The syndrome resulting from combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema has not been comprehensively described.

The current authors conducted a retrospective study of 61 patients with both emphysema of the upper zones and diffuse parenchymal lung disease with fibrosis of the lower zones of the lungs on chest computed tomography.

Patients (all smokers) included 60 males and one female, with a mean age of 65 yrs. Dyspnoea on exertion was present in all patients. Basal crackles were found in 87% and finger clubbing in 43%. Pulmonary function tests were as follows (mean±sd): total lung capacity 88%±17, forced vital capacity (FVC) 88%±18, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 80%±21 (% predicted), FEV1/FVC 69%±13, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity of the lung 37%±16 (% predicted), carbon monoxide transfer coefficient 46%±19. Pulmonary hypertension was present in 47% of patients at diagnosis, and 55% during follow-up. Patients were followed for a mean of 2.1±2.8 yrs from diagnosis. Survival was 87.5% at 2 yrs and 54.6% at 5 yrs, with a median of 6.1 yrs. The presence of pulmonary hypertension at diagnosis was a critical determinant of prognosis.

The authors hereby individualise the computer tomography-defined syndrome of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema characterised by subnormal spirometry, severe impairment of gas exchange, high prevalence of pulmonary hypertension, and poor survival.

Emphysema and the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), are entities defined by distinct clinical, functional, radiological, and pathological characteristics. Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) has been mentioned in passing in series of patients with IPF or has been the subject of case reports or short series 13, but has not hitherto been specifically studied in a large cohort of patients. The current study provides a detailed analysis of the clinical characteristics of a homogenous group of 61 patients with computer tomography (CT)-defined CPFE, thus leading to the individualisation of a characteristic entity, and further shows that the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at diagnosis is a critical determinant of prognosis in these patients.


Case recruitment

This retrospective multicentre study was conducted by the Groupe d'Etudes et de Recherche sur les Maladies “Orphelines” Pulmonaires (GERM“O”P), a collaborative group of >200 physicians dedicated to the study of rare (so-called “orphan”) pulmonary diseases. A letter was sent to all participating physicians of the network asking them to report to the GERM“O”P registry any case of CPFE encountered between January 1985 and December 2003. The clinical data was then collected retrospectively through a detailed questionnaire that was sent to each participating physician who had reported cases. Data collection ended on July 1, 2004.

Selection of cases

Cases were acceptable for inclusion if the following criteria were met. 1) Presence of emphysema on CT scan, defined as well-demarcated areas of decreased attenuation in comparison with contiguous normal lung and marginated by a very thin (<1 mm) or no wall, and/or multiple bullae (>1 cm) with upper zone predominance. 2) Presence of a diffuse parenchymal lung disease with significant pulmonary fibrosis on CT scan, defined as reticular opacities with peripheral and basal predominance, honeycombing, architectural distortion and/or traction bronchiectasis or bronchiolectasis; focal ground-glass opacities and/or areas of alveolar condensation may be associated but should not be prominent.

Only cases for which a CT scan was available for review were included.

Patients with connective tissue disease at the time of the diagnosis of CFPE were excluded from the study, as well as patients with a diagnosis of other interstitial lung diseases, such as drug-induced interstitial lung disease, pneumoconiosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis, pulmonary histiocytosis, lymphangioleiomyomatosis and eosinophilic pneumonia 4.

Clinical analysis

The authors reviewed the medical records, pulmonary function tests and laboratory tests at diagnosis and during follow-up.

High-resolution CT (HRCT) scans of the chest were reviewed on films separately by two of the authors without knowledge of the clinical data, with a third analysis when discordant. They were asked to specify whether the CT pattern of the lower lobe abnormalities was typical of IPF, or strongly suggestive of IPF or fibrosing nonspecific interstitial pneumonia 4. Data were collected for emphysema characteristics and the main interstitial abnormalities, as defined elsewhere 5.

Open lung biopsy, when available, was reviewed according to international criteria 4.

Pulmonary function tests were performed according to the European Respiratory Society guidelines 6. The alveolar–arterial oxygen difference P(A-a),O2 while breathing room air was estimated as the difference between alveolar oxygen partial pressure (PA,O2) and the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (Pa,O2), where:Embedded ImagePa,CO2 is the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood.

PAH was defined by a systolic arterial pulmonary pressure ≥45 mmHg as estimated by the tricuspid regurgitant flow on echocardiography.

Data analysis

Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the end points death or censoring. Patients were censored if they were still alive at last contact (n = 43), had received lung transplantation (n = 2), or died from a known cause other than CPFE (n = 2). The cause of death was considered to be due to CPFE when unknown (n = 4). Comparisons of survival were performed using the log-rank test. Values are presented as mean±sd unless specified otherwise. p<0.05 was considered significant.


Clinical presentation

A total of 73 completed questionnaires were received for analysis. Twelve cases were excluded because of the presence of an associated connective tissue disease at diagnosis of the CPFE (dermatomyositis, n = 2; rheumatoid arthritis, n = 1; systemic sclerosis, n = 1), because the CT scan was not available for review (n = 7), or because CT diagnostic criteria were not met (n = 1). Sixty-one patients were included in the study. Thirty-three patients were collected in two large referral centres (L. Pradel Hospital, Lyon, 21 cases; Avicenne Hospital, Bobigny, 12 cases); each of the core authors collected ≥3 cases; one or two cases were collected by other participants of the group (see Acknowledgements). Based on the records of the epidemiology departments, it was estimated that CPFE accounted for ∼5–10% of cases of idiopathic diffuse parenchymal lung disease.

All patients but one were male, and all were current or ex-smokers (table 1). Ex-smokers had quit smoking for a period of 10.6±10.4 yrs. Two patients had a history of infectious pneumonia; another patient had a history of acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to ammonia exposure. Fourteen patients (23%) had a history of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (n = 9) or atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease (n = 5).

View this table:
Table. 1—

Characteristics and clinical manifestations at diagnosis in 61 patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema

The mean time between the first symptoms and diagnosis of CPFE was 2.3±4.5 yrs (range 0–19 yrs; median 43 days). The characteristics and clinical manifestations at diagnosis are listed in table 1. The major clinical symptoms were dyspnoea on exertion present in all patients, and cough present in half of the patients. Finger clubbing was reported in 43% of the cases. Auscultation of the lungs found abnormalities in 90% of the patients, consisting of bilateral crackles of the lower zones of the lungs in 87%, rarely associated with wheezes (13%).

None of the patients met diagnostic criteria for pneumoconiosis, and none had significant environmental antigenic exposure.

The imaging diagnosis of emphysema preceded the identification of fibrotic changes in 16 cases with a median of 4.7 yrs (0–10.7); fibrosis was observed before emphysema in only three cases; emphysema and fibrosis were discovered concomitantly in 31 patients (no chest radiograph anterior to the diagnosis of CPFE was available in 11 cases).

Biology and bronchoalveolar lavage

The haemoglobin level was 14.9 g·dL−1±2.1, and was >16 g·dL−1 in 14 patients. The level of α1-antitrypsin was low (0.19 g·L−1) in a single patient who was PiZZ homozygous; another patient with a PiMZ phenotype had a normal level of α1-antitrypsin (1.6 g·L−1).

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed in 27 patients. The BAL leucocyte count was 240±200×106·L−1 (range 71–760). The BAL differential cell count was as follows: macrophages 76%±24 (range 10–90), neutrophils 10%±19 (2–73), eosinophils 2%±10 (0–43), and lymphocytes 5%±9 (0–43).

Antinuclear antibodies were present in 17 out of 44 patients tested (39%), with a median titre of 1/160 (range 1/64–1/1,280), including 10 with a homogenous pattern and five with a speckled pattern, with anti-double-stranded DNA in none. Circulating immune complexes were found in six out of 20 cases tested, and rheumatoid factor in four out of 43 patients tested. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies were present with a low titre in four out of 35 patients tested, without anti-proteinase 3 or anti-myeloperoxidase specificity on ELISA.

Pulmonary function tests

The body mass index was normal (18.5–25) in 15 patients, >25 in 36 patients (60%), and <18.5 in none. Six-minute walk test was performed in 23 patients, including nine who were receiving oxygen during the test; the 6-min walking distance was 336±139 m (range 50–548), with a decrease in arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SP,O2) of 9±6% (0–20%), and a SP,O2 of 85±6% (74–96%) at the end of the test.

The pulmonary function parameters are listed in table 2. Despite the presence of significant emphysematous changes on the CT scan in all patients, the mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) was 69%, and only half of the patients (30 out of 61) presented with an obstructive ventilatory defect, as defined by FEV1/FVC <70%. The FEV1 was <80% of predicted (% pred) in 29 patients (48%), and the mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25–75%) was <80% in 47 out of 57 tested patients (82%). Improvement of FEV1 upon bronchodilators was >15% in none. A restrictive ventilatory defect as shown by decrease of total lung capacity (TLC) was found in 12 out of 56 patients (21%). TLC >120% pred was present in only two patients, and residual volume >200% pred in none. Lung volumes were normal in 42 out of 56 patients (75%). Transfer factor for carbon monoxide (TL,CO) was <80% pred values in 56 out of 57 tested patients (98%), while transfer coefficient of the lung (KCO) was <80% pred in 54 out of 57 patients (97%). Overall, spirometry was normal in 20 out of 61 patients (33%), including 16 with normal TLC. A decrease of TL,CO was the only abnormal function test in 14 patients. A total of 50 patients (82%) were hypoxaemic at rest (Pa,O2 <10 kPa). At exercise, Pa,O2 decreased by a mean of −1.5±1.6 kPa and was <10 kPa in 18 out of 21 tested patients (86%).

View this table:
Table. 2—

Pulmonary function tests in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema

Pulmonary arterial hypertension

Forty-three patients and 49 patients had echocardiography at diagnosis and during follow-up, respectively. The prevalence of PAH was 47% at diagnosis, and 55% during follow-up. The mean systolic arterial pulmonary pressure was 48±19 mmHg (range 21–96) at diagnosis and 52±20 mmHg (range 22–96) during follow-up. PAH was confirmed by right cardiac catheterisation in six patients, with a mean arterial pulmonary pressure ≥40 mmHg in four patients (median 40 mmHg, range 24–54). Eleven patients (18%) developed right cardiac failure during follow-up.

Computed tomography of the chest and pathology

According to the inclusion criteria, CT scan of the chest showed coexistence of emphysema with upper zone predominance and parenchymal lung disease suggestive of pulmonary fibrosis of the lower lobes in all patients (fig. 1). The main findings of radiological review are summarised in table 3.

Fig. 1—

Imaging of a typical case of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. a) Chest radiograph showing bilateral infiltrative opacities of the lower lobes and hyperlucent upper zones. b) Chest computed tomography (CT) of the upper zones of the lungs showing predominant centrilobular and paraseptal emphysema. c) Chest CT of the lower zones of the lungs showing reticular opacities, honeycombing, and traction bronchiectasis. Lung biopsy performed in this patient showed centrilobular emphysema of the upper lobes and usual interstitial pneumonia of the lower lobes.

View this table:
Table. 3—

Computed tomography (CT) findings

Centrilobular emphysema was present in the upper zones in all but two patients. Paraseptal emphysema was particularly frequent in this population (93%). Bullae were seen in half of the patients.

Honeycombing, reticular intralobular opacities and traction bronchiectasis were the most frequent findings, present in 95%, 87%, and 73% of the cases, respectively. Nonprominent ground-glass attenuation was present in two-thirds of the patients. Air-space consolidation and micronodules were rare. Fibrotic changes predominated in the lower and/or middle lobe(s) in all cases, and in the subpleural areas in 56 cases (95%). The CT pattern in the lower lobes was typical of IPF in 31 patients (51%), strongly suggestive of IPF or fibrosing nonspecific interstitial pneumonia in 21 patients (34%), and showed a complex pattern with predominant reticular opacities in the remaining cases.

Histological analysis of open lung biopsy or explanted lung was available for review in eight cases, and confirmed the presence of predominantly centrilobular emphysema in the upper lobes. Interstitial pneumonia was classified as usual interstitial pneumonia in five cases, desquamative interstitial pneumonia in one case, organising pneumonia in one case, and unclassifiable interstitial pneumonia in one case.

Treatment and outcome

Due to pulmonary fibrosis, half of the patients (30 out of 61) received oral corticosteroids, starting with a minimal daily dose of 0.5 mg·kg−1 prednisone or prednisolone. Thirteen patients (21%) received further immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents. Fourteen patients (23%) received long-term inhaled corticosteroids. Some improvement of the restrictive ventilatory defect was obtained with treatment in only five patients (8%), while 11 patients remained stable clinically (18%) and 29 deteriorated (48%) over the follow-up period (in 16 patients the clinical outcome was not evaluable). A follow-up CT scan of the chest was available in 36 patients, showing worsening of emphysema lesions in five, worsening of fibrotic changes in 11, improvement of ground-glass opacities in two, and stable abnormalities in the remaining cases. Thirty patients (49%) received long-term nasal oxygen therapy during follow-up, including 17 in whom oxygen therapy had to be increased during follow-up. Twenty patients (33%) were hospitalised for acute increase of dyspnoea.

The mean length of follow-up after the diagnosis was 2.1±2.8 yrs (0–12 yrs), and the total time interval from the onset of pulmonary manifestations to the last follow-up (or death) averaged 4.6±5.6 yrs (ranging 0.2–22.2 yrs). Two patients underwent pulmonary transplantation 5.6 and 11.7 yrs after the diagnosis. Forty-seven patients were alive at the last follow-up. Fourteen patients died over that period of time, with a median time interval from diagnosis to death of 3.2 yrs. Causes of death were respiratory failure (n = 7), intestinal malignancy (n = 1), post-operative sepsis (n = 1), surgical complications following lung transplantation (n = 1), and unknown (n = 4).

Survival analysis

Survival calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method was 91.3% at 1 yr, 87.5% at 2 yrs, and 54.6% at 5 yrs, with a median survival of 6.1 yrs (fig. 2).

Fig. 2—

a) Survival of patients with combined emphysema and fibrosis (Kaplan-Meier analysis); 5-yr survival was 55%. b) Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival for subjects with combined emphysema and fibrosis stratified on the basis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at diagnosis (––: no PAH, systolic arterial pulmonary pressure <45 mmHg, 5-yr survival 75%; ----: PAH, systolic arterial pulmonary pressure ≥45 mmHg, 5-yr survival 25%); p = 0.03.

Clinical, radiological and functional variables were tested for influence on survival. The only statistically significant difference in survival (hazard ratio = 4.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.170–27.92, p = 0.03) was found between patients with PAH at diagnosis (median survival 3.9 yrs, 95% CI: 1.3–6.6; mean survival 4.8 yrs, 95% CI: 1.6–8.0; 5-yr survival 25%) and patients without pulmonary hypertension (median survival not reached; mean survival 9.1 yrs, 95% CI: 6.5–11.7; 5-yr survival 75%; fig. 2). Systolic arterial pulmonary pressure correlated with KCO (Spearman rank coefficient = 0.36; p = 0.031) but not with other lung function parameters (data not shown). No significant difference was observed between patients with or without PAH at diagnosis in terms of clinical, radiological and pulmonary function parameters (data not shown).


The current study provides a comprehensive analysis of a homogenous group of 61 patients with CPFE as defined by imaging criteria, leading to the individualisation of a characteristic entity. PAH at diagnosis represented a critical determinant of prognosis in these patients.

Patients were almost exclusively males. All were current or ex-smokers. The median age at diagnosis (65 yrs), the prevalence of finger clubbing (43%), the presence of velcro-type fine inspiratory crackles predominating in the basal areas on chest auscultation in a majority of the patients, and the BAL differential cell pattern were similar to that found in IPF 7. Nonspecific antinuclear antibodies were found in a third of the patients, although none of them had overt connective tissue disease at the diagnosis of CPFE.

Since little is known of the imaging features of CPFE, in this descriptive study, the authors chose to include patients with diffuse parenchymal lung disease suggestive of fibrosis of the lower lobes (associated with upper lobe emphysema), rather than restricting inclusion criteria to only those patients with a CT pattern typical of IPF. However, the CT pattern was that of interstitial pneumonia in all cases, with a CT pattern of IPF or fibrosing nonspecific interstitial pneumonia in 84% of the cases. The current authors suspect that the CT pattern of IPF may be altered by emphysema, so that radiological criteria for the diagnosis of IPF may not apply properly in CPFE. Since they include the evidence of restriction as a major criterion 4, the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria for the diagnosis of IPF in the absence of a surgical lung biopsy are not well suited for the diagnosis of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias when combined with emphysema. Honeycombing, reticular intralobular opacities, and traction bronchiectases were the most frequent findings. Although cases with prominent ground-glass opacities were not included according to inclusion criteria, some ground-glass opacities were present more frequently than in IPF 4, suggesting that smoking-related interstitial lung disease, such as desquamative interstitial pneumonia and respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial pneumonia, may be present in some heavy smokers with CPFE. A histological pattern of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia may also be present in some patients with CPFE and ground-glass opacities, as reported in isolated cases 8. The analysis of eight cases of CPFE with open lung biopsy or lung transplantation indeed showed usual interstitial pneumonia to be the predominant pattern in the lower lobes, with desquamative interstitial pneumonia in one case.

Lung function tests in patients with CPFE markedly differed from both those of patients with IPF and those of patients with emphysema. As mentioned in previous reports 1, 9, the mean values of lung volumes were near normal, thus contrasting with markedly impaired capacity of carbon monoxide transfer. Measurement of FEF25–75% may be more useful than FEV1 to detect obstructive lung disease in patients with CPFE. Hyperinflation and high compliance of the emphysematous areas of the lungs probably compensate the volume loss due to fibrosis of the lower lobes, while pulmonary emphysema and fibrosis may have additive or synergistic effects on carbon monoxide transfer and exercise hypoxaemia. Spirometry and measurement of TLC were normal in a quarter of the patients. As a consequence, CPFE may be underrecognised in patients with subnormal or normal spirometry if carbon monoxide transfer and/or exercise blood gases are not measured.

As both upper zone emphysema and lower zone fibrosis may occasionally be missed on plain chest radiographs, careful analysis of chest HRCT is warranted to accurately diagnose this syndrome. Centrilobular emphysema predominating in the upper lobes, which typically results from smoking, was the predominant radiological presentation of emphysema, while panacinar emphysema was not seen, but it is known that HRCT is inaccurate to distinguish panacinar from centrilobular emphysema 10. A novel finding in this study is the outstanding prevalence (>90%) of paraseptal emphysema (also called distal acinar emphysema), suggesting that it may be a hallmark of CPFE. Paraseptal emphysema is associated with tobacco smoking 11, and may by itself mimick interlobular opacities and septal lines. However, genuine infiltrative opacities suggestive of lung fibrosis were observed in the lower zones in the patients of the current study. Relationships between interstitial opacities and emphysema were variable, with emphysema lesions of the upper zones distant to fibrotic lesions of the bases in some cases, progressive transition from emphysema and fibrosis of the adjacent lung in the upper lobes to honeycomb lung in the lower lobes in other cases, and paraseptal emphysema with fibrosis-like thickening of the interlobular septa in remaining cases.

There is significant heterogeneity in survival time among patients with interstitial lung disease 4. As estimation of prognosis may have an influence on drug treatment decisions, referral for transplantation and information given to the patient, attempts to identify indicators that reliably predict survival have become increasingly important. This study provides the first survival analysis of patients with CPFE. Median survival was 6.1 yrs, a better survival than that reported in large studies of biopsy-proven usual interstitial pneumonia which have shown a median survival of only 35 months from the time of the initial visit 12. However, survival in CPFE was worse than that expected for emphysema in the absence of fibrosis, where an almost 100% 2-yr survival was observed in patients with FEV1 above one-third of predicted 13, 14, and a 19% mortality at 5 yrs in patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency 15.

The prevalence of pulmonary hypertension was particularly high in patients with CPFE (nearly half the patients who underwent echocardiography at diagnosis), and was higher than that reported in IPF 1618 or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 19, 20, even at a late stage of the disease. In most cases, echocardiography was performed as part of routine investigations in patients with dyspnoea. However, this study being retrospective, not all patients had an echocardiography, so that the possibility that echocardiography may have been performed more often in patients with a more severe disease, and hence a higher likelihood of pulmonary hypertension, cannot be ruled out. Even assuming that patients who did not undergo echocardiography may not have pulmonary hypertension, the minimal calculated prevalence of pulmonary hypertension would still be 33% at diagnosis and 44% during follow-up. In contrast, pulmonary hypertension may have been missed by echocardiography in some cases, since the tricuspid regurgitation flow is not measurable in up to a third of patients with COPD 21 (although chest hyperinflation may not be as important in CPFE as in emphysema). This prevalence is unlikely to be due to studying patients at a particularly late stage, and rather reflects the natural history of CPFE. Pulmonary hypertension despite a rather moderate daytime hypoxaemia at rest may reflect the reduction of the capillary bed secondary to both emphysema and fibrosis (rather than the sole hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction), as suggested by the significant correlation between KCO and systolic arterial pulmonary pressure. Significantly, the presence of pulmonary hypertension at diagnosis was an independent predictor of survival. PAH has been shown to significantly affect survival in patients with COPD 20, but this has not been clearly demonstrated in patients with IPF, although evidence of pulmonary hypertension on chest radiograph has been related to a poor prognosis 12.

The pathophysiology of CPFE is unknown. A history of tobacco smoking was present in all patients, suggesting that it may be a strong determinant of the pathophysiology of this syndrome. The role of cigarette smoking is well established in emphysema 14. Case control studies have suggested that smoking may also be a risk factor for the development of IPF 22. In addition, tobacco smoking may alter lung function in patients in IPF 23, 24. It has been suggested that traction of the upper zones of the lung by fibrotic lower zones may contribute to emphysema 1. However, radiographic fibrotic changes rarely preceded the onset of emphysema, indicating that emphysema in CPFE did not result only from fibrotic lung retraction. It may be speculated that both emphysema and fibrosis may in some cases be related to a common environmental trigger and (or) genetic susceptibility factor, with tobacco exposure playing a central role. CPFE may thus result from the coincidental occurrence of a smoking-related interstitial lung disease in a patient with smoking-related emphysema (the latter may facilitate honeycombing in a fibrotic lung).

Therapeutic options in CPFE are limited. There was no significant benefit of corticosteroid or immunosuppressive treatment in this retrospective series. Tobacco smoking should be discontinued. Interferon-γ is poorly effective in IPF 25, causes emphysema in mice 26, and thus is not advisable in CPFE. Specific treatments of pulmonary hypertension have not yet been evaluated in the context of pulmonary emphysema, IPF, and CPFE.

In conclusion, the syndrome of combined emphysema of the upper lobes and fibrosis of the lower lobes on chest computed tomography results in a characteristic functional profile, with preserved lung volumes, strongly impaired carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung, and hypoxaemia at exercise, thus deserving the individualisation of this entity apart from both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary emphysema. Despite subnormal spirometry, which may be responsible for its underrecognition, combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema is a severe entity. The presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension at diagnosis is a critical determinant of prognosis.

Note added to proof: since the submission of this article, pathological changes consistent with both emphysema and fibrosis have been demonstrated in transgenic mice overexpressing tumour necrosis factor-α 27, which may represent an experimental animal model of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema.


The authors would like to thank C. Youakim, R. Frognier, J.O. Maillard, C. Compère, G. Brinchault, and S. Guillot for assistance in data collection, and S. Barrot and C. Silarakis for data entry and secretarial work. The authors would also like to thank M. Brauner (Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny) for reviewing the CT scans, and F. Thivolet-Béjui (Hôpital L. Pradel, Lyon), M. Kambouchner (Hôpital Avicenne) and E. Brambilla (Grenoble) for pathological analysis.

The following members of the Groupe d'Etude et de Recherche sur les Maladies “Orphelines” Pulmonaires (GERM“O”P) participated in the study by including one or more cases: P. Carré (Carcassonne), F. Chabot (Nancy), G. Chatté (Caluire), D. Coëtmeur (Saint-Brieuc), J-F. Cordier (Lyon), V. Cottin (Lyon), I. Court-Fortune (Saint-Etienne), B. Crestani (Paris), J.C. Dalphin (Besançon), P. Delaval (Rennes), G. Devouassoux (Lyon), A. Dietemann (Strasbourg), B. Gentil (Bourgoin), M. Humbert (Paris), D. Israel-Biet (Paris), J. Lacronique (Paris), M. Mairesse (Namur, Belgium), E. Marchand (Yvoir, Belgium), H. Nunes (Bobigny), M. Reynaud-Gaubert (Marseille), I. Tillie-Leblond (Lille), and D. Valeyre (Bobigny).

  • Received February 23, 2005.
  • Accepted June 29, 2005.


View Abstract