ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 26, 2006
Eur Respir J 2006, doi:10.1183/09031936.06.00002606
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/2/358    most recent
09031936.06.00002606v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, B.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, B.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, R.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Relations among questionnaire and laboratory measures of rhinovirus infection

B. Barrett 1*, R. Brown 1, R. Voland 1, R. Maberry 1, R. Turner 2

1 University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
2 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bruce.barrett{at}fammed.wisc.edu.


   Abstract

Due to high incidence and quality-of-life impact, upper respiratory infection substantially impacts population health. To test or compare treatment effectiveness, a well-designed and validated illness-specific quality-of-life instrument is needed.

Data reported here come from a trial testing echinacea for induced rhinovirus infection. Laboratory-assessed biomarkers include interleukin-8 (IL-8), nasal neutrophil count (PMN), mucus weight, viral titer and seroconversion. Questionnaires include the general health SF-8 (24 hour recall version), the 8-item Jackson cold scale, and the 44-item Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS-44).

399 participants were inoculated with rhinovirus and monitored over 2,088 person-days. Statistically significant associations were found among nearly all variables. Between questionnaire correlations were: WURSS-Jackson=0.81; WURSS-SF8=0.62; Jackson-SF8=0.60. Correlations with laboratory values: WURSS-mucus-weight=0.53; Jackson-mucus-weight=0.55; WURSS-viral titer=0.37; Jackson-viral titer=0.46; WURSS-IL-8=0.31; Jackson-IL-8=0.36; WURSS-PMN=0.31; Jackson-PMN=0.28. Neither WURSS nor Jackson yielded satisfactory cutoff scores for diagnosis of infection.

Symptomatic and biological outcomes of URI are highly variable, with only modest associations. While WURSS and Jackson both correlate with biomarkers, neither is a good predictor of induced infection. Inclusion of functional and quality-of-life items in WURSS does not significantly decrease the strength of association with laboratory-assessed biomarkers.

Keywords:  Common cold, psychometrics, quality-of-life, questionnaires, rhinovirus, symptom measurement, upper respiratory infection, validation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the European Respiratory Society.