ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print July 26, 2006
Eur Respir J 2006, doi:10.1183/09031936.06.00126005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/4/772    most recent
09031936.06.00126005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Reiss, T.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, S.
Right arrow Articles by Reiss, T.F.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

An Oral Selective M3 Anticholinergic Receptor Antagonist in COPD

S. Lu 1, D.D. Parekh 1, O. Kuznetsova 2, S.A. Green 1, C.A. Tozzi 1, T.F. Reiss 1*

1 Depts of Respiratory and Allergy
2 Biostatistics, Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: theodore_reiss{at}merck.com.


   Abstract

Anticholinergic antagonists have been used for a century as bronchodilators for COPD. This study investigated whether an oral M3-selective anticholinergic agent (OrM3) would provide an improved therapeutic advantage compared with an inhaled anticholinergic agent in patients with COPD.

A 6-week, multicenter, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group study was performed at 56 sites in the United States. Four hundred twelve male and female patients (ages 35-86 yr) with a clinical history consistent with COPD were randomized to receive OrM3 0.5, 2, 3, or 4 mg orally once daily; ipratropium bromide 36 µg by inhalation 4 times daily; or placebo.

OrM3 demonstrated a significant dose-related improvement in serial FEV1 and a trend for dose-related improvement in patient-reported symptoms compared with placebo. However, at a dose that provided efficacy less than that of ipratropium, the incidence of dose-related, mechanism-based side effects for OrM3 exceeded those observed for ipratropium.

In patients with COPD, OrM3 did not offer a therapeutic advantage over inhaled ipratropium. These results do not support the hypothesis that high selectivity for M3 receptors over airway neuronal M2 receptors will represent a more effective therapy than current inhaled anticholinergics in obstructive airway disease.

Keywords:  Anticholinergics, antimuscarinic agents, bronchodilators, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ipratropium bromide, muscarinic receptors







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the European Respiratory Society.