ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 12, 2009
Eur Respir J 2009, doi:10.1183/09031936.00190008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
34/1/56    most recent
09031936.00190008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groenwold, R.H.H.
Right arrow Articles by Hak, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groenwold, R.H.H.
Right arrow Articles by Hak, E.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Impact of influenza vaccination on mortality risk among elderly

R.H.H. Groenwold 1*, A.W. Hoes 1, E. Hak 1

1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.h.h.groenwold{at}umcutrecht.nl.


   Abstract

Estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness have mostly been derived from non-randomized studies and therefore are potentially confounded. The aim of the current study was to estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness in preventing mortality among elderly taking both measured and unmeasured confounding into account.

Information on patients aged 65 years and older from the computerized Utrecht General Practitioner database on eight influenza epidemic and summer periods was pooled to estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness in preventing mortality. Summer periods (during which no effect of vaccination was expected) were used as a reference to control for unmeasured confounding in epidemic periods.

After adjustment for measured confounders using multivariable regression analysis, propensity score matching and propensity score regression analysis, influenza vaccination reduced mortality risk (odds ratios 0.58 [95%CI: 0.46–0.72], 0.56 [95%CI: 0.44–0.71], and 0.56 [95%CI: 0.45–0.69], respectively). After additional adjustment for unmeasured confounding (as observed during summer periods) the association between influenza vaccination and mortality risk decreased (odds ratio 0.69 [95%CI: 0.52–0.92]).

We conclude that after state-of-the-art adjustment for typical confounders such as age, sex, and co-morbidity status, unmeasured confounding still biased estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness. After taking unmeasured confounding into account, influenza vaccination is still associated with substantial reduction in mortality risk.

Keywords:  Bias, confounding, confounding factors, epidemiologic methods, influenza vaccines







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the European Respiratory Society.