ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 7, 2009
Eur Respir J 2009, doi:10.1183/09031936.00120407
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/4/734    most recent
09031936.00120407v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dufour, M-H.
Right arrow Articles by Boulet, L-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dufour, M-H.
Right arrow Articles by Boulet, L-P.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparative Airway Response to High- vs Low-Molecular Weight Agents in Occupational Asthma

M-H. Dufour 1, C. Lemière 2, P. Prince 1, L-P. Boulet 1*

1 Unité de recherche en pneumologie, Centre de recherche de, l'Hôpital Laval, Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et de, pneumologie, Hôpital Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
2 Service de pneumologie, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur, Université de, Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lpboulet{at}med.ulaval.ca.


   Abstract

Airway responses to occupational agents in sensitized workers may vary, clinically and physiologically. We compared the patterns of change in airway responsiveness, type of response, and fall in expiratory flows following laboratory exposure to high or low molecular weight agents in sensitized workers.

Data on workers who underwent specific inhalation challenges with occupational sensitizers (117 exposed to HMW and 130 to LMW) were collected in their medical charts.

Maximum falls in FEV1 were of similar magnitude for both types of agents. Compared with high molecular weight agents, low molecular weight substances induced more frequently late or dual responses and higher increases in airway responsiveness. After exposure to high molecular weight agents, there was a mean reduction in doubling concentrations of methacholine (±SD) of 0.5±1.7 for early responses, compared to 2.8±1.2 for late responses, and 1.4±2.0 for dual responses. Isolated early responses were more frequently found in women, smokers, workers with a higher % predicted FEV1 and higher PC20, and in those with longer asthma duration.

Workers' characteristics, as well as the type of agent they are sensitized to, may help predict the type of response after specific inhalation challenge.

Keywords:  Airway inflammation, airway responsiveness, occupational asthma, Specific inhalation challenge







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the European Respiratory Society.