Abstract

Exosomes are 30–100 nm diameter vesicles formed by inward budding of endosomal compartments and are produced by several cell types, including T‐cells, B‐cells and dendritic cells (DC)s. Exosomes from DCs express major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) class I and II, and co-stimulatory molecules on their surface, and can induce antigen-specific activation of T‐cells.

The aims of the present study were to investigate for the presence of exosomes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from healthy individuals, and to establish if these exosomes bear MHC and co-stimulatory molecules.

The authors analysed BALF taken from seven healthy volunteers and used exosomes from monocyte-derived DC (MDDC) cultures as a reference. After ultracentrifugation, exosomes were bound to anti‐MHC class II coated magnetic beads and analysed by flow cytometry and electron microscopy.

The authors report for the first time that exosomes are present in BALF. These exosomes are similar to MDDC derived exosomes as they express MHC class I and II, CD54, CD63 and the co-stimulatory molecule CD86.

The results demonstrate that exosomes are present in the lung, and since they contain both major histocompatibility complex and co-stimulatory molecules it is likely that they are derived from antigen presenting cells and might have a regulatory role in local immune defence.

This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (grants no. 16x-7924, 74x-14182, and 6537), the Swedish Council for Work Life Sciences, the Swedish Asthma and Allergy Association's Research Foundation, the Hesselman Foundation, Konsul TH Bergs Foundation, the Swedish Heart‐Lung Foundation, the Vårdal Foundation, the Centre for Allergy Research at Karolinska Institutet, the King Oscar II Jubilee Foundation, the King Gustaf V 80th Birthday Fund and the Karolinska Institutet.

Exosomes are 30–100 nm diameter vesicles produced by different cell types, including reticulocytes 1, platelets 2, B‐lymphocytes 3, T‐lymphocytes 4, mast cells 5, epithelial cells 6 and dendritic cells (DC)s 7. Exosomes are formed by inward budding of the limiting membrane of endosomal compartments, called multivesicular bodies (MVB)s 8. In antigen presenting cells (APC)s MVBs are the main site for loading major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II and recycling MHC class I molecules with exogenous antigens. The MHC molecules are located both on the limiting membrane and on the internal vesicles. When MVBs fuse with the plasma membrane the internal vesicles are released extracellularly and become exosomes 3. APCs secrete exosomes that carry peptide-loaded MHC molecules, which can stimulate T‐cell proliferation in vitro 3. T‐cell stimulation has also been seen when using exosomes from rat mast cells engineered to express mouse or human MHC class II molecules 9. In a mouse model, exosomes have shown a good potential for use as a tool in cancer therapies, where exosomes with tumour-peptide loaded MHC molecules were used for tumour eradication 7. Exosomes from APCs do not only express MHC molecules, but also co-stimulatory molecules, such as CD86. They further express proteins not detected on the cell surface, such as the tetraspan proteins CD63 and CD82 7, which interact with membrane proteins, such as integrins and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)‐DR 10.

Exosomes may not only have a role in T‐cell activation, but may also function as a communicator between cells in the immune system. Intestinal epithelial cells secrete exosome-like vesicles, which favour cross communication between the intestinal epithelium and the T‐cells in the mucosa or in the blood 6. Upon T‐cell receptor (TCR) triggering, T‐cells produce exosome-like vesicles expressing TCR and CD3, which may deliver signals to target cells baring the right MHC‐peptide complex 4.

The lung is constantly exposed to inhaled particles and has numerous capillaries making its' mucosa a vulnerable surface between the environment and internal tissues. Therefore, it is important to have a powerful local immune defence. Whether exosomes are part of such a defence in the lung has not previously been addressed. The authors of the present study investigated if exosomes are present in human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from healthy individuals, using exosomes from monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) as a reference. The authors show for the first time, using flow cytometry and electron microscopy (EM), that exosomes are present in BALF. The authors found that these exosomes selected for MHC class II expression, such as exosomes derived from MDDC cultures, express HLA‐DR, MHC class I, CD54, CD63 and the co-stimulatory molecule CD86.

Materials and methods

Subjects

BALF from seven healthy nonsmoking individuals aged 22–51 yrs (median 25 yrs), two males and five females, were analysed. None had a history of atopy, and all had normal serum Immunoglobulin (Ig)E values (<120 kUL−1, ImmunoCap, Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden), normal chest radiographs and were without signs of respiratory infection for ≥1 month prior to the study. The local ethics committee approved the study and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and handling of cells

Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (five aliquots of 50 mL phosphate buffered saline (PBS)) was performed as described previously 11. The BALF was then strained through a double layer of Dacron nets (Millipore, Bedford, Ireland), and centrifuged at 400×g for 10 min at 4°C. Cell viability was determined by Trypan blue exclusion and was >90%. For differential cell counts, cytospins were prepared at 20×g for 3 min and stained in May‐Grünwald Giemsa. A total of 500 cells were counted.

Generation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells from peripheral blood

Buffy coats from six healthy blood donors at the Karolinska Hospital blood bank (Karolinska, Sweden) were used for generation of MDDCs as described previously 12, 13. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated by density centrifugation on Ficoll Paque (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden). CD14+ monocytes were positively selected using anti‐CD14 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Separated cells were analysed by flow cytometry for their expression of CD14 and purity ranged 88–96% (median 92%, n=6). The cells were diluted to 4×105 cells·mL−1 and cultured for 7 days in the presence of granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor and interleukin 4 13. The medium was depleted from exosomes as described previously 14. On day seven the MDDCs were analysed by flow cytometry and had a typical immature phenotype 13. The expression of CD1a ranged 81–91% (median 86%, n=6).

Exosome preparations

BALF stored at −80°C from seven healthy volunteers or cellsupernatants from MDDCs cultured for 7 days, were used for exosome preparations. The exosomes were purified as described previously with minor modifications 3. The supernatants were centrifuged at 3,000×g for 20 min in room temperature (RT) and ultracentrifuged at 10,000×g for 30 min at 4°C to remove cell debris. For the collection of exosomes the supernatants were ultracentrifuged at 110,000 ×g for 1 h at 4°C. The exosomes were washed and resuspended in PBS and stored at −80°C. Exosome samples were measured for protein content using BioRad DC protein assay (Bio‐Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The protein content of theexosome preparations from BALF ranged 0.20–0.51 µg protein·mL−1, median 0.30 µg protein·mL−1, of original volume BALF, n=7.

Exosome coating to beads

Exosomes were adsorbed onto dynabeads precoated with mouse IgM antihuman MHC class II (Dynal®, Oslo, Norway) in PBS containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.01% sodium-azide overnight at RT 15. Pilot experiments with exosomes from MDDC supernatants (MDDC‐exosomes) showed the beads to be saturated with exosomes at a concentration of 1 µg protein to 1 µl beads (∼4×105 beads). The authors also tested the saturation of beads with exosomes from BALF (BALF‐exosomes). Here, the authors needed up to 10 times more protein to saturate the anti‐MHC class II beads. Due to restricted amounts of BALF‐exosomes the authors coated the beads with the amount of BALF‐exosomes that gave a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of ≥17 for HLA‐DR. The MFI for the isotype matched-control antibody was normalised to 10 fluorescent units 15. For EM the authors used 4–5 µg protein per 1 µL beads for BALF‐exosomes and 1 µg protein per 1 µL beads for MDDC‐exosomes. Due to the limited amount of exosomes the authors could not analyse the exosomes from all individuals for all molecules with both flow cytometry and EM.

Flow cytometry

BALF‐exosomes from seven healthy volunteers, MDDC‐exosomes and DCs from six blood donors were analysed by flow cytometry. The following mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were used: anti‐HLA‐DR (Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)), anti‐CD14 FITC and anti‐CD54 phycoeythrin (PE) (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA), anti‐CD86 FITC, anti‐CD80 FITC, anti‐CD40 FITC, anti‐MHC class I FITC, anti‐CD63 PE (PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA), and anti‐CD1a PE (Coulter Corporation, Hialeah, FL, USA) and compared with isotype-matched controls (Becton Dickinson). Cells or exosomes on beads were incubated with mAbs for 30 min on ice, in the dark, in PBS with 0.05% sodium-azide and 0.5% BSA for cells and in PBS with 0.01% sodium-azide and 0.1% BSA for exosomes. Samples were analysed by a Fluorescence-activated cell sorting calibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). A minimum of 104 cells and a minimum of 5×103 beads per sample were examined. The MFI for isotype-matched controls were normalised to 10 fluorescence units. The variation between FACS stainings was evaluated with MDDC‐exosomes using pentaplicate determinations. The MFI for the isotype control antibody mouse IgG2a‐FITC was 10.0±0.05, 10±0.05 for CD14 and 55.3±1.34 for HLA‐DR. Based on these observations the authors set the end-point for a positive expression at 10.2 (10.0+3×sd for isotype control antibody).

Cells from BALF were analysed by flow cytometry for their expression of HLA‐DR (DAKO Corporation, Carpinteria, CA, USA), CD14 (DAKO Corporation) and CD86 (Serotec, Oxford, UK) using primary antibodies and a secondary PE‐conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody (DAKO Corporation). A minimum of 104 cells per sample were examined in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer.

Electron microscopy

BALF‐exosomes from three healthy volunteers and MDDC‐exosomes from one blood donor were coated to beads and incubated with a purified mouse IgG1 anti‐CD63 mAb (PharMingen) and a purified rat IgG2a anti‐HLA‐DR mAb (Accurate Chemical and Scientific Corporation, Westbury, NY, USA) overnight at 4°C. After repeated washings the beads were incubated with a 5 nm gold conjugated anti-rat IgG antibody and a 10 nm gold conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody (Sigma Chemical Company). The exosomes-coated beads were then pelleted (13,400 g, 30 min, at RT) and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate‐HCl buffer (pH 7.3) with 0.05 M sucrose. The specimens were postfixed in 1.5% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.3) with 0.5% potassium ferrocyanate for 90 min at 4°C, dehydrated in ethanol, stained with 2% uranyl acetate in ethanol, and embedded in epoxy resin. Sections of 50–70 nm thickness were cut with a Leica Ultracut (Leica/Reichert, Vienna, Austria), picked up on grids, stained with lead citrate, and examined in a Philips CM120 EM (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The number of gold particles were counted on 50 exosomes from each preparation and compared with isotype-matched controls, mouse IgG1 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and rat IgG2a (PharMingen), and the mean number of gold particles per exosome was calculated.

Results

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell counts

BALF cells were retrieved and counted from all seven individuals (table 1). The results were similar to previous reports of BAL cells in healthy nonsmokers 16, with a majority of the cells characterised as macrophages, and a few as lymphocytes, mast cells or neutrophils. Occasionally, a few epithelial cells could be identified. BALF cells from all seven individuals were analysed by flow cytometry and found to express HLA‐DR, CD14 and CD86 (table 1).

View this table:
Table 1

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) recovery and cell count data from seven healthy individuals

Exosomes are present in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Exosomes were detected in BALF from all seven individuals by flow cytometry. The BALF‐exosomes expressed HLA‐DR, CD54, CD63 and CD86 (table 2 and fig. 1). Further, exosomes from two out of three individuals showed expression of MHC class I (table 2). The molecules found on BALF‐exosomes were in agreement with those detected on MDDC‐exosomes (fig. 1). In addition, the MDDC‐exosomes expressed CD40 and CD80, which were not detected on BALF exosomes. The level of MHC class I and II expression varied between BALF exosome donors, which was also seen for MDDC‐exosomes (table 2). The authors could not detect any expression of CD3 or CD14 (table 2 and fig. 1).

Fig. 1.—

Expression of surface molecules exosomes coated beads, with exosomes from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (a), c), e), g), i), k), m), o), q)) and monocyte derived dendritic cells supernatants (b), d), f), h), j), l), n), p), r)), with controls shown in. All exosomes were coated to antimajor histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II magnetic beads and analysed by flow cytometry. All antibodies used were compared with isotype-matched controls. A minimum of 5×103 beads per sample were examined. Results shown are from one experiment taken from the 2–7 experiments performed. HLA‐DR: human leukocyte antigen‐DR.

View this table:
Table 2

Characterisation of surface molecules on exosome-coated beads

Both BALF exosomes and MDDC exosomes had positive staining for CD63 and HLA‐DR when analysed by immuno EM (fig. 2). The exosomes were 30–100 nm in size, in accordance with previous findings 17. BALF‐exosomes had a higher number of anti‐CD63 labelling (median, 1.7; range, 1.2–2.1 antibodies/exosome) than anti‐HLA‐DR labelling (median, 0.1; range, 0.1–0.2 antibodies/exosome). In contrast, MDDC exosomes had higher HLA‐DR labelling (2.5 antibodies/exosome) than CD63 labelling (0.6 antibodies/exosome). This was also evident when the exosomes were analysed by flow cytometry (table 2 and fig. 1).

Fig. 2.—

Exosomes detected by immune electron microscopy (EM). Exosomes from a) bronchoalveolar lavage and b) monocyte derived dendritic cells were coated to antimajor histocompatibility class II magnetic beads, stained for CD63 and human leukocyte antigen‐DR HLA‐DR using gold-conjugated antibodies and analysed by EM. The detection of HLA‐DR (arrow 1) used 5 nm gold conjugated antibodies and 10 nm gold conjugated antibodies were used for the detection of CD63 (arrow 2). Scale bar=100 nm.

Discussion

The authors showed for the first time that exosomes are present in BALF obtained from healthy individuals, and that they are similar to MDDC exosomes in that they express HLA‐DR, MHC class I, CD63, as well as CD86 and CD54.

The protein levels needed to saturate the beads with MDDC exosomes were highly reproducible, supporting the theory that the MDDC supernatant is a reliable source of exosomes. Higher levels of protein were needed to saturate anti‐MHC class II magnetic beads with BALF exosomes, probably because exosomes from BALF come from different cellular sources, including MHC class II negative cells. Another reason why higher protein levels are needed for saturation of anti‐MHC class II magnetic beads with BALF exosomes compared with MDDC exosomes could be that thepurification of exosomes from BALF might lead to co-purification of surfactant, which is a complex mixture of lipids and proteins of vital importance for lung function 18. Therefore, surfactant could contribute to the total protein content in the exosome preparations from BALF. The reason that the MFI in general was lower for BALF exosomes compared with MDDC exosomes may be due to the beads that were not saturated due to the restricted amount of BALF exosomes.

The expression of MHC class I and II, CD63, CD86 and CD54 found on exosomes from DCs is in accordance with previous studies 7, 14, 15, as is also the absence of CD14 and the poor expression of CD80 15. However, the detection of CD40 on MDDC exosomes is contradictory to the findings ofClayton et al. 15 who were unable to detect CD40. MHC and co-stimulatory molecules are not only present on exosomes from DCs, therefore the exosomes detected in BALF might also be derived from other cell types. Exosomes from intestinal epithelial cells bear both MHC class I and II molecules, besides CD63 6. CD54, CD86, CD40 and MHC class II have been found on mast cell-derived exosomes 19. Moreover, CD54, CD86, CD63 and MHC class I and II have been detected on exosomes derived from B‐cells 3, 20, 15. Exosomes from T‐cells have been shown to bear CD63 and MHC class I and II molecules 4. It would be expected that the majority of the exosomes detected in BALF originate from macrophages, since they were by far the most dominant cell type (table 1). Another possibility is that some of the exosomes are derived from cells that are not recovered in the BALF, e.g. epithelial cells.

CD86 is a co-stimulatory molecule of great importance for prevention of anergy, induction of clonal expansion and differentiation of T‐cells 21. CD54 is an adhesion molecule that interacts with lymphocyte function-associated antigen (LFA)‐1 to retain T‐cells at the surface of APCs like DCs 22, and it can also deliver co-stimulatory signals to T‐cells 23. In addition, CD54 is important for cell migration. The fact that exosomes are located in the lung at the site of antigen entry and that these exosomes express MHC class II and I, as well as CD86 and CD54, is an indication that exosomes could be capable of homing to T‐cell areas in lymph nodes and have a role in T‐cell stimulation by adhering and presenting antigens, as well as providing co-stimulatory signals. In addition, they could have a role in stimulating memory T‐cells present in the lung. CD54 on exosomes could initiate adhesion to other cell types, thereby delivering signals between cells of the immune system. In a recent study, exosomes were found to be capable of promoting the exchange of functional peptide MHC complexes between DCs, which could increase the number of DCs bearing a certain peptide 24. Another study indicated that follicular DCs can acquire microvesicles from other cells 25.

The exact function of exosomes in vivo is still unknown. APCs might secrete exosomes bearing antigen loaded MHC molecules, which could contribute to the stimulation of T‐cells and give an amplified immune reaction. Alternatively, exosomes could be secreted to inhibit T‐cell activation and keep the immune system in balance. Exosome-like structures, called tolerosomes, are released from small intestinal epithelial cells 26. Tolerosomes carry MHC class II with bound antigenic peptide sampled from the gut lumen, and are capable of inducing antigen specific tolerance in naive recipient rats 26.

Taken together, the present study results demonstrate the presence of exosomes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. They exhibit surface presence of major histocompatibility complexes class I and II, as well as CD86, CD63 and CD54. This suggests that exosomes might have a role in antigen delivery or immune regulation during airway antigen exposure. The authors have preliminary data on the presence of exosomes expressing human leukocyte antigen ‐DR in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from sarcoidosis patients and from birch pollen allergic patients during an allergic reaction. A future task will be to investigate the role of exosomes during inflammatory reactions in the lung.

  • Received April 14, 2003.
  • Accepted May 29, 2003.

References

View Abstract