Eur Respir J 2006, doi:10.1183/09031936.06.00038806
Interstitial lung diseases associated with amyopathic dermatomyositis
1 Second Division, Dept of Internal Medicine
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: suda{at}hama-med.ac.jp.
The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with interstitial lung disease associated with amyopathic dermatomyositis (ILD-ADM) The study subjects consisted of 14 consecutive patients with ILD-ADM. They were classified into two categories, acute/subacute and chronic forms, according to the clinical presentation of ILD. The clinical features, responsiveness to therapy, and prognosis between the two forms were compared. Nine ILD-ADM patients were categorized as the acute/subacute form, and five as the chronic form. PaO2 was significantly lower in the acute/subacute ILD than chronic ILD. On high-resolution computed tomography, ground-glass opacities were frequently found in the two forms, but consolidation was more common in acute/subacute ILD than chronic ILD. Bronchoalveolar lavage analysis showed higher numbers of total cells and lymphocytes in acute/subacute ILD than chronic ILD. Histologically, the most common finding was nonspecific interstitial pneumonia in the two forms, while diffuse alveolar damage was found only in acute/subacute ILD. Acute/subacute ILD was generally resistant to therapy, while chronic ILD responded well. Notably, the mortality of acute/subacute ILD was much higher than that of chronic ILD (67% vs. 0%, respectively). In conclusion, ILD-ADM includes two different forms, acute/subacute and chronic forms, with distinct prognoses. Keywords: Amyopathic dermatomyositis, interstitial lung disease
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||