ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 2, 2006
Eur Respir J 2006, doi:10.1183/09031936.06.00125605
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/5/889    most recent
09031936.06.00125605v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernasconi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tamm, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernasconi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tamm, M.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Combined TBNA and PET for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer

M. Bernasconi 1, P.N. Chhajed 1*, F. Gambazzi 2, L. Bubendorf 3, H. Rasch 4, S. Kneifel 4, M. Tamm 1

1 Pulmonary Medicine
2 Thoracic Surgery
3 Institute of Pathology
4 Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pchhajed{at}uhbs.ch.


   Abstract

There are no data available combining transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes and PET in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

We aimed to determine if these two methods can enhance the negative predictive value of the individual modality alone for a specific lymph node station and if this integrated approach can reduce the number of mediastinoscopies.

113 patients with enlarged mediastinal lymph node (≥ 1 cm) who underwent both transbronchial needle aspiration and PET scanning were included. In 51 patients, histopathology confirmed by surgical lymph node dissection was compared with PET results and transbronchial needle aspiration.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy to detect malignant lymphadenopathy was 68% (13/19), 89% (119/134), 46% (13/28), 95% (119/125) and 86% (132/152) for PET; 54% (6/11), 100% (53/53), 100% (6/6), 91% (53/58) and 92% (59/64) for transbronchial needle aspiration; and 100% (11/11), 94% (50/53), 79% (11/14), 100% (50/50) and 95% (61/64) for combined transbronchial needle aspiration and PET respectively.

Combination of transbronchial needle aspiration and PET has the potential to allow adequate mediastinal staging of non small cell lung cancer with enlarged lymph nodes in most patients without the need for mediastinoscopy.

Keywords:  Bronchoscopy, lung cancer, mediastinoscopy, transbronchial needle aspiration




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Melloni, M. Casiraghi, A. Bandiera, P. Ciriaco, A. Carretta, L. Libretti, and P. Zannini
Transbronchial needle aspiration in lung cancer patients suitable for operation with positive mediastinal positron emission tomography.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 87(2): 373 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
H. S. Lee, G. K. Lee, H.-S. Lee, M. S. Kim, J. M. Lee, H. Y. Kim, B.-H. Nam, J. I. Zo, and B. Hwangbo
Real-time Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in Mediastinal Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: How Many Aspirations Per Target Lymph Node Station?
Chest, August 1, 2008; 134(2): 368 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
N. Singh and A. Khan
It's All About US: (E)US, (EB)US, and Their US(age)
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2007; 175(11): 1208a - 1209.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. N. Chhajed and M. Tamm
Bronchoscopy for small pulmonary nodules and mediastinal staging of lung cancer: just do it!
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2006; 174(9): 961 - 962.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the European Respiratory Society.