ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 20, 2008
Eur Respir J 2008, doi:10.1183/09031936.00101307
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Online supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
32/1/175    most recent
09031936.00101307v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelsall, A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelsall, A.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

How to quantify coughing? Correlations with quality of life in chronic cough

A. Kelsall 1*, S. Decalmer 2, D. Webster 2, N. Brown 2, K. McGuinness 1, A. Woodcock 1, J. Smith 2

1 Respiratory Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; and North West Lung Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
2 Respiratory Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Angela.Kelsall{at}manchester.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Different methods are used for quantifying coughing in sound recordings, but as yet no method has been shown to be more valid than any other. We have examined the relationships between three different units of cough and evaluated their ability to predict subjective ratings of cough and cough related quality of life.

70 subjects (mean age 55yrs (SD±11.7yrs), 73% female) with chronic unexplained cough (median duration 4.8yrs (IQR 2.5–10.1 yrs), performed fully ambulatory 24-hour sound recordings, manually counted by trained observers and quantified in (1) explosive phases, (2) cough seconds and (3) cough epochs. Subjects also completed cough visual analogue scales (VAS) and the Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ).

All units of cough were strongly correlated; explosive phases and cough seconds correlated slightly more strongly than cough seconds with cough epochs or explosive phases with cough epochs (r=0.99 p=<0.001, r=0.92, p=<0.001 and r=0.90, p=<0.001, respectively). LCQ scores correlated moderately with explosive phases and seconds (r= -0.53, p<0.001 and r= -0.53, p<0.001); epochs correlated slightly less well (r= -0.46, p<0.001). Cough VAS scores showed a similar pattern.

Explosive phases and seconds are interchangeable units of cough, moderately related to subjective measures and cough related quality of life; epochs are a less satisfactory alternative.

Keywords:  Ambulatory cough monitoring, chronic cough, cough epochs, cough seconds, explosive phases




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A Kelsall, S Decalmer, K McGuinness, A Woodcock, and J A Smith
Sex differences and predictors of objective cough frequency in chronic cough
Thorax, May 1, 2009; 64(5): 393 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the European Respiratory Society.