinical predictors of MRA treatment outcome have been evaluated in a number of studies. Females, who are not supine dependent and males with supine-dependent OSA are more likely to achieve therapeutic success with MRAs 22. Improved treatment response has been associated with lower values of age, body mass index (BMI), neck size and respiratory disturbance index (RDI) 2325. Cephalometric features have been shown to be associated with treatment response. These include, but are not limited to: anteroposterior oropharynx dimension, overjet, mandible length, and mandibular plane-to-hyoid distance 23, 26. Imaging studies, using magnetic resonance imaging of the pharynx, suggest an association between lack of occlusion during the Mueller manoeuvre and MRA treatment success 27. The data from these studies investigating clinical predictors of MRA success are too limited to formulate general recommendations.

The present study addresses the need for a tool that prospectively identifies favourable candidates for MRA therapy, ideally prior to involving a dentist, and accurately estimates optimal protrusive distance as useful therapeutic information for the treating dentist. A recent study 28 examined a tool to protrude the mandible during polysomnography (PSG) and evaluate the effect on OSA. In this pilot study of 19 compliant subjects, the remotely controlled mandibular positioner (RCMP) demonstrated positive and negative predictive values of 90 and 89%, respectively, in predicting MRA treatment success. The purpose of the present study was threefold: 1) to confirm the predictive capabilities of the RCMP; 2) to investigate the association between the RCMP effective protrusive measurement and MRA success; and 3) to evaluate the effectiveness of the RCMP when employed by standard PSG personnel. The current authors hypothesised that when the RCMP test was efficacious, the protrusive measurement (mm) at which this occurred would also be effective with an MRA 28.


Patients were recruited from Alberta Lung Association Sleep Centre (Calgary, AB, Canada), which is the major referral centre for southern Alberta with a population of >1.5 million 29. Referral sources for the centre include family physicians, interns, otolaryngologists, psychiatrists and dentists. As standard management, patients with mild-to-moderate OSA (RDI <30 events·h−1) may be offered a referral for a consultation regarding oral appliance therapy. Patients received a home diagnostic study 30, and patients with OSA were informed of the therapeutic options. Those who chose to pursue oral appliance therapy were approached to participate in the current study. Those with suitable dentition underwent baseline clinical evaluation.

An overnight PSG, using an RCMP (, figs 1 and 2), was performed on all subjects. A polysomnographic technician performed the overnight RCMP trial. On the night of the study, the technician fabricated a custom temporary trial appliance using pre-formed trays customised with impression material. The vertical opening at the central incisors was ∼2–4 mm, with the trial appliance in position in centric occlusion (normal closing) position.

Fig. 1—

A remotely controlled mandibular positioner device.

Fig. 2—

A remotely controlled mandibular positioner device placed intra-orally without polysomnography set-up.

A stepper motor, which was attached to a strut extending from the lower tray, applied force to the upper tray. The motor was remotely controlled using a computer interface program. The force exerted by an axial foot upon the labial surface of the maxillary tray advanced the mandible. The protrusive distance from the initial position was quantified using linear potentiometer feedback.

A computerised polysomnographic system (Sandman, Nellcor Puriton Bennett; Melvin Ltd, Ottawa, ON, Canada) recorded all PSG data. The standard montage consisted of: ECG, electrooculogram, electroencephalogram (EEG, C4/A1), submental electromyogram and digitally recorded snoring sounds. Bilateral nares pressure was recorded by catheters anchored on the upper lip and connected to a pressure transducer that qualitatively assessed airflow. Inductance plethysmography (Respitrace, Ambulatory monitoring, Ardsley, NY, USA) detected thoracic-abdominal motion. Oximetry (Model 3700; Ohmeda, Denver, CO, USA) was used to determine arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2).

The mandible was advanced in 1-mm increments following documentation of baseline obstructive respiratory events in stable stage 2 sleep. An obstructive event was defined either as an apnoea (absence of airflow for 10 s) or as a hypopnoea (a >10 s reduction in either airflow or thoracoabdominal movement, associated with a >3% drop in Sa,O2 and increased pressure deflections in PSG). If an EEG arousal occurred, no further advancement was attempted until stable sleep (at least three epochs of sleep without arousals) returned. If the patient awoke and was unable to fall asleep within 10 min, all advancement was reversed and re-initiated following the appearance of stable stage 2 sleep. Mandibular advancement continued until elimination of obstructive apnoeas, hypopnoeas and nocturnal oxygen desaturation was achieved.

The RCMP test results were scored as follows: successful if obstructive events and snoring were eliminated; failure if the patient could not tolerate the RCMP, if there were technical difficulties with the RCMP device or obstructive events and snoring remained in non-rapid eye movement (REM) or REM sleep. A dentist (L.C. Dort, Alberta Lung Association Sleep Centre) who was blinded to the results of the RCMP study fitted the subjects with an MRA. The MRA KlearwayTM 17 used in this trial is a custom fabricated MRA that is individually titratable to determine the most desirable protrusion over an 11-mm range. The dentist was given a target protrusive distance for all subjects, regardless of the outcome of the RCMP study. When the RCMP test was considered a success, the protrusive distance at which it occurred was reported to the dentist. When the RCMP test failed, protrusive distance of two-thirds of the subject's protrusive capabilities was reported to the dentist. The two-thirds protrusive distance is the routine initial treatment position for the KlearwayTM 17.

The MRA was fabricated at target protrusion. When a patient reported the ability to wear the appliance for a minimum of 4 h at a time at target protrusion during sleep, home portable monitoring was repeated. The MRA was fixed at target protrusion prior to monitoring.

MRA therapy was considered successful if the RDI was reduced to <15·h−1 and <30% of the baseline. If portable monitoring showed the RDI to be <15·h−1, no further advancement was made to the MRA, unless the patient wished to reduce snoring as reported by the bed partner. If the RDI at target was >15·h−1, the MRA was advanced until the patient's discomfort prevented further protrusion. This is referred to as final adjustment. At that time, a second post-treatment portable monitoring was performed. Patients completed a baseline and post-treatment Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) 31, and the Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index questionnaires 32.

The RDI was assessed at baseline, target and final position using a portable monitor that recorded Sa,O2, heart rate, snoring sounds and body position. An off-line algorithm analysed the Sa,O2 signal to determine RDI. The monitor's diagnostic performance characteristics for OSA provided a close estimate of the PSG-determined apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) 30, with a sensitivity and specificity of 98 and 88%, respectively, at an AHI diagnostic criterion of >15·h−1.

Descriptive summary statistical analysis was performed. Non-normally distributed variables were geometrically transformed. Paired t-tests compared baseline RDI with RDI and the MRA at target protrusion. Two-by-two frequency tables, using Fisher's exact test, were employed to examine the association between RCMP test and MRA outcome, as well as to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Target RDI was used as the dependent variable in a multiple regression analysis of clinical predictors. Baseline average RDI, baseline supine RDI, age, BMI, neck circumference and ESS were employed as the independent variables.

The Conjoint Ethics Committee of the University of Calgary (Calgary, AB, Canada) approved the study.


A total of 44 patients were recruited for the study, on the basis of the initial ambulatory sleep study. During the PSG RCMP study, six subjects did not meet the inclusion criteria of RDI >5. The RCMP test and MRA construction was completed for 38 subjects. Five subjects were lost to follow-up after MRA fitting. The study was completed in the remaining 33 subjects. The study population comprised predominately middle-aged, overweight males. The mean±sd initial RDI was 26.9±18.3 (table 1).

View this table:
Table 1—

Baseline characteristics of the study population

MRAs were fitted for 38 subjects. Five subjects did not respond to follow-up contact attempts. Baseline characteristics of those who were lost to follow-up did not differ significantly from those who completed the study. The RCMP test was a success in 15 out of 33 (45%) and failed in 18 out of 33 (55%) subjects. Five subjects were failures because they could not tolerate the RCMP device long enough for sufficient data to be recorded. Two subjects had insufficient data due to a lack of REM sleep and there were two technical failures when the RCMP device stopped working part way through the night. The remaining nine subjects tolerated the device but obstructive events were not eliminated.

A significant association (p = 0.001) was observed between the RCMP test outcome and the treatment outcome with the MRA at the determined target protrusion. MRA therapy was successful in 12 out of 15 (80%) subjects, who had a successful RCMP test and failed in 14 out of 18 (78%) subjects when the RCMP test was a failure (table 2). The sensitivity and specificity of the RCMP test were 75 and 82%, respectively.

View this table:
Table 2—

Association between remotely controlled mandibular positioner(RCMP) test and mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) outcome at target protrusion using different criteria#

The individual changes in RDI with MRA treatment at target protrusion are grouped by RCMP test outcome category and are illustrated in figures 3 and 4. Paired t-tests showed a significant RDI change (p<0.0002) only in the subjects with a successful RCMP test. Additional MRA treatment success was attained in three out of 18 (17%) subjects of those who failed the RCMP test when advancement was continued beyond target. Further advancement in the group with successful RCMP tests did not increase MRA effectiveness.

Fig. 3—

Change in respiratory disturbance index (RDI) for group one for remotely controlled mandibular positioner success.

Fig. 4—

Change in respiratory disturbance index (RDI) for group two for remotely controlled mandibular positioner failure.

The mean target advancement was 6.3 mm in the group where the RCMP was a therapeutic success and 4.8 mm in the group that failed the RCMP test. The maximum protrusion mean was 8.6 mm. This was the mean of the demonstrable mandibular protrusion measured clinically at the time the appliances were fabricated for both groups. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between RCMP successes and failures (table 3).

View this table:
Table 3—

Characteristics by remotely controlled mandibular positioner(RCMP) test outcome

A multiple regression analysis revealed the baseline average RDI as the only significant determinant (p<0.002) of target RDI. Target RDI did not depend on baseline average RDI, baseline supine RDI, age, BMI, neck circumference or ESS. Further regression analysis showed no significant dependence of percentage change in RDI on any of these characteristics.


An RCMP test evaluated efficacy of mandibular advancement in controlling OSA during PSG and determined therapeutic protrusive distance (target) when possible in 38 subjects. Custom MRAs were fitted for all subjects. The MRA compliance rate was 33 out of 38 (87%). MRA therapy achieved therapeutic success at target in 12/15 (80%) subjects who had a successful RCMP test. MRA therapy failed therapeutically at target in 14 out of 18 (78%) subjects whose RCMP test was a failure. The overall success in treating OSA with the MRA at target in compliant subjects was 16 out of 33 (49%). Follow-up evaluation with MRAs at target protrusion demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 75 and 82%, respectively, in determining MRA treatment outcome. A previously published pilot study reported a sensitivity and specificity of 90 and 89%, respectively. Baseline characteristics of both studies show no significant differences. Five subjects in the present study could not tolerate the RCMP device. None of the subjects in the initial study were intolerant of the RCMP. The difference in tolerance may be explained by the protocol of the current study, which was designed to evaluate the RCMP effectiveness under standard PSG conditions. A PSG technician trained in the RCMP technique, yet with limited experience with oral devices and conditions, set up the RCMP. While test tolerance may have been improved by using dental health professionals, the clinical utility of the test is reduced by the need for the presence of these professionals in the PSG setting.

The success of the MRA may have been confounded by the absence of supine-dependent OSA in the predominantly male subjects evaluated. Marklund et al. 22 demonstrated increased success with MRAs in males with supine-dependent OSA.

Target protrusion as determined by the RCMP test was predictive of MRA therapeutic protrusion in all those who had a successful RCMP test. In three of the subjects who failed the RCMP test, advancement beyond two-thirds of the demonstrable protrusive distance on the night of the RCMP eventually resulted in success with the MRA. These three subjects tolerated the RCMP test but continued to have events at the maximum protrusion determined on the night of the RCMP test. This was the maximum protrusion they were able to demonstrate immediately preceding the RCMP test. The eventual therapeutic success with the MRA, at protrusion greater than the originally measured maximum, may reflect accommodation to the MRA over time or technical error at the time of the RCMP test. A dental health professional in attendance at the RCMP test might improve the test reliability. This restriction would significantly reduce the clinical utility of the test.

The negative predictive capability of the RCMP test could be of potential clinical value in presenting treatment options, i.e. patients with a negative or equivocal test could be informed that chances of success with MRA treatment would be poor. Such information may, in turn, enhance acceptance of CPAP therapy. Patients with an RCMP test predicting a successful outcome would possibly benefit by eliminating both time to effective treatment and decreasing cost. The current authors were unable to identify any characteristics, such as baseline RDI or BMI, which could help categorise potential successes and failures. The success of MRA therapy without consideration of RCMP success/failure grouping ranged 49–56%, depending on the criteria used to determine success. A randomised control trial comparing KlearwayTM to CPAP determined therapeutic efficacy to be 61–80%, depending on the severity of the OSA 17. A pilot RCMP trial indicated effectiveness in the range of 53% 28.

A multiple regression analysis examining baseline characteristics did not show baseline RDI, age, weight, mean Sa,O2 or ESS to be predictive of per cent reduction in RDI with the MRA. A model formulated by Mehta et al. 25, which includes both clinical features and cephalometric features, predicts that 82% of the variation in the RDI after MRA therapy is accounted for by neck circumference, baseline RDI and two cephalometric measurements, i.e. retropalatal airway space and the angle between anterior cranial base and mandibular plane. While statistically a good fit, the clinical usefulness of this model has not been tested. Prospective studies are required to confirm that this model will aid clinicians in predicting MRA outcome after baseline sleep test and cephalometric analysis. Recent prospective case series of oral appliances have reported success ranging 54–81% in reducing RDI by ≥50% 33. The model of Mehta et al. 25, which combines clinical and cephalometric features, does not significantly improve the potential to predict success with MRAs compared with the range of reported success in reducing the RDI by ≥50% 33.

Two recent, small studies have investigated titration of MRAs during sleep. One of these included six subjects using the MRA during PSG 34. The patient was awakened, the custom appliance removed and advanced during the sleep study. At the end of the PSG with the custom appliance, all candidates could have been classified as successes, i.e. RDI with MRA ≤15. A limitation of this case series is that subjects were selected who had had a custom appliance fabricated and had undergone an adjustment period. This was not a predictive study.

The second study involved seven subjects 35. A PSG titration study with a trial appliance was compared to a PSG study with a custom appliance. The RDI was reduced to <10·h−1 in 42.9% of subjects. The success with this group of subjects was similar to that reported by other published studies. In addition, the mean±sd mandibular advancement was 12.6±2.7 mm. This advancement is considerably greater than the mean±sd target protrusion of 5.6±2.3 mm and the mean±sd maximum protrusion of 8.6±3.4 mm determined by the present study. Most patients would be unlikely to tolerate an advancement of 12.6 mm in the long term. Although this study was aimed at predicting a therapeutic effect, the subjects had not been adapted to the custom appliance. The second PSG at the therapeutic advancement was conducted on the first night the subject had the custom appliance. It is possible that the subjects would not have been able to adapt to the appliance.

The target distance determined by the RCMP provided a reliable estimate of therapeutic advancement. Determination of target advancement has potential in increasing MRA compliance, decreasing the titration time and decreasing the need for extensive titration capabilities of an appliance. Even when the MRA was well tolerated and the RCMP test was successful the MRA was not effective in treating OSA in all subjects. Three of the 15 patients, who were predicted to have been treated successfully with MRA were failures. The RDI of one subject increased with the MRA and the RDI changed negligibly for the other two subjects. These failures may be related to environmental factors in the home, such as allergies, alcohol and body position. While the increase in area of the upper airway in response to mandibular advancement has been shown to be dependent on the amount of advancement 21, it is also variable. The response of the anteroposterior diameter of the velopharynx has been shown to enlarge in those who respond to MRA therapy 36.

The results of an RCMP test could significantly influence future MRA design and treatment when used in conjunction with other predictive factors. A therapeutic target and prediction of success would eliminate the sometimes long titration period, which is a probable compliance inhibitor with appliance therapy. A nonadjustable design set at target could decrease the time necessary for titration and thereby reduce cost.

The ability to prospectively identify candidates who will experience therapeutic success continues to limit the clinical utility of mandibular repositioning appliances. The remotely controlled mandibular positioner test can aid identification of candidates but additional factors must be investigated and added to the remotely controlled mandibular positioner predictive capabilities to give subjects >80% probability of therapeutic success with a mandibular repositioning appliance.

  • Received June 28, 2004.
  • Accepted December 2, 2005.


View Abstract