ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 9, 2008
Eur Respir J 2008, doi:10.1183/09031936.00161806
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
31/4/830    most recent
09031936.00161806v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nilius, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ruhle, K-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nilius, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ruhle, K-H.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Impact of controlled heated breathing tube humidifier on sleep quality under CPAP therapy in a cool sleeping environment

G. Nilius 1*, U. Domanski 1, K-J. Franke 1, K-H. Ruhle 1

1 Klinik Ambrock, Hagen, University of Witten-Herdecke

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nilius{at}klinik-ambrock.de.


   Abstract

There are conflicting data on the effect of adding a heated humidifier to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). The effects of heated humidification on sleep quality and treatment side effects for patients who prefer a cold bedroom environment have not been studied.

A randomized, controlled crossover trial involving 19 patients with a first-ever diagnosis of OSAS measured the effect of conventional heated humidification added to CPAP compared to a controlled heated breathing tube humidifier (ThermoSmart®) on sleep quality.

During the night in the sleep laboratory at a mean room temperature of 14°C, less condensation formed with the controlled heated breathing tube humidifier (1.9 ml versus 35.3 ml, (p=0.0001)) in the delivery system, the TST, S3/4 and REM sleep phases were significantly longer and the overall side effect score was lower than with conventional heated humidification.

Patients on CPAP desiring a cool bedroom temperature could benefit from controlled heated breathing tube humidification technology (with inputs from ambient temperature, set pressure and flow).

Keywords:  Continuous positive airway pressure, heated humidification, obstructive sleep apnoea, side effects







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the European Respiratory Society.